The Competition to Develop the Ultimate Self-Driving Car Heats Up | Technology

Greetings! Welcome to TechScape. I’m your host, Blake Montgomery, reaching out from Barcelona where my culinary adventures have, quite humorously, turned half of me into ham.

Who will lead the self-driving car industry?

The global rollout of self-driving cars is on the horizon. Next year, leading companies from the United States and China plan to expand their operations considerably and introduce robotaxis in major cities worldwide. These firms are akin to male birds strutting to attract a mate, setting the stage for upcoming worldwide rivalries.

On the U.S. front, we have Waymo, the autonomous vehicle initiative by Google. Over the last 15 years, it has invested billions into Waymo. After extensive testing, the company launched its robotaxi service for the public in San Francisco in June 2024, and has since expanded significantly. Waymo vehicles are now a common sight in most parts of Los Angeles, with introductions planned for Washington, D.C., New York City, and London next year.

On November 2nd, Chinese tech giant Baidu lodged a complaint against Google. Baidu claimed its autonomous vehicle division, Apollo Go, conducts 250,000 rides weekly, matching Waymo’s performance. Waymo recently hit a major milestone in the spring.

Most electric vehicles in China are priced significantly lower than their American counterparts, even without self-driving capabilities. Experts estimate that a single Waymo vehicle costs hundreds of thousands to manufacture, though exact figures remain unclear. “The hardware costs for our vehicles are much less than Waymo’s,” declared the CFO of Pony AI, a leading Chinese self-driving firm, to the WSJ.

To recoup its billion-dollar investment in Waymo, Google must persuade potential customers of its superior quality.

Google is highlighting transparency as a distinguishing factor. Much less data is accessible regarding Baidu’s vehicles, raising concerns about their safety records. Baidu asserts that its vehicles have amassed millions of miles without “a single major accident.” Google referenced this in a statement, posing a question about the extent to which the success of Chinese self-driving companies has been communicated to U.S. transportation authorities, as noted by the Wall Street Journal.

However, Apollo Go, which has unlocked taxis in Dubai and Abu Dhabi, is not Waymo’s only contender, as Gulf nations pursue diverse tech partnerships. Wheels from WeRide, another Chinese autonomous vehicle company, have made their way to the UAE and Singapore. All major players in the Chinese market are pursuing expansion into Europe, according to Reuters. Vehicles built by Momenta and deployed by Uber are slated to begin operations in Germany by 2026. WeRide, Baidu, and Pony AI are also gearing up to introduce robotaxi services in various European locations soon, leading to many more people encountering self-driving cars in their everyday lives.

Initially, the primary question concerning self-driving cars was: can we create a working vehicle? Now, the focus has shifted to: who will dominate the market?

Read more: Driving competition: Chinese automakers race to take over European roads

This Week in AI

Elon Musk’s loyal supporters push his wealth to $1 trillion

Martin Lawson discusses Elon Musk’s new compensation package. Illustration: Martin Rowson/The Guardian

Tesla’s recent performance has been lackluster. The looming end of the U.S. electric vehicle tax credit has resulted in a surge of buyers at dealerships over the past few months, yet the company reported a 37% drop in profits in late October. This decline adds to a series of challenges facing EV manufacturers.

In spite of Tesla’s struggles, shareholders voted in favor of a plan to compensate Elon Musk $1 trillion over the next decade, contingent on his ability to elevate Tesla’s valuation from $1.4 trillion to $8.5 trillion. Should he succeed in this and other objectives, it would mark the largest reward in the company’s history.

The results of the vote were revealed during the company’s annual shareholder meeting in Austin, Texas, where more than 75% of investors backed the proposal. Enthusiastic chants of “Elon” filled the room following the announcement.

Musk has been associated with Tesla for a decade through this pay structure, yet his attention has rarely been confined to just one venture. He has remained deeply involved in politics. My colleague Nick Robbins Early details how Musk has aligned himself with the international far-right:

Skip past newsletter promotions

Since his departure from the Trump administration, Musk’s political endeavors have included wielding social media as a platform to influence the New York mayoral election and orchestrating a right-wing, AI-generated alternative to Wikipedia. He has expressed concerns over a “homeless industrial complex” of nonprofits purportedly harming California and declared that “white pride should be acceptable.” On X, he stated that Britain is on the brink of civil war and warned of the collapse of Western civilization.

The social and economic repercussions stemming from Musk’s political stance have not deterred his public support for the far right, and he has increasingly showcased these affiliations, all while maintaining in his characteristic obstinacy that being branded a racist or extremist is of no consequence to him.

Read more: How Tesla shareholders’rewarded Elon Musk towards becoming the world’s first trillionaire

Can you take on the data center?

