Bond Market Influence: Rachel Reeves’ Push to Safeguard the £2.7 Trillion ‘Beast’

By 12:30 PM on Wednesday, systems will be active, trading algorithms set, and billions in buy and sell orders prepared for Rachel Reeves’ budget announcement.

For the first time, a custom artificial intelligence tool will be tuned in to a Prime Minister’s speech at Deutsche Bank’s London trading floor. It will transcribe her address, detect shifts in tone, and notify you when figures fall short of expectations.

“Once the information is available, we can analyze it in real time,” explained Sanjay Raja, chief UK economist at the bank. The natural language model has been trained on Reeves’ recent public appearances, including media interviews, speeches at conferences, the spring Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) forecast, and last year’s budget, all designed to give banks a competitive edge in this highly anticipated budget.

“As we approach November 26th, there are heightened expectations regarding the city’s budget,” Raja stated.

We are now in the era of bond market budgets, following a decade of soaring government borrowing. With rising debt interest costs and the lingering effects of Brexit and Liz Truss’ mini-budget, market reactions will be critical.

Deutsche Bank’s trading floor in London. Photo: Roger Parks/Alamy

Mr. Reeves has clashed with major players in Britain’s £2.7 trillion debt market for months, engaging with top government officials from Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan in an effort to smooth over a multi-billion pound tax and spending plan.

What comprises the market? Think of it as the embodiment of electronic trading executed in systems around the globe, extensively analyzed by commentators leading up to the budget. There is concern that market turmoil could trigger stock declines and elevate borrowing costs for governments, mortgage holders, and businesses, potentially leading to political upheaval for Mr. Reeves and Keir Starmer.

Mr. Reeves experienced the bond market’s influence firsthand earlier this month when government borrowing costs surged after announcements that he scrapped income tax hikes, breaking his manifesto commitment.

The British government bond market, known as gilts, isn’t governed by a single entity but rather by a group of institutions and individuals working behind trading desks in the City, Canary Wharf, and other financial hubs.

graphic

At Phoenix Group’s trading room, a FTSE 100 insurance firm by London’s Old Bailey, Summer Refai gets ready behind a Bloomberg terminal. Budget day is significant as they manage £300 billion in assets, which includes billions of pounds in gold backing pensions, savings, and life insurance for 12 million clients.

“You might recall the famous quote from Bill Clinton’s advisor,” the firm’s head of macro markets commented. (Former strategist James Carville remarked in 1993 that a “bond market” would wield more power than any president or pope.)

“It really intimidates folks. No force makes governments move faster than the bond market,” he noted.

“You can see how the market dynamics certainly have an effect.”

The influence of bond traders has intensified in recent years as government debt and borrowing costs have surged globally, partly due to rising inflation and sluggish economic growth. The UK faces distinct challenges.

Following multiple economic shocks and consecutive budget deficits, Britain has amassed over £2.7 trillion in debt, nearly 100% of its national income. Inflation remains among the highest in the G7, and ongoing speculation regarding the government’s financial position is troubling.

Simultaneously, the Bank of England is offloading government bonds from its quantitative easing program, releasing vast amounts of gilts into the commercial market to support government borrowing.

Historically, pension funds managed most of the debt, but their demand has been dwindling due to the decline of defined benefit and final salary plans. Foreign investors have increasingly entered the market, now accounting for about a third of it.

The OBR has cautioned that this could render the UK more susceptible. Foreign investors could easily opt to invest elsewhere. For Reeves, preserving the bond market’s stability will be a top priority.

graphic

Amidst this context, the UK’s annual debt interest expenses have soared to £100 billion, about £1 for every £10 spent by the Treasury. This added financial pressure is exacerbated by the mounting costs of refurbishing damaged public services and catering to an aging population.

The yield (real interest rate) on 10-year bonds has reached 4.5%, the highest among G7 nations and nearly at a three-decade peak since 1998.

Simon French, chief economist at Panmure Liberum, mentioned that part of Reeves’ strategy involves reducing yields to alleviate this interest overhead. Bringing the UK back to a mid-ranking position could translate to billions in savings annually.

“Comparing the UK to the G7 is akin to determining who is the most inebriated at a party. But that’s a serious embarrassment regarding fiscal disparity. That’s a vital opportunity.”

Lower interest rates could yield “muted returns,” he suggests. This contrasts with the “stupid premium” witnessed during the Truss government. “By avoiding self-inflicted harm, we could see a market rebound.”

To achieve this, Reeves will need to bridge a possible £20 billion budget gap while addressing inflation. Raising taxes and cutting spending could intensify challenges, especially without stalling economic progress or violating Labor’s manifesto pledges.

graphic

The amount of debt investors will need to absorb will be a pivotal moment in the budget. The city anticipates that Mr. Reeves will have to rebuild considerable leeway, contrary to fiscal regulations. This would cap deficits and consequently reduce future gilt issuances.

“We’re closely monitoring the possibility of new budget rules being announced. That’s our focal point,” remarked Moeen Islam, head of UK rates strategy at Barclays.

In the spring, Reeves had set aside £9.9 billion as a cushion. However, this reserve is likely to be impacted by rising borrowing costs, a reversal in welfare policies, and downward adjustments to the OBR’s productivity forecasts.

Investors are hoping for a figure exceeding £20 billion, he adds. “That would be incredibly optimistic.”

However, a political approach focused on satisfying city investors may not be a comfortable route for Labor, especially when many are urging Mr. Reeves to ensure welfare spending does not rise.

Geoff Tilley, senior economist at the Labor Congress, stated that the city backed the Conservative Party’s austerity measures during the 2010s. “Rather than mending public debt, it has harmed it.”

“Our perspective is that markets are not inherently rational, but they do appreciate growth, and there’s evidence they respond favorably to policies that steer the economy in a positive direction.”

Investors had expected a manifesto-breaking increase in income tax. Implementing this would be the simplest route to generate billions for the Treasury, rather than relying on a mix of smaller, harder-to-execute measures.

“We underestimated the complexity of such a decision, and how high the bar would be. [a breach of manifesto] This decision lies with the prime minister, any prime minister,” remarked Islam.

Curiously, this could temper reactions on Wednesday, as numerous investors fear Reeves may be ousted from No. 11. “The market has recognized that such decisions can often be more intricate and nuanced than originally perceived.”

graphic

On Panmure Liberum’s trading floor, Marco Varani anticipates turbulent trading conditions.

“In this industry, what you’re truly after is movement and volatility. It generates more business. Days like Brexit and the onset of Covid were peaks of chaos. It was absolute madness.”

Once Reeves’ speech appears on Bloomberg, retail trading leaders expect an immediate impact. “You’ll see the gold market react, becoming a bit unsettled. Expect considerable volatility.”

During her address, he predicts that gold fluctuations, currency shifts, and movements in UK-listed company stocks will primarily be influenced by “fast money” (the City’s term for hedge funds).

Their involvement in the gold market has doubled from 15% of transactions in 2018 to roughly 30%, according to the Bank of England. Many are speculating with debt from a limited number of companies.

However, a clear judgment may unfold over several days. A crucial factor will be Threadneedle Street’s response regarding its scheduled rate cut on December 18 in the following weeks, as well as the UK’s growth trajectory and global circumstances.

Anthony O’Brien, head of market strategy at Phoenix Group, emphasized, “The market’s initial reaction should never be taken as definitive. It’s typically just individuals caught off guard, and it may require several days for clarity on the situation.”

“In the end, the economy dictates the valuation of national debt. Focusing on reducing inflation is vital. We must eliminate this uncertainty.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Concerns Over AI Bubble Resurface as Wall Street Pulls Back from Brief Rally | Stock Market

Concerns about a potential bubble in the artificial intelligence sector emerged again on Thursday as major U.S. stock markets declined, just a day after chipmaker Nvidia’s impressive results had sparked a market rally.

Initially, Wall Street experienced a boost following Nvidia’s reassurance of robust demand for its advanced data center chips. However, this optimism faded as the tech stocks central to the AI boom began to face downward pressure.

In New York, the S&P 500 index ended the day down 1.6%, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell by 0.8%. The tech-focused Nasdaq Composite Index dropped by 2.2%.

Earlier in the session, the FTSE 100 rose by 0.2% in London, and the DAX closed 0.5% higher in Frankfurt. The Nikkei Stock Average increased by 2.65% in Tokyo.

Currently valued at approximately $4.4 trillion, Nvidia has seen an extraordinary surge in valuations among AI-related companies in recent months. The escalating concerns about a bubble have arisen as businesses invest heavily in chips and data centers to secure their position in the AI market.

Nvidia continues to experience strong demand, with highly anticipated earnings surpassing expectations on Wednesday. Yet, worries persist that companies utilizing these chips and investing in AI are making substantial expenditures to stimulate demand.

“The sale of semiconductors to support AI doesn’t mitigate fears that some hyperscalers might be overspending on AI infrastructure,” remarked Robert Pavlik, senior portfolio manager at Dakota Wealth. “While certain companies are turning a profit, many are still investing heavily.”

Mixed employment data released Thursday morning highlighted robust labor market growth in September, albeit with a slight uptick in the unemployment rate, reinforcing the expectation that Federal Reserve policymakers may choose to maintain interest rates at their upcoming December meeting.

Nvidia’s stock saw a decline of 3.2%, while the VIX index, which gauges market volatility, increased by 8%.

Report contributed by Reuters

Source: www.theguardian.com

Nvidia CEO Addresses Wall Street’s AI Bubble Concerns During Market Downturn: ‘We Excel at Every Step of AI’

Global stock markets experienced an upward trend following Nvidia’s impressive third-quarter profits, which surpassed Wall Street forecasts, easing concerns that the AI company’s skyrocketing valuations might have reached their limit.

On Wednesday, all attention turned to Nvidia, the frontrunner in the AI industry and the highest valued publicly traded company globally. Analysts and investors were eager for the chip maker’s third-quarter results, hoping they would dispel worries about an impending bubble in the sector.

Nvidia’s founder and CEO, Jensen Huang, addressed these apprehensions right at the start of the earnings call, emphasizing that a significant transformation is underway in AI, and Nvidia stands at the core of this change.

“Many discuss the AI bubble,” Huang noted. “From our viewpoint, the situation looks quite different. To clarify, Nvidia differs from other accelerators. We shine at every phase of AI, from pre-training through to inference.”

The company consistently exceeded Wall Street’s expectations across multiple metrics, indicating that the substantial AI economic boom is not decelerating. Nvidia announced diluted earnings per share of $1.30 on total revenues of $57.01 billion, which topped investor expectations of $1.26 per share on revenues of $54.9 billion. Sales surged by 62% year over year, with data center revenues reaching $51.2 billion—surpassing the anticipated $49 billion. The company also forecasts fourth-quarter sales to be around $65 billion, exceeding analyst expectations of $61 billion.

During a conference call with investors, Huang outlined three pivotal shifts in platforms: the move from general-purpose computing to accelerated computing, the transition toward generative AI, and the development of agential and physical AI, such as robotics and autonomous vehicles.

“When contemplating infrastructure investments, consider three fundamental dynamics,” Huang stated. “Each one adds to the wealth of infrastructure. Nvidia… facilitates all three transitions, and we do so across all types and modalities of AI.”

He further noted that demand for Nvidia’s chips continues to expand.

“AI permeates everywhere and operates on multiple fronts simultaneously.”

Skip past newsletter promotions

According to Thomas Monteiro, Senior Analyst at Investing.com, “This clarifies many uncertainties surrounding the AI revolution; the essence is clear: The AI revolution is far from nearing its peak. Despite investor concerns that rising capital expenditures may compel firms to decelerate their adoption cycles for AI, Nvidia continues to demonstrate that data center growth is not merely an alternative but an essential requirement for every tech company globally.”

Analysts and experts expressed confidence that Nvidia would exceed Wall Street’s forecasts but were keenly awaiting further insights regarding industry demand for the company’s AI chips.

“There’s no denying Nvidia maintains its position as the dominant player in AI-centric chips,” noted David Meyer, a senior analyst at the investment platform Motley Fool. “We anticipate that revenue, margins, and cash flow will align closely with analysts’ predictions. However, invaluable insights are more likely to stem from management’s commentary on their market outlook, whether concerning the AI sector or new markets they are exploring.”

In November, Nvidia’s shares experienced a 7.9% decline amid significant investors offloading their holdings. Peter Thiel’s hedge fund teal macro divested its entire stake in the chipmaker in the last quarter, with estimates of around $100 million in assets, according to Reuters. SoftBank also offloaded $5.8 billion worth of its shares, heightening concerns regarding an AI bubble.

Following the news, Nvidia’s shares, having recently achieved the milestone of being the world’s first $5 trillion company, increased by over 5% in after-hours trading, with S&P 500 and Nasdaq futures also climbing. Asian markets rose on Thursday as well.

However, Stephen Innes of SPI Asset Management cautioned: “NVIDIA’s latest forecast has thus far alleviated some of the most intense apprehensions regarding an AI bubble looming over global markets… Nevertheless, this situation still leaves markets precariously balanced between exuberance over AI and the sobering reality marked by debt.”

“We do not believe Nvidia’s growth can be sustained in the long run,” asserted Alvin Nguyen, senior analyst at Forrester. “Although the demand for AI is unmatched, we anticipate Nvidia’s stock growth may slow if market corrections occur, balancing supply with demand, innovation progresses at a slower pace, or companies become acclimated to the current rate.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Buckingham Palace Christmas Market: Tourists Arrive Only to Face a Locked Gate and a Large Puddle

Name: Buckingham Palace Christmas Market.

