Ancient Vertebrate Ancestors: The Surprising Discovery of Four Eyes

Illustration of Haikouichthys, a Cambrian fish

Illustration of Haikouichthys, a notable Cambrian fish with fossilized evidence of a second pair of eyes

Xiangtong Lei, Sihang Zhang

Over 500 million years ago, the earliest known vertebrates exhibited an intriguing feature: an extra eye. Interestingly, humans may retain traces of this ancient evolutionary trait.

Significant fossils from two species of jawless fish, known as myllokunmingids, were discovered by Kong Peiyun. From 2019 to 2024, Kong worked alongside colleagues at Yunnan University in China, specifically around Dianchi Lake.

The fossils unearthed in the Chengjiang biota area, renowned for its exquisite preservation, date back to approximately 518 million years ago—a timeframe marked by a dramatic increase in life’s diversity during the Cambrian period.

Remarkably, the vertebrate fossils discovered by Kong’s team included well-preserved soft tissue and vital eye structures.

Complex eye structures evolved independently in various animal groups. Many invertebrates, like insects, possess compound eyes, which consist of numerous individual units, each with its own lens, enabling a mosaic vision.

Meanwhile, vertebrates such as humans and reptiles possess what scientists label as “camera eyes.” These comprise a spherical lens, retina, iris, and muscles that regulate eye movement. Additionally, they contain pigment structures called melanosomes that influence eye color.

Light focuses on the retina, generating a signal relayed to the brain via the optic nerve.

Under electron microscopy scrutiny, Kong and his team identified two eyes situated on the sides of the head, with melanin-rich melanosomes preserved, alongside two smaller enigmatic black marks between them.

Employing a lens impression to analyze the fossils, team members led by Jacob Vinther from the University of Bristol suggested that these ancient creatures possessed two pairs of camera-like eyes, allowing them to visualize their environment much like modern vertebrates. The decisive difference? They utilized four eyes instead of two.

Fossil of Haikouichthys displaying conserved melanosomes

Xiangtong Lei, Sihang Zhang

The research team posits that this ancient additional eye has evolved into various organs known as the pineal complex. Some vertebrates, such as reptiles, possess a light-sensitive organ called the parietal eye atop their heads, while all mammals retain a reduced version that is the pineal gland, a key player in regulating sleep cycles through melatonin secretion.

“Early vertebrates likely used the pineal organs as functional eyes, enabling them to perceive their surroundings before evolving into sleep-regulating organs,” states Vinther.

These large eyes may have been optimized for high-resolution vision, complemented by smaller eyes that enabled detection of nearby threats—critical for survival in the predator-rich Cambrian seas.

According to Vinther, these creatures could likely discern objects with detail, estimating their shape and gain a degree of depth perception—all thanks to their remarkable four-eyed adaptation.

Tetsuto Miyashita, from the Canadian Museum of Nature in Ottawa, finds the interpretation of these fossils both “half-believable and half-doubtful.”

The structure located between the two eyes had previously perplexed researchers, but realizing it may indicate another camera eye was considered a “lightbulb” moment, he explains.

If indeed this is the case, it raises the question: where is the animal’s nose? “Most early fish evolution centered around nose development, suggesting that it would be unusual for the nose to not be preserved,” he notes.

Miyashita anticipates significant discussions will persist until experts can engage in a thorough debate regarding this exciting finding. “What function do so many prominent eyes actually serve?” he questions.

John Patterson, a researcher from the University of New England in Armidale, Australia, asserts that it is logical for prey species to have developed such visual capabilities to escape formidable predators.

The Cambrian era was evolutionary peculiar, showcasing animals displaying unusual behavior and not strictly developing pairs of eyes on their heads, but placing eyes in other regions as well.

Karma Nangle, a professor at the University of California, Riverside, aims to create a comprehensive map of the entire fossil body to investigate the potential existence of similar traces. Such findings could demonstrate that the second set of eyes may simply be a result of chemical processes during fossilization.

Dinosaur Hunting in Mongolia’s Gobi Desert

Embark on an exhilarating expedition to discover dinosaur remains in the remote wilderness of the Gobi Desert, renowned as a leading paleontology hotspot.

Topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Moroccan Hominin Fossils: Potential Close Ancestors of Modern Humans

Ancient Human Jawbone Discovered in Morocco’s Man Cave

Hamza Mehimdate, Casablanca Pre-History Program

Approximately 550,000-year-old fossils discovered in North Africa potentially belong to a shared ancestor of Neanderthals, Denisovans, and modern humans, existing right before these three significant hominin lineages diverged.

Neanderthals and Denisovans, the final common ancestors of modern humans, are believed to have thrived between 765,000 and 550,000 years ago. However, key questions about their existence and habitats still challenge our understanding of human evolution.

Recent fossil discoveries suggest that researchers, including Jean-Jacques Hublin from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, are nearing the pivotal moment of divergence in ancient human lineages.

Hublin and his team examined various fossils, including two adult jawbones, one juvenile jawbone, and several vertebrae unearthed from a cave referred to as the Cave of Mankind near Casablanca, Morocco. One of the adult jawbones had been detailed in a 1969 study, while the remaining specimens are presented for the first time.

The fossilized molars share similarities with early Homo sapiens and Neanderthals, yet their jaw structures resemble ancient African Homo erectus.

Fortunately, these Moroccan hominids existed around the same period as changes in Earth’s magnetic field, recorded within the geological formations containing the fossils, allowing for precise dating to approximately 773,000 years ago.

Hublin described the find as filling a “significant gap” in the African human fossil record dating back to between one million and 600,000 years ago. Paleogenetic studies reveal that the ancestors of Neanderthals and Denisovans diverged around this time, while H. sapiens evolved independently in Africa.

The newly identified fossils are contemporaneous with a hominid population in Spain, previously hypothesized to serve as a common ancestor between Homo sapiens and Neanderthals.

Excavation Team at Moroccan Fossil Site

R. Gallotti, Casablanca Pre-History Program

Both Homo ancestors and Moroccan hominins exhibit “a mosaic of primitive and derived features,” Hublin notes, suggesting possible genetic exchanges across the Strait of Gibraltar. However, notable distinctions exist between the fossils from both areas, with Spanish specimens appearing more Neanderthal-like.

“The last common ancestor likely inhabited both sides of the Mediterranean during that era, indicating a deep African lineage for Homo sapiens opposed to the Eurasian origin theories proposed by some,” Hublin states.

Julian Lewis, a professor at Griffith University in Brisbane, Australia, expresses intrigue over the physical differences in early Pleistocene hominids closely related to our species.

“The key takeaway is that these differences have been developing for a substantial period,” Lewis concluded, alluding to the arrival of the Homo ancestor in Spain, indicating it may represent one of several species across North Africa that eventually crossed over to Europe.

