Human Cloning: Are the Ultra-Wealthy Engaging in Secret Experiments?

Is it conceivable that the ultra-wealthy are covertly cloning humans?

Juan Lovaro/Shutterstock

Throughout my extensive career reporting on extraordinary breakthroughs in biology, I’ve observed numerous concepts gaining massive attention, receiving thorough media scrutiny for years, and later fading from the public consciousness. Take, for instance, human cloning.

Following the landmark birth of Dolly the sheep in 1997—the first cloned mammal—speculation soared about the potential for human cloning. There were even some implausible claims about human clones existing. Yet, in recent years, such fervor has significantly diminished.

Nonetheless, reproductive technologies have evolved remarkably since the 1990s. Notably, just six years after CRISPR was unveiled, the world saw the first unlawful creation of a gene-edited child. This raises questions about what might be occurring behind closed doors. Are human clones already out there, undetected? Of course, identical twins don’t count.

What could motivate someone to engage in this? Recently, in a discussion between Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, the topic of extending life via organ transplants emerged. The most effective method could involve cloning individuals for organ harvesting, thereby eliminating the common issue of immune rejection often depicted in science fiction narratives. Consider Island or the book Never Let Me Go.

Moreover, cloning brings forth the notion of creating a duplicate of a person, offering a semblance of immortality, as illustrated in the television series Foundation, where the empire is governed by successive clones. However, our experiences with identical twins tell us that sharing the same genome does not equate to being the same person. As shown by Tatiana Maslany in the series Orphan Black, each clone evolves into a distinct individual. Nevertheless, wealthy individuals can hold irrational beliefs similar to others and often display a particular desire to extend their lifespans.

For scientists, there’s also the allure of being the first to achieve a groundbreaking feat. A report from a Chinese commission determined that the creators of CRISPR children “conducted research illegally in pursuit of personal fame and profit.”

Goals of Therapeutic Cloning

So, could human clones exist? For many years, the notion of cloning mammals was deemed unfeasible. Early embryo cells have the ability to differentiate into any bodily part but quickly become specialized—a process previously thought irreversible.

Dolly’s existence disproved that theory. She was produced by fusing cells from an adult ewe’s udder with a DNA-depleted egg. Her announcement in February 1997 led to a frenzy of attempts to generate cloned human embryos. The objective wasn’t to create cloned infants, but rather to harvest embryonic stem cells for novel medical therapies. As cloned cells are a perfect match for an individual, they could theoretically be employed to produce replacement tissues and organs with no risk of immune rejection.

However, extracting stem cells from cloned human embryos has proven more challenging than anticipated. It wasn’t until 2004 that Hwang Woo-seok claimed success. At that time, I found his paper impressive, as it addressed all conceivable objections effectively. Unfortunately, the study was later revealed to be fraudulent, resulting in its retraction. This experience remains ingrained in my memory. Nowadays, whenever a thesis appears too good to be true, my initial instinct is to be skeptical.

Ultimately, true embryonic stem cells from cloned human embryos weren’t obtained until 2013. By then, alternative methods for generating compatible stem cells through the activation of specific genes had emerged, leading to a decline in interest in therapeutic cloning.

Cloned Pets and Other Animals

Conversely, animal cloning has become increasingly established. Occasionally, headlines emerge when celebrities disclose that they’ve cloned their pets. Recently, former NFL player Tom Brady made news by revealing that his dog is a clone, produced by a company acquired by Colossal Biosciences.

Apart from serving as a way to “revive” cherished pets, cloning is also utilized in agriculture and horse breeding. For instance, male horses are often castrated, meaning that if they excel in show jumping, the only method to utilize their genetic material for future breeding is through cloning.

Nonetheless, animal cloning continues to pose significant challenges. A 2022 study of the first 1000 dog clones found that the cloning process is still highly inefficient, with merely 2 percent of implanted cloned embryos resulting in live births. This inefficiency contributes to the high cost of pet cloning, around $50,000.

Moreover, about 20% of cloned dogs presented noticeable physical anomalies, including enlarged tongues, unusual eye colors, cleft palates, and excessive muscle mass. Some male dog clones even exhibited female physical traits.

But what if the wealthy and powerful could clone themselves, unburdened by such concerns?