Year: Debuting this year.

Exterior: Absolutely charming.

Really? A Christmas market at Buckingham Palace? Indeed! Picture a spacious avenue adorned with wooden stalls, creating a “stunning winter wonderland” filled with twinkling lights and festive trees, right at the palace’s forecourt.

Sounds almost too good to be real. Is that true? Just take a look at the images!

I. Where are those lights suspended from? They seem to float magically. That’s part of the allure.

And there’s snow on the ground. When was this picture taken? Don’t worry. You can check it out for yourself. There are many trains heading to London, and they are all free.

Wait – is this a prank? Yes, it has some elements typical of a hoax.

Like? AI-generated fake photos of the Buckingham Palace Christmas market are circulating on TikTok, Facebook, and Instagram.

What’s the purpose? That remains unclear. Numerous accounts have shared various AI fabrications without any obvious intent.

Besides disappointing royalist Christmas enthusiasts? It certainly seems that way. Many visitors have reported encountering only locked gates, safety barriers, and remnants of water puddles.

So, is there any truth to this? Just around the corner from the palace gates, the Royal Mews gift shop is offering a festive pop-up, featuring royal-themed Christmas gifts and a single kiosk serving hot drinks at the back.

It’s not quite the same. The Royal Collection Trust feels the need to clarify: “There will be no Christmas market at Buckingham Palace,” it states.

Are these types of AI hoaxes becoming more frequent? It’s unfortunate. In July, it was reported that an elderly couple was misled to the Malaysian state of Perak by a video showcasing a non-existent cable car.

That’s hard to believe. Additionally, travel agency Amsterdam Experience is noting a rise in inquiries for trips to Amsterdam to see imaginary places in the Netherlands.

What about their iconic windmills? Windmills beside picturesque canals and tulip fields exist only in AI-generated visuals.

When will people learn? It appears not anytime soon. Tourists who rely on AI for travel planning could find themselves stranded on a secluded mountaintop in Japan or searching for an Eiffel Tower in Beijing.

I’m not usually one for quick judgments.Using AI for travel planning is quite misguided. Perhaps, yet currently, around 30% of international travelers are doing just that.

Remember to say: “Never travel without ensuring that the destination actually exists.”

And please don’t say things like: “I’m looking for the main entrance to Jurassic Park. Is it located behind the carpet warehouse?”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Cryptocurrency Market Plummets Over $1 Trillion in 6 Weeks Amid Tech Bubble Concerns

Over $1 trillion (£760 billion) has been erased from the crypto market’s valuation in the last six weeks as concerns about a tech bubble grow and hopes for a US interest rate reduction next month diminish.

According to data company CoinGecko, the value of the cryptocurrency market, which tracks over 18,500 coins, has dropped by a quarter since peaking in early October.

Bitcoin has experienced a 27% decline during this time, reaching $91,212, marking its lowest point since April.

Rising worries about an artificial intelligence bubble in the stock market are causing unease among global investors, with even the CEO of Google’s parent company cautioning that “no company will be immune” if the bubble bursts.

.

The FTSE 100 index in Britain fell by 1.3% on Tuesday, marking its fourth consecutive decline and its most severe day since April. The Stoxx Europe 600, which monitors the continent’s largest companies, declined by 1.8%. Wall Street also faced losses, with the Dow Jones, Nasdaq, and S&P 500 all down approximately 1% on Tuesday.

This was followed by a significant drop in Asia, with Japan’s Nikkei Stock Average falling by 3.2% and Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index decreasing by 1.7%.

Sundar Pichai, the CEO of Google’s parent firm Alphabet, remarked in an interview with the BBC that there is a sense of “irrationality” surrounding the current AI boom. He cautioned that if the AI bubble were to burst, “no company, including us, will be exempt.”

Meanwhile, JPMorgan Chase Vice Chairman Daniel Pinto stated that the skyrocketing valuations of AI necessitate a reassessment. “There will likely be a correction,” he mentioned at the Bloomberg Africa Business Summit in Johannesburg on Tuesday. “This adjustment will also impact the rest of the sector, the S&P, and the industry.”

Klarna CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski expressed concerns this week about the vast sums of money being invested in computing infrastructure.

He told the Financial Times: “[OpenAI] has the potential to be highly successful as a company, but I’m apprehensive about the extent of these data center investments, which is my primary concern.”

The Klarna co-founder highlighted the increasing valuations of AI companies, including Nvidia, as a troubling issue. Nvidia became the first firm to achieve a market valuation of $4 trillion this year, followed by Apple and Microsoft.

Skip past newsletter promotions

“That concerns me, considering the amount of wealth currently being blindly allocated to this trend without deeper thought,” Siemiatkowski remarked.

“You might say, ‘I don’t believe NVIDIA is worth this much, but it doesn’t matter. Some wealthy individuals will lose money.’ However, the reality is that due to index funds and their mechanisms, one might assume their pension is a sound investment.”

AI bubbles are viewed as one of the most significant risks to the stock market, with research from Bank of America indicating that 45% of fund managers surveyed consider AI bubbles to be the paramount risk. tail risk.

Gold, typically regarded as a safe-haven asset, has also seen a decline. Spot prices dropped by 0.3% on Tuesday morning to $4,033.29 an ounce, following a one-week low.

This drop occurs as expectations around a US Federal Reserve (Fed) interest rate reduction next month wane. Higher interest rates make gold less appealing due to its non-increasing yield.

Nonetheless, Giovanni Staunovo, an analyst at Swiss investment bank UBS, mentioned that while gold prices may fall further, he anticipates a rebound soon.

“With the Fed projected to lower interest rates multiple times in the coming quarters and the strong trend of central banks diversifying into gold, we predict that gold prices will stabilize soon,” he stated.

Source: www.theguardian.com

British Firms Poised to Seize a Major Share of the AI Chip Market

TThe UK holds a unique and advantageous position to contribute significantly in the new era of artificial intelligence, provided it seizes the chance to establish the production of millions of computer chips, an area that is often misunderstood.

AI technology demands a vast quantity of chips, and a collaborative national initiative could fulfill up to 5% of the global requirement.

Our legacy in chip design is unparalleled, beginning with the first general-purpose electronic computer, the initial electronic memory, and the first parallel computing system. Presently, Arm, based in Cambridge, is a prominent player that designs over 90% of the chips found in smartphones and tablets worldwide.

Given this background, it is certainly plausible that British companies can capture a notable share of the AI chip market. A target of 5% is both conservative and achievable. Our distinguished universities, a flourishing foundational AI company like DeepMind, and a strong innovation ecosystem equip the UK with the tangible resources necessary to compete.

The potential gains are tremendous. The global market for AI chips is expected to soar to $700 billion (£620 billion) annually by 2033, surpassing the entire current semiconductor market. Achieving that 5% share would translate to an influx of $35 billion in new revenue and the creation of thousands of high-paying jobs.

AI is set to transform not only the economy but also societal structures and security. Unfortunately, many do not grasp where its true value and strategic influence lie.

In this contemporary gold rush, real wealth is accessible not only to those mining digital gold but also to those who provide the tools for the task. I witnessed this firsthand from 1997 to 2006 when Gordon Moore and Andy Grove helped establish Intel’s board and founded the company in California. They set the groundwork for the first technology revolution, much like Nvidia is doing today on an even larger scale.

UK engineers, intellects, businesses, and investors excel in this domain. However, government collaboration is crucial.

While consumers are captivated by the generative marvels of OpenAI, the true market winner is Nvidia, the entity that provides the advanced chips facilitating such achievements. OpenAI’s estimated value stands at merely 1/10th that of Nvidia. AMD, a semiconductor design company, holds a distant second place, while emerging firms like Cerebras and TenTrent strive for a share of the market.

All AI models and applications, ranging from autonomous robots to real-time translation services, depend heavily on advancements in chip technology. Chips are the new oil of the digital economy, dictating the speed and efficiency with which future applications can be developed. Currently, the only major players in the AI field seeing true profitability are chip manufacturers.

Concerns have arisen that China may commoditize AI chips similar to its approach with solar technology, leading to dramatic price fluctuations and undercutting existing companies. The situation is more complex. U.S. export controls will restrict China’s access to advanced chip manufacturing technology for the next decade, significantly curtailing its capacity to dominate the high-end AI chip arena. This reality positions the U.S. as a key player and creates a substantial opportunity for its closest ally, the UK, which excels in chip design.

The UK has already birthed several companies in this sector, such as Fractile, Flux, and Oriole. However, we lack the necessary scale to capitalize on the opportunity. Instead of competing with Nvidia in data center computing, we should focus on specialized applications that usher in innovation, like robotics, factory automation, medical devices, and autonomous vehicles.

These domains offer ample opportunities for inventive architectures and new competition.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Too frequently, Britain’s industrial strategy is impeded by national insecurity and a lack of confidence. This must change. Primarily, governments must advocate decisively for our intent to excel in AI chips.

Secondly, we should aim to double our chip design workforce from the current 12,000 within a decade and encourage more talented individuals to pursue electrical engineering and computer science through generous scholarships. A target of 1,500 new students each year is achievable. Universities must offer relevant courses, and governments need to enhance financial support.

Thirdly, the UK should fully utilize its investment instruments: the Sovereign AI Fund, the British Business Bank, the National Wealth Fund, and the Ministry of Defence’s initiatives to ‘buy British’.

Fourthly, the UK-US strategic partnership must serve as a foundation for greater collaboration with leading US chip manufacturers and facilitate access to their state-of-the-art sub-3 nanometer manufacturing technologies. Collaborating with our U.S. partners to develop a robust supply chain and innovation pipeline is essential.

If the UK commits fully, the emerging age of AI could be characterized not only by code but also by silicon, leaving a distinctly British legacy.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Monte Sierpe: Mysterious Thousands of ‘Holes’ in Peru Could Have Served as an Ancient Barter Market

Monte Sierpe, meaning “Mountain of the Serpent” and informally referred to as the “Zone of Holes,” is situated in the Pisco Valley of southern Peru. It comprises around 5,200 meticulously aligned holes. Recent studies indicate that the site may have originally functioned as a barter market, bringing together a variety of people for trade.



Aerial view of Monte Sierpe looking northeast. Image credit: Jacob Bongers, University of Sydney.

Stretching over 1.5 km in the Pisco Valley of the southern Peruvian Andes, Monte Sierpe features approximately 5,200 carefully aligned holes (ranging from 1–2 m in width and 0.5–1 m in depth) arranged in distinct sections.

This extraordinary structure likely dates back to at least the Late Middle Period (1000-1400 AD) and was actively used by the Incas (1400-1532 AD).

Initially brought to modern attention in 1933 following an aerial photo published in National Geographic, the specific purpose of the monument remains a mystery.

Speculations about its function include various roles such as defense, storage, accounting, water collection, fog capture, and horticulture, but the actual intent continues to elude researchers.

“What led ancient people to excavate over 5,000 holes in the hills of southern Peru? Were they used for gardens? Did they provide water? Did they serve agricultural purposes?” inquires Dr. Jacob Bongers, a digital archaeologist from the University of Sydney.

“While we cannot ascertain their purpose, our new data offers significant clues and supports emerging theories regarding the site’s utilization.”

Utilizing drone technology, Dr. Bongers and his team mapped the site, uncovering numerical patterns in its layout that indicate intentional organization.

Interestingly, the archaeologists also found that the configuration of Monte Sierpe resembles that of at least one Inca quipu (an ancient knotted string for accounting) discovered in the same valley.

“This discovery significantly enhances our understanding of the origins and variety of indigenous accounting practices both within and outside the Andes,” noted Dr. Bongers.

Soil samples taken from the holes revealed ancient maize pollen, one of the Andes’ key staple crops, along with reeds traditionally utilized for basket making for millennia.

These surprising findings indicate that ancient people likely planted crops in the holes, using woven baskets and bundles for transport.

“This is quite intriguing. Perhaps this area functioned as a pre-Inca market, akin to a flea market,” remarked Dr. Bongers.

“We estimate that the pre-Hispanic population in this region was around 100,000. It likely served as a meeting point for traveling merchants, including llama caravan traders, as well as local professionals like farmers and fishermen to trade goods like corn and cotton.”

“Fundamentally, I believe these holes served as a form of social technology that unified individuals and later evolved into a comprehensive accounting system under the Inca Empire.”

“Numerous questions remain: Why is this monument unique to this location and not found throughout the Andes?”

“Was Monte Sierpe a type of ‘landscape’? – Nevertheless, we are gradually moving closer to unraveling the mysteries of this fascinating site. It’s genuinely exciting.”

Refer to the study published in the Journal on November 10, 2025 ancient.

_____

Jacob L. Bongers et al. Indigenous accounting and interaction at Monte Sierpe (“Band of Holes”), Pisco Valley, Peru. ancient published online on November 10, 2025. doi: 10.15184/aqy.2025.10237

Source: www.sci.news

OpenAI Expected to Navigate a $1 Trillion Market Shift

OpenAI is said to be gearing up for a stock market debut, potentially becoming the largest initial public offering (IPO) ever, with a valuation of $1 trillion (£760 billion) expected as soon as next year.

The creator of the popular AI chatbot ChatGPT is contemplating an IPO filing in the latter half of 2026, as reported by Reuters, based on information from sources close to the matter. The company aims to raise at least $60 billion.