Chris Stringer from the Natural History Museum in London has also contributed to this discussion. His research, including findings from human fossils in China published last year, suggests that the last common ancestor of Homo sapiens, Neanderthals, and Denisovans could date back over a million years.

“The specific continent for that common ancestor’s existence remains unknown,” Stringer remarked. “Yet even if it lived outside Africa, our analysis indicates that the evolution of Homo sapiens predominantly took place in Africa, suggesting a potential early migration back into Africa for continued evolution.”

These newly identified Moroccan fossils may even represent early specimens of Homo sapiens, though sufficient skeletal fragments are lacking for definitive classification.

Ongoing comparisons with previously studied fossils will help ascertain their evolutionary positioning.

Topics:

  • Human Evolution/
  • Ancient Hominins

Source: www.newscientist.com

Kissing Likely Evolved from Our Ape Ancestors 21 Million Years Ago

Romantic kisses may trace back to our evolutionary history

ATHVisions/Getty Images

Ancient beings like Neanderthals likely engaged in kissing, and our primate ancestors might have practiced it as far back as 21 million years ago.

There is considerable discussion regarding the origins of romantic kissing among humans. While ancient texts suggest sexual kissing existed in Mesopotamia and Egypt around 4,500 years ago, such evidence has only surfaced within the past 4,000 years. Some suggest that 46 percent of human cultures argue that kissing is a relatively recent cultural phenomenon.

However, it’s noted that Neanderthals shared oral bacteria, and kissing has also been documented in chimpanzees, bonobos, and orangutans, suggesting the practice may precede existing historical records.

To explore this further, Matilda Brindle and colleagues from the University of Oxford investigated the evolutionary background of kissing. “Kissing appears to be an evolutionary paradox; it likely doesn’t contribute directly to survival and can even pose risks in terms of pathogen transmission,” she states.

The researchers defined kissing in a manner applicable across various species, describing it as non-hostile, mouth-to-mouth contact that involves lip movements but excludes the exchange of food.

This definition eliminates many forms of affection, such as kisses on the cheek. “If you kiss someone on the cheek, it feels like a kiss, but according to our definition, it’s not,” Brindle explains. “Humans have elevated kissing to a new level.”

They then examined scientific literature and consulted primate researchers for instances of kissing among modern monkeys and apes from Africa, Europe, and Asia.

To gauge the probability that various ancestral species also engaged in kissing, Brindle and her team mapped this data onto the primate family tree, employing a statistical method called Bayesian modeling to simulate diverse evolutionary scenarios.

The findings indicate that kissing likely originated in the ancestors of great apes approximately 21.5 to 16.9 million years ago, with an 84 percent probability that Neanderthals also practiced it.

“Clearly, it involves Neanderthals kissing, though we can’t ascertain whom they were kissing,” Brindle notes. “Nevertheless, the similarity in oral microbiomes between humans and Neanderthals, coupled with the fact that many non-African humans carry Neanderthal DNA, supports the idea that they probably shared kisses. This certainly adds a romantic dimension to human-Neanderthal relationships.”

Brindle acknowledges a lack of sufficient data to explain why kissing developed but proposes two hypotheses.

“In the context of sexual kissing, assessing mate quality could enhance reproductive success,” she suggests. “If a partner has poor oral hygiene, they might decide against mating with them.”

Moreover, sexual kissing could facilitate post-coital success by heightening arousal and fostering conditions that allow for faster ejaculation and a vaginal pH more accommodating to sperm.

Another prevailing theory is that non-sexual kissing evolved from grooming, which serves to strengthen social bonds and alleviate tension. “Chimpanzees literally kiss and reconcile after conflicts,” Brindle points out.

“Based on current evidence, I believe kissing undoubtedly serves an affiliative purpose,” says Zanna Clay from Durham University, UK. “We know, for instance, that in chimpanzees, it plays a vital role in mending social ties. However, I find the sexual aspect somewhat uncertain.”

Regarding whether kissing is an evolved behavior or a cultural construct, Brindle asserts, “Our findings strongly indicate that kissing has evolved.”

Trolls Punk Arbor, a professor at the University of Copenhagen, who traced the initial references to kissing in ancient Mesopotamian texts, concurs. “This provides a well-rounded foundation for asserting that kissing has been a part of human behavior for an extended period,” he states.

Nonetheless, this does not encompass the entire narrative, considering many individuals do not engage in kissing. “I believe there is a significant cultural element involved, which likely varies across different cultural contexts,” Clay observes.

Ancient caves, the origins of humanity: Northern Spain

Explore some of the planet’s oldest cave paintings in the picturesque region of northern Spain. Travel back 40,000 years to uncover how our ancestors lived, played, and worked. From ancient Paleolithic art to stunning geological formations, each cave conveys a singular and timeless narrative.

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

New Fossil Discoveries Indicate Asian Forest Tortoise Ancestors Evolved in Europe

Paleontologists from the Institute of Paleontology of the Polish Academy of Sciences and the Autonomous University of Barcelona have identified a new species within the genus Turtle, known as Manuria. This discovery is based on fossilized remains found in the Czech Republic.



Life restoration of Manulia morula. Image credit: Rudolf Hima.

Manulia morula thrived in the wetlands of what is now the Czech Republic during the early Miocene epoch, roughly 20 to 17 million years ago.

This species is recognized as the oldest member of Manuria, which currently exists solely in Southeast Asia and comprises four extinct species along with two living ones: Manulia Emmis and the impressed turtle (Manulia Impreza).

Tortoise paleontologist Dr. Milan Kraust from the Institute of Paleontology of the Polish Academy of Sciences remarked, ‘Turtles of the family Testudinidae are a clade highly specialized for terrestrial environments, predominantly inhabiting semi-arid conditions.’

“Members of the Testudinidae family, with carapace lengths ranging from 35 to 75 cm (14 to 30 inches), are categorized as medium to large-sized turtles, while those exceeding 75 cm are classified as giant-sized turtles.”

“Extant species of the Testudinidae can be divided into three main groups: gophers and Manuria (which appears as a basal genus or continuous branch), geokerona clade, and test duna clade, with the latter two forming the subfamily Testudininae.”

The fossil remains of Manulia morula include parts of the carapace and plastron, along with numerous unidentified shell fragments, which were uncovered at the Arnikov I fossil site in the Most Basin of Bohemia.

The length of the turtle’s shell is estimated to have been around 50 cm (20 inches).

“The Anikov I area has long been recognized as a region where wetlands featuring flooded rivers and shallow lakes have been documented,” the paleontologists stated.

“The wetland habitat near the coast was also inferred from the abundance of juvenile crocodiles and potentially the presence of Coristodere.”

“However, based on research findings regarding this genus, Manuria suggests a humid forest of evergreen broad-leaved trees situated near water, characterized by a rainy season and a distinct drier, cooler season, reminiscent of the current Kaeng Krachan National Park in Thailand.”