Google data center located in Santiago. Photo: Rodrigo Arangua/AFP/Getty Images

The data centers fueling the AI revolution are truly colossal. Their financial scope, physical dimensions, and vast datasets encompass all, making the idea of halting their construction seem counterintuitive amid ongoing developments. Silicon Valley’s leading firms are investing hundreds of billions at a rapid pace.

Yet, as data centers expand, resistance is mounting in the United States, the UK, and Latin America, where these facilities are rising in some of the most arid regions globally. Local opposition typically centers on the environmental repercussions and resource use of such monumental constructions.

Paz Peña, a researcher and fellow at the Mozilla Foundation, focuses on the social and environmental effects of data center technology in Latin America. She shared insights with the Guardian at the Mozilla Festival in Barcelona on how communities in Latin America are filing lawsuits to extract information from governments and corporations that prefer to keep it hidden. This dialogue has been condensed for brevity and clarity.

Read my Q&A with Paz Peña here.

Read more: “Cities that draw the line”: A community in Arizona fights against massive data centers

The Broader TechScape

Source: www.theguardian.com

Self-Driving Cars Hit UK Roads: The Challenging Journey Ahead

The timeless inquiry from the backseat remains relevant as we approach a new age of driverless vehicles. “Are we close?” For those in the UK, the promise of fully autonomous cars has been long-awaited, and the answer is “yes, almost”—but not quite there yet.

A pivotal advancement in the journey toward autonomous driving is on the cusp of realization. Waymo, known for its successful robotaxi operations in San Francisco and several other U.S. cities, announced recently that it plans to introduce its vehicles to London.

Specifics are limited, yet the potential is intriguing. The groundbreaking California-based firm stated that its self-driving service “will be providing driverless vehicles on this side of the Atlantic in 2026… We’re excited to cater to Londoners and the millions visiting London next year.”

These visitors may want to grab a London Underground Oyster card just in case. This past summer, the UK government announced initiatives aimed at enticing major tech companies, aiming to hasten the rollout of self-driving vehicles, with robotaxis potentially entering regulated public trials as early as spring 2026. However, regulations are still being finalized, which may mean that safety drivers remain in the mix for a while longer.

The British company Wave, in collaboration with Uber, has unveiled plans to develop a more modest Level 4 fully autonomous vehicle and to commence public road tests in London.

While Americans are leisurely experiencing self-driving vehicles, the UK’s winding road to this technology has been met with commitments that vanish like pedestrians in the rain. Back in 2018, Addison Lee, in conjunction with researchers from the University of Oxford, promised robotaxis by 2021.

Waymo has indicated plans to bring its successful robotaxis from San Francisco and four other U.S. locations to London. Photo: ZUMA Press, Inc./Alamy

A year ago, Nissan nearly achieved having one of its Leaf models drive itself without incident near Becton, east London. The then-transport secretary, Chris Grayling, forecasted self-driving cars arriving within four years, with small pods autonomously navigating around the O2 in Greenwich. The offspring of a British innovation, the Union Jack-patterned Sinclair C5 Tardis, was showcased in a Milton Keynes car park back in 2015. Vince Cable, the business secretary at the time, confidently stated that 100 of these would soon ferry passengers across town for just £2 each.

Meanwhile, in regions like the U.S. and parts of China, self-driving taxi services are nearing routine functionality, rendering Waymo’s impending arrival more significant compared to earlier aspirations and predictions.

In San Francisco, Waymo’s home base, self-driving cars have integrated seamlessly into daily life, traversing the city’s challenging hilly streets at a deliberate pace.

Since its full implementation in June 2024, it has established its place alongside electric scooters and city buses within the urban landscape. Riding a Waymo has become a must-try attraction for visitors, akin to experiencing the city’s historic trolley cars.

Democratic Mayor Daniel Lurie has advocated for expansion to rejuvenate the downtown district, but the streets still host many people experiencing homelessness, creating a stark contrast as high-tech AI-driven vehicles pass by individuals living in extreme poverty.

The modified white Jaguar iPace resembles surveillance equipment, featuring rapidly rotating cameras on each side and roof akin to a police siren. Advertised similarly to Uber or Lyft rides via an app, the absence of a human driver and the steering wheel twirling under its digital command serve as a poignant reminder of the economic upheaval these vehicles may precipitate.

Uber, which debuted in San Francisco in 2010, disrupted traditional taxi practices and created precarious gig jobs for drivers. Now, they are facing another wave of technological change.

Since Uber’s launch in 2010, the job landscape for taxi drivers has significantly changed, leading to precarious working conditions. Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

In 2024, data referenced by The Economist indicated that the number of people employed by taxi firms in San Francisco increased by 7%, alongside a 14% rise in salaries. The newspaper noted that Lyft’s CEO David Risher predicted that self-driving taxis “will actually grow the market.”

Yet, those on the front lines may not share this optimism. An Uber driver from Venezuela expressed doubts when asked about Waymo while in San Francisco’s Mission District: “I think I have about a year left in this job.”