The fluctuations in stock market shares offer OpenAI an additional avenue for funding, supporting CEO Sam Altman’s vision of investing trillions in the construction of data centers and other necessary infrastructure to accelerate chatbot development.

During a livestream on Tuesday, Altman reportedly stated: “Given our future funding needs, this is the most likely path for us.”

An OpenAI representative noted, “We cannot set a date as the IPO is not our priority. Our focus is on building a sustainable business and advancing our mission for the benefit of all through AGI.”

AGI, or artificial general intelligence, is defined by OpenAI as “a highly autonomous system that surpasses humans in performing the most economically valuable tasks.”

Skip past newsletter promotions

Founded in 2015 as a nonprofit, OpenAI aims to securely develop AGI for the benefit of humanity. Recently, the company underwent a major restructuring, transitioning its core operations to a for-profit model. Although still overseen by a nonprofit, this change facilitates capital raising and prepares the ground for an IPO.

As it stands, Microsoft holds approximately a 27% stake in the commercial entity, valuing OpenAI at $500 billion under the terms of their deal. Following the restructuring announcement, Microsoft’s valuation reached over $4 trillion for the first time.

Technology news outlet Information reported that OpenAI recorded revenues of $4.3 billion alongside an operating loss of $7.8 billion in the first half of this year.

Such enormous valuations do not ease concerns that the AI sector may be in a bubble. Bank of England officials have recently warned that tech stocks driven by the AI surge face heightened risk, noting market vulnerability if expectations about AI impact wane.

OpenAI’s Chief Financial Officer Sarah Friar has reportedly informed colleagues that the company is targeting a public offering in 2027, although some advisers speculate it could occur in the year prior, as reported by Reuters.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Nvidia Shatters Records as First $5 Trillion Company Amid Stock Market and AI Surge

Nvidia has officially become the first company in the world to achieve a $5 trillion valuation, just three months after it made history by surpassing the $4 trillion market cap milestone.

In comparison, Nvidia’s valuation exceeds the GDPs of India, Japan, and the United Kingdom, as reported by the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

As the U.S. stock market opened on Wednesday, Nvidia’s stock surged to $207.86, boasting 24.3 billion outstanding shares and a market cap of $5.05 trillion. The company’s significant demand for chips, which are essential for advanced artificial intelligence products and software, has played a crucial role in its rapid stock price increase since early 2023.

This week, the overall U.S. stock market has reached several record highs, driven by increased investment in artificial intelligence.

On Tuesday, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang announced a massive $500 billion chip order. The company also disclosed a partnership with Uber focused on robotaxis and a $1 billion collaboration with Nokia to advance 6G technology. Furthermore, Nvidia is teaming up with the U.S. Department of Energy to develop seven new AI supercomputers.

Last month, Nvidia revealed plans to invest $100 billion in OpenAI, part of a partnership that will enhance the computing resources for users of the ChatGPT AI chatbot with at least 10 gigawatts of Nvidia AI data centers.

In August, Huang mentioned that Nvidia was discussing with the Trump administration the development of new computer chips tailored for China. Donald Trump stated on Air Force One that he would engage in discussions with Chinese President Xi Jinping regarding Nvidia chips on Thursday.

Reaching this new milestone highlights the impact of the artificial intelligence boom, deemed one of the most significant technological shifts since Apple co-founder Steve Jobs unveiled the first iPhone 18 years ago. Apple capitalized on the iPhone’s success and became the first publicly traded company to hit a $1 trillion valuation, then $2 trillion, and later $3 trillion.

Skip past newsletter promotions

However, there are growing worries over a potential AI bubble, with Bank of England officials cautioning earlier this month about the increasing risk that tech stocks, buoyed by the AI surge, could face a downturn. The head of the IMF has echoed similar concerns.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Apple Achieves $4 Trillion Market Capitalization with Surge in New iPhone Sales

Apple reached a market capitalization of $4 trillion for the first time on Tuesday, becoming the third tech giant to achieve this milestone. Strong demand for its latest iPhones has mitigated fears regarding the company’s slow progress in the AI sector. On the same day, the U.S. stock market soared to an all-time high, with Microsoft also achieving a $4 trillion market cap for the second time.

Since the announcement of its new product on September 9, Apple’s stock price has increased approximately 13%, marking a significant rebound that has pushed the stock into positive territory for the first time this year.

“The iPhone constitutes over half of Apple’s profits and revenue, and the more devices we can distribute, the more users we can integrate into our ecosystem,” noted Chris Zaccarelli, Chief Investment Officer at Northlight Asset Management, prior to the milestone.


Earlier this year, Apple’s shares faced challenges from intense competition in China and uncertainty surrounding the impact of high U.S. tariffs on Asian markets, where the company relies heavily on manufacturing.

The newly launched iPhone 17 has attracted customers from Beijing to Moscow within weeks of its release, with Apple absorbing high tariffs rather than transferring costs to consumers. Analysts believe the sleek design of the iPhone Air could help it compete against rivals like Samsung Electronics Co., with early sales of the iPhone 17 exceeding its predecessor in both the U.S. and China by 14%, according to research firm Counterpoint. Some analysts suggest that the demand forecast for the iPhone Air may not be met, while other companies have disputed these claims.

Following Nvidia and Microsoft, Apple becomes the third company to breach the $4 trillion mark, with Nvidia currently leading the group at over $4.5 trillion.

Microsoft achieved its initial stock market milestone in July. Following a minor dip in stock prices, the company re-entered the exclusive club as shares climbed after the ChatGPT creator announced a partnership with OpenAI on Tuesday, allowing it to transition into a public benefit corporation. OpenAI boasts a valuation of $500 billion, making Microsoft’s 27% stake in the company worth over $100 billion.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Unlike Microsoft’s aggressive AI strategy, Apple’s cautious stance has raised concerns about its position in what could become the industry’s most significant growth opportunity in years. Recent reports have also highlighted the departure of several senior AI executives to Meta.

Rollout delays for Apple’s Intelligence suite, which includes ChatGPT integration, and a postponed AI upgrade for its voice assistant Siri until next year have disappointed some consumers, as these products currently lack features found in competing AI software.

Apple recently reported its best quarterly results in years for the April-June period, achieving double-digit growth in key segments and exceeding analysts’ expectations. The company is set to announce its fourth-quarter results on October 30th.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Is the AI Bubble on the Verge of Bursting, Potentially Triggering a Stock Market Crash? | Philip Inman

An increasing anxiety surrounds the possibility of a stock market collapse. The rise from minor dips to significant drops casts shadows as the initial excitement surrounding artificial intelligence begins to wane.

In recent weeks, U.S. tech stocks have faced a downward trend, suggesting that a stream of disappointing figures could become commonplace before the end of the month.

We may be looking at a scenario reminiscent of 2000, where the burst of the dot-com bubble could lead to a grim situation.

Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell is among those policymakers responsible for guarding against impending crises. At the annual Jackson Hole meeting with central bank governors in Wyoming, he sought to reassure worried minds.

He expressed that the Fed is concerned about increasing inflation and is prepared to assist the economy in overcoming the uncertainties brought on by Donald Trump’s actions and the global economic slowdown.

With STAGFLATION looming, there’s a genuine threat as the U.S. economy decelerates and inflation rises. Powell has indicated to stock markets that interest rates may decrease, relieving pressure on companies dependent on debt.

The stock market draws Powell’s attention even more than usual, given the extent of U.S. personal pensions invested in publicly traded companies. Specifically, tech stocks are heavily investing in AI, despite not yet achieving a single dollar in profit.

A recent study from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology uncovered that 95% of companies investing in generative AI have not yet realized financial returns.

This news follows remarks from Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, who cautioned that some company valuations appeared “unusual.”

“We are happy to announce Ipek Ozkardeskaya, a senior analyst at the currency trading firm Swissquote,” remarked Ipek Ozkardeskaya. Altman’s comments served as a wake-up call for investors, likely triggering a sharp decline in various high-flying stocks.

Earlier this week, stock values for data mining and surveillance companies with substantial government contracts dropped almost 10%. AI chip manufacturer Nvidia declined by more than 3%, while other AI-related stocks such as ARM, Oracle, and AMD also suffered losses.

Most pension funds are heavily invested in these tech firms, along with established names like Amazon, Microsoft, Alphabet (Google), and Meta (Facebook).

Should fund managers consider withdrawing? That’s likely not a prudent choice.

The magnitude of investments in AI by companies like Google and Meta is vast, and while the technology’s potential is subject to much speculation, white-collar workers are already seeing expected benefits in their daily tasks.

Daily reports and suggestions for utilizing AI in presentation preparation are commonplace (though they come with the unspoken caveat that job openings remain unaddressed).

Skip past newsletter promotions

Microsoft Co-Pilot and numerous other “assistance” AI tools are available.

If this trend has already gained momentum across various economic sectors, a soft landing may await the tech industry, despite the elimination of some unstable, speculative enterprises.

In fact, a recession could facilitate large corporations in seizing opportunities from struggling competitors and leveraging new, affordable technological innovations.

The ratio of Palantir’s price to acquisition is over 500. Many investors are anxious even at a 50 ratio. Nvidia’s price to return ratio stands at 56.

As stock prices align with realistic revenue prospects, the Palantir/Nvidia ratio might decline; however, even in the harshest stock market turbulence, companies are unlikely to go bankrupt.

Trump remains a significant proponent, paving the way for AI to delve deeper into corporate operations. His advocacy for cryptocurrencies, along with his support for deregulated social media platforms, reflects his ideological leanings.

AI may pose potential dangers to humanity, given that politicians and regulators lag behind the notable figures and tech giants championing AI.

However, for investors, AI is not an entity that will simply vanish, crash, or evade downfall.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Crypto Mogul Do Kwon Admits Guilt in Fraud Linked to $400 Billion Market Collapse

Do Kwon, the South Korean entrepreneur behind two cryptocurrencies that were responsible for an estimated $400 billion loss in 2022 and caused significant market turbulence, pleaded guilty to two counts of fraud and wire fraud in a US court on Tuesday.

At 33 years old, Kwon co-founded Terraform Labs in Singapore and was the creator of the Terrausd and Luna currencies. He appeared in a federal court hearing in New York, having initially pleaded not guilty in January to nine charges, which include securities fraud, wire fraud, merchandise fraud, and conspiracy to commit money laundering.

Kwon was accused of deceiving investors about Terrausd in 2021—a Stablecoin intended to maintain a value equivalent to one US dollar—leading him to plead guilty to two counts under a plea agreement with Manhattan prosecutors.

He could face a maximum of 25 years in prison when Judge Engelmeyer sentences him on December 11. However, prosecutor Kimberly Ravener noted that Kwon has agreed to a prison term of no more than 12 years if he takes responsibility for his actions. He has been in custody since his extradition from Montenegro late last year.

Kwon is among several cryptocurrency executives facing federal charges after the 2022 downturn in digital token prices led to the collapse of numerous businesses. Sam Bankman-Fried, the founder of FTX—the largest crypto exchange in the US—was sentenced to 25 years in prison in 2024.


Prosecutors allege that when Terrausd dipped below $1 in May 2021, Kwon misled investors, claiming that the “Terra Protocol,” a computer algorithm, had restored the coin’s value. Instead, he allegedly arranged for the covert purchase of millions of dollars in tokens to artificially inflate the price through high-frequency trading companies.

These false representations reportedly misled retail and institutional investors, enticing them to invest in Terraform products and escalate the value of Luna.

During the court proceedings, Kwon expressed remorse for his actions.

“I made misleading statements about why it regained its value without disclosing the involvement of the trading company in restoring that PEG,” Kwon stated. “What I did was wrong.”

Skip past newsletter promotions

Kwon has also agreed to pay $80 million in civil penalties in 2024 and is prohibited from engaging in crypto trading as part of a $4.555 billion settlement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Additionally, he faces charges in South Korea. As part of his plea agreement, prosecutors indicated they would not oppose his potential transfer to serve his sentence overseas after completing his time in the US, Ravener stated.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Why Have Thousands of Adult Titles Vanished from the Largest PC Gaming Market? | Games

In the last two weeks, countless “adults only” and “not safe for work” games have been removed from Steam and itch.io—two leading platforms for PC game distribution—as they scramble to adhere to stricter regulations set by payment processors like MasterCard, Visa, and PayPal.

These regulations came about following a campaign known as A Collective Cry, which pressured payment processors to cease facilitating transactions for platforms hosting content that features “games related to rape, incest, and child sexual abuse.” However, the scope of these new rules extends far beyond those issues, affecting even award-winning titles.


How did this begin?

On July 16th, Valve, the developer behind Steam, revised its Rules and Guidelines for game distribution. Existing prohibitions against “nude or sexually explicit images of real people” and “adult content that is not labeled or age-gated” were expanded to include “content that may violate the rules and standards laid out by certain types of adult content.”

In a statement to PC gamers on July 18th, Valve acknowledged that several games have been “retired” from the Steam store due to these new regulations. However, they did not specify which games were removed or define what types of “adult content” are deemed unacceptable.

A week later, itch.io issued a statement indicating it was also being “scrutinized” by payment processors. Consequently, all games tagged as “NSFW” were “deleted” (removed from search results) following a “comprehensive audit of content to comply with payment processor requirements.” Unlike Valve, itch.io explicitly mentioned the collective cry as the impetus behind the increased scrutiny.