The discovery of Manulia morula broadens the paleobiogeographical distribution of this genus, Manuria, extending its range from Asia into the heart of Europe.

“According to our findings, the genus Manuria originated in Europe just prior to the Miocene climate optimum, subsequently spreading to Asia, where it continues to thrive today,” the researchers elaborated.

These findings were published on October 3, 2025, in the Swiss Journal of Paleontology.

_____

M. Kraust et al. 2025. Manulia morula sp. Nov.: An ancient large turtle from a Miocene swamp in Anikov, Czech Republic. Swiss Journal of Paleontology 144, 63; doi: 10.1186/s13358-025-00400-6

Source: www.sci.news

Research Indicates Humans Evolved from Ape-Like Ancestors in Africa

A recent investigation conducted by paleoanthropologists from the United States and Canada has focused on the morphology of the hominid talus, a significant bone in the ankle that connects to the tibia and calcaneus of the foot. Ardipithecus ramidus, a hominid species that existed in eastern Africa approximately 4.4 million years ago, was at the center of this study. The researchers discovered that the fossil exhibits similarities to the talus of chimpanzees and gorillas, which are adapted for vertical climbing and terrestrial quadrupedal locomotion—a form of movement where animals traverse on all fours with the entire sole of the foot touching the ground, including the heel. Additionally, the authors confirmed the presence of derived features in the specimen that align with earlier suggestions for improved extrusion mechanisms in the legs of Ardipithecus ramidus.

Ardipithecus ramidus, a hominid that existed in Africa over 4 million years ago. Illustration by Arturo Asensio, from Quo.es.

Partial skeleton from 4.4 million years ago, Ardipithecus ramidus, affectionately dubbed “Aldi,” was uncovered in 1994.

This species featured an ape-sized brain and had grasping big toes adapted for climbing trees.

It walked on two legs, and its upper canine teeth were diamond-shaped as opposed to the V-shape commonly found in chimpanzees.

“Aldi represents one of the oldest and most complete skeletons discovered,” remarked Dr. Thomas (Cody) Plan, a researcher at Washington University in St. Louis.

“Aldi is roughly a million years older than ‘Lucy’, another renowned early human ancestor, and signifies an early phase in human evolution.”

“Oneof the surprising aspects of this find was that, despite walking upright, Aldi retained many monkey-like characteristics, such as its grasping feet.”

“Great apes, including chimpanzees and gorillas, possess forked big toes that facilitate gripping tree branches while climbing.”

“However, it also exhibited traits consistent with our lineage. Ardipithecus truly represents a transitional species.”

Initially, scientists speculated that Ardi’s locomotion resembled a common form rather than being typical of African apes, leading them to conclude that this early human ancestor was not particularly ape-like, which startled the paleoanthropology community.

“From their analysis, they inferred that contemporary African apes, like chimpanzees and gorillas, represent a dead end, or a kind of evolutionary cul-de-sac. Dead end underscores the evolutionary process rather than the point at which humans emerged,” stated Dr. Puran.

“Instead, they posited that Ardi offered evidence of a more generalized ancestry that was less akin to chimpanzees and gorillas.”

By examining the ankles of chimpanzees and gorillas, researchers can gain insights into their movement, especially regarding their vertical tree climbing techniques.

This crucial bone also sheds light on how early species transitioned to bipedalism.

For the recent study, Dr. Plan and his team compared Ardi’s ankles to those of great apes, monkeys, and early humans.

Their findings indicated that Ardi’s ankle is the only one within the primate fossil record that shares similarities with African apes.

These apes are recognized for their adaptations to vertical climbing and terrestrial quadrupedal locomotion, suggesting that Ardi might have utilized their feet similarly.

Alongside these primitive traits, Ardi’s talus exhibited signs of an enhanced foot extrusion mechanism.

This complexity points to a blend of climbing and locomotor behaviors in this early human species, which is crucial in understanding the evolution of bipedalism.

“This discovery is both controversial and aligns with earlier theories,” Mr. Pran noted.

“While there is no disagreement regarding the significance of Aldi’s find, many in the field would argue that the initial interpretation was likely flawed.”

“Thus, this paper represents a reevaluation of the original views that distanced Aldi from chimpanzees and gorillas.”

“It’s vital to understand that our paper does not claim that humans evolved from chimpanzees.”

“However, this study further supports the hypothesis that the common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees was likely very similar to today’s chimpanzees.”

For more details, refer to the paper published in the journal Communication Biology.

_____

TC Plan et al. 2025. Ardipithecus ramidus Ankle provides evidence of African ape-like vertical climbing in early humans. Commun. Biol. August 1454. doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-08711-7

Source: www.sci.news

The Costs of Our Ancestors’ Evolving Intelligence

Model of Homo heidelbergensis, potentially a direct ancestor of Homo sapiens.

WHPics / Alamy

A timeline tracking genetic alterations spanning millions of years of human evolution indicates that variants linked to elevated intelligence appeared most rapidly around 500,000 years ago, succeeded by mutations that heighten the risk of mental illness.

The findings point to a “trade-off” between intellect and mental health issues in brain evolution, according to Ilan Libedinsky from the Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research in Amsterdam, Netherlands.

“The genetic changes linked to mental disorders clearly involve regions of the genome associated with intelligence, indicating a significant overlap,” says Libedinsky. “[The progress in cognitive abilities] might have made our brains more susceptible to mental health issues.”

Humans branched away from our closest relatives, chimpanzees and bonobos, over 5 million years ago, with brain size tripling since then, exhibiting the fastest growth rate in the last 2 million years.

While fossils enable the examination of shifts in brain size and shape, they provide limited insights into the brain’s functional capacities.

Recently, genome-wide association studies have explored the DNA of diverse populations to identify mutations associated with traits like intelligence, brain size, height, and various diseases. Concurrently, other research teams are investigating specific mutation characteristics that imply age, facilitating the estimation of when those variants emerged.

Libedinsky and his team are pioneers in merging these methodologies to form an evolutionary chronology of genetics linked to the human brain.

“There’s no evidence that our ancestors were conscious of their behaviors or mental health issues; we can’t trace them in the paleontological record,” he notes. “We aimed to see if our genome could serve as a kind of ‘time machine’ to uncover this information.”

The research team analyzed the evolutionary roots of 33,000 genetic mutations identified in modern humans, linked to various traits such as brain structure, cognition measures, mental illnesses, and health-related characteristics like eye shape and cancer. While most genetic variations exhibit only a weak tie to traits, Libedinsky emphasizes that “these links offer a valuable starting point but are far from conclusive.”

The study revealed that most genetic variants emerged roughly between 3 million and 4,000 years ago, with a notable surge of new variants arising over the past 60,000 years. Homo sapiensexperienced significant migration out of Africa.