For passengers, riding a Waymo evokes a sense of entrusting their journey to artificial intelligence. Upon hailing the vehicle via the app, a warm welcome greets them, initially displaying their initials on the digital screen atop the car. Tapping the app unlocks the doors, while a friendly voice reminds riders to buckle their seatbelts. A broad selection of music is readily available, creating a truly intimate atmosphere behind the tinted rear windows.

Pressing the ‘Start Ride’ button on the touchscreen allows the car to smoothly merge into traffic. The gear shift, adorned with a message that reads “Keep your hands out of it,” spins like a ghostly fairground attraction.

Soon enough, riders cultivate a sense of comfort while remaining cautious enough to avert dangers. A scrolling map on the screen displays their route and updates the estimated time of arrival. The ‘Stop Now’ button will only engage once it’s safe to do so, but the option to change the original destination is appreciated.

Passengers in a Waymo find themselves surrendering to the capabilities of artificial intelligence during their ride. Photo: Tamamario/Getty Images

Waymo has sparked diverse social reactions. Recently, three individuals stalled at a busy intersection in the Marina District, visibly disoriented with blinking lights, attracting cheers from onlookers, while one man executed multiple backflips off a nearby vehicle.

In July, a prankster gathered a crowd at a dead-end street, leading everyone to summon a Waymo simultaneously, creating a spectacle featuring 50 robocars. Earlier in 2024, one such vehicle was vandalized, covered in graffiti, and set ablaze during the Lunar New Year celebrations in Chinatown.

If the black taxi driver does not react directly, it’s possible a similar reception will greet the driverless taxis. Steve McNamara, executive director of the Licensed Taxi Drivers Association, remarked: “We observe kids hacking Lime bikes, but how long until surfing atop a Waymo becomes the latest TikTok sensation?”

McNamara maintains a calm demeanor: “This proposes a solution to a problem we don’t currently have. These vehicles may be performing excellently in San Francisco and Los Angeles, but London is unlike anywhere else. I’d like someone to elucidate how this self-driving car intends to navigate streets like Charing Cross Road at 11 p.m., where pedestrians are continually crossing.” [sensor] “When you’re on top of a Waymo, you know it will stop, so you just get out or disembark.”

Christian Wolmer, author of *Driverless Cars: On a Road to Nowhere*, echoes this skepticism, stating: “There are no pedestrian crossing rules in this environment. If Google expects adherence to pedestrian crossing norms for cars…”

Despite the experiences in the U.S., he staunchly doubts that fully autonomous taxis will hit the streets here next year, asserting: “Unless a human operator is present, the likelihood of that happening is zero.”

‘London is like nowhere else’: Can driverless cars adapt to transportation systems outside the US by 2026? Photo: Paolo Paradiso/Alamy

Waymo revealed its London plans partly to mitigate any surprise over test vehicles on the roads, initiating a lengthier mapping initiative. They feel emboldened after a self-driving trial spanning approximately 100 meters in San Francisco, which is a far from orderly or flat city, in addition to over a dozen other trials.

Carriers have long argued that regulation trumps technological hurdles. Even swift progress has limitations. The consultation’s outcome, which wrapped up last month, should pave the way for the pilot program, though confirmation is still pending.

While this may have spurred Waymo’s plans, transforming the testing program to operational vehicles still involves numerous challenges with the Department for Transport and Transport for London, indicating that broader legislation may take at least another two years to enact. Insurers have particularly raised concerns regarding liability in these scenarios.

Previous pre-legislative testing frameworks stalling other innovative transport modalities, such as electric scooters, are currently set to persist for eight years. Tony Travers, a professor at the London School of Economics, posits that self-driving cars may be more favorably received: “They will have to abide by regulations. Sure, they might contribute to congestion, but they’re not likely to induce chaos like electric scooters have.”

However, even with the arrival of driverless taxis, one might wonder, “So what?” suggests Walmer.

According to Waymo co-CEO Tekedra Mawakana, the answer lies in the fact that their vehicles are “reliable, safe, and magical,” with an emphasis on safety. Up to now, Waymo cars have been involved in a fewer number of accidents compared to human-driven vehicles over equivalent distances.

They also aim to provide a new form of autonomy to those previously lacking it. The Royal Institute for Blind People praised the Waymo announcement as the inception of “technology that allows for safe, spontaneous, autonomous movement.”

Waymo stated that its entrance into the UK market would entail investments in warehouses, infrastructure for charging, cleaning services, support teams, and would temporarily employ “human experts” in the driver’s position.

Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander has mentioned that the upcoming self-driving car revolution could generate 38,000 job opportunities within the UK.

However, it is professional drivers who face the greatest threat. Approximately 300,000 individuals hold private hire licenses, with an additional million expected to be in roles related to HGV and delivery services moving forward. Many of the UK’s 82,000 bus drivers have recently secured significant pay rises, while its 27,000 train operators are well-regarded for their labor efforts.