What is A Collective Cry?

Collective Shout is an Australian group describing itself as “a grassroots campaign against the objectification of women and the sexualization of girls.”

In April, they achieved a major victory by having the game No Mercy—featuring themes of “incest,” “coerced sexual acts,” and “inevitably non-consensual gender”—removed from both Steam and itch.io. Following this, the group released an open letter stating, “We have identified hundreds of additional games on Steam and itch.io that involve themes of rape, incest, and child sexual abuse,” demanding companies to “demonstrate corporate social responsibility” by ceasing payment processing for those platforms.

After Steam updated its rules, A Collective Cry requested credits for the changes, stating that over 1,000 supporters contacted their payment processors to “stop financing these games.”


What is the role of payment processors?

Like many online retailers, both Steam and itch.io depend on payment processors to facilitate transactions. As such, these processors wield significant influence, impacting what products can be sold, published, or purchased, regardless of their legality.

In recent years, payment processors have tightened rules regarding transactions linked to adult content. In 2021, several subscription-based adult content platforms considered banning such materials following pressure from payment processors but ultimately reversed that decision. Later that same year, MasterCard initiated a new policy governing adult content retailers. The American Civil Liberties Union has pointed out that these measures can restrict free speech and be detrimental to sex workers, contributing to financial censorship.




The award-winning game Consume Me has been affected by these policies. Photo: 66

Which games have been impacted?

It’s unclear how many games have been “retired” from Steam as a result of these new regulations, but several titles featuring incest themes have been deleted. As previously mentioned, itch.io has also removed most games labeled as NSFW. According to the Games Industry Newsletter Game Files, since July 16th, over 20,000 games have been removed from itch.io’s NSFW category.

Among those affected are games that explore unique themes of identity and sexuality, such as Radiator 2, created by Robert Yang, a former faculty member at New York University’s arcade center. The rules have also impacted games that do not feature sexual content at all, including The Last Call, an award-winning narrative about domestic violence survival created by Nina Freeman, and Consume Me, which has received numerous industry accolades for its approach to intricate topics.


How has the gaming industry reacted?

Many developers have criticized the power that payment processors hold over the market, particularly how their influence is amplified through campaign groups like A Collective Cry. In a post on Bluesky, Yang labeled the collective cry and payment processors’ actions as “a cultural war against sexual expression, particularly affecting LGBTQ individuals,” but noted that it is entirely unacceptable for payment processors to engage in selective censorship that systematically marginalizes adult content creators.

On July 17, a petition was launched on change.org, urging payment processors and activist groups to “refrain from controlling what we can watch, read, or play.” The petition argues that “MasterCard and Visa hinder legal entertainment” and calls for “the right to select our own narratives without moral surveillance.” Over 150,000 signatures have been gathered so far, as gamers and developers share contact information for major payment companies to encourage complaints.


What comes next?

It’s difficult to predict the future. Ongoing consumer pressure could prompt payment processors to reconsider their stance, but it may also challenge anti-censorship advocates to gain political backing amidst shifting legislative attitudes toward online adult content. The UK recently implemented stricter regulations regarding age verification for internet users seeking access to adult material, while the EU has proposed draft guidelines for similar measures.

Thus, new rules may be here to stay on Steam and itch.io for now. However, the resulting fallout has illuminated the influence of payment processors and the ambiguity surrounding the regulations. Such uncertainty may compel companies to tread more carefully in responding to pressure from future advocacy groups.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Navigating the Workforce Crisis: Key Insights for Alumni Battling AI in the Job Market


  • 1. The current crisis has as much to do with economics as it does with AI

    According to Kirsten Barnes, head of Bright Network’s digital platform, the graduate labor market is facing challenges that are not uncommon.

    “Typically, fluctuations in the graduate job market hover around 10-15% this year, stemming from various factors such as the overall economic landscape and typical business demand changes, rather than being solely driven by AI.”

    Fewer graduates report that among companies employing alumni, “no one attributes this to AI,” said Claire Tyler, director of insights at the Institute for Student Employers (ISE), which advocates for leading graduates.

    Some recruiting professionals noted that the recent rise in employer national insurance contributions is hindering entry-level hiring.

    Ed Steer, CEO of Sphere Digital Recruitment, highlighted a drop in graduate vacancies from 400 annually in 2021 to a projected 75 this year, indicating that companies prefer candidates with more experience to “hit the ground running.”


  • 2. Nonetheless, AI is indeed a significant factor

    Auria Heanley, co-founder of Oriel Partners, reported a 30% decrease in entry-level personal assistant roles this year, stating, “It’s undeniable that AI, coupled with broader economic uncertainty, is making it increasingly challenging for graduates to secure these positions.”

    Felix Mitchell, co-CEO of Instant Impact, noted that fields related to STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) are particularly affected. “Evidence suggests while AI will create jobs, job losses will occur faster than new roles are generated.”


  • 3. The revolution is set to escalate

    Major tech companies like Microsoft are highlighting the profound impacts of AI agents—technology capable of performing complex cognitive tasks autonomously. Developer AI leader Dario Amodei has cautioned that this advancement could eliminate half of all entry-level office roles within the next five years.

    James Reid, CEO of Employment Agency Reid, remarked that AI is on the verge of reshaping the job market dramatically.

    “This seems to be a pivotal year where AI is truly transforming and becoming ingrained in workflows.”

    Sophie O’Brien, CEO of Pollen Careers, catering to early-career and entry-level roles, mentioned that AI has “accelerated” the decline in graduate recruitment over several years.

    She added: “It’s evident that a substantial number of jobs in the coming years will vanish due to the prevalence of desk jobs focused on information processing.”


  • 4. Acquire AI skills immediately

    According to David Bell from Odgers, an executive search firm, law firms are increasingly prioritizing AI skills in their graduate recruitment processes. “During interviews, they are inquiring about candidates’ knowledge and use of AI,” he noted. “Candidates unfamiliar with tools like ChatGPT will find it hard to secure positions.”

    James Milligan, global head of STEM recruitment for multinational Hayes, concurred: “Without an understanding of AI tools, candidates will disadvantage themselves. Jobs remain, but they evolve. We are in the midst of that evolutionary shift.”

    Chris Morrow, managing director at Digitalent, which specializes in AI-related placements, mentioned he is developing a new category of AI-Adjacent roles rather than merely adopting technology.

    This rising demand for skills has led universities to rethink their curriculum. Louise Ballard, co-founder of atheni.ai, stated that while assisting companies in integrating AI technology, there’s a noticeable gap in “basic AI literacy education” at the university level.

    “Your workforce lacks the necessary training,” she remarked. “Success in AI requires practical skills, which are not strictly academic.”

    Morrow asserted the real concern lies in underutilizing AI, emphasizing that educational institutions and governmental policies need to adapt. “Universities must incorporate AI training across all subjects,” he urged.


  • 5. Graduates are using AI to job-hunt, but caution is advised

    AI is proving helpful for composing resumes and cover letters, leading to an increase in applications as the process becomes more user-friendly.

    Bright Network reports that AI utilization among alumni and undergraduates has grown to 50%, up from 38% last year. Teach, a prominent graduate employer, plans to enhance non-writing review processes to mitigate the effects of AI-generated inputs.

    ISE’s Tyler cautioned that over-reliance on AI in applications may force employers to cut recruitment efforts short and focus on specific demographics. This could disadvantage underrepresented groups, she indicated.

    James Reed noted that what was once a major red flag, such as typos, may now be viewed differently. “In the past, I filtered out CVs with spelling mistakes, assuming candidates were either careless or inattentive to detail,” he remarked.


  • 6. Consider applying to small businesses

    Small and medium-sized enterprises, defined as those with fewer than 250 employees, have also emerged as viable options for graduates.

    Pollen O’Brien noted that small businesses are the largest employers in the UK, accounting for 60% of the workforce. A lack of AI proficiency in these organizations presents unique employment opportunities.

    “Many of these businesses are unaware of AI capabilities and may even fear them, creating chances for new graduates to provide much-needed skills,” she affirmed. “By imparting these skills to small businesses, there’s potential to revolutionize operations.”

    Dan Hayes, co-founder of the Alumni Recruitment Office, remarked on the thousands of lesser-known employers “eager for innovative individuals.”

    “There exists a vast, untapped market seldom covered in discussions,” he concluded.

  • Source: www.theguardian.com

    Nvidia Set to Become the First Company to Achieve a $4 Trillion Market Value | Technology

    Nvidia, the leading chipmaker, made history on Wednesday by becoming the first publicly traded company to achieve a market valuation of $40 billion, as its stock price continues its remarkable ascent.

    The shares of this top chip designer surged approximately 2.4% to reach $164, fueled by an increasing demand for artificial intelligence technology. Nvidia’s chips and related software are recognized globally as the benchmark for developing AI products.

    Nvidia initially reached a market value of $10 billion in June 2023, and since then, its market valuation has more than tripled in under a year, outpacing giants like Apple and Microsoft, and ranking alongside US companies with market valuations over $30 billion. Apple was the first to hit a $3 trillion valuation in 2022.

    Microsoft stands as the second-largest US company with a market value estimated around $3.75 trillion. Nvidia’s valuation represents about 7.3% of the S&P 500, a widely regarded index on Wall Street. Meanwhile, Apple and Microsoft contribute roughly 7% and 6% respectively.

    Nvidia has rebounded nearly 74% from its low in April, a period when the global markets faced turbulence caused by tariffs imposed by Donald Trump. The company has also retaliated against US export controls by restricting the sale of its most advanced chips to China.

    However, positive outlooks regarding trade agreements have propelled the S&P 500 to unprecedented heights recently.

    Daniel Ives, a tech analyst at Wedbush, forecasts that other major tech players will join Nvidia in surpassing the $4 trillion market cap. “The leading figures in the AI Revolution are Nvidia and Microsoft, as both embody the most significant tech trends we’ve witnessed in 25 years,” he stated.

    Microsoft also reached a market value of $40 trillion this summer and aims to reach $5 trillion within the next 18 months.

    Skip past newsletter promotions

    Report contributed by Reuters

    Source: www.theguardian.com

    Trump Assumes Power as Foreign Crypto Firms Enter the U.S. Market

    Last month, Tether’s CEO Paolo Ardoino attended a private lunch with business leaders and lawmakers at the Willard, a luxury hotel situated near the White House.

    Tether has long been accused of financial misrepresentation and enabling illegal activities on its platform. However, at the Willard, Ardoino and other leaders from the crypto sector received a warm reception from Sen. Bill Hagerty, a Republican from Tennessee who serves on the Senate Banking Committee. He participated in the lunch, and discussions on digital currency regulations and national security were led by four knowledgeable attendees.

    This gathering signifies a transforming landscape for crypto firms, especially with President Trump expressing support for the industry. Once operating with minimal visibility in the U.S., Tether is now seizing this shift to expand its influence in Washington.

    Since President Trump took office, Tether has been advocating for regulatory changes in response to its U.S. operations. The company’s primary product, a cryptocurrency known as Stablecoin, aims to maintain a consistent price of $1. Tether aligns with a push in Congress surrounding Senate bills; legislation was introduced this year by Hagerty to define rules for Stablecoins. The firm also initiated a public relations campaign, featuring advertisements in influential Washington publications and highlighting cooperation with U.S. law enforcement agencies.

    For years, Tether was viewed with suspicion. Its stability has been a favored method for criminals. In 2021, the company paid $18.5 million to settle a fraud investigation by the New York Attorney General’s office.

    However, within mere days of taking office, Trump, who had begun exploring crypto alongside his sons the previous year, reversed the Biden administration’s stringent stance on digital assets. Crypto firms that once avoided the U.S. for fear of regulatory actions now enjoy significant access to Congress and the White House.

    No one has undergone a transformation as pronounced as Ardoino, an Italian who had not set foot in the U.S. until this year. During a trip to Washington in March, he met with lawmakers and attended forums hosted by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, mingling with industry peers at a gathering sponsored by Coinbase, a major crypto exchange.

    In a recent interview and social media update, Ardoino described himself as an average foreigner on a delightful journey across America, sharing photos of his visit to the U.S. Capitol and the White House, as well as his experiences at the Central Park Zoo and the Museum of Natural History.

    “I’m very naive,” he remarked in an interview with the New York Times. “I’m sure I’ll finally have my first Italian meal in New York at the age of 40.”

    Ardoino takes pride in Tether’s robust partnerships. The company’s most prominent ally is investment bank Cantor Fitzgerald, which until recently was led by Howard Lutnick, Trump’s former Secretary of Commerce. One of Tether’s principal lobbyists is Jeff Miller, a significant Republican political player. Cantor Fitzgerald is also involved in discussions surrounding the Stablecoin Bill.

    During his recent visit, Ardoino also met Zach Witkoff, the head of Trump’s crypto initiative, World Liberty Financial, and the son of the White House envoy to the Middle East. Tether sought guidance on media strategies from Washitz, the corporate public relations firm founded by former Republican leaders Miller and Kevin McCarthy.

    “I’ve met Kevin several times,” Ardoino shared. “We maintain a solid relationship,” he noted, “because we respect the boundary that he hasn’t been involved with Howard during his term.”

    Lutnick’s representative did not respond to inquiries for comments.

    In a statement, Miller referred to Tether as “the ultimate ally for America,” expressing pride in representing them. A spokesperson for Hagerty mentioned that the senator participated in the March lunch to discuss the relationship between digital assets and national security.