According to Libedinsky, mutations linked to higher cognitive skills evolved relatively recently compared to other traits. For instance, those associated with fluid intelligence (logical problem-solving in new situations) surfaced on average around 500,000 years ago, about 90,000 years after mutations related to cancer and 300,000 years later than mutations connected to metabolic functions. Following closely were the intelligence-related variants and those related to psychiatric disorders, appearing on average around 475,000 years ago.

This trend initiated approximately 300,000 years ago, continuing with the rise of numerous variants influencing cortical shape (the brain’s outer layer crucial for higher-level cognition). In the last 50,000 years, several variants associated with language have evolved, followed by variants linked to alcoholism and depression.

“Mutations influencing the fundamental structures of the nervous system emerged slightly earlier than those influencing cognition and intelligence, which is logical since a developed brain is necessary for advanced intelligence,” Libedinsky states. “Additionally, it makes sense that intelligence mutations precede mental health disorders, as these capabilities must exist before dysfunction occurs.”

These timelines align with evidence indicating that Homo sapiens obtained certain variants linked to alcohol use and mood disorders through interbreeding with Neanderthals, he added.

It remains uncertain why evolution has not eradicated variants that predispose individuals to mental health issues; however, Libedinsky suggests that their mild effects could be advantageous in certain situations.

“This area of research is thrilling because it enables scientists to revisit enduring questions in human evolution and empirically test hypotheses utilizing actual genomic data,” says Simon Fisher from the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics in Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Nonetheless, this research can only assess genetic sites that vary among contemporary humans, potentially overlooking ancient, now widely shared changes pivotal to human evolution. Fisher emphasizes that developing tools to probe “fixed” genetic regions could lead to deeper understanding of our unique human characteristics.

Topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

New Study Uncovers How the Pelvis Evolved and Helped Our Ancestors Stand Upright

The pelvis is often described as the keystone for upright locomotion. Over millions of years, it has undergone significant transformations, enabling us to walk on two legs more effectively than any other part of our lower body. However, the specifics of this remarkable adaptation have been largely unknown. Recent research has uncovered two crucial genetic changes that reshaped the pelvis, permitting it to evolve into the upright structure that our ancestors utilized while traversing the Earth.

Ardipithecus ramidus Humanity resided in Africa over 4 million years ago. Illustrations by Arturo Asensio, via Quo.es

Anatomists have long recognized that the human pelvis is distinct among primates.

In our closest relatives, African apes (chimpanzees, bonobos, and gorillas) possess hipbones that are tall, narrow, and flat from front to back. When viewed from the side, they resemble thin blades.

The pelvic structure of an ape supports large muscles essential for climbing.

In contrast, human hip bones rotate sideways, forming a bowl shape. This flaring of the hip bones allows for muscle attachment critical for maintaining balance while shifting weight from one foot to the other during upright locomotion.

Nonetheless, the mechanisms behind this transformation have been elusive until now.

In a recent study, Professor Terrence Capelini from Harvard University and his team pinpointed vital genetic and developmental shifts that facilitated the evolution from the pelvis of tetraleaf monkeys to bipedalism.

“Our findings illustrate a complete mechanistic shift in human evolution,” stated Professor Capelini.

“There is no parallel to this among other primates.”

The researchers analyzed 128 samples of embryonic tissue from humans housed in museums in the US and Europe, along with nearly 20 other primate species.

These collections included specimens over 100 years old, preserved on glass slides or in bottles.

Using CT scans and histological analysis, they investigated pelvic anatomy during the early stages of development.

Their research revealed that the evolution of the human pelvis unfolded in two major phases.

Initially, the growth plate shifted 90 degrees, widening the human ilium instead of extending its height.

Following this adjustment, the timeline for embryonic bone formation was altered.

Typically, bones in the lower body develop when chondrocytes align along the long axis of the growing bone.

This cartilage becomes rigid through a process known as ossification.

At the early stages of development, similar to other primates, human growth plates formed from the head and continued to develop.

However, by day 53, the growth plate had notably shifted vertically from its initial orientation, resulting in a shorter and broader hip joint.

“When I examined my pelvis, it wasn’t initially on my radar,” Professor Capelini remarked.

“I anticipated a gradual modification to shorten and widen it, but histology indicated a complete 90-degree reversal.”

Group of Australopithecus afarensis. Image credit: Matheus Vieira.

A further significant alteration was the timeline of bone formation.

In most cases, bones develop along the primary ossification center located in the center of the bone shaft.

However, in humans, the ilium diverges from this norm, with ossification beginning at the posterior region in the sacrum and expanding radially.

This mineralization remains restricted to the peripheral layer, while internal ossification is postponed by 16 weeks, allowing bones to grow and maintain their shape during their geometric transitions.

To uncover the molecular mechanisms driving these changes, the team employed techniques like single-cell multiomics and spatial transcriptomics.

The researchers identified over 300 active genes, including three with notable roles: Sox9 and PTH1R (which control growth plate shifts) and runx2 (which governs ossification changes).

The significance of these genes is underscored by diseases arising from their dysfunction.

For example, mutations in Sox9 can lead to Campomelic dysplasia, a disorder characterized by an abnormally narrow hip joint lacking lateral flaring. Similarly, mutations in PTH1R result in narrow hip joints and various skeletal disorders.

The scientists propose that these adaptations began with the reorientation of the growth plate around the time our ancestors separated from African apes, estimated to have occurred between 5 and 8 million years ago.

They believe the pelvis has served as a focal point for evolutionary transformations over millions of years.

As brain size increased, the pelvis encountered selective pressures known as the obstetric dilemma—the trade-off between a narrow pelvis for efficient movement and a broader one for accommodating the birth of larger babies.

Researchers suspect that the delay in ossification likely occurred within the last two million years.

The oldest pelvic fossil, dated at 4.4 million years, belongs to Ardipithecus from Ethiopia—a species exhibiting a blend of upright walking and tree-climbing features, with pelvic characteristics akin to those of humans.

The renowned 3.2 million-year-old skeleton of Lucy (Australopithecus afarensis) showcases further adaptations for bipedalism, including the distinctively flaring hip blades.

“From that point onwards, all hominin fossils displayed pelvises that diverged significantly from those of earlier primates,” stated Professor Capelini.

“The implications of brain size and its subsequent changes should not be interpreted through growth models applicable to chimpanzees and unassociated primates.”

“Models should focus on the developments between humans and their own lineage.”

“Post-fetal growth occurred against the backdrop of novel methods for constructing the pelvis.”

This study is set to be published in the journal Nature.

____

G. Senevilas et al. The evolution of hominin bipedal walking in two steps. Nature Published online on August 27th, 2025. doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09399-9

Source: www.sci.news

Keylistbones Emerged in Bird Ancestors Millions of Years Earlier Than Previously Believed

A group of paleontologists from Yale University and Stony Brook University made a significant discovery while studying dinosaur fossils, including two bird species found in the Gobi Desert, Mongolia.

