How AI is Set to Revolutionize Mental Illness Diagnosis

Vibrant chatbot icon representing AI in mental health

The most significant advancements in depression treatment have not occurred since the 1980s. Prozac, the first SSRI (Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor), marked a pivotal moment when it was introduced. This medication quickly spread globally, leading to hundreds of millions of individuals relying on SSRIs. Despite three-quarters of users reporting positive effects, not everyone experiences success with these treatments. As rates of depression continue to rise and with no substantial breakthroughs in therapies since SSRIs, an increasing number of people hope AI could revolutionize psychiatric care.

However, concerns remain. The effectiveness of chatbots hinges on the quality of data used for training. These AI tools are also susceptible to inherent biases and errors, often referred to as “hallucinations.” A recent study revealed that many well-known AI models fell short in providing reliable advice for 60% of women’s health inquiries.

Yet, AI could offer much-needed objectivity in the challenging realm of mental health diagnosis. Currently, depression diagnoses rely on ambiguous symptoms. By harnessing AI’s ability to analyze minor physical indicators, such as facial expressions and vocal patterns, psychiatry is on the path to establishing clearer biomarkers urgently needed in the field.


AI can finally impart the objectivity needed to tackle the challenging nature of diagnosis.

The consequences of inadequate treatment are profound. In the absence of novel biomarkers, recent studies have highlighted the crucial influences of relationships and exposure to nature in the prevention of depression. Notably, a recent review provided compelling evidence that physical exercise can be as effective as antidepressants and cognitive behavioral therapy in treating depression, although the reasons and ideal candidates for this approach remain unclear.

If AI can effectively determine which treatments suit individuals best, it may transform the lives of millions. Developers can learn to mitigate the numerous pitfalls associated with AI from the outset, ensuring that no patient encounters a “hallucinating” psychiatrist in the process.

Source: www.newscientist.com

Doctors say Biden’s prostate cancer diagnosis is unusual, but not unprecedented.

New information regarding former President Joe Biden’s prostate cancer diagnosis indicates that while his case is not common, it is not entirely unheard of, according to the healthcare professionals who treated him.

At 82, Biden received a diagnosis of aggressive cancer on Friday after a nodule was found in his prostate, his personal staff announced. The cancer has spread to his bones, but his office stated that he is likely to respond well to treatment.

Most prostate cancer diagnoses occur at an early stage through routine screenings, which may include blood tests or rectal exams.

However, approximately 8% of cases have already metastasized to other organs by the time of diagnosis. In such instances, oncologists believe the patient may have had prostate cancer for several years, possibly up to a decade.

“We’ve encountered numerous patients facing significant health challenges,” stated Dr. William Dahoot, chief science officer at the American Cancer Society.

That said, exceptions exist.

“While most prostate cancers are slow-growing, some can develop rapidly and pose a high risk of metastasis,” explained Dr. Aron Weiser, a urologist and chief medical officer. “Is it common? No. But it can occur, dependent on the unique biology of that cancer.”

Screening facilitates early detection, yet there is disagreement among healthcare professionals regarding who should be screened for prostate cancer.

Many physicians refrain from screening men in their late 70s or 80s, as these individuals are generally more likely to die from other medical issues than prostate cancer. Nevertheless, with increasing life expectancies, some doctors consider screening appropriate for healthier older men.

According to the American Cancer Society’s recommendations, men in their 50s and 60s should be screened every two years. Men with elevated levels of prostate-specific antigens—a protein made by the prostate—should undergo annual screenings. Additionally, men at higher risk for prostate cancer, such as African Americans or those with a family history of the disease, should begin screening in their 40s.

However, current guidelines from the U.S. Task Force on Preventive Services, an independent panel that advises on practices often covered by insurance, state that men aged 55 to 69 should only consider discussing blood tests with their physicians. The task force is currently reviewing new screening guidelines for prostate cancer, with many healthcare providers advocating for a broader recommendation.

Weiser noted that there was a broader screening approach in the late 1980s and early 1990s, leading to premature diagnoses and treatments that may not have impacted patients’ lives. The 2012-2018 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommended blood tests to help identify prostate cancer, resulting in decreased screening rates.