Challenges in Adult Cloning

Multiple sources have indicated several successful monkey cloning endeavors since 2017, suggesting potential applicability for humans as well. However, these sources often fail to mention that all these primate clones have been derived from fetal cells, not adult ones.

The crux of the issue lies in the fact that reprogramming adult cells to mimic a fetal state is far more complex than reprogramming fetal cells. To me, cloning signifies creating a genetically identical replica of an adult, which is what made Dolly’s achievement exceptional.

In essence, I remain convinced that cloning an adult is still unattainable. In a world filled with dictators and eccentric billionaires, this might be a fortunate circumstance.

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Women Seek Greater Beauty Than Their Partners, While Men Aspire to Be More Engaging.

What do you look for in a partner?

Mapodiel/Getty

Would you prefer a partner who is attractive but plain, or someone who is appealing, even if you consider yourself less attractive? Your response may vary based on your gender. A study involving over 1,200 heterosexual adults in the U.S. revealed significant differences in how men and women choose between possessing certain traits themselves or seeking them in a partner.

“Men are inclined to compromise their own attractiveness for the sake of a very appealing partner, while the reverse is true for women,” Bill von Hippel from the Australian consultancy Research with Impact explained.

Von Hippel and his research team questioned participants about their preferences regarding six traits: wealth, beauty, ambition, humor, intelligence, and kindness, asking them how much of a disparity they would tolerate between their own traits and those of a partner. “It’s as if only supermodels are acceptable for dating, regardless of one’s own attractiveness,” von Hippel remarked.

In contrast to earlier studies, this research required participants to articulate their preferences. It revealed that the most notable difference between men and women lay in physical looks, while they were aligned in wishing to date partners possessing similar levels of kindness.

Generally, women perceived themselves as more attractive and intelligent, favoring men who are wealthier, more intriguing, and more ambitious, while men mainly preferred dating women who outshined them in beauty and wealth.

For instance, women rated the importance of their own beauty as 7.01 on an 11-point scale, whereas men assigned a value of 4.77 to their own looks. Conversely, men valued being interesting at 7.08, while women rated this trait at 5.81. A score below 6 indicates a greater desire for that trait in a partner than in oneself.

While Von Hippel acknowledged variations among individual responses, he stressed that the overall results were compelling. “This has a significant impact,” he remarked.

Lisa Welling, a professor at Oakland University in Rochester, Michigan, commented that this approach of forced choices is an intriguing way to reveal underlying preferences, though such constructs may lack relevance in genuine relationships. There’s also the question of whether individuals are considering short-term versus long-term partners, which “often holds significance,” she noted.

Steve Stewart-Williams from the University of Nottingham in Malaysia pointed out that while the findings are generally unsurprising, having participants make definitive choices may have clarified their true feelings. Previous research might have underestimated the breadth of gender differences in mate preferences due to measurement techniques, he opined. For instance, past studies may not have adequately accounted for the notion that individuals might wish for traits in themselves because they believe it could enhance their appeal to potential partners.

Von Hippel suggested that these findings are understandable from an evolutionary standpoint. Women carry the substantial biological responsibility of child-rearing and thus need to ensure prospective partners are capable of providing for their offspring, while men are evolutionarily driven to select for health and fertility in women.

Stewart-Williams believes the study may reflect evolutionary patterns in contemporary human populations, but cautioned that the research was limited to self-reported data from heterosexual individuals in the U.S., and it remains uncertain whether these conclusions apply more broadly.

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Review of The Séance at Blake Manor: An Engaging Gothic Detective Game Brimming with Mystery and Intrigue

A A quirky group of misfits and a sharp-dressed investigator harboring their own secrets reside in an isolated mansion on Ireland’s west coast. A seance at Blake Manor may seem like the perfect setting for a cozy evening, but this folk horror drama delivers far more than mere entertainment for Agatha Christie enthusiasts.

Set in October 1897, you step into the shoes of private detective Declan Ward. Tasked with uncovering the fate of Evelyn Dean, a guest who has mysteriously vanished, you find yourself in a once-grand mansion turned into a luxurious hotel. Inside, a host of eccentric characters await: from a camera-wielding medium to a voodoo practitioner named Ungan, and a Brazilian woman searching for her family’s history. They’ve gathered for a grand seance on the eve of All Hallows’ Eve, when the veil between the living and the dead is at its thinnest. As you explore the intricately designed rooms and gardens from a first-person perspective, you soon realize that every attendee harbors dark or tragic secrets and knows more about young Miss Dean than they let on.