    Even within the chaotic world of crypto, Tether’s origin story is particularly intriguing, featuring a diverse array of characters. The company was founded 11 years ago by ex-child actor Brock Pierce, who, alongside his associates, eventually transferred control to Italian Giancarlo Devasini, a former plastic surgeon.

    Devasini, now a crypto millionaire, lives in Switzerland and is seldom in the limelight. Ardoino, a former software developer who has been connected with Tether for much of the past decade, stated that since 2014, he has served as the public face of the company.

    Tether’s offerings aim to mitigate the significant drawbacks of traditional cryptocurrencies, which are often volatile and less practical for everyday transactions. Stablecoins retain a $1 valuation, making them a preferred choice for many crypto traders.

    In essence, Tether and similar issuers function akin to banks. For instance, if a trader deposits $500, they receive 500 Tether coins. The issuer earns income by investing some of these deposits while maintaining their own returns. The model relies on the issuer having sufficient reserves for each coin in circulation and the ability for customers to redeem holdings at any time.

    Critics of Tether have long argued that their reserves are inadequate to cover redemption requests. When the New York State Attorney General’s Office announced its 2021 settlement, it was stated that Tether had misrepresented the nature of its reserves, dubbing its cryptocurrency both “unstable” and “stable.”

    “Tether’s reputation should matter to everyone,” emphasized California Representative Maxine Waters, a leading Democrat on the House Financial Services Committee in an interview.

    Yet, Tether has continually managed to navigate challenges. Currently, the company has made its public audit accessible, revealing that approximately two-thirds of its reserves, equating to about $94 billion, are invested in U.S. Treasury bills.

    Last year, Tether recorded profits exceeding $13 billion, establishing itself as one of the wealthiest cryptocurrency operations globally. In December, Tether made an investment of $775 million in Rumble, a right-leaning streaming platform closely associated with Trump Media & Technology Group. Additionally, it has unveiled plans for Tether Tower, a headquarters in El Salvador.

    One of Tether’s most influential allies in the U.S. is Lutnick, whose company, Cantor Fitzgerald, manages billions in U.S. Treasury investments for Tether, lending the firm an air of institutional credibility. At last summer’s Bitcoin Conference, Lutnick confirmed that he could verify full backing for Tether coins.

    “We accounted for every penny,” he stated at the event. He exclaimed.

    After Lutnick was appointed as Secretary of Commerce, he delegated control of Cantor Fitzgerald to his sons. Currently, Cantor Fitzgerald and Tether, in collaboration with lobbyist Miller, are working on shaping Stablecoin regulations in Washington. Lobbying disclosures indicate that both are active in discussions on the Senate’s Stablecoin Act, which sets guidelines to ensure that U.S. issuers maintain adequate reserves.

    However, the official guidelines introduced for national innovation under the U.S. Stablecoins Act include provisions allowing foreign issuers to sell coins without adhering to the new regulations, subject to certain law enforcement agency requirements. This clause has drawn criticism from Democratic senators during recent Banking Committee hearings, who denounced it as a “significant loophole” benefiting Tether.

    “My Republican colleagues appear concerned about backlash from one of Donald Trump’s close associates,” remarked Senator Elizabeth Warren, a Democrat from Massachusetts.She stated at the hearing.

    Ultimately, the Banking Committee approved advancing the bill to the full Senate.

    In an interview, Ardoino expressed that he is “very excited” about the Genius Law’s language requiring cooperation with law enforcement, as Tether is already closely collaborating with U.S. authorities. He revealed that Tether is considering launching a U.S. branch and offering “domestic stubcoins” tailored for financial institutions.

    Ardoino plans to return frequently to the U.S. He described Washington as “very clean,” although he had some reservations about the food. He is enthusiastic about the potential to challenge American crypto firms on their home turf.

    “What fun,” Ardoino remarked.

    Source: www.nytimes.com

    Video Exposes Lax Biosecurity in New York Poultry Market During Avian Flu Outbreak

    Concerns are escalating among actors and experts after video evidence obtained by BBC Science Focus revealed that a New York City poultry market is neglecting essential safety measures to protect both staff and the public amid rising bird flu cases in the state.

    The footage showcases employees at various locations in Queens handling birds without the minimal recommended personal protective equipment (PPE).

    This revelation comes shortly after city officials ordered a temporary closure of over 80 poultry markets following the identification of avian flu cases in February.

    Despite efforts by the New York State Department of Agricultural Markets to test birds for the virus before entering the live markets, conditions have raised alarms among advocates, as not adhering to biosecurity protocols could lead to further spread.

    Taken from a video at the entrance to the live poultry market in Queens, New York, on April 13, 2025, this shows workers without masks and insufficient PPE. They are seen wearing only one glove, and possibly touching their faces with uncovered hands. – Crystal Heath

    Doctor Crystal Heath, the veterinarian who filmed the footage, indicated that “These live poultry markets do not adhere to basic biosecurity protocols.” He emphasized the role of official negligence in allowing these sites to compromise public health.

    Edita Birnkrant, executive director of Animal Rights New Yorker, a nonprofit organization, has inspected numerous markets, declaring that conditions within them pose risks to both workers and customers.

    “Anyone walking by could be exposed to pathogens,” she noted in an interview with BBC Science Focus.

    Both Heath and Birnkrant have urged public health officials to take decisive actions to mitigate the risk of avian flu in New York’s poultry markets, warning that locations in densely populated areas pose significant public health threats.

    Heath explained that these markets bring together multiple bird species, creating an optimal setting for the virus to interact with other strains of influenza, potentially leading to new variants that could spread between humans.

    Footage captured by Heath highlights clear violations of biosecurity recommendations. The New York Ministry of Agriculture Markets indicated to BBC Science Focus on April 15 that best practices for live poultry markets should include:

    • Discouraging unnecessary visitors
    • Utilizing biosecurity signs to prevent unauthorized entry
    • Ensuring footwear is covered and disinfected for visitors
    • Screening visitors for recent bird contact
    • Reporting any abnormal, sick, or deceased birds to authorities.
    Captured from a video taken outside another live poultry market in Queens, New York, on April 13, 2025, this shows individuals leaving the market without any protective gear. The facility’s doors are wide open, allowing public access. – Crystal Heath

    In response to inquiries from BBC Science Focus, New York State Health Department Director Dr. James MacDonald stated there is “no immediate threat to public health” and that no confirmed cases of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) have been reported among humans in New York. However, he advised those regularly in contact with livestock and wild birds to exercise caution by wearing PPE.

    Despite these warnings, the Health Department has confirmed that there are currently no plans to mandate PPE use in New York’s live poultry markets.

    While no human cases have been documented in New York thus far, over 70 infections have occurred nationwide, with some leading to fatalities. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) maintains that there is no confirmed human-to-human transmission, asserting that the general public remains at low risk.

    Nonetheless, experts caution that each time a virus successfully infects a person, it presents potential for evolution. Research indicates that single mutations in the H5N1 strain responsible for ongoing outbreaks could facilitate easier human transmission.

    Professor Jarra Jagne, a poultry expert and veterinarian affiliated with the US Department of Agriculture’s Livebird Market Working Group, stated that while PPE usage is highly encouraged, there are currently no legal mandates for its use.

    This was taken from a video captured at the third live poultry market in Queens, New York, on April 13, 2025, showing individuals without masks or other PPE. The entrance to this market was also open to the public. – Crystal Heath

    “We advise that these viruses can infect humans, and we recommend wearing masks and changing clothes when visiting the market,” she stated. “Ultimately, it’s a personal choice.”

    Jagne emphasized the concern of irregular PPE use, but noted that New York’s live bird markets are better regulated than they were in the past. Regulations now dictate bird sourcing, handling, and testing procedures.

    “Conditions used to be dire,” she remarked. “New York has more markets than any other state, and we had to lead the charge. For many years, flu cases in these markets have been minimal.”

    Currently, flocks must be tested 72 hours prior to their market entry, with additional testing conducted upon arrival. However, Jagne pointed out that even rigorous testing cannot eliminate the wide array of risks, particularly as wild birds continue to circulate the virus across the nation.

    The presence of unprotected customers in these markets poses a significant vulnerability. “Perhaps markets should provide masks at the entrance, similar to what we did during Covid,” Jagne suggested.

    The poultry market featured in Heath’s video has not responded to requests for comment from BBC Science Focus.

    About our experts

    Crystal Heath: A veterinarian specializing in shelter medicine and high-quality castration neutrality (HQHVSN), and co-founder of Our Honor, a nonprofit organization focused on animal rights.

    Edita Birnkrant: Executive director of Animal Rights New Yorker, a nonprofit established in 2008 with a mission to advocate for animal rights, including saving NYC carriage horses and promoting the Animal Rights Act.

    James MacDonald MD, MPH: A health committee member of the New York State Department of Health. Before joining the department in July 2022, MacDonald worked with the Rhode Island Department of Health since 2012.

    Jarra Jagne: A Practical Professor in the Public and Ecosystem Health Department at Cornell University’s Veterinary Medicine Department, with research published in journals like International Journal of Infectious Diseases, Avian Diseases, and Avian Pathology.

    Editor’s Notes

    This article is based on footage and information gathered during an independent investigation into live poultry market practices. All content is sourced legally and reviewed to adhere to editorial standards. To protect privacy, identifying details have been removed or obscured. The footage was filmed in a public setting; individuals or businesses depicted are not meant to be misrepresented, and every effort has been made to ensure accuracy and fairness.

    read more:

    Source: www.sciencefocus.com

    US judge rules that Google has illegally dominated the online advertising market

    Google, owned by Alphabet, was found to have illegally controlled two markets related to online advertising technology. The ruling by a US District Judge in Alexandria, Virginia, on Thursday dealt a blow to the tech giant, opening the door for anti-trust prosecutors to potentially split up its advertising products.

    The judge, Leonie Brinkema, held Google responsible for monopolizing the market for advertising exchanges between buyers and sellers, as well as for publisher ad server platforms used to manage advertising inventory on websites. The judge rejected the claim that Google had a monopoly on advertisers’ ad networks.

    Lee-Anne Mulholland, vice-chairman of the regulator, stated that Google plans to appeal the ruling.

    The decision sets the stage for further proceedings to determine how Google can restore competition in the markets it monopolized. This may involve selling off a portion of its business, though no date has been set for this examination.

    The Department of Justice has indicated that Google may need to sell Google Ad Manager at the very least.

    In addition to this case, Google is facing the possibility of being forced to sell assets or change its practices in another court case. A Washington judge is set to preside over a trial next week concerning Google’s Chrome browsers and its dominance in online searches. Google has previously considered selling ad exchanges to comply with European antitrust regulations.

    Brinkema presided over a trial last year where prosecutors accused Google of using monopoly tactics to eliminate competitors and control online advertising transactions. Google refutes these claims, stating that it continues to develop tools that can work with competitors’ products and pointing out competition from companies like Amazon and Comcast.

    Source: www.theguardian.com

    Elon Musk Urges Tesla Employees to Hold on to Stock Despite Market Challenges

    During the All Hands meeting at the Company on Thursday, Elon Musk reassured Tesla employees about the automaker’s “bright and exciting” future, encouraging them not to sell their stocks despite the company’s declining valuation.

    “There may be challenging times,” the billionaire CEO informed his employees. “But what I want to emphasize is that the future looks incredibly bright and promising, and I am committed to achieving great things that nobody thought possible.”

    During the meeting aired on X, Musk urged employees to hold onto their stocks despite a 50% decrease in stock prices. Tesla has faced criticism due to tech executives’ roles in the Trump administration. Following Trump’s reference to Musk as the head of the “Governmental Efficiency Department” (DOGE), the world’s richest person has dismantled the entire federal agency, leading to issues related to diversity, equity, and inclusion.

    As a response, Tesla owners are considering selling their vehicles, leading to a plummet in the company’s stock price and incidents of destruction of Teslas across the country.

    Musk expressed his concerns, stating, “When I read the news, it feels like Armageddon. If you choose not to purchase our products, I understand, but resorting to burning them is unreasonable.”

    The day before, Tesla issued a recall for the CyberTruck model due to issues with a part called a can rail, prompting the replacement of the assembly of affected vehicles for free.

    Even long-standing financial supporters of the company lament the challenging political environment facing Tesla and the subsequent decline in its performance.

    Dan Ives, managing director of Wedbush, described the current situation as a “brand tornado crisis” for Tesla due to the recent events surrounding the company.

    Musk’s plea to employees regarding stocks is part of his efforts to stabilize stock prices and boost vehicle sales amid the ongoing challenges. Earlier this month, Musk stood alongside Trump in front of the White House to promote Tesla’s technological capabilities, with Trump expressing interest in purchasing the vehicles.

    In conclusion, Musk reiterated his long-standing claims during the meeting, reassuring employees that Tesla vehicles would eventually be able to drive autonomously.

    “I urge you to hold onto your stock,” Musk emphasized.

    Source: www.theguardian.com

    Nigeria takes legal action against $81.5 billion cryptocurrency market for economic losses and tax evasion

    Nigeria has filed a lawsuit seeking $79.5 billion from the government for economic losses caused by $2 billion in cryptocurrency exchange operations and back taxes, according to court documents filed on Wednesday.

    Authorities have criticized Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, blaming it for the devaluation of the Nigerian currency. Two executives of the company were arrested in 2024 after local Naira trading websites emerged as popular platforms. Binance, which is not registered in Nigeria, has not yet commented on the situation.