This scene illustrates the oviraptorid dinosaur Citipati appearing astonished as it rests on sand dunes. The creature raises its arms in a threat display, exposing its wrists and emphasizing the small, relocated, closed carpal bones (highlighted in blue x-ray). Image credit: Henry S. Sharp.

For years, the identity of a particular carpal bone in the bird’s wrist was a scientific enigma, until researchers determined it functioned as a trap.

This bone, originally resembling a kneecap-like sesame bone, shifted from its original position in the wrist, replacing another carpal bone known as Urna.

Positions in modern birds indicate a link that enables the bird to automatically fold its wings when it bends.

The bone’s large V-shaped notch allows for the alignment of hand bones to prevent dislocation during flight.

Consequently, this bone plays a crucial role in the bird’s forelimb and is integral for flight.

“The carpal bone in modern birds is a rare wrist bone that initially forms within muscle tendons, resembling knee-like bones, but eventually takes the place of the ‘normal’ wrist bones known as Urna,” commented one researcher.

“It is closely associated with the muscle tissue of the arm, linking flying muscle movement to wrist articulation when integrated into the wrist.”

“This integration is particularly vital for wing stabilization during flight.”

In their recent study, Dr. Bhullar and his team analyzed two Late Cretaceous fossils: Troodontid (birds of prey, related to Velociraptor) and citipati cf. osmorusca (an oviraptorid with a long neck and beakless jaw).

“We were fortunate to have two rigorously preserved theropod wrists for this analysis,” said Alex Rubenstal, a paleontologist from Yale University.

“The wrist bones are small and well-preserved, but they tend to shift during decay and preservation, complicating their position for interpretation.”

“Observing this small bone in its correct position enabled me to thoroughly interpret the fossil wrists we had on hand, as well as those from previous studies.”

“James Napoli, a vertebrate paleontologist and evolutionary biologist at Stony Brook University, noted:

“While it’s unclear how many times dinosaurs learned to fly, it’s fascinating that experiments with flight appear only after they adapted to the wrist joint.”

“This adaptation may have established an automated mechanism found in present-day birds, although further research on dinosaur wrist bones is necessary to validate this hypothesis.”

Placing their findings within an evolutionary framework, the authors concluded that it was not merely birds but rather theropod dinosaurs that underwent the confinement of this adaptation by the origin of Penalaptra, a group of theropods that includes Dromaeosaurids and Oviraptorosaurs like Velociraptor.

Overall, this group of dinosaurs exhibited bird-like features, including the emergence of feathered wings, indicating that flight evolved at least twice, if not up to five times.

“The evolutionary replacement of Urna was a gradual process occurring much deeper in history than previously understood,” stated the researchers.

“In recent decades, our understanding of theropod dinosaur anatomy and evolution has expanded significantly, revealing many classical ‘bird-like’ traits such as thin-walled bones, larger brains, and feathers.

“Our findings suggest that avian construction is consistent with a topological pattern traced back to the origin of Penalaptra.”

The team’s paper was published in the journal Nature on July 9, 2025.

____

JG Napoli et al. Theropod wrist reorganization preceded the origins of bird flight. Nature, Published online on July 9, 2025. doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09232-3

Source: www.sci.news

Ancient Salmon and Pike Ancestors Thrived in Alaska’s Freshwater 73 Million Years Ago

Paleontologists have identified three new fossil species. Sivulliusalmo Alaskensis was found in a purine cream formation in northern Alaska, USA.



Chinook salmon (oncorhynchus tschawytscha). Image credit: US Geological Survey.

Sivulliusalmo Alaskensis reveals significant insights,” remarked Dr. Patrick Druckenmiller, the director of the University of Alaska Museum in the North.

“Our research uncovers several additional species of ancient fish new to the Arctic, including two new pike species: Archaeosiilik Gilmulli and Nunikuluk Gracilis, as well as the oldest record within the group comprising carp and minnows.”

“Many fish we now consider unique to Alaska’s high-latitude environment existed alongside dinosaurs.”

The discovery of Sivulliusalmo Alaskensis adds an impressive 20 million years to the fossil history of the salmon family.

Previously, the oldest known salmonidae fossil was from British Columbia and Washington.

“It’s noteworthy that the Salmonidae, which typically thrives in cold water, adapted and flourished during the warm Cretaceous period, enduring for millions of years amidst significant geographical and climatic changes,” noted Andres Lopez, Fish Curator at the University of Alaska in the north.

“Even though the Arctic was warm during that era, there would still be substantial seasonal variations in temperature and sunlight, much like today.”

“Salmon were among the fish adept at navigating these dramatic shifts.”

“Despite the planet’s numerous geological and climatic transformations, the ancestors of the same species group persisted in dominating the region’s freshwater ecosystems.”

The new species is the latest finding from the Prin Creek Formation, renowned for its dinosaur fossils discovered along the Colville River in northern Alaska.

During the Cretaceous period, Alaska was significantly closer to the Arctic than it is today.

“Fish fossils are among the most abundant in the Purine Creek Formation, yet they are challenging to distinguish in the field,” stated Dr. Druckenmiller.

“Consequently, we transported the fine sand and gravel samples to our museum lab, where microscopic analysis revealed the bones and teeth.”

“Our new findings heavily rely on small, fossilized jaws, some of which are small enough to fit on the edge of a pencil eraser.”

For detailed examination, the researchers employed micro-computed tomography to digitally reconstruct the small jaws, teeth, and other bones.

“We identified very distinct jaws and other components of the salmon family, which were recognized as belonging to this lineage,” said Dr. Druckenmiller.

“The presence of salmonidae in the Cretaceous polar regions and their coexistence with common low-light fish from this period suggests that salmonidae likely thrived in northern climates.”

“The high latitudes of the northern regions may have been vibrant centers for their evolutionary development.”

This paper was published in the journal Paleontology papers.

____

Donald B. Brinkman et al. 2025. Fish from the Purine Cream Formation in the northern slopes of Alaska: the pre-Cretaceous and their paleobiogeographic significance. Paleontology papers 11(3): E70014; doi: 10.1002/spp2.70014

Source: www.sci.news

How did crocodile ancestors survive two mass extinctions?

Crocodylomorphs are surviving members of a 230 million-year-old lineage called Crocodylomorphs, a group that contains live crocodiles (i.e. crocodiles, alligators, garials). The crocodile ancestors continued with two mass extinction events: the final mass extinction (2014 million years ago) and the final mass extinction (approximately 66 million years ago). One of the secrets of crocodile longevity is their extremely flexible lifestyle, both in what they eat and in the habitat they get.

Approximately 215 million years ago, it is a land crocodile in what is now northwestern Argentina. Hemiprotostus leali Prepare to eat early mammal relatives Chaliminia musteloides. Image credit: Jorge Gonzalez.