“Prostate cancer behaves differently; many cases are benign, not causing issues for individuals,” Weiser remarked. “The goal should be to identify aggressive cancers.”

In recent years, there has been a shift back toward increased screening as doctors have improved their understanding of which cases require treatment versus those that should be monitored.

Nevertheless, Dahut expressed ongoing concerns among patients and physicians about whether the benefits of screening outweigh the risks of overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Screening rates have declined steadily since 2012, and Dahut notes that this trend has led to a 5% increase in diagnoses of more advanced prostate cancer.

It remains unclear whether Biden has undergone prostate cancer screenings in recent years. His annual physical examination in February 2024 did not indicate a screening was performed, which is not unusual for someone of his age. A physical exam in 2019 revealed an enlarged prostate but did not lead to a cancer diagnosis at that time.

Dr. David Shusterman, a urologist based in New York, stated that Biden’s advanced diagnosis is atypical among patients who are screened regularly.

“It is rare for metastasis to have occurred in someone who regularly sees a urologist,” he said.

Diagnosis is often more prevalent in individuals who do not maintain regular medical consultations. Rick Gum is one such case; he was never screened before his prostate cancer diagnosis in 2018. Gum, a 73-year-old trucking company owner from Big Rock, Illinois, initially sought care for a hernia but was found to have aggressive cancer that had spread to his bones.

“I learned the hard way,” he remarked. “I should have visited the doctor.”

Gum noted that his cancer was too advanced for standard treatment, prompting his participation in various clinical trials at Northwest Medicine, which included chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and treatments involving radioisotopes.

“I’ve enjoyed seven excellent years since my diagnosis,” he reflected. “They’ve been quality years. I ride motorcycles, travel a bit, and love my work. I’ve been able to do it all.”

According to the American Cancer Society, around 37% of patients with metastatic prostate cancer survive at least five years post-diagnosis.

Dr. Peter Nelson, vice president of precision oncology at the Fred Hutch Cancer Center, mentioned that patients like Biden could have over a 90% response rate to treatments that lower testosterone—a hormone that can promote cancer growth. These hormonal therapies are typically administered through injections or tablets.

“He may start with multiple medications and anticipate several years of effective treatment before any resistance develops,” Nelson noted. Some patients also receive chemotherapy or radiation in conjunction with hormone therapy, he added.

According to sources familiar with the family’s perspective, Biden and his family are exploring “multiple treatment options,” including hormone therapy.

Source: www.nbcnews.com

Approach to Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Insights from Biden’s Patient Care Strategies

Prostate cancer specialists assert that former President Joseph R. Biden’s diagnosis is grave. Announced by his team on Sunday, it was revealed that the cancer has metastasized to his bones and is classified as Stage 4, the most severe stage of the illness. This condition is currently incurable.

However, prostate cancer professionals highlight that advancements in the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer have significantly improved the outlook for men facing advanced disease, primarily based on research funded by the National Institutes of Health and the Department of Defense.

“We’ve explored numerous avenues for intervention,” remarked Daniel W. Lynn, a prostate cancer specialist at the University of Washington.

Dr. Judd Mull, a prostate cancer expert at Duke University, noted that men experiencing prostate cancer that has spread to the bones can now “survive five, seven, ten years or even longer” with current treatments. In the 1980s, men like Biden might “wish to pass away from natural causes rather than from prostate cancer,” he pointed out.

Biden’s office indicated that he experienced urinary symptoms, which prompted him to seek medical evaluation.

However, Dr. Lin expressed skepticism, stating, “I don’t believe his symptoms were related to the cancer.”

Instead, he suggested that the most plausible sequence was that doctors had examined Biden, discovered a nodule in his prostate, and conducted blood tests and prostate-specific antigen tests. PSA tests detect proteins produced by cancer cells and can follow blood tests and MRIs that indicate cancer.

Currently, Biden and other patients diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer are in a better situation than past patients. There are approximately ten novel treatments available for the disease that have significantly altered the prognosis.

The primary strategy is to inhibit the testosterone that fuels prostate cancer. When Dr. Muru began his practice as a urologist in the 1980s, this was achieved by surgically removing the testicles. Today, men have the option of two medications administered via injection that prevent testosterone production, alongside oral pills that achieve the same result.