Consequently, surveys indicate that public sentiment in Britain is cautiously optimistic regarding self-driving vehicles, primarily stemming from fears surrounding job displacement due to artificial intelligence, even if human jobs haven’t been entirely eradicated yet.

Licensing and legal clarifications are still pending. McNamara expressed hope: “Who will grant approval? If I aimed to become a successful politician, I wouldn’t add my signature to that document.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

U.S. Regulators Launch Investigation into Tesla’s Self-Driving System Following Multiple Crashes

U.S. automotive safety authorities have initiated an investigation into Tesla vehicles equipped with fully autonomous driving technology due to traffic safety infractions following multiple accidents.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) stated that the electric vehicle manufacturer’s automated driving assistance system, which necessitates driver attention and intervention when required, “caused vehicle actions that contravened traffic safety regulations.”


NHTSA’s preliminary evaluation marks the initial step that could lead to a vehicle recall if deemed a safety risk.

The agency reported incidents of 2.88-metre Teslas disobeying red lights and traveling against oncoming traffic while changing lanes while utilizing the system.

NHTSA indicated that there were six reports of Tesla vehicles in fully autonomous driving (FSD) mode “entering intersections on red, proceeding into intersections against red lights, and subsequently colliding with other vehicles within those intersections.”

The agency highlighted that at least one individual sustained injuries in four of the crashes. Tesla has not yet responded to Reuters’ request for comments.

NHTSA documented 18 complaints and a media report stating that Tesla vehicles operating in FSD mode “failed to adhere to red lights, did not come to a complete stop, or inadequately detected and displayed the appropriate signal conditions on the vehicle interface.”

Skip past newsletter promotions

Some whistleblowers expressed that the FSD “failed to provide any alerts regarding the system’s operation when approaching a red light.”

Tesla’s FSD is more sophisticated than the Autopilot system and has been under NHTSA scrutiny for a year.

In October 2024, authorities initiated an investigation into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with FSD following four accidents under poor visibility conditions, such as sun glare, fog, or airborne dust. One incident in 2023 resulted in a fatality.

According to Tesla’s website, FSD is “designed for fully attentive drivers who maintain their hands on the wheel and are prepared to assume control at any moment. These features are meant to grow more capable over time, but the features currently enabled do not render the vehicle self-driving.”

Reuters contributed to this report

Source: www.theguardian.com

Why Elon Musk’s Vision for Self-Driving Tesla Taxis Misses the Mark: A Critique of Lidar

After years of promising investors that millions of Tesla Robotaxis would soon flood the streets, Elon Musk launched a limited driverless car service in Austin, Texas. The rollout faced significant challenges from the start.

The June 22nd debut was met with a barrage of videos from pro-Tesla influencers, who appeared to celebrate the service and showcased their rides. Musk heralded it as a milestone, and Tesla’s stock shot up nearly 10% the next day.

However, it soon became evident that some of the influencer footage painted a troubling picture of an autonomous vehicle that either broke traffic laws or struggled with basic functions. By Tuesday, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) had launched an investigation into these incidents and sought Tesla’s input.

If, as Musk boasted on X, this limited deployment is the result of over a decade of work, it symbolizes the complex technical choices and fixations embraced by the world’s richest person in pursuit of fully autonomous vehicles.

Musk framed the idea of a driverless car as integral to the company’s future. This year it experienced a severe decline but he vowed to rapidly expand the Robotaxi service. Nonetheless, this week’s rocky launch suggests Tesla grapples with the technical hurdles that have drawn scrutiny from regulators.

The Robotaxi pilot involved around 10 cars navigating a confined area in Austin, with safety drivers present in the front seats. Additional limitations included restrictions during adverse weather and at nighttime. Influencer rides were priced at $4.20 each, mirroring Musk’s penchant for cannabis-related memes.

“Tesla’s autonomous driving can be deployed in approved locations. There’s no need for extensive mapping or specialized equipment,” the official Tesla account tweeted on launch day. “It just works.”

However, footage from at least 11 rides indicated that the trial did not unfold as flawlessly as Tesla’s promotional materials suggested. In one instance, the Robotaxi failed to make a left turn, veering into oncoming traffic instead, and resolved the issue by driving along a double yellow line. Other clips showed the vehicle allegedly exceeding speed limits.

This footage caught the NHTSA’s attention, with the agency stating they were aware of the incidents and had reached out to Tesla for more details.

Meanwhile, Musk retweeted a pro-Tesla influencer praising the service amidst technical failures and ongoing regulatory inquiries. One tweet shared by Musk featured a video showing a Robotaxi halting for a peacock crossing the road, while another urged followers to “ignore the media.”

“Lidar is lame.”