A captivating experience…the séance at Blake Manor. Photo: Spooky Doorway/Raw Fury

What ensues resembles a classic detective adventure, presented in a graphic novel style, with art that draws inspiration from the likes of Mike Mignola (Hellboy) and Eduardo Risso (The Hundred Bullets). Engage in conversations with suspects, rummage through rooms for hidden clues and valuable items, and gradually compile a list of potential culprits. The game features a real-time clock and a schedule of events that must align with your investigation. Time only advances when you are actively exploring or interrogating guests, compelling you to apply your detective skills judiciously. Being at the right place at the right time to overhear clandestine conversations about spiritualism, mythology, and the mansion’s history in the Great Drawing Room is crucial.

All your findings can be meticulously organized through a set of graphical inventory screens, including a dynamic mind map of clues and actions. Though initially overwhelming, as you gather letters, keys, and hints, you quickly adapt and realize that taking notes is essential. While it may not exhibit the structural freshness of Blueprint, the game creatively guides you in certain directions, featuring a word game deduction mechanism that allows you to formulate theories regarding motives and backgrounds when approaching suspects.

As you delve deeper into the investigation, it becomes apparent that this is more than just a quaint mystery. The mansion, steeped in historical and religious significance, serves as a poignant reminder of colonialism, highlighting the stark contrast between the guests’ wealth and the struggles of the hotel staff. The narrative weaves themes of appropriation and cultural destruction alongside the enigma of a missing person, revealing the true implications of the mansion and its affluent owners, the troubled Blake family. Guests arriving from colonized regions, seeking answers to intricate family histories, enhance this diaspora narrative, while stories of addiction, trauma, and sorrow are thoughtfully interlaced throughout. There are chilling moments, where ghosts flicker just out of sight or unsettling events transpire during the night.

The outcome is a spellbinding detective tale—a well-researched interactive folk horror experience that stands alongside notable titles like Strange Antiquities and Wadjet Eye’s landmark The Excavation of Hob’s Barrow. Immersed in a world of cultural conflict and supernatural vengeance, it tackles profound themes of colonial trauma, identity, and spirituality all within the context of a singular location and event. For those eager to explore spiritualism, folklore, and ancient Irish history further, diving into a bookstore or library is essential.

Undoubtedly, The Séance at Blake Manor is a seasonal delight filled with eerie moments, but it is also an enlightening journey. Overall, it’s a game that challenges, engages, excites, and educates harmoniously.

Séance of Blake Manor is available now for £16.75

Source: www.theguardian.com

Blowwinner Review: Engaging and Powerful Books Uncover the Biases That Influence Our Lives

Despite significant changes since the 1950s, women continue to shoulder more domestic responsibilities

ClassicStock/Alamy

Earn money
Melissa Hogenboom (Canongate Books, August 14th, UK)

Why do individuals without jobs feel uplifted when their partners are unemployed? How do women develop empathy as they mature? Why does a disordered room appear untidy when it belongs to Jennifer, but not John? These pressing issues are explored by Melissa Hogenboom in her book Earn money: and other power imbalances that affect your life. The book uncovers the hidden power dynamics and subconscious cognitive biases that influence our behaviors and choices.

This narrative goes beyond individual actions; it serves as a well-researched examination of how stereotypes and unseen disparities shape everything from household chores to career advancement.

Fair warning: it may provoke anger—especially regarding household responsibilities. Studies indicate that in heterosexual relationships, domestic duties are typically assumed by women unless addressed directly. Women tend to take on more odd jobs, even when they log more hours at work. Hogenboom notes that some studies imply this might be an unconscious “compensation” strategy for unconventional family dynamics.

Gender biases begin early in life. Mothers engage more extensively during pregnancy, whereas fathers share more about their feelings with daughters and their achievements with sons. Studies have found that fathers react more deeply to their daughters’ emotions.

This reinforces the notion that women are inherently nurturing or empathetic—a stereotype that influences various realms, from parenting to leadership roles. In fact, while empathy can be partially genetic, there are no innate differences between genders.