“Many of the groups closely associated with crocodiles exhibited more diverse, more abundant and different ecology, but disappeared except for these few generalist crocodiles who live today,” said Dr. Keegan Melstrom, a researcher at the University of Utah.

“Extinction and survival rate are two aspects of the same coin. Through all mass extinctions, some groups can last and diversify. What can we learn by studying the deeper evolutionary patterns given by these events?”

The Earth has experienced five mass extinctions in its history. Experts claim we are alive throughout the sixth, driven by habitat destruction, invasive species and climate change. Identifying traits that increase survival rates during planetary upheavals could help scientists and conservationists better protect today’s vulnerable species.

Historically, the field has seen mammals as poster children to understand the survival of mass extinction.

Despite their resilience, research has largely ignored alligator clades.

In a new study, Dr. Melstrom and colleagues reconstructed the food ecology of crocodiles and identified the properties that helped several groups to persist and thrive through the final Triassic and mass extinction of the Tododonians.

“There’s a risk that we’ll draw a conclusion millions of years ago and try to apply it directly to conservation. We have to be careful,” said Professor Randy Ilmith at the University of Utah.

“If people study mammals and reptiles and find the same pattern in terms of extinction survival, they may predict that species with a generalist diet will be better.”

“That information helps to make predictions, but it’s rare that you can choose which individual species survive.”

Living crocodiles are famous for being semi-aquatic generalists who thrive in lakes, rivers, and swamps and waiting to ambush unsuspecting prey. Noisy people, they aren’t. Young people enjoy tadpoles, insects, crustaceans and more before graduating to a larger fare, including fish, deer and even fellow crocodiles.

However, today’s crocodile’s uniform lifestyle obscures the massive dietary ecology that crocodiles flourished in the past.

A broader evolutionary group, including early crocodiles and many other extinct strains, Pseudosuchia ruled the land during the late Triassic period (237-2014 million years ago).

Early crocodiles were small to medium-sized creatures, rare in the ecosystem, and were mainly carnivorous animals that ate small animals.

In contrast, other pseudosu bone groups dominated the land, occupying a broad ecological role, exhibiting diverse body types and sizes of vertigo.

Despite their superiority, once a serious extinction hit, the non-crocodylomorph fake su did not survive.

Hypercarnivore crocodile also seemed to die, while generalists on earth went through it.

The authors assume that this ability to eat almost anything allowed them to survive, but many other groups have become extinct.

“Then it becomes a banana. Aquatic high carnivores, terrestrial generalists, terrestrial carbides, terrestrial herbivores – crocodiles have evolved a huge number of ecological roles throughout the age of dinosaurs,” Dr. Melstrom said.

Something happened in the late Cretaceous period and the crocodile faded.

Diverse ecology-focused lineages have begun to disappear even among the generalists on the ground.

Due to the mass extinction event of Cretatuas (separated by meteors that killed non-bird dinosaurs), most of the survivors are semi-predictive generalists and a group of aquatic carnivorous animals.

Nearly all 26 live crocodiles today are semi-rated generalists.

How do scientists analyze food on menus that are millions of years old? They analyze the shape of fossilized teeth and skulls to collect the basics of the animal’s diet.

The author visited museum collections of zoology and paleontology across seven countries and four continents to obtain the necessary fossil specimens.

They examined skulls of 99 extinct alligator species and 20 living crocodile species, creating a fossil dataset that spans 230 million years of evolutionary history.

They previously had built a living database of non-crocodilians, including 89 mammals and 47 lizard species.

The specimens represent a variety of vegetative ecology, ranging from strict carnivorous to mandatory herbivores and a wide variety of skull shapes.

As semiac ambush predators, today’s crocodiles primarily occupy a similar ecological role in many different environments.

They continue to have a very flexible diet. Perhaps it is a remnant of their deep, diverse evolutionary past.

For endangered crocodile people, such as Cuban crocodiles in the Himalayas’ hills and the swamps of the country’s Zapata, dietary flexibility may give us an opportunity to continue our current sixth mass extinction.

The biggest challenges these species face are habitat loss and human hunting.

“I hope that, rather than thinking about ferocious beasts or expensive handbags, when I see living crocodiles and crocodiles, people will appreciate their astonishing 20 million years of evolution and how they survived so many turbulent events in Earth’s history,” Professor Ilmith said.

“Crocodiles are equipped to survive many future changes if they are willing to help maintain their habitat.”

result It will be displayed in the journal Paleontology.

____

Keegan M. Melstrom et al. 2025. For a while, Crocodile: Crocodile’s resilience to mass extinction. Paleontology 68(2): E70005; doi: 10.1111/pala.70005

This article is a version of a press release provided by the University of Utah.

Source: www.sci.news

The oldest human ancestors in Western Europe found: Fossilized face fragments.

In a cave in northern Spain, researchers found fossilized face fragments of ancient human ancestors.

The ruins, known as “Pink,” are estimated to be between 1.1 million and 1.4 million years old. However, they pose a mystery as the face fragments do not match any known species from the same area and cannot be definitively identified.

Maria Martinon Torres, a paleontologist at the Spanish National Centre for the Evolution of Humans and a co-author of the study, stated in a press call, “We have documented a previously unknown population in Europe. These fossils represent the earliest human fossils ever discovered in Western Europe.”

The initial fragment was unearthed in 2022, with new details featured in Wednesday’s issue of Nature Journal Nature.

Research findings tentatively suggest that Pink may be linked to human ancestors, potentially Homo Erectus. The fossil was named partly after the band Pink Floyd and Rosa Huguet, the study’s lead author and archaeological site coordinator.

Dr. Rosa Huguet.Maria D. Gillen/Ifes Kerkha

This discovery is significant as it provides a more accurate timeline for the arrival of human ancestors in Western Europe. It also helps bridge the evolutionary gap between the oldest human fossil finds in Europe, dating back about 1.8 million years to the site in dmanisi, Georgia, where Homo Aristroux was discovered, going back approximately 900,000 years.

Rodrigo Lacruz, a professor of molecular pathology at New York University, stated that this finding could aid in understanding early human evolution and migration narratives in Europe.

The research team confirmed that Pink’s fossils are adult but could not determine their gender. The discovery was made about 60 feet deep within the Sierra de Atapueca archaeological site, known for its rich historical record of rock formations.

Within the same sediment layer as Pink, evidence suggests that these early ancestors were involved in hunting and butchering animals for meat.

Archaeological excavation work at the Sima Del Elefante Cave site.Maria D. Gillen/Ifes Kerkha

There is evidence suggesting that human ancestors entered Europe in multiple waves, with many of these groups later diminishing. Fossil records show discontinuity across Atapuerca sites and Western Europe, indicating a prolonged period without human presence.