Musk has long maintained that reliance solely on cameras for autonomous vehicles is the key to true self-driving capabilities. Tesla’s consumer models feature what are termed “Autopilot” and “Fully Autonomous” capabilities, enabling hands-free driving on highways. These systems are supported by numerous external cameras for navigation, maneuvering, and stopping. The Robotaxis use similar software while depending entirely on cameras.

This camera-centric approach starkly contrasts with other self-driving tech firms like Waymo and Zoox, which utilize a combination of cameras and sensors, including radars and lidars. For instance, Waymo’s latest driverless vehicles are equipped with about 40 cameras and sensors, while Tesla’s advanced model for fully autonomous driving employs around 8 cameras. Bloomberg analysis. Lidar and radar are beneficial for detecting obstacles under poor weather and lighting conditions.

Despite lidar’s advantages, Musk argues that Tesla operates without it. “Lidar is lame,” he declared during Tesla’s Autonomy Day in 2019. “Using it in a car is foolish. It’s costly and unnecessary.”

According to Bloomberg, Lidar systems can cost around $12,000 each, whereas cameras are typically much more affordable. Musk contends that camera-only technology mirrors how humans navigate using their vision.

Tesla Faces Lawsuits and Investigations Over Full Self-Driving Mode

Musk’s claims regarding camera-only technology have placed Tesla under scrutiny, particularly following a fatal accident involving drivers using its fully autonomous driving features. The company is currently embroiled in various government investigations and civil lawsuits, asserting that fully autonomous driving suffers from weather-related issues like sun glare, fog, dust, and darkness. There are reports of at least 736 accidents and 17 fatalities linked to this technology. Analysis by the Washington Post.

“Tesla maintains an almost obsessive view of running the system solely on cameras, despite the consensus among experts in the field,” commented Brett Schreiber, a lawyer representing several victims of Tesla’s autopilot failures.

“Anyone following collision avoidance technology since the ’90s understands that radar, lidar, and cameras are the optimal trio.”

Schreiber expressed little surprise at Tesla’s Robotaxi’s shaky development in Austin.

“The real tragedy here is that people continue to be harmed and killed due to this technology,” he said. “And this highlights issues like, ‘Look how cute it is that a car can’t even make a left turn.’

Tesla did not respond to inquiries regarding the ongoing lawsuits, investigations, and crash incidents related to its fully autonomous driving capabilities.

Tesla’s Tactics vs. Waymo’s Approach

The contrast between Waymo’s method of launching commercial autonomous driving services in densely populated cities and Tesla’s approach extends beyond discussions about lidar versus cameras. Waymo is often seen as a frontrunner in the U.S. autonomous vehicle landscape, which has seen its competitors sharply reduced.

There are numerous reasons Waymo has outlasted many of its rivals. Historically, the Google subsidiary dedicated extensive time to mapping urban areas and rigorously testing vehicles prior to launch. For example, in San Francisco, where Waymo first implemented a completely autonomous commercial service, the company had begun mapping and testing as early as 2021.

Initiated as part of Google’s X Research Lab in 2009, Waymo also encountered challenges with self-driving cars despite its cautious, step-by-step city-by-city rollout. Earlier this year, Waymo was compelled to recall over 1,200 vehicles due to software problems causing collisions with roadside objects, gates, and other barriers. Additionally, the NHTSA launched an investigation last year after receiving 22 reports of Waymo vehicles demonstrating erratic behaviors or violating traffic laws.

In contrast, Tesla is still in the trial phase with its service, yet the Robotaxi launch in Austin marks the first time the automaker has deployed its fully autonomous driving technology in real-world conditions. There has been no information disclosed regarding the duration or extent of mapping or testing this technology in Austin.

This launch evokes memories of Uber’s initial attempt at self-driving vehicle ride-sharing services in 2016, which was also conducted without the necessary approval from California regulators. On the very first day of their pilot project in San Francisco, Uber vehicles reportedly ran a red light. They were forced to suspend the service just a week later after the DMV revoked their registration. At the time, an autonomous driving executive at Uber had urged engineers to expedite the process.

Faced with a lawsuit from Waymo regarding its self-driving operations and struggling to stay competitive, Uber sold its autonomous driving division in 2020.

Like Uber, Tesla also did not seek permission to operate its Robotaxi Service in Austin, as Texas has no existing permit process, which is not expected to be established until September.

At this time, it remains uncertain how frequently Tesla plans to deploy its Robotaxi service behind the scenes, but it’s clear that automakers are under pressure to meet deadlines set by Musk.

With the introduction of Robotaxis, Musk has claimed that Teslas will achieve full automation since at least 2016, and he may be approaching the deadlines he has postponed several times over the last decade.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Uber to Launch Self-Driving Taxis in London Courts Next Spring

The autonomous Uber is set to hit the roads of London next year, following the government’s announcement that a trial for fully self-driving vehicles will commence in spring 2026.