However, these medications alone are insufficient. Therefore, physicians typically add one of several androgen blockers that further suppress testosterone.

Some men receive supplementary treatments such as chemotherapy or radiation, depending on the extent to which the cancer might spread within the bones.

There have also been advancements in diagnostic procedures.

Previously, doctors assessed the degree of cancer in the bones through scans that detected inflammation. Now, they utilize a more precise scan known as the Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) PET scan. This scan employs a radioactive tracer that binds to markers on the surface of prostate cells, allowing for faster cancer detection. Consequently, men with prostate cancer cells in their bones now often have a considerably better prognosis compared to those who underwent bone scans just a few years ago.

Additionally, there are medications available that block testosterone and others that can target cancer if chemotherapy and radiation therapy become ineffective.

Dr. Lynn pointed out that increased federal research funding, alongside Biden’s initiative to prioritize cancer research, has contributed to these advancements. He noted that Biden was “one of the first presidents to elevate cancer awareness.”

Regarding Dr. Muru, he remarked that men who develop stage 4 prostate cancer are now often filled with a sense of hope.

“There are now even more resources at our disposal,” Dr. Moul added. “The survival rate has nearly tripled in the last decade. The extent of change is truly remarkable.”

Source: www.nytimes.com

ICE detains Harvard scientists analyzing images that could alter cancer diagnosis

Harvard Medical School’s cutting-edge microscopes have the potential to revolutionize cancer detection and lifespan research. However, a scientist who developed computer scripts to extract maximum information from the images found herself in immigration detention for two months, jeopardizing significant scientific advancements.

The scientist in question is 30-year-old Russian-born Xenia Petrova, who worked at Harvard’s renowned Kirschner Institute until her arrest at Boston Airport in mid-February. Currently detained at the Richwood Correctional Center in Monroe, Louisiana, Petrova is fighting against deportation to Russia, where she fears persecution and imprisonment due to her participation in protests against the conflict in Ukraine.

The incident involving Petrova and the detention of scholars across the country have hindered American universities’ ability to attract and retain crucial talent, a concern raised by Petrova’s colleagues. In fields where expertise is highly specialized, the loss of talent could have grave global implications for the future of medicine and scientific discovery. Scientists and faculty members are contemplating leaving institutions nationwide out of fear that their visas may be revoked or impacted by immigration enforcement actions.

“It’s like a meat grinder,” Petrova, as per a person talking to NBC News from the Louisiana facility, described her situation. “We are all in this system, regardless of having a visa, green card, or a valid reason.”

Petrova’s first immigration court hearing in Louisiana is scheduled for Tuesday morning, where she expects more clarity on her asylum case. Dr. Leon Peshkin, a prominent research scientist at Harvard University’s Faculty of Systems Biology and Petrova’s supervisor, received a call from Customs and Border Protection on February 16, notifying him of Petrova’s detention at Logan International Airport for failing to declare a sample of frog embryos used in research.

International researchers are increasingly anxious about the Trump administration’s strict stance on illegal immigration, with concerns that these policies could deter other foreign scientists from coming to Harvard. Recent surveys indicate a significant portion of scientists are contemplating relocating to Europe or Canada due to actions taken by President Donald Trump.

content omitted for brevity

Simplified diagnosis of endometriosis possible with stool test

Endometriosis tissue seen under a microscope

Bio Photo Associates/Science Photo Library

Low levels of certain compounds in your feces may be a sign of endometriosis, and supplementing with those compounds may also help control your symptoms.

Endometriosis, which affects about 200 million people worldwide, occurs when the tissue lining the uterus grows in other parts of the reproductive tract. There is no known cure, but once the condition is diagnosed, lesions can be removed periodically through surgery. However, it currently takes more than six years on average for endometriosis to be diagnosed, largely due to a lack of awareness and understanding.

Previous research suggests that the gut microbiome may play a role in this condition. To investigate further, ramakrishna konmagani and colleagues at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas, collected stool samples from 18 women with endometriosis and 31 women without endometriosis. They investigated the bacteria in feces and the metabolome, the set of chemicals produced by gut bacteria.

They found that women with endometriosis had lower levels of the metabolite 4-hydroxyindole in their feces. This is likely due to changes in the gut microbiome.