When societal pressures are lifted, a new truth may surface. As highlighted in a case study of same-sex male couples, “The assumption that if parents remain at home without societal pressures, they will naturally share childcare responsibilities is quite misguided,” says one participant. “If my partner had suggested returning to work within a fortnight, I would have been furious.”

Hogenboom also points out that mothers in same-sex relationships may encounter fewer career obstacles after maternity leave compared to those in heterosexual partnerships, indicating that maternity alone does not dictate such penalties.

The myth of mutuality deludes couples that they have achieved a good balance of labor.

The book sheds light on the intangible forces predominantly managed by men: hidden inequalities often perceived as normal. At times, Hogenboom asserts, “Women, here’s the evidence you need to justify your exhaustion.”

Notably, the persistent challenges faced by men who seek to address these power disparities are highlighted. A study referenced by Hogenboom found that men requesting part-time roles often face skepticism more than women and encounter taunts like “Where’s your mom?” They often struggle to be taken seriously and may be viewed as less committed, complicating their social dynamics within parenting communities.

Couples who believe they have achieved equality might be surprised by how Hogenboom reveals these unseen dynamics of authority. She argues that systematic inequalities represent a dominant form of power in relationships, often overlooked—even by the couples who experience them.

The perception of mutuality can lead couples to falsely believe they maintain an even distribution of responsibilities. However, they may be deceiving themselves if they don’t consider whose needs are genuinely met and who does the work. For instance, your partner might “cook all the meals,” but have you handled the meal planning, grocery shopping, cleaning, and budgeting?

Fortunately, Hogenboom offers actionable advice. If you find yourself overwhelmed, she suggests handling tasks comprehensively: “It eliminates hidden burdens when ownership of the entire task is taken.”

Her recommendations provide a much-needed relief amidst the wealth of data presented. While authoritative and insightful, Hogenboom’s writing style leaves little room for reflection.

However, moments of reflection are necessary. Earn money constructs a convincing argument to recognize the influence of concealed power dynamics and informs how to address them. This leads to fairer relationships and more successful careers, potentially saving marriages.

Helen Thomson is an author based in London.

New Scientist Book Club

If you enjoy reading, join a welcoming community of fellow book enthusiasts. Every six weeks, we explore exciting new titles, offering members exclusive access to book excerpts, author articles, and video interviews.

Source: www.newscientist.com

Orca Captured Engaging in a “Tongue Kiss” in the Wild for the First Time

In a remarkable encounter with citizen scientists off the coast of Norway, a duo of orcas was seen engaging in “kissing” behavior in the wild for the very first time.

The footage captured by the group displays the pair gently nodding at each other, accompanied by “tongue nibbling.”

While similar behaviors have been documented before, this marks the first instance of such interactions being observed in a natural habitat.

During the video, the orcas came within 10-15 meters (30-50 feet) of each other, sharing three brief moments of affection above the water’s surface for a duration of two minutes.

https://c02.purpledshub.com/uploads/sites/41/2025/07/Orca-kissing-video.mp4
The footage captures a serene moment of connection between the two whales.

“This behavior has only been documented in orcas under human supervision,” said Dr. Javier Almunia from Loro Parque in Spain, as reported by BBC Science Focus. He was part of a recently published study utilizing observation videos from marine environments.

“Witnessing it in the wild indicates that such intricate social behaviors extend beyond captivity and are likely integral to the species’ natural social behavior.”

Orcas are known for their strong social structures, employing intricate behavioral systems to form and maintain social relationships.

For marine biologists, these observations are crucial for understanding orca interactions.

“Gaining insight into the social behavior of wildlife is essential for understanding their communication, bonding, and cooperation—key elements for their survival and well-being,” noted Almunia.

Unfortunately, these wild behaviors are rarely seen and require a fair amount of luck to witness at the right moment.

While studying animals in captivity is safer and more accessible, their behaviors often differ significantly from those observed in the wild.

https://c02.purpledshub.com/uploads/sites/41/2025/07/Nibbling-at-Loro-Parque.mov
Orcas in captivity have previously been observed “nibbling” their tongues at each other.

A Remarkable Encounter

The video was filmed on January 11, 2024, when two whales were observed by a fortunate group of snorkelers diving in Kavanangenfjord, northern Norway.