The study speculates that the species to which Pink belonged may have overlapped temporarily with Homo Alivisor and could have been extinct due to climate changes around 1.1 million years ago.

Chris Stringer, a professor and research leader in human evolution at the Museum of Natural History in London, suggested that a climate event may have caused a significant decline or complete depopulation of humans in Western Europe.

The Simadel Elephante cave, where Pink was discovered, has previously yielded intriguing fossils. In 2007, researchers found a small jawbone believed to be around 1.2 million years old, possibly closely related to Pink.

Maria Martinón-Torres expressed surprise and excitement at the discovery of new fossils even deeper within the cave.

The abundant collection of fossils in the region is likely due to its geographical features, providing a natural corridor and resources that attracted early humans.

Archaeological excavation work in the area is ongoing, with researchers hopeful for more surprises.

“We will continue to excavate,” Martinón Torres stated. “There may be more surprises to come.”


Source: www.nbcnews.com

The ancient ancestors of geese are the earliest recorded modern birds

Vegavis Iaai was an ancient relative of ducks and geese, but it dived for fish like graves and runes

Mark Whitton

The 69 million-year-old skull found in Antarctica is identified as a relative of geese and ducks, making it the oldest known modern bird.

It belongs to the first identified species named 20 years ago Vegavis Iaai, He lived alongside the last dinosaurs in the late Cretaceous period. However, only fragments of the skull had been discovered previously, so scientists were unable to agree on what kind of bird it was, or whether it was a non-vian dinosaur like a bird instead.

The fossil skull was discovered in 2011 on Vega Island off the coast of Antarctic Peninsula. However, it was enveloped in such a fierce rock that the excavator had to scrape away the surrounding stones for hundreds of hours before scanning to reveal details about its interior.

Patrick O'Connor At Ohio University, which worked on the analysis, it says that two almost perfect skull features occur only in modern birds. First, the upper beak is made up of bones, which are primarily called the anterior axis, and the size of the second bone, the maxilla, is significantly reduced, contributing only to a small portion of the bone-palate.

Second, in modern birds, the forebrain is huge compared to the rest of the brain. Like pre-modern birds and dinosaurs of nearby birds Velociraptorthese areas are proportionally much smaller.

meanwhile Vegavis According to O'Connor, it has the ability to clearly mark it as being in the same group of waterfowls as ducks and geese. The bird's beak shape, jaw muscle tissue and hind legs suggest that they were very specialized in diving into the pursuit of fish.

“Perhaps you can easily mistake it for modern graves and runes. This is only related to ducks and each other,” he says.

Jacqueline Nguyen The Australian Museum in Sydney says that this ancient species has been the subject of many debate among bird evolutionary scientists, but new research will help resolve the debate.

“together, [the evidence] It suggests that Vegavis It looks completely different from the duck and geese parents, and this could have been an “evolutionary experiment” in the early history of this group of birds.” says.

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Fashion: The Evolution and Innovation of Our Ancestors’ Inventions

France. Cannes. Gucci. cruise. 2018.

Today, clothes are the means of self -expression and group identity, and we will not go without them.

Photo of Martin Parr/Magnum

Venus figurines are most famous for their sexual characteristics. These frequently pronounced sculptures of women’s forms made about 30,000 years to 20,000 years ago have been interpreted as a ritual rich Ility, the mother of the mother, and the self -portrait. Like a fashion plate, one of them is not generally seen. However, some of them can get a glimpse of the appetite, which is worn by a good-looking stone-oriented woman. One of Russian Kostenki is equipped with a strap-style robe. Others have stringed instruments. And the famous Venus of Willendorf is wearing a woven hat, but it is a very wonderful hat.

These statues are far from our general concepts in the past, covered with animal fur. According to archeologists, the gorgeous details with their clothes are the importance of clothing tens of thousands of years ago and hundreds of thousands of years ago. Olga sofaProfessor Emerita from the University of Illinois University of Urbanhamping. It started as needed and turned into a canvas for aesthetic expressions and meanings to keep people warm. Now, the story of how it happened was added, thanks to some new discoveries.

Clothing is easy to rot, and the oldest archeological site is only around 10,000 years old。 However, as the Venus figurine shows, we can follow the time dating in other ways. These archeological clues have revealed the origin of both simple cape and complex tailoring. largely…

Source: www.newscientist.com

Ancestors of Indonesian Hobbits Could Have Been Even Tinier

Fragment of a humerus excavated at Mata Menge on the island of Flores, Indonesia

Yosuke Kaifu

700,000 years ago, humans lived on an island in Indonesia. Homo floresiensisThe so-called Hobbits lived on the same islands until much more recently, and while newly analyzed fossils may show their ancestors, the evolutionary story of these small-bodied hominins remains shrouded in mystery.

Fossil H. floresiensis Hobbit bones were first discovered in the Liang Bua cave on the island of Flores in 2003. The hobbit bones date back to between 90,000 and 50,000 years ago.

In 2016, Yosuke Kaifu Researchers from the University of Tokyo discovered hominin fossils at Mata Menge, an open-air archaeological site that was once a riverbed on the east side of Flores island. Approximately 700,000 years ago It includes part of a skull, part of a jawbone and six teeth, all of which are unusually small for a hominoid.

That the Mata Menge humans were the ancestors of hobbits was an obvious interpretation, but the fragmentary nature of the remains meant that no certainty was possible.

Kaifu and his colleagues described three new fossils from Mata Menge: two teeth and part of an important upper arm bone. This limb bone “finally allowed us to determine the body size,” Kaifu says.

Unfortunately, the humerus was not complete; it was broken along its shaft. To determine exactly where the bone broke, the team looked for key landmarks, such as grooves that support nerves and muscle attachment points. From these clues, the team determined that the bone broke about halfway through, and estimated its total length to be between 20.6 and 22.6 centimetres.

The bone microstructure shows characteristics that indicate it was from an adult. Using the humerus as a whole-body estimate, the team estimates that the Mata Menge hominin was between 93 and 121 cm tall, with the highest estimate being 100 cm. H. floresiensis The Liang Bua specimen is at least six centimetres tall, Kaifu said, making it the smallest adult hominin ever found.

This discovery H. floresiensis Kaifu says the species has long been suspected to be a descendant of a large species called a hominin. Homo erectus The Mata Menge teeth and the hominoids from the Mata Menge fossils are the first hominid species known to have lived outside of Africa, including on the Indonesian island of Java, about 1 million years ago. “I'm pretty sure they descended from those groups,” Kaifu says. This is based on the Mata Menge teeth and the hominoids from the Mata Menge fossils. Homo erectus From Java and because of the closeness of the date and location.

It has been suggested that a small number of Homo erectus They probably arrived on Flores by chance, where they lived in isolation, and then must have become smaller over the next 300,000 years, Kaifu says. “They were small early on, and they stayed small for a long time after that,” he says.