Based on this finding, commercially available stool analysis could enable rapid screening of this widely “underdiagnosed, understudied, and underdiagnosed” condition, potentially leading to early and effective management. Konmagani said.

“Stool sampling is very easy and not as invasive as current diagnostic techniques such as laparoscopy.” [a kind of keyhole surgery]” he says.

To test whether 4-hydroxyindole had a protective effect, the research team gave additional 4-hydroxyindole to a group of mice that had tissue implanted in their abdomens to induce endometriosis. After 14 days of treatment, these mice did not have fewer lesions compared to control animals, but the lesions were significantly less severe and showed signs of significantly reduced pain.

Further experiments showed that administering 4-hydroxyindole to mice with established endometriosis significantly improved the lesions. The results were similar in mice transplanted with human endometriosis lesions, suggesting that the treatment may be equally effective in humans.

“We believe this is a very good treatment option because it is something that occurs naturally in the body and is not drugged or synthetic,” Konmaghani said. I say.

However, large-scale human studies will be needed to confirm whether 4-hydroxyindole can be used to diagnose endometriosis and whether the compound is effective as a treatment.

topic:

  • women's health/
  • microbiome

Source: www.newscientist.com

Research suggests smartphone app could aid in early diagnosis of dementia in younger adults

New data suggests that a smartphone app could aid in detecting the main cause of early-onset dementia in individuals at a high risk of developing it.

Researchers have discovered that cognitive tests conducted through smartphone apps can identify early signs of frontotemporal dementia in those genetically predisposed to the condition, showing comparable sensitivity to traditional medical evaluations.

Frontotemporal dementia is a neurological disorder that typically emerges in middle age, impacting a person’s ability to plan, prioritize, filter distractions, and control impulses as certain brain regions responsible for these functions diminish over time.


Approximately one-third of individuals affected by this disease have a genetic component, underscoring the urgency of early diagnosis and monitoring response to treatments most effective in the disease’s initial stages.

Lead author Adam from the University of California, San Francisco, noted, “Most frontotemporal dementia patients receive a belated diagnosis due to their young age and symptoms being mistaken for mental health issues.”

The use of smartphones as diagnostic tools for Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and Huntington’s diseases has been gaining popularity. Researchers collaborated with a software company to develop an app for assessing cognitive function, gait, balance, movement, and language skills in individuals at high genetic risk for frontotemporal dementia, even before symptoms manifest.

The study published in JAMA Network Open demonstrated the app’s ability to accurately detect dementia and potentially outperform traditional neuropsychological assessments in the early stages of the disease.


While there are no immediate plans for public availability, the app could significantly advance research efforts in understanding and treating frontotemporal dementia.

Over 30 clinical trials are underway or in the pipeline, exploring treatments that may slow disease progression in specific gene carriers. The app could address the challenge of collecting sensitive outcome measures easily, benefitting patients, caregivers, and clinicians.

Stafaroni added, “We believe smartphone-based assessments could facilitate innovative trials for potential treatments, reducing the need for frequent in-person evaluations.”

Ultimately, the app may serve as a tool to monitor treatment efficacy and potentially replace most in-person visits to clinical trial sites.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Moving Beyond the Authority of the Doctor: Highlighting the Importance of Patient Input in Diagnosis

A comprehensive study highlights the importance of assessing patient experience with medical diagnosis, especially in complex diseases such as neuropsychiatric lupus. This suggests a shift to a more collaborative approach between patients and clinicians to improve diagnostic accuracy and patient satisfaction.

Research highlights the need to incorporate patients’ lived experiences into medical diagnosis and advocates for a more collaborative relationship between patients and clinicians to enhance diagnosis. Accuracy and patient satisfaction.

Experts today called for more value to be given to patients’ “lived experiences” after a study of more than 1,000 patients and clinicians found multiple instances of patient underreporting. There is.

The study, led by a team from the University of Cambridge and King’s College London, found that clinicians ranked patients’ self-assessment as the least important in making diagnostic decisions, and patients were more likely to overestimate or underestimate their symptoms. It was found that patients were evaluated more frequently than patients reported doing so.