For the first time in Europe, companies will be allowed to operate publicly, with human safety drivers permitted to oversee “bus-like” service pilots from the driver’s seat or onboard.

Uber is teaming up with UK tech company Wayve to trial taxis that can be booked through the app in the capital, marking a significant step in the largest European market.

A broader rollout of self-driving taxis, or Robotaxis, is anticipated after the full implementation of automated vehicle laws in late 2027.

The UK is accelerating its efforts, as unmanned taxis have already been established in numerous cities across San Francisco, USA, and China. Earlier this year, Uber launched its first unmanned taxi in Austin, Texas, in collaboration with Waymo. Meanwhile, Tesla also plans to introduce autonomous services for its competitors this month.

The Department of Transport (DfT) has stated that if the technology enhances road safety, it could generate 38,000 jobs and create a £42 billion industry by 2035.

Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander remarked: “The future of transportation is on the horizon. Self-driving cars can create jobs, attract investments, and provide opportunities for the UK to become a leader in new technology.”

“With road safety at the core of the pilot and the legislation, we are committed to taking bold steps to foster job creation, advance innovation, and facilitate transformative plans in the UK industry.”

The DfT emphasized that autonomous vehicles could enhance transport options for millions, especially by offering new public transport solutions in rural areas to those unable to drive.

Thanks to technology from Wayve and fellow UK company Oxa (formerly Oxbotica), self-driving vehicles have been under development for over a decade. However, during all road tests for cars and buses, safety drivers have been present to assume control if necessary.

The Automated Vehicle Act mandates that self-driving vehicles must be approved following thorough testing.

Our earlier commitment to launching Robotaxis in London has yet to realize. The unmanned bus service started in Edinburgh in 2023 has been halted due to a lack of ridership.

Nonetheless, automated taxi services in the U.S. are currently conducting hundreds of thousands of paid rides, although progress has not been without challenges. General Motors has abandoned its autonomous service plans after several incidents, including ones that led to severe injuries for pedestrians. Early indications, however, suggest that self-driving taxis are safer, and some users, particularly women, prefer to use unmanned services.

Wayve co-founder and CEO Alex Kendall stated that accelerated testing will position the UK as a leader in fully autonomous vehicles, adding, “These initial pilots will help establish public confidence and unlock new job opportunities, services, and markets.”

“We are excited about what the future holds,” said Gavin Jackson, CEO of Oxa. “Clear regulations will open up the market and encourage transport companies to embrace the advantages of self-driving cars across the nation. Today’s announcement signifies that the UK is prepared for this technology.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

What will the future of transportation look like: Robotaxis or self-driving cars? | Technology

Welcome back. This week in tech: General Motors announces the end of robotaxis but not self-driving cars. One woman’s battle against AI in her housing application. Salt Typhoon and tech companies donating to Donald Trump. Thank you for your engagement.

GM discontinues Cruise robotaxi. Uber resumes robotaxi service in Abu Dhabi

Despite the shut down of one robotaxi business, another will emerge. General Motors recently revealed its decision to cease funding Cruise, its subsidiary responsible for self-driving car software and robotaxi services. Cruise faced challenges after a serious accident in 2023, leading to regulatory restrictions on its operations. GM has invested significantly in Cruise but has not seen profits. This move aligns with Apple’s discontinuation of its self-driving car project.

Former Cruise CEO’s revenue projections fell short, leading to GM’s decision. Cruise’s closure mirrors Uber’s shift away from robotaxis to a distribution model in the self-driving sector. Meanwhile, Waymo continues to expand its robotaxi services.

Woman’s fight against AI in housing

AI is infiltrating various aspects of life, including housing. One US woman faced discrimination based on AI screening in her apartment application. After legal action, the responsible company settled and pledged to avoid AI screening for future tenants.

What’s new: Tech CEOs and Trump. Salt Typhoon

  • Technology CEOs and Trump: Silicon Valley leaders publicly align with Trump through donations and engagements. Meta, Amazon, and OpenAI among those contributing to Trump’s fund. Google and Microsoft also show signs of collaboration with Trump.

  • Salt Typhoon: Following the Salt Typhoon cyber attack, cell phone companies are under scrutiny for lack of notification to affected individuals. FBI only alerted high-profile targets, leaving many uninformed.

Wider TechScape

Source: www.theguardian.com

Investors React Poorly to CyberCab Self-Driving Car, Tesla’s Value Drops $60 Billion

Tesla shares dropped almost 9% on Friday, erasing roughly $60 billion from the company’s market value following the underwhelming announcement of its highly anticipated robotaxis that failed to impress investors.

The electric vehicle manufacturer’s stock plummeted to $217 at the close of the market after CEO Elon Musk revealed a much-hyped self-driving car at an event in Hollywood. Since the start of the year, the stock price has declined by about 12%.