    The Nigerian Federal Internal Revenue Service (FIRS) claims that Binance owes corporate income tax due to its significant economic presence in the country. FIRS is seeking income tax payments for 2022 and 2023, along with a 10% annual penalty on the outstanding amounts. Additionally, FIRS is demanding an unpaid tax rate of 26.75% based on the interest rate of the Nigerian central bank.

    Nigeria is already facing four counts of tax evasion related to the cryptocurrency industry, including non-payment of VAT, company income tax, failure to file tax returns, and conspiracy to help customers evade taxes through the platform.

    Skip past newsletter promotions

    In response to the allegations, Binance announced in March that it had halted all Naira transactions. The company is also facing separate allegations of institutional money laundering, which it has denied.

    Source: www.theguardian.com

    Investors spooked as China’s AI chatbot Deepseek causes global technology stock drop on the stock market

    Global tech stocks took a hit on Monday as investors reacted to the emergence of a Chinese chatbot competitor, Deepseek, on Openai’s ChatGpt. This raised concerns about the long-term sustainability of the artificial intelligence boom in the US.

    The NASDAQ index in New York, heavily weighted towards tech, dropped as investors processed the news about Deepseek’s latest AI model development.

    Companies like Nvidia, valued at over $400 billion, saw significant losses in their market capitalization as shares plummeted. Other tech giants like Alphabet and Meta also experienced declines.

    Deepseek’s AI assistant topped the charts on the Apple App Store in the US and UK, surpassing Openai’s ChatGpt.

    Stocks of other US-based AI companies like Tesla, Meta, and Amazon also saw declines in early trading.

    Deepseek’s claims about developing advanced AI models using fewer chips than competitors have raised doubts around the massive AI investments made by US companies in recent years.

    The company utilized lower-powered chips from Nvidia to create its model, highlighting the potential limitations of US technology export bans on China.

    Venture capitalist Marc Andreessen likened Deepseek’s achievement to a “Sputnik moment” in the AI industry, signaling a notable disruption.

    Deepseek’s R1 model outperforms other leading models in various benchmarks, challenging the dominance of tech giants like Google and Meta.

    Founded by entrepreneur Liang Wenfeng, Deepseek focuses on research rather than commercial products, aiming to make AI accessible and affordable to all.

    Skip past newsletter promotions

    Deepseek’s disruptive approach to AI has led to questions about the necessity of heavy investments in AI infrastructure and the supremacy of US tech companies in the field.

    The pan-European Stoxx 600 and Asian tech stocks also took a hit, reflecting the global impact of Deepseek’s advancements.

    Experts in the field acknowledge the significance of Deepseek’s breakthrough, highlighting the potential for innovation without the need for massive resources.

    Source: www.theguardian.com

    The Impact of YouTube and Skibidi Toilets on the Christmas Toy Market | Advertisement

    LLetters to Santa used to be filled with ideas from Argos catalogs and children’s TV ads, but for today’s kids who have grown up ‘swiping and streaming’, YouTube is now the main source of influence. This shift is evident in this year’s Christmas wish list, with some children asking for plastic toilets.

    The holiday season is a critical time for the toy industry, with consumers spending approximately £900 million, a quarter of the annual sales, on dolls, games, and action figures.

    Despite the high stakes, this year’s sales could fall short without a significant last-minute surge. Current data from Sarkana shows that spending is about 5% lower compared to 2023.

    Reaching today’s kids in bulk has become a challenge, with traditional broadcast TV campaigns struggling to reach more than 30% of the targeted child audience. In contrast, over 80% of children aged 4 to 9 regularly access YouTube, and more than 70% play games, as reported by research firm Childwise.

    Melissa Simmons, executive director of British toy company Circana, notes the shift from traditional TV advertising to digital platforms, saying that YouTube has become an integral part of children’s daily lives.

    While online video sharing platforms like YouTube are increasingly seen as alternatives to traditional children’s television, the two mediums are converging. Many children’s favorite shows are now distributed on YouTube, blurring the line between television and online content.

    As children spend more time watching videos online, toy manufacturers have adapted their strategies to align with these shifts. They now collaborate with popular online creators and integrate merchandising plans from the outset.

    PAW Patrol maker Spin Master has launched Unicorn Academy, which is more of a “complete franchise ecosystem” than a TV show. Photo: Reuters

    Spin Master’s Unicorn Academy is an example of this trend, with a multi-platform approach that includes movies, series, and toy lines to create a comprehensive franchise ecosystem.

    Rachel Simpson Jones, editor of Toy World magazine, highlights the importance of storytelling and character-driven content in successful toy lines, reflecting children’s expectations shaped by their consumption of various forms of digital content.

    YouTube, alongside other tech giants like Google, holds significant influence over children’s preferences, as noted by the Toy Retailers Association. Major toy brands are now leveraging YouTube channels to connect with young audiences and create engaging content.

    In this digital landscape, trends can quickly emerge and shape the toy industry. Brands need to adapt rapidly to meet changing consumer preferences and capitalize on online platforms to reach their target audience.

    With children’s tastes evolving rapidly, retailers face challenges in predicting which products will resonate with young consumers. The dynamic nature of children’s preferences, influenced by online trends, poses a constant challenge to the toy industry.

    Source: www.theguardian.com

    Reclaiming the Handheld Gaming Market: Strategies for Sony to Compete with Nintendo and Smartphones

    a Report from Bloomberg Suggest this week Sony is working on a new portable PlayStation device. As someone who can't bear to leave my PlayStation Vita in the attic and still has it sitting in my desk drawer, this is a very exciting prospect. It's been almost 13 years since Sony released its last portable console, the Vita, and with its crisp big screen and skinny little stick, it's a real wonder. I wish more people would have made games. Papercraft adventure Tearaway and dizzying platform puzzle game Gravity Rush remain underrated.

    In fact, aside from the beautiful and very niche Playdate, no one has bothered to release a dedicated handheld game console in over a decade. Both the Nintendo Switch and Valve's Steam Deck are hybrids that can be played handheld or connected to a big screen.

    There's a reason for this. First, smartphones have taken over almost the entire portable gaming market, offering an endless supply of free and cheap games on the devices everyone already owns. And secondly, it's handheld and In the past, commercially available home game consoles divided development resources. Only Nintendo has had enough success selling handheld devices to overcome generations of talent split between DS and Wii, or 3DS and Wii U, games. That made the Switch a candidate for the smartest business decision in the company's history. .

    Sony, on the other hand, has always struggled to make enough games for the PlayStation Portable (PSP) and Vita, alongside the home PlayStation, to make the handheld console an attractive buy. The PSP, which sold 75 million units, was a highly profitable console, even though it was in direct competition with the Nintendo DS, which sold 150 million units (12 million was sold by the PSP before moving to a competing platform). (Thanks in part to Capcom's Monster Hunter series, which sold more than just books.) But when the Vita launched in 2011, it was obsessed with the smartphone world and only sold an estimated 15 million units.

    It’s underrated…. Platform puzzle game “Gravity Rush”. Photo: Sony

    The difference this time is that the machine Sony is reportedly developing can play it. existing PlayStation 5 game. The idea seems to be to have a portable and home version of the same console that can play the same games. Bloomberg suggests that Microsoft is also working on portable console prototypes, but none of these may ever make it to market.

    Another difference is that cloud gaming has become mainstream. I know a lot of people who used the Vita primarily as a not-so-legal emulator that allowed them to play a ton of retro games, as it was sadly easy to crack. But now, with a PlayStation Plus subscription and fully legal access to Sony's treasure trove of back catalogue, I'm happy to have a handheld gaming console that lets me play most of PlayStation's history without having to buy a game. How many people would pay for it?I'm sure there are many.

    Sony did it some There has been experimentation with portable hardware ever since the Vita was discontinued. Late last year, the company released a strange little device called the PlayStation Portal. It's essentially a screen attached to the center of a PlayStation 5 controller, allowing you to stream games from the PS5 and play them in your hands. This has limited practicality, but it's great and I love it Sony's hardware design – so I really hope we see a new PlayStation Portable in the next few years, even if it doesn't come loaded with the bite-sized, bespoke games that older handsets enjoyed .

    However, as Steam Deck proved, mobile devices can be a game-changer for busy people, as they simply give you more time and opportunities to play, even if you don't have your own dedicated games. For example, the only way to beat Persona 4 was to play it on the vita on the train. With the next portable PlayStation, you could probably manage the last 10 hours of Persona 5.

    what to play

    Memories… LocoRoco.

    When you think about the history of the old portable PlayStation, a few games come to mind. There is LocoLocoa game about a singing blob that's back with this year's Atom Bonus Level. And I spent more than 100 hours with my index finger oddly curled over the PSP's directional button, my hand forming the shape known as Monster Hunter's claw.

    And there it is tear awayMedia Molecule's intimate and brilliant Vita platformer is set in a world made of paper. This is the easiest to try as there is a slightly less capable PS4 version. unfolded tear duct Available from the PlayStation Store. It's included with PlayStation Plus, so I just downloaded it to play with my kids this afternoon.

    Available: PS4/5
    Estimated play time:
    8 hours

    what to read

    Is there a new one on the way? … Bloodborne: The Old Hunters. Photo: Public Relations
    • If you stick to Sony news, PlayStation 30th anniversary next month. to celebrate, released by Sony There are tons of game soundtracks, timelines, quizzes, and of course some things you can buy.

    • Shuhei YoshidaThe former head of PlayStation Studios and current head of the company's indie developer initiative will retire from the company in January after 31 years. I last interviewed him last year. He remains one of the friendliest people in the entire gaming industry and one of its most seasoned advocates.

    • And Sony clearly intends to buy Kadokawa, From Software's parent companyManufacturer of Elden Ring, Dark Souls, and Armored Core. Will we finally get a new Bloodborne?

    • New version of Microsoft flight simulator have It started in a small state. If you're considering buying one, it's probably best to wait a few months.

    Skip past newsletter promotions

    What to click

    question block

    Under discussion… Elden Ring: Shadow of the Eld Tree. Photo: unknown/Bandai Namco Europe

    leader benjamin This week's question:

    “You said your latest Pushing Buttons cost money.” Shadow of the Eld Tree forgame of It's the annual award, but I'm curious. to hear your thoughts First of all, it is a downloadable extension and not a game itself. Wouldn't it set a strange precedent if something that wasn't playable as a standalone could end up being the best game of the year?”

    Gaming awards categories such as the Baftas, Game Awards and Golden Joysticks are struggling to keep up with the speed at which video games are evolving. A few years ago, most of them introduced some version of the “games in progress” category to account for games that have been running for years and change frequently, such as Fortnite, No Man's Sky, and Minecraft. did. But now it has become difficult in itself. Does the game have to change in that year to qualify? How about something like Cyberpunk 2077? Although this is not a multiplayer game with continuously new content; did Will it be significantly changed and improved after release? How about a remaster? Should we also consider downloadable expansions? And where should we place games that fit into more than one genre? Every year there are many releases that challenge the definition of categories.

    I might end up saying things like this forever. My feeling is that anything released that year, if it's good enough, should be eligible for an award, whether it's an add-on or expansion to an earlier game. Shadow of the Erdtree was over 30 hours long and could very well have been a standalone sequel. That's 10 times longer than some indie games nominated in other categories. Personally, I think it's hard to justify disqualifying this game for technical reasons, but of course I think I'd judge it on its own merits, not the basic game's merits.

    If you have any questions for the questions block or anything else you'd like to say about the newsletter, please reply or email us at pushbuttons@theguardian.com.

    Source: www.theguardian.com

    In the job market, standing out with design: 6 tips for creating authentic personal brands

    Personal branding has undergone a radical transformation. The way we present ourselves in the workplace and in the job market has evolved, thanks to the tools available to us and social changes like the merging of work and personal life. Just 25 years ago, a resume was all you needed to secure a new job. However, today, the internet, social media, and smartphones have revolutionized the way we showcase ourselves to the world. These tools enable us to transform our resumes into polished websites or captivating slide decks. Social media platforms provide an avenue for anyone to cultivate and manage their personal brand in real time.

    The current landscape is witnessing a significant shift as increasingly advanced tools allow individuals to create professional visual and video content using just their smartphones. With the proliferation of platforms and social channels, along with the emergence of technologies like artificial intelligence, the possibilities are virtually limitless.

    So, what are the guidelines for personal branding in this new era?

    Utilize modern tools

    Personal branding expert Jennifer Holloway emphasizes the importance of packaging the best aspects of oneself to appeal to the target audience. Leveraging available tools can help in creating a sophisticated website with striking images and polished videos, crafting engaging social media content, and developing well-designed marketing materials.

    Smartphone editing tools and the abundance of visual content on social media have inadvertently enhanced our visual skills. As the competition grows, standing out from the crowd necessitates a higher level of skill. Apps like Adobe Express can be game-changers by facilitating the creation of eye-catching designs quickly and effortlessly, while tools like generative AI enable the adoption of new design capabilities.

    Be authentic – yet genuine

    Daisy Morris, an Adobe Express evangelist and author, highlights the importance of personal branding reflecting one’s unique traits without feeling overly curated. Authenticity plays a crucial role, but the concept has become somewhat cliché. Striving for authenticity can sometimes create a conflict between one’s true self and their ideal self. It’s vital to strike a balance between highlighting one’s strengths and ensuring all information conveyed is accurate.