This area is known as a gathering spot for marine mammals, making it an ideal location for observing orcas due to its clear waters.

The group had the opportunity to watch the orcas under the guidance of experienced expedition leaders.

However, the study emphasized that while tourist excursions can lead to valuable scientific observations, “it is widely recognized that activities like whale watching and swimming can pose significant risks to wild populations.”

Orcas, often referred to by the misleading nickname “Killer Whale,” actually belong to the dolphin family. The latter portion of this nickname is accurate, as all dolphins are categorized as “toothed whales.”

Nevertheless, the term “killer” is misleading, as there are no documented cases of wild orcas intentionally harming humans.

The name stems from an ancient mariner who observed orcas hunting other large whales.

“They were originally called ‘whale killers,’ a term that evolved into ‘killer whale’,” explained Almunia.

“While orcas are indeed apex predators, they are also incredibly intelligent and social animals with complex cultures and strong familial bonds. They play a critical role as top predators within marine ecosystems.”

About Our Experts

Dr. Javier Almunia serves as the director of Loro Parque Fanfacion, a Spanish organization dedicated to the conservation of endangered parrot and marine species. He specializes in cetacean biology and has participated in numerous initiatives aimed at preserving biodiversity and protecting endangered species.

Read More:

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Four Science-Backed Strategies for Engaging Conversations

Speculations regarding older women

One key aspect of engaging conversation is levity. You don’t have to be a comedian, just have fun.

Tetra Images, LLC/Alamy

Conversations form the foundation of our relationships, yet many people find initiating dialogue challenging. Feelings of anxiety often surface when trying to engage in small talk with strangers, or even when connecting with those closest to us. If this resonates, Alison Wood Brooks is here to assist. She is a professor at Harvard Business School and teaches a highly sought-after course titled “Talk: How to Talk Gooder in Business and Life.” Additionally, her works, Talk: The Science of Conversation and the Art of Being Yourself, present four essential principles for fostering deeper conversations. Wood Brooks explains that while conversations can be unpredictable, they adhere to certain guidelines that, once understood, can ease our discomfort about the unpredictable aspects of interaction. New Scientist took the opportunity to ask her how to implement these insights into our daily conversations.

David Robson: Discussing conversation feels quite meta. Have you ever found yourself critiquing your own conversational skills?

Alison Wood Brooks: The layers of “metaness” are numerous. Even as I participated in discussions, I often felt as if I was observing from above. At Harvard, I teach courses, and many of my students experience this phenomenon too. There may be a challenging phase of over-excitement, but I hope that this subsides as they develop more effective conversational habits. There’s a well-known quote from Charlie Parker, the jazz saxophonist, which goes, “Practice, practice, practice, and when you hit the stage, let it all go and just play.” That’s how I approach conversation—it’s crucial to embrace the joy of being with another human, never losing the magic of that connection. While it’s beneficial to prepare, once you’re engaged in conversation, let go and allow the dialogue to flow.

From reading your book, I gathered that to bring energy into a conversation, one should ask about another person’s passion—so, what inspired your passion for conversation?

I have two responses to this question. The first is professional; early in my tenure at Harvard, I delved into emotions by examining how people articulate their feelings and the balance between emotions that one feels and expresses. Through this exploration, I developed a profound interest in understanding not just my emotions but how others communicate their experiences as well. We have advanced scientific tools today that allow us to analyze conversations on a large scale, thanks to the advent of natural language processing, machine learning, and AI, enabling us to process vast amounts of conversational data effectively.

On a personal note, I am a twin, which means I’ve always coexisted with someone who mirrors me closely. From the moment I opened my eyes as a newborn, I was beside an exact copy of myself. This relationship has allowed me to observe my interactions with the world and how she engages with others. When she succeeded in communicating or making jokes, I learned from her success, and I was able to avoid similar pitfalls when I witnessed her failures. This unique dynamic provided feedback most people don’t have. As twins, we were able to converse constantly, sharing spaces, clothes, friends, and even sports, cultivating a shared reality.

Your book outlines a framework for better conversation: topics, asking, lightness, kindness. Let’s start with the first element—how do you decide what topic to discuss?