Musk stated that Tesla would commence the development of a fully autonomous CyberCab by 2026 priced under $30,000 and introduced a van capable of transporting 20 people autonomously within the city, aiming to revolutionize parking.

Prior to the event, he tweeted: “And within 50 years all transportation will be fully autonomous.”

During the presentation, he mentioned that parking would no longer be necessary in the city.

However, analysts were disappointed by the lack of specifics at the event concerning Tesla’s projects and other developments. Musk has a track record of making ambitious projections about future products that often fail to materialize within set deadlines or at all.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Royal Bank of Canada analyst Tom Narayan remarked in an investor note that the event lacked specifics. He stated, “Investors we spoke to during the event felt that the event glossed over actual figures and timelines.”

“These shortcomings are common at Tesla events, which appear to focus more on promoting and branding Tesla’s vision rather than providing concrete data for analysis. Consequently, we anticipate a decline in the stock price.”

Narayan also mentioned that some investors were anticipating a preview of an affordable car equipped with pedals and a steering wheel set to be launched next year, but no such announcement was made.

Garrett Nelson, an analyst at investment research firm CFRA, expressed disappointment with the revelations about the CyberCab and the lack of information regarding more economical vehicles.

He said: “The event raised numerous questions but was surprisingly brief and resembled more of a controlled demonstration than a comprehensive presentation. We were unsatisfied with the absence of details about [Tesla’s] near-term product plans, which include a more affordable model and the Roadster. Musk previously mentioned on a conference call that production of these models is set for 2025.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Self-driving cars are typically safer than humans in most scenarios, but struggle around curves

Self-driving car driving through downtown San Francisco

Jason Doi Photography/Getty Images

Self-driving cars may be safer than human drivers in everyday situations, but the technology struggles more than humans in dark places and when turning, according to the largest accident research study to date.

The findings come at a time when self-driving cars are already on the roads in some US cities, and GM-owned Cruise is set to resume testing of driverless cars. Pedestrian dragging incident The March incident prompted California to suspend its license, but Google spinoff Waymo has been gradually expanding its robot taxi operations in Austin, Los Angeles, Phoenix and San Francisco.

“It is important to improve the safety of self-driving cars at dawn, dusk or when turning,” he said. Ding Sheng Xuan “Key strategies include strengthening weather and lighting sensors and effectively integrating sensor data,” say researchers from the University of Central Florida.

Ding and his colleagues Mohamed Abdel AtiA team from the University of Central Florida collected data from California and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) on 2,100 crashes involving vehicles equipped with some degree of autonomous or driver-assistance technology, as well as more than 35,000 crashes involving unassisted human drivers.

The researchers then used statistical matching techniques to find pairs of accidents that occurred under similar circumstances, with common factors such as road conditions, weather, time of day, whether the accident happened at an intersection or on a straight road, etc. The researchers focused their matching analysis on 548 autonomous vehicle accidents reported in California, excluding less automated vehicles equipped only with driver assistance systems.

Abdel Aty said the overall results suggest that self-driving cars are “generally safer in most situations.” But the analysis also found that self-driving cars are five times more likely to crash when driving at dawn and dusk than human drivers, and are almost twice as likely to crash when making turns.

One obstacle to research is that “the database of autonomous vehicle accidents is still small and limited,” Abdel Aty said. He and Din cited the need for “enhanced autonomous vehicle accident reporting,” a major caveat that independent experts agree with.

“I think this is an interesting, but very early, step in measuring the safety of self-driving cars.” Missy Cummings Cummings, of George Mason University in Virginia, said the number of self-driving car accidents is “too small to make blanket conclusions about the safety of these technologies,” and warned about biased reporting by self-driving car makers. During her time at NHTSA, Cummings said, video footage of accidents didn’t always match the manufacturers’ explanations, which tended to place the blame on the human driver. “When you looked at the actual videos, they told a completely different story,” she said.

He said some minor collisions may not be reported to police, so that factor needs to be taken into account when comparing accidents involving self-driving cars with those involving human drivers. Eric Teo Virginia Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, 2017 study Early testing of Google’s self-driving cars found that only three out of 10 accidents made it into police reports.