One patient shared a common sentiment that disbelief is “degrading and dehumanizing,” adding: As if I don’t have authority over it and what I’m feeling isn’t valid, in which case it’s a very dangerous environment…When I tell them the symptoms, they think the symptoms are I would say wrong, otherwise I could not feel the pain there or in that way. ”

Diagnostic issues of neuropsychiatric lupus

In a study published today (December 18th), RheumatologyUsing the example of lupus neuropsychiatric, an incurable autoimmune disease that is particularly difficult to diagnose, researchers examined the different values ​​clinicians place on 13 different types of evidence used in diagnosis. . This includes evidence such as brain scans, patient views, and observations of family and friends.

Less than 4% of clinicians ranked patient self-assessment among the top three types of evidence. Clinicians ranked themselves among the highest despite admitting that they often lack confidence in diagnoses that involve less visible symptoms such as headaches, hallucinations, and depression. It has been reported that such “neuropsychiatric” symptoms can lead to poor quality of life and early death, and are more often misdiagnosed and therefore not treated correctly than more visible symptoms such as rashes. It has been.

Aiming for a collaborative relationship between patients and clinicians

Sue Farrington, co-chair of the Rare Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases Alliance, said: “We are moving away from the paternalistic and often dangerous ‘doctor knows best’ mentality and towards patients with lived experience. “The time has come for experienced physicians to move towards a more equal relationship.” The learned experience works more collaboratively. ”

Almost half (46%) of the 676 patients reported never or rarely being asked about their self-assessment of their illness, while others were very positive. I talked about my experiences. Some clinicians, particularly psychiatrists and nurses, value patient views, with a Welsh psychiatrist explaining: “Patients often arrive at the clinic having undergone multiple evaluations, researched their condition to a very high level, and worked hard to understand what’s going on with their body. …They are often expert diagnosticians in their own right.”

Lead author Dr Melanie Sloan, from the University of Cambridge’s School of Public Health and Primary Care, said: After all, these are people who know what it’s like to live with their condition. However, we also need to ensure that clinicians have time to fully investigate each patient’s symptoms, which is difficult within the constraints of our current healthcare system. ”

Gender and ethnicity in diagnosis

It was felt that the personal characteristics of patients and clinicians, such as ethnicity and gender, could influence the diagnosis, and there was a recognition that women in particular were more likely to be told that their symptoms were psychosomatic. The data showed that male clinicians were statistically more likely to state that patients were exaggerating their symptoms. Patients were more likely than clinicians to say that their symptoms were directly caused by the disease.

Conclusion: Emphasize patient contribution in diagnosis

While the study authors acknowledge that patients’ reasoning is sometimes inaccurate, there are many potential benefits to incorporating patients’ “attributional insights” and experiences into decision-making (diagnostic accuracy, They concluded that there is a high likelihood that this will result in a reduction in misdiagnosis, an increase in patient satisfaction, etc. diagnosis. This comes at a time when it is widely known that diagnostic tests for neuropsychiatric lupus erythematosus, like many other autoimmune diseases and long-term COVID-19 infections, are “not enlightening,” according to one neurologist. Especially important.

Lead study author Dr Tom Pollack, from the Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience at King’s College London, said: mistaken. However, especially when diagnostic tests are not advanced enough to consistently detect these diseases, evaluating both perspectives in combination can reduce misdiagnosis, improve clinician-patient relationships, and improve symptom reporting. There could be more trust and openness. ”

Reference: “Attribution of neuropsychiatric symptoms and prioritization of evidence in the diagnosis of neuropsychiatric lupus: A mixed methods analysis of patient and clinician perspectives from the international INSPIRE study” Melanie Sloan, Laura Andreoli, Michael S. Zandi, Rupert Harwood, Melvi Pitkanen, Sloan by Sam, Colette Barea, Eftalia Massu, Chris Whincup, Michael Bosley, Felix Norton, Mandeep Ubi, David Jayne, Guy Leszziner, James Brimicombe, Wendy Dement, Kate Middleton, Caroline Gordon, David D’Cruz, Thomas A. Pollack, December 18, 2023, Rheumatology.
DOI: 10.1093/Rheumatology/kead685

This research was funded by The Lupus Trust and LUPUS UK.

Source: scitechdaily.com