My initial advice is preparation. Some individuals do this instinctively, thinking about potential conversation topics before meeting someone. For those who naturally lean into this habit, I encourage you to embrace it. However, some students perceive preparation as too rigid and scripted. Remember, just because you’ve prepared for a conversation doesn’t mean you need to stick exclusively to your planned topics. When unsure what to say next, having backup topics can ease those awkward silences. Maintaining fluidity in conversation is essential for connection. The choice of topic is less crucial at the outset; we are constantly making decisions on whether to stay on one subject, pivot to another, or change completely.

Sometimes the topic of conversation is clear. Still, it can be difficult to know when to switch to a new one.

Martin Parr/Magnum Photos

What guidance can you offer when making these topic decisions?

There are three clear indicators that suggest it’s time to change the topic. The first is a prolonged mutual pause. The second indicator is an awkward laugh, often used to fill spaces with excitement. The third sign is redundancy—if the discussion starts to repeat itself, it’s a signal to switch gears.

After a decent conversation, most people report feeling that they’ve covered an adequate range of topics. However, if you ask individuals about a conversation that didn’t flow well, they often feel they either discussed too little or went too deep into a single subject. This indicates that a common mistake is lingering too long on a single topic.

Your second element of conversation is asking questions. Many of us have heard the advice to ask more questions, yet why do you think many struggle with this?

Research indicates that human nature is inherently egocentric. We often become so absorbed in our own thoughts that we forget to invite others to share theirs. Fear also plays a role; while you might genuinely want to ask others about themselves, you may hesitate, worried about coming off as intrusive or revealing your own ignorance.

What types of questions should we be asking?

In my book, I discuss the significance of follow-up questions, building upon what your conversational partner just expressed. This demonstrates that you’ve listened, care, and wish to delve deeper. Even one thoughtful follow-up question can elevate a shallow conversation to something meaningful.

However, certain questioning patterns, like “Boomerasking,” should be avoided. Michael Yeoman and I recently researched this and it was fascinating. This conversational game boomerangs back to the initial questioner; for instance, if I ask about your breakfast and you reply, sharing details, I might then pivot to my own breakfast without giving due attention to your thoughts. Such a transition can come across as self-centric. Our findings reveal that this can leave your conversational partner feeling unheard. Sharing your perspective is essential, but do so at a moment that allows for mutual engagement rather than overshadowing.

Research by Alison Wood Brooks includes a recent study on “Boomerasking.”

Janelle Bruno

What benefits does levity bring to conversation?

When we examine conversations that falter, we often cite hostility and disagreement as culprits, yet the subtle killer of engaging dialogue is boredom. Levity serves as a preventative measure. Small moments of humor and lightness can rekindle engagement and enhance our connections.

Research shows that those who elicit positive feelings in others often receive respect and recognition, even with a simple joke, as confidence and the capacity to read a room are essential qualities of effective leaders. The joke doesn’t need to be profound or elaborate; it’s the willingness to share that showcases adaptability.

If someone isn’t a natural comedian, what practical steps can they take to introduce levity?

Levity transcends humor—it isn’t solely about being funny. Aspiring to become a comedian isn’t the ultimate goal. Watching stand-up performances showcases how comedians have meticulously refined their craft over time—a stark contrast to the spontaneity of live conversation. In real interactions, individuals seek connection, which doesn’t rely on elaborate jokes but on shared moments of joy. Seize opportunities to introduce lightness by switching to fresh topics or referring back to earlier points in the conversation or relationship. These callbacks, which may highlight something memorable, effectively demonstrate that you’ve been attentive and engaged. Levity can also emerge in the form of genuine compliments; if you appreciate something about someone, articulate it.

This brings us to the final conversation element: kindness. What holds us back from being as kind as we aspire?

Kindness frequently contends with our own egotism. Studies suggest we often underestimate how different others’ perspectives are from our own, leading us to overlook the value of simply asking to hear those perspectives. Being a kind conversationalist means focusing on your partner’s viewpoint—considering their needs and helping fulfill them.

Lastly, what are your top recommendations for enhancing conversations the next time your readers engage with someone?

Conversations can be surprisingly complex and challenging. When things go awry, grant yourself and others some grace. Everyone makes mistakes; sometimes a little kindness can make a significant difference.