“Neither California nor NHTSA require comprehensive data reporting on the testing and deployment of autonomous vehicles,” Cho Junfeng “Autonomous vehicles, and especially robotaxis, often operate in specific regions and environments, making it difficult to generalize research findings,” the Arizona State University researchers said.

topic:

  • artificial intelligence/
  • Driverless cars

Source: www.newscientist.com

Cruise reduces self-driving workforce by 25%, another electric scooter startup leaves market, and a special year-end message

The Station is a weekly newsletter dedicated to all things transportation. Just sign up here and click on “The Station” to have our newsletter delivered to your inbox every weekend. Subscribe for free. Welcome to the station. It is the central hub for all past, present, and future means of moving people and goods from point A to point B. Hello! And goodbye! Well, at least until 2024. The station will be closed for a while until the end of this year. I would like to thank everyone who reads our weekly newsletter and sends me suggestions, tips, and criticism. Yes, I appreciate the thoughtful backlash. This year has seen new startups emerge (so many electric boat and RV companies, right?), more EVs on the roads, and numerous commercial milestones achieved in the self-driving vehicle industry. It was a year of lots of movement. Of course, there were dark moments and even shocking moments. Many startups went bankrupt, including a number of mobility SPACs, and layoffs remained widespread into the final months of the year. Two of the most surprising stories involve the self-driving car industry. Argo AI It made a comeback with a new AV startup funded by Softbank, but cruise. Cruise’s story continues to unfold and will likely play out until 2024. Last week was a tough week for Cruise, albeit as expected. As a result, the Cruise board, and by extension the GM board, are doing a housecleaning to restore years of technological advances. As part of that mission, nine top leaders were removed and 900 workers were laid off. We will continue to follow Cruise’s story next year. But that’s not our only focus. The TechCrunch team cares about the future of transportation, from new EV and battery technologies to electric and hydrogen aviation, self-driving cars, micromobility, and in-vehicle technology. It’s not just about highlighting the next new new thing. Instead, we strive to explain why it’s important and who it affects. In other words, we’re the kind of people who take unlikely exits and side streets to explore what others might avoid. Please join us. See you in the new year! Want to contact us with a tip, comment, or complaint? Email Kirsten at kirsten.karasec@techcrunch.com. Send your notes to tips@techcrunch.com. If you wish to remain anonymous, Click here to contact usthis includes SecureDrop (instructions here) and various encrypted messaging apps. micromobin The big talking point in Scooterville was the “seemingly” sudden decision. super pedestrian Just 18 months after raising $125 million, the company is closing its U.S. operations and beginning to consider selling its European operations. I don’t want to say I saw this coming, but given that in late November Superpedestrian began laying off several European executives responsible for global development and operations, Let’s just say I wasn’t shocked by the news. Superpedestrian’s Link scooters are available in about 60 cities in 11 countries, but are scheduled to be withdrawn from most markets by the end of 2023. The startup positioned itself as a partner for safe cities and invested in advanced passenger assistance technology by acquiring Navmatic in July 2021. That’s where Pedestrian Protection was born, Superpedestrian’s GPS-based safety system that could detect and correct unsafe rider behavior in real time. However, the system was competing with other camera-based computer vision systems popularized by Drover AI and Luna. Lime, the only big scooter company likely to survive, introduced its own version of rider-assistance technology on its scooters in July 2022, around the same time that Superpedestrian began cutting jobs. As the balance sheets of public companies Bird and MicroMobility.com (formerly Helbiz) demonstrate, shared micromobility is a difficult business to run properly. Bird has recently been kicked off the stock market, announced several layoffs and is likely close to filing for bankruptcy. MicroMobility.com has undergone not one but two reverse stock splits this year, and its stock price remains depressed. And after several failed acquisition talks, Tier Mobility also announced layoffs in November. Oh, and let’s not forget Boruto’s mysterious disappearance. My question now is who will be next to fly off to the great beyond? — Rebecca Beran This week’s sale We have lots of great deals this week! dimensional energy, a New York-based startup that develops sustainable aviation fuel from carbon dioxide emissions and water, has raised $20 million in a Series A round led by Envisioning Partners. Strategic investors include United Airlines Sustainable Flight Fund, Microsoft Climate Innovation Fund, Rock Creek Smart Aviation Futures Fund, DSC Investments, Derek US, and New York Ventures, as well as Elemental Excelerator and Chloe Capital. Existing investors also participated. summer timea Chinese new energy vehicle fleet management company, has completed an $80 million funding round to fuel R&D investment and real-time computational analysis. exponential energyThe Indian EV charging startup has raised $26.4 million in Series B led by Eight Road Ventures and TDK Ventures. This funding will help Exponent expand its 15-minute charging solution to five major cities in India in FY2024 and enter the intercity e-bus segment. The company plans to deploy 1,000 charging stations and equip 25,000 EVs with Exponent by 2025. Ric the mobility-as-a-service startup has raised €1.4 million ($1.53 million) from Habert Dassault Finance, AfriMobility (Akwa Group), angel investors, and banks including Bpifrance, Crédit Mutuel, and Caisse d’Épargne. meta fuela sustainable jet fuel startup, has raised $8 million in a round led by Energy Impact Partners and Contrarian Ventures. Vanmo, a São Paulo-based startup looking to expand electric motorcycle battery swapping in Latin America, has raised $30 million in a Series A round to capitalize on the growing popularity of bikes across the region. The equity and debt round was led by Monasees, with participation from Climate Technology Fund 2150 and Maniv Mobility.

Source: techcrunch.com