It's common for island animals to become smaller over the course of evolution because limited food resources and a lack of large predators mean there's no advantage to being large. Along these lines, Flores has been home to generations of dwarf elephants and other species.

But there is another explanation. Debbie Argue Australian National University, Canberra Small Species, Big Mystery: The Story of Homo floresiensis.

Argus said Mata Menge's teeth were: H. floresiensis Liang Bua's molar. For example, Mata Menge's molar has five sharp “cusps” H. floresiensis They have four molars. “There's no clear indication that anyone evolved into anyone else,” she says, and it's not clear why the latter evolved. H. floresiensis It would have evolved a slightly larger body than its ancestors. Homo erectus From the island.”

For these reasons, Argue says we shouldn't assume that the Mata Menge hominins were the ancestors of hobbits: “I would consider an alternative hypothesis, that they are a new, previously unknown species.” If island life could have caused one group of humans to evolve smaller in size, she suggests, it could have happened twice.

In 2017, Argue and his colleagues H. floresiensis Compared to other hominins, the closest known relatives are Homo erectus instead It is called the old species Homo habilisThis is known only from Africa. Based on this, they proposed the following: H. floresiensis It actually evolved in Africa, HabilisSome of them then migrated east, ending up on the island of Flores. Argue says more fossils are probably needed to settle the question of the hobbit's origins.

topic:

  • Human evolution/
  • Ancient humans

Source: www.newscientist.com

What defines humanity and why is it challenging to distinguish ourselves from our ancestors?

Is it in the way we live, laugh, love? Or is it our aversion to clichés? Deep inside each of us, there must be something that makes us human. The problem is, after centuries of searching, we haven’t found it yet. Maybe it’s because we’ve been looking in the wrong places.

Ever since researchers began unearthing ancient hominin bones and stone tools, their work has held the tantalizing promise of pinpointing the long-ago moment when our ancestors transformed into humans. Two of the most important fossil discoveries in this quest reach an important milestone this year: 100 years since the first “near-human” was found. Australopithecus Fossils have been discovered in South Africa that have upended previous ideas about human origins, and it’s been 50 years since the most famous fossil was found. Australopithecus Lucy, also known as humanity’s grandmother, emerged from the dusty hills of Ethiopia, and the two fossils have led researchers to believe they can pinpoint humanity’s Big Bang, the period when a dramatic evolutionary wave led to the emergence of humans. Homo.

But today, the story of human origins is much more complicated. A series of discoveries over the past two decades has shown that the beginning of humanity is harder to pinpoint than we thought. So why did it once seem like we could define humanity and pinpoint its emergence, thanks to Lucy and her peers? Why are we now further away than ever from pinpointing exactly what it means to be human?

Source: www.newscientist.com

Why do our ancient animal ancestors possess tails?

WASHINGTON — Tails were once a feature of our ancient animal ancestors. Why did they disappear?

Around 20 to 25 million years ago, during the split between apes and monkeys, the evolutionary branches of our family tree shed their tails. Scientists have been puzzled about the reasons behind this change since the time of Darwin.

Now, a group of researchers has pinpointed at least one crucial genetic mutation that played a role in this transformation.

“We identified a single mutation in a highly important gene,” explained Beau Xia, a geneticist at the Broad Institute and one of the authors of the study that was recently published in Nature magazine.

By comparing the genetic makeup of six types of great apes, including humans, and 15 species of tailed monkeys, researchers found significant genetic differences between the two groups. To test their hypothesis, they used the gene-editing tool CRISPR to alter the same genetic spot in mouse embryos, leading to the birth of tailless mice.

Xia cautioned that there may be other genetic factors contributing to the loss of tails.

An intriguing aspect of this evolutionary change is whether the absence of tails conferred an advantage to our ape ancestors and ultimately to humans. Was it a random mutation or did it serve a purpose in survival?

“It could have been purely coincidental, but it may have provided a significant evolutionary benefit,” suggested Miriam Konkel, an evolutionary geneticist at Clemson University who was not part of the study.

Various theories speculate on the advantages of being tailless. Some suggest that it may be linked to the development of upright walking in humans.

Rick Potts, who leads the Human Origins Project at the Smithsonian Institution and was not involved in this study, believes that the absence of tails in some apes could be due to their vertical posture even when still in trees. This transition might have been the initial step.

Although not all great apes are land dwellers, orangutans and gibbons are examples of tailless apes that continue to live in trees. Their movements differ significantly from monkeys, as they do not need tails for balance while moving among branches.

Study co-author Itai Yanai, a biologist at New York University, acknowledges that losing the tail was a major change. However, the true reasons behind it remain a mystery that can only be unraveled with a time machine.

Source: www.nbcnews.com

New Insights from a 45,000-year-old Bone Hole into the Lives of our Earliest Ancestors

In a cave beneath a medieval German castle, researchers have discovered a bone pit that is said to reveal the secrets of early humans.

The remains, buried in layers of soil in a collapsed cave, contained genetic material from cave bears and hyenas, as well as the bones of 13 early humans who died about 45,000 years ago.

The discovery, described in three papers published Thursday in the journals Nature and Nature Ecology & Evolution, suggests that early humans may have traveled further north earlier than scientists realized. It shows that they went on an adventure, they were able to make spear-shaped tools, and then humans were able to make spear-shaped tools. A means to thrive in temperatures much colder than today’s climate.

These discoveries, perhaps made through the development of new DNA techniques, are reshaping the way scientists understand the time when humans and Neanderthals roamed the European continent.

Fragments of human bones excavated from a cave in Ranis, Germany.
From Tim Schuler, Springer Nature

The discovery could bring scientists closer to understanding why Neanderthals ultimately became extinct and what role humans played in their demise.

John Hawkes, a paleoanthropologist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison who studies ancient human relatives but was not involved in the study, said the study shows that as Neanderthals neared their demise, different human cultures He said this helps solidify the theory that these spots were developing.

“These groups are doing research. They’re going to go to new places. They live there for a while. They have different lifestyles,” he said of early humans. “They feel comfortable moving into areas where Neanderthals were.”

These discoveries were only possible because previous researchers left no stone unturned. Archaeologists in the 1920s and 1930s previously excavated the Ilsenhöhle Cave beneath Ranis Castle in the Thuringia region of Germany. The castle was built over the cave long before any excavations took place.

That’s when scientists were unable to drill into critical layers of the cave, which collapsed after hitting rock more than five feet thick.

In 2016, researchers returned with updated drilling techniques and new forms of analysis. About 24 feet below the surface, they discovered a layer containing leaf tips (like the tip of a spear) and human bone fragments.

The discovery of human bone fragments led researchers to dig deep into material excavated nearly 90 years ago, where they discovered additional skeletal fragments.


Source: www.nbcnews.com