Topics:

Source: www.newscientist.com

People engage in watching sports, engaging in sexual activities, procreating, and conducting research.

children’s victory

Data from a study by Gwynyay Maske and colleagues at University College Dublin in Ireland shows that spectator sports are good for kids – good for them.

The data covers major American football, association football (soccer), and rugby union tournaments in Africa, Asia, Europe, and North America.

The researchers found that, “with a few exceptions,” these popularity contests “continue to increase in number of births and/or fertility 9 (±1) months after notable team wins and/or tournaments.” “It was associated with an increase in the ratio.” .

Sporting events at this level seem to work that way for the winners, but not for the losers, says a study published in the journal Peer J. No joke, the downsides are significant. “Unexpected losses by Premier Soccer League teams were associated with fewer births nine months later.”

celebratory sex

The study of sports viewing begins with the following fascinating sentence: “Major sports tournaments may be associated with increased birth rates nine months later, possibly due to celebratory sex.”

Not many researchers have focused on the topic of celebratory sex. However, four academics from the University of South Dakota wrote in a 2017 paper thatMidwestern college students reported sexual activity in parked cars.”.

The quartet candidly write about their observations:[Some people] For birthdays, holidays, graduations, proms, new car “run-in” sessions, we planned days and weeks in advance to have “celebratory” sex in a slow, long park… Parking Sex during men and women was primarily a positive sexual and romantic experience for both parties. “

The abstract climax of this study ends with the simple idea that “future research on sex in parked cars in urban settings is recommended.”

Timeliness of time

The eternal question, “What is time?'' staggered onto the stage. The first was the Finnish report on Russia's time zone, and the second was the varied actions of the Kazakh state.

Neri Piatteva and Nadezhda Vasileva from the University of Tampere in Finland,Controlling the time zone: a national large-scale assessment of time as a means in the Russian Federation”.

Russia has 11 time zones. Piattyeva and Vasileva tell us that “the existence of multiple time zones indicates the lack of a unified spatiotemporal nature.” And they express ideas that no one has ever been able to articulate clearly. “Bureaucratically, the desire for simultaneity and synchronicity takes the form of meticulously ordering sequences of actions through normative documents.” They argue that there is a hinge to everything. is revealed. “In our analysis, we repeatedly returned to the most difficult question: What is time?”

On its own, the Kazakh government added clarification, surprise, and perhaps confusion to the general timeliness. On March 1, Kazakhstan changed its two time zones to a single time zone nationwide.

period of central asia reported two weeks before the big day that “not all citizens are happy about this, and some claim it will affect their health.” times In an interview with Sultan Turekhanov of Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, he warned: In particular, it is a change in the temporal structure parameters of human biological rhythms. ”

The feedback is, above all, a tribute to the audacity of those who dare to play with the temporal structural parameters of the biological rhythms of human tissues.

unread, non-existent

How many studies are there that no one reads…and eventually disappear? And how many studies disappear that no one reads even before they disappear? Both? Rough answer to the question – it's not exactly the same question. – Now it exists.

The first question was answered almost 20 years ago when Lockman I. Mejo of Indiana University Bloomington published a paper (which has not disappeared) called “.The rise of citation analysis”.

Meho writes: “It is a solemn fact that approximately 90% of papers published in academic journals are not cited at all. In fact, 50% of his papers are never read by anyone other than the authors, reviewers, and journal editors. not.”

Martin Paul Eve from Birkbeck, University of London got the second question right. His new research (also not extinct yet) is called “.Poor preservation of digital academic journals: A study of 7 million articles”. The study “evaluated” 7,438,037 academic citations with unique identification codes called DOIs. Now, in the research, we attempted to evaluate. According to Eve's report, 2,056,492 (27.64%) of them appear to be missing.

Eve also said that 32.9 percent of organizations responsible for digitally preserving documents “do not appear to be doing adequate digital preservation.”

Feedback: old ideals: The study should raise more questions than answers.

Mark Abrahams hosted the Ig Nobel Prize ceremony and co-founded the magazine Annals of Improbable Research. Previously, he was working on unusual uses of computers.his website is impossible.com.

Have a story for feedback?

You can email your article to Feedback at feedback@newscientist.com. Please enter your home address. This week's and past feedback can be found on our website.

Source: www.newscientist.com