    Holloway stresses the need for truthfulness in personal branding to avoid potential discrepancies in the future. The goal is to provide a glimpse of what one would experience in a personal encounter, ensuring alignment between the online persona and the real self.

    Embrace experimentation

    Not every strategy works for everyone, so experimenting with various media, platforms, and channels is essential. Researching suitable channels and focusing efforts on a select few can amplify the impact of a personal brand, fostering a unique message tailored to the chosen audience.

    Exercise discretion in sharing

    While openness is often encouraged, it’s acceptable to maintain privacy in certain aspects of life. Crafting a personal brand should align with one’s comfort level, whether leaning towards transparency or a more professional stance.

    Patiently pursue success

    Social media may promote instant success stories, but building a successful personal brand requires dedication and time. Avoid getting caught up in the allure of rapid success and focus on developing engaging content at a sustainable pace.

    Learn from others

    Observing successful personal brands can offer valuable insights and inspiration. Staying informed about evolving technologies and best practices is crucial to thriving in the dynamic realm of personal branding.

    Learn more about Adobe Express

    Source: www.theguardian.com

    TechScape: The Thriving World of Online Gambling Faces New Challenges as FBI Targets Market

    GMentioning presidential election results became legal in the United States in early October after being banned for decades, marking a new type of pre-election polling. Online prediction markets such as Calci and Polymarket accept billions of dollars in bets on the outcome, with users out of sync with mainstream polls that gave Donald Trump a 70% chance of winning over Kamala Harris. The Trump campaign touted this prediction.

    Election gambling is legal in the UK, but takes a very different form. Traditional bookmakers and betting companies take players’ bets and set prices and odds. This betting is less similar to a prediction market than it is to horse racing. These markets are prone to their own scandals. Kalshi and Polymarket offer a vision of online gambling that covers a wider range of themes, is algorithmically priced, and relies on cryptocurrencies.

    Now, Kalsi is riding the wave of these accurate predictions, gaining millions of new users and billions of dollars in trade value, expanding the scope of what users can bet on. Polymarket has courted political influencers like Nate Silver and ZeroHedge to ask questions that users can bet on. Robinhood and DraftKings also intend to throw themselves into the political gambling ring. Will every public event soon have billions of dollars in online wagers? Will the Oscars become a new type of speculative financial market? Would you bet your life’s savings on whether the price of eggs will rise in the first month of President Trump’s inauguration? This is a real bet you can place on Karsi.

    Callum Jones of the Guardian reports:

    “We are just getting started,” said Tarek Mansour, CEO of Karshi. Kalsi is adding “nearly 100” new markets to its platform every day, and is based on combinations that allow users to bet on a bunch of different outcomes or conditional markets (e.g. “What will happen to GDP if Trump wins?”) We plan to launch a market for ) within a few weeks. “I think it will accelerate from here…”

    For Karshi, the only things off-limits are “terrorism, assassinations, and violence.” What about Ukraine? Although the conflict falls under the platform’s banned category, the Russian invasion and subsequent war have certainly moved stocks and products since February 2022. “Time will tell,” Mansour said.

    That’s great news for Kalsi. The polymarket is making the post-election party much quieter. Last Wednesday, the FBI searched the Manhattan home of gambling market founder Shane Coplan, 26, and seized his cell phone and other electronic devices. The company quickly blamed the 6 a.m. attack on “clear political retaliation by the outgoing government.”

    However, Bloomberg reported: The US Department of Justice is investigating The company is suspected of accepting transactions from users in the United States, but has been prohibited from doing so since a settlement agreement with regulators in 2022. However, users of the site have done their best to circumvent geofencing using virtual private networks. Two weeks ago, Polymarket announced that it would soon resume operations in the United States. With an active FBI investigation looming over the company, it’s hard to imagine it will reopen. Fortune also reported on another type of illegal market manipulation: “wash trading.” It is said to have been proliferated on the site..

    France is also grappling with the effects of the polymarket. A French man with the username “Theo” made the site’s most famous bet. It was a bet of around $30 million (about £23.7 million) that Trump would win the US election. Do such huge bets amount to foreign election interference? Mr Teo’s bet is similar to that of Peter Thiel, the US entrepreneur who made an unexpected early bet against Mr Trump in the 2016 election. It is similar to the polymarket itself supported by

    France’s gambling regulator is currently investigating the site for market manipulation. Cryptocurrency industry publications It was reported that the country is considering banning it. In response, Polymarket said it saw no evidence of market manipulation.

    Can Trump and Elon Musk weaponize the US? Internet and satellite regulator?

    Donald Trump and Elon Musk attended a UFC event at Madison Square Garden in New York over the weekend. Photo: Chris Unger/Zuffa LLC

    Late Sunday, President Trump announced his nomination of Brendan Carr to head the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). A conservative committee member wrote: Chapter on the future of the FCC He joined Project 2025, the second Trump administration’s infamous far-right strategy, and was the only current government official to do so. Mr. Carr’s views on the U.S. technology sector are largely in line with those of Mr. Trump and Mr. Musk. In recent months, they have collectively criticized broadcast television networks and public broadcasters.

    Rather than be bound by exclusive practices, Kerr said, “censorship cartel” He believes that statements from big tech companies are stifling conservative speech. Google is already reeling from losing an antitrust case against the United States, and with President Trump slamming Google in his campaign speech, it could be a big loser in the next administration. Carr also supports banning TikTok due to its alleged national security threat.

    Mr. Carr’s agency could become a political bludgeon for President Trump in his personal vendetta against technology companies. He is a friend of the telecommunications industry and an enemy of Silicon Valley’s big tech companies. He applied a hands-off approach to internet service providers, dismantling consumer protections that benefit the industry’s largest incumbents, and then sacrificing consistency in favor of political expediency, including Google and Facebook. Will it apply oversight and strict powers to things like that?

    “Brendan Kerr campaigned for this job promising to be at the mercy of Donald Trump and Elon Musk,” said Co-CEO of left-wing media advocacy group Free Press Action. says Craig Aaron. “Kerr doesn’t care about protecting the public interest. He took this job to carry out a personal vendetta against Trump and Musk.”

    Mr. Kerr also could turn the FCC into a commercial weapon against his billionaire tech rivals, “First Buddies,” as Mr. Musk himself christened them. The main beneficiary of the commissioner’s appointment is likely to be Musk’s SpaceX, whose satellites and the internet services it provides fall under the jurisdiction of the FCC. In his Project 2025 proposal to the FCC, Carr emphasizes the priority of “advancing America’s space leadership.” He cited Starlink, SpaceX’s satellite internet company, and said his agency would adopt the friendliest possible regulatory stance on the company’s launch schedule.

    Skip past newsletter promotions

    Please lock your phone

    “As a company, we are not anti-technology”…Yondr cell phone pouch. Photo: Public relations company handout

    When everyone else is digging for gold, sell shovels. A company called Yondr discovered this. The brand saw a market opportunity as schools around the world implemented No Phone Days and governments debated whether children should be banned from using social media altogether. Founded in 2013, Yondr was one of the first companies to create a lockable phone pouch that allows students (and others) to isolate their devices. CEO Graham Dugoni told the Guardian that 1 million students across 35 countries use Yondr pouches every day.

    Dugoni said his company sees a spike in business when principals, school districts and states implement no-phone policies. However, he was hesitant to use the word “ban” when referring to the school’s policy on phone use. “No one has done anything wrong, and we are not anti-technology as a company… rather, it’s about how we constructively interact with these tools in the future.”

    Dugoni doesn’t want to ban smartphones, he wants people to live in harmony with them, but he uses a flip phone and doesn’t control any of his or his company’s social media profiles. . “Creating a phone-free space is a positive step forward. We’re not trying to take anything away or pull us back into the world of the past. In doing so, we’re creating a fundamentally new and no-one They create a framework and social etiquette around what they are trying to understand about the possibilities and possibilities of the Internet.”

    Wider TechScape

    Small aircraft are used to protect humans and livestock from predators. Photo: Wesley Sarmento/Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks

    Source: www.theguardian.com

    Tesla’s market value skyrockets by nearly $150 billion in a single day, marking its best performance in a decade

    On Thursday, Tesla shares surged to their lowest point in over a decade after Elon Musk confidently predicted a sales increase, reassuring investors about the company’s commitment to expanding its electric car sales. The stock closed with nearly a 22% increase, marking its largest gain. By the end of trading, Tesla’s market value had risen by almost $150 billion.

    Musk anticipated a sales growth of 20-30% for the next year, announced plans to unveil an affordable car in the first half of 2025, and highlighted efforts to enhance profit margins through production cost reductions in the third quarter.

    The stock price peaked at $262.2 during trading, with approximately 200 million shares exchanged. This jump was the company’s biggest since May 2013, reversing recent losses from concerns that Musk’s focus on new projects like robotaxis was diverting attention.

    Musk is striving to transition Tesla from a leading electric vehicle company to an AI and robotics enterprise, although a detailed plan for this shift has not yet been formulated. Investors had sold Tesla stock earlier due to insufficient information about the robotaxi initiative.

    Ed Egilinsky of Direxion said, “Some skeptics view this rally as reassuring, especially after the pre-earnings release stock sell-off in October, as the financial results exceeded expectations.”

    During the last quarter, Musk made daring company announcements focusing on ventures beyond cars, such as driverless taxis and humanoid robots, causing concerns among investors about shrinking profit margins already affected by price reductions.

    Tesla reported third-quarter profit margins surpassing Wall Street forecasts, with production costs at record lows of approximately $35,100 per vehicle. The company also revealed $326 million revenue from its autopilot software, Fully Self-Driving (FSD), integrated into the Cybertruck and other autonomous features.

    FSD serves as the foundation for Tesla’s robotaxi program.

    Skip past newsletter promotions

    Musk also expressed his belief that Tesla vehicles will soon offer paid driverless ride-hailing services, reiterating his commitment at the robotaxi event. However, this plan may encounter regulatory hurdles.

    Despite the reassurances on Wednesday, not all investors are placated by Tesla’s direction.

    Ross Gerber, CEO of Gerber Kawasaki Wealth and Investment Management and a significant Tesla investor, stated that robotaxis and AI are not the core businesses he wants Musk to prioritize.

    “The good old days were when Elon Musk was sleeping in the factory, working tirelessly every day. He shouldn’t be distracted by ventures that stray from his main focus,” Gerber emphasized.

    Source: www.theguardian.com

    Watchdog accuses Google of employing anti-competitive tactics in UK ad market

    Britain’s competition watchdog has accused Google of anti-competitive behavior in the market for buying and selling advertising on websites, following similar investigations in the US and EU.

    The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said it had found that Google had “abused its dominant position” in online advertising, to the detriment of thousands of UK publishers and advertisers.

    The CMA said that while the majority of publishers and advertisers use Google’s advertising technology services to bid for and sell advertising space, Google is preventing its rivals from offering a competitive alternative.

    Regulators are focusing on Google’s role in three areas: owning two tools for buying ad space, running an advertising platform that allows publishers to manage their ad space online, and managing AdX, an ad exchange that brings together advertisers and publishers in a way that matches buyers and sellers in the stock market.

    “The CMA is concerned that Google is actively using its dominance in this sector to favor its own services,” the watchdog said. “Google is putting competitors at a disadvantage and preventing them from competing on a level playing field to offer publishers and advertisers better, more competitive services that will help them grow their businesses.”

    In its interim findings published on Friday, the CMA found that Google abused its dominant market position by using its own buying tools and inventory tools for publishers to bolster its own ad trading position and protect it from competition since 2015. The CMA also alleged that Google blocked rival ad inventory tools (called publisher ad servers) from effectively competing with its own product, DoubleClick for Publishers.

    The CMA will consider Google’s response before making a final decision.

    Regulators can impose fines of up to 10% of a company’s global turnover depending on the severity of the violations, and can also issue legally binding directions to end the violations.

    In a statement, Google said the CMA’s arguments were “flawed”.

    “Our ad tech tools help websites and apps fund their content and help businesses of all sizes effectively reach new customers,” said Dan Taylor, Google’s vice president of global advertising. “At the heart of this lawsuit is a misinterpretation of the ad tech sector. We disagree with the CMA’s position and will respond accordingly.”

    The U.S. Department of Justice and the European Commission are also investigating Google’s ad tech activities: In June 2023, EU regulators said Google may have to sell parts of its ad tech business to address concerns, while the U.S. Department of Justice is set to accuse Google in court on Monday of monopolizing the ad tech market.

    Last month, a federal court ruled that Google was illegally monopolizing the internet search market, a decision that could lead to a partial breakup of the company’s business.

    Source: www.theguardian.com

    Concord: Sony’s online shooter is ready for takeoff, but faces obstacles in a crowded gaming market| Games

    IIt’s no exaggeration to say that the video game industry is currently undergoing a period of alarming turmoil: studios are closing, development budgets are exploding, and lucrative genres are becoming saturated with a host of entirely interchangeable big-budget contenders.

    Into this uneasy market comes Sony’s new 5v5 “hero” shooter, Concord, a subgenre of multiplayer online blasters in which players control characters with elaborate special abilities rather than generic special forces soldiers or space marines. Set in a war-torn galaxy ruled by a dictatorial government called the Guild, the game puts players in control of a variety of freelance gunners, mercenaries who roam the space lanes in search of work and throw one-liners at each other in the game’s highly polished cutscenes. In-game, though, they do fight.




    Heroism…Concord. Photo: Sony Interactive Entertainment

    All the standard characters from hero shooters are there: regular soldiers, floating witches, teleporting weirdos, sassy tanks, etc., but they don’t have the instant appeal of Overwatch’s denizens D.Va and Mei. But they bring a lot of variety to the combat zone. Lark is a weird mushroom alien who plants spores to slow enemies and heal allies. Kipps is a stealthy assassin who can reveal enemy locations to his team. A chunky robotic one-off throws exploding trash cans. I like the innate flexibility of these skills and how they can be combined between characters. The submachine gun-toting Duchess can throw up a defensive barrier, which is useful as cover, but can also be used to block objective points for the enemy team or lure enemy soldiers into an ambush. Davers can bombard an area with a napalm-like substance called Burnite, which can be ignited by other players’ incendiary bombs, doubling its effect.

    The 12 launch maps are mostly super-colourful takes on the sci-fi industrial spaces we’ve come to expect from Quake: Spine Works and Sorting Hub are labyrinthine complexes, all interconnected steel corridors, shipping containers and box-like warehouse choke points; Water Hazard is an abandoned oil rig with the remains of a giant sea monster lying on top like a nightmarish, Lovecraftian sushi plate; and my favourite is Train Trouble, a post-apocalyptic railroad graveyard where Mad Max meets Tatooine.




    Lovecraft Sushi… Concord. Photo: Sony Interactive Entertainment

    The crux of the matter is the excitement and tension of every moment of team-based combat, and Concord really does fly at times. There’s a bit of Destiny floatiness to movement that works brilliantly on this very vertical map, with players making full use of their double jump to make combat truly three-dimensional. The guns feel great; from shotguns to laser pistols, every weapon is solid and easy to read, and the audio and visual feedback perfectly communicates each weapon’s unique capabilities. There are sublime moments when the whole team comes together and all their abilities combine in unexpected ways to create an explosive, euphoric shooter experience that rivals the best moments in Overwatch.

    But the big question at this point is whether the game is enough to draw players away from Activision’s games, or Valorant, or Apex Legends, or any of the others. It’s beautifully made, but most of it is painfully familiar, not just in character types and anime-esque visual aesthetics, but in structure as well. The game modes are all the standard types: team deathmatch, one where you have to capture three objective zones, one where there’s only one zone but it’s always moving, one where you have to pick up tokens from fallen enemies to score a kill, etc. This is what we’ve been playing since Doom. Meanwhile, the dialogue and humor are the same post-Whedon, cynical aloof approach that Marvel and Netflix YA dramas have been forcing on us for a decade. Oh, I miss the dark, anarchic satire and anarchic teammate-slaughtering mayhem of Helldiver 2.

    The most interesting thing about Concord is the “meta” of the game, that is, the strategic part outside the main action. The game introduces some deck-building elements, where players must organize their own crew of characters. Each character has slight differences in their normal abilities. These characters all have their own buffs, called crew bonuses, which slightly boost the health, armor, or firepower of your team every time you play in a match. These buffs accumulate throughout the battle. So, if you’re playing in an organized team, you can work together to build a strong statistical advantage, just like having a good hand in Hearthstone. It’s an interesting idea, but in the chaos of a public server, where only a small percentage of participants play as part of an organized team, it’s unclear whether it will work.

    Perhaps the bravest thing about Concorde is that it’s a premium-priced product rather than a “live service” free-to-play — meaning all subsequent content will be free rather than the run-of-the-mill season pass model — and it’s also unashamedly and vociferously pro-diversity, which will likely anger players who are increasingly jaded by modern online games. Should Frankly, it pisses me off because this small group of misanthropic, gatekeeping blabbermouths are ruining the fun for everyone else.

    Ultimately, Concord needs time, space, and a healthy community to gain an advantage over its older, wiser competitors. Right now, players are getting a feel for the place, but the game is choppy and unfocused, yet at times surprisingly fun. Its attitude, detail, and elaborate backstory (explorable in a visual encyclopedia undoubtedly inspired by The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy) give it the feeling of being something the development team really cares about, and if it’s not taken off life support by publisher funding anytime soon, it has a chance of finding an audience that feels the same way.

    Concord is available now on PC and PS5

    Source: www.theguardian.com

    Finds from the Bronze Age indicate that market economics may have originated earlier than previously believed

    Bronze Age metal hoard from Weisig, Germany

    J. Lipták/Landesamt für Archäologie Sachsen

    Bronze Age Europeans earned and spent money in much the same way we do today, indicating that the origins of the “market economy” are much older than expected.

    That’s the controversial conclusion of a new study that challenges the view that elites were the dominant force in Bronze Age economies and suggests that human economic behaviour may not have changed much over the past 3,500 years or more.

    “We tend to romanticize European prehistory, but the Bronze Age was not just a fantasy world where townsfolk and peasants served their needs as a backdrop for great lords,” he said. Nicola Ialongo “It was a very familiar world, with family, friends, social networks, markets, jobs, and ultimately having to figure out how to make ends meet,” says Professor at Aarhus University in Denmark.

    Bronze Age Europeans, from 3300 to 800 BCE, were not meticulous bookkeepers like people in other ancient societies, such as those in Mesopotamia. But Ialongo and Giancarlo Lago Researchers at the University of Bologna in Italy suggest that the treasure trove of metal they left behind may hold important insights into their daily lives and the roots of modern economic behavior.

    Lago and Ialongo analyzed more than 20,000 metal objects from Bronze Age burials in Italy, Switzerland, Austria, Slovenia and Germany. These metal objects came in many different forms, but around 1500 B.C. they began to be standardized by weight, which is how they were classified. Many experts These are distinguished as a type of pre-monetary currency.

    “The discovery of widespread systems of measurement and weight allows us to model things that have been known for centuries in ways that have never been modeled before,” Ialongo says. “This not only gives us new answers to old questions, but it also gives us new questions that no one has asked before.”

    The team found that the weight values ​​in their vast sample followed the same statistical distribution as the daily expenses of a modern Western household: small everyday expenses, represented by lighter pieces, dominated the consumption pattern, while larger expenses, represented by heavier pieces, were relatively rare. This pattern is similar to that found in the average modern wallet, with many small bills and very few large bills.

    Lago and Ialongo interpret their find as evidence that the Bronze Age economic system was regulated by market forces of supply and demand, with everyone participating in proportion to how much they earned. This hypothesis contrasts with the influential view put forward by anthropologist Karl Polanyi in the 1940s, who characterized the modern economy, based on monetary gain, as a new phenomenon distinct from ancient economies centered on barter, gift exchange, and social status.

    Richard Brunton A researcher from Purdue University in Indiana called the study credible: “I think this argument will stimulate debate among archaeologists and economic anthropologists who have been based for decades on erroneous assumptions about the antiquity of market economies,” he said.

    “I think this paper adds useful fuel to that criticism,” Brunton says, “and to me it sheds entirely new light on the function of bronze deposits and the potential use of bronze coins as a unit of exchange.”

    but, Erica Schonberger Researchers at Johns Hopkins University in Maryland are skeptical of the team’s conclusions. “It’s dangerous to assume that ordinary people in premodern times used money in normal economic activities,” says Schonberger. “For example, medieval English peasants only got money for selling their produce when lords began to demand money in lieu of rents or taxes in kind. They gave most or all of that money directly to the lords. They sold to get money, but they didn’t use it to buy things they needed. We’re still a long way from modern economic behavior.” [in the Middle Ages].”

    Lago and Ialongo hope that their work will inspire other experts to carry out similar studies on artefacts from different regions and cultures. They suggest that market economies are a natural development across time and cultures, and that such systems are not something new or unique that has emerged in Western societies over the past few centuries.

    “Technically, we haven’t proven that the Bronze Age economy was a market economy,” Ialongo says, “we simply have no evidence that it wasn’t. And we’re just pointing out a contradiction: why is everyone so convinced that there wasn’t a market economy when everything we see can be explained by a market economy model? In other words, if the simplest explanation works well enough, why should we have to imagine a more complex one?”

    topic:

    Source: www.newscientist.com

    How soon can Tesla introduce more affordable car options to the market? | Tesla

    Tesla’s efforts to make electric cars more affordable are making progress.

    After announcing plans to speed up production and start manufacturing low-cost EVs sooner than expected, Tesla’s stock price surged by 12% on Tuesday.

    Investors are eager to see what Tesla has in store and how quickly these new vehicles will be available.

    What is Tesla planning?

    Tesla is reworking its production timeline to launch new models faster.

    The company updated its vehicle lineup to accelerate the introduction of more affordable models before the previously projected start date of late 2025.

    Elon Musk, President of Tesla, mentioned that production could begin as early as this year or by early 2025.

    While details about the design and specifications of the new car remain scarce, it’s known that Tesla had previously discussed creating a cheaper vehicle, referred to as the Model 2, priced below $25,000.

    How can I achieve this?

    To ramp up production of affordable cars, Tesla may need to modify its Model 2 program.

    The company aimed to implement a new manufacturing process that would reduce production costs by half, but this will require substantial investment.

    Recent announcements indicate that Tesla plans to build the new vehicle on its current production line, steering away from innovative manufacturing technologies.

    Some experts believe this shift signals the abandonment of the Model 2 plans in favor of continuing to produce existing models.

    How much does a more affordable car cost?

    The exact price of the upcoming “more affordable” model remains unknown, but Tesla initially aimed for a $25,000 price tag to compete with Chinese electric vehicle manufacturers.

    However, revised plans suggest that cost savings may not meet previous expectations.

    Source: www.theguardian.com

    Apple faces full-scale lawsuit from US over alleged smartphone market monopoly

    The U.S. government initiated a significant antitrust lawsuit against Apple on Thursday, alleging that the tech giant impeded competition by limiting access to its software and hardware. The lawsuit challenges Apple’s core products and practices, including iMessage and the interconnectivity of iPhone and Apple Watch.

    The lawsuit, filed in federal court in New Jersey, asserts that Apple holds monopolistic power in the smartphone market and engages in “pervasive, persistent, and unlawful” conduct to maintain its dominance. It seeks to “free the smartphone market” from Apple’s anti-competitive behavior and claims that the company stifles innovation.

    U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland stated, “Apple’s illegal conduct has helped them remain in power, threatening the free and fair markets essential to our economy.”

    The Department of Justice’s case against Apple is a significant legal action against the world’s most valuable publicly traded company. It follows similar antitrust cases targeting major tech firms like Amazon, Meta, and Google, which have faced scrutiny for consolidating power and stifling competition.

    Apple denies the allegations, arguing that the lawsuit jeopardizes their core business and principles that set their products apart in a competitive market.

    The lawsuit questions whether Apple’s practices of limiting rivals’ access to proprietary features like iMessage and Siri constitute anti-competitive behavior. It investigates whether Apple’s closed ecosystem creates unreasonable barriers for competitors.

    The complaint accuses Apple of anti-competitive actions such as blocking innovative apps, restricting third-party digital wallets, and limiting cross-platform messaging. These actions allegedly inhibit competition and increase prices for consumers.

    The lawsuit aims to change Apple’s practices and impose fines for their actions. It seeks to prevent Apple from strengthening its monopoly and using its app store and private APIs to hinder cross-platform technology distribution.

    Apple, as a dominant force in the smartphone market, has faced criticism for its closed ecosystem. Rival companies view Apple’s features as creating a walled garden that limits consumer choice and competition.

    The lawsuit highlights Apple’s clash with startup Beeper, which attempted to enable non-iPhone users to access iMessage. Beeper’s struggles with Apple exemplify the challenges faced by smaller competitors against tech giants.

    The legal action against Apple is part of a broader crackdown on anticompetitive behavior by major tech companies. Regulators in both the U.S. and Europe have been investigating and pursuing cases against tech giants to promote fair competition.

    European regulators, in particular, have fined Apple for anti-competitive practices. The investigation stemmed from complaints that Apple’s restrictions on its app store harmed other music streaming providers.

    Source: www.theguardian.com

    Epic Games challenges Apple and Google in Australia amid claims of market power abuse

    When Apple’s first iPhone was released in 2007, all of its apps were created by Apple.

    According to his biography by Walter Isaacson, Steve Jobs was reluctant to allow apps from third-party developers on the iPhone. He eventually succumbed to pressure with the launch of his App Store in 2008. However, the company wanted to maintain strict control over what was allowed on the platform: email. 2021 release schedule revealed.

    The case, which will be heard over the next five months in Melbourne’s Federal Court, will center on Apple’s control over its empire. At the same time, Google, which has prided itself on having a more open ecosystem than Apple, will have its practices tested.


    Two cases in Australia’s Federal Court were adjourned in April 2021, pending the outcome of a similar case in the United States. Epic Games, the maker of the popular game Fortnite, has spent the past three years in a global legal battle against Apple and Google, alleging abuse of market power over their app stores.


    Fortnite announced a deal with Google in 2020 after Epic Games offered its own in-app payment system that bypasses the one used by the platform and reduced the fees Apple and Google receive on in-app payments. Removed from Apple’s app store.

    Epic lost a 2021 antitrust lawsuit against Apple, but won a lawsuit against Google late last year. Although the Australian cases were initially separate, they are now integrated into one monolith. Judge Jonathan Beech decided to hear the two cases and a related class action at the same time to avoid duplication of witness evidence.

    David and Goliath?

    In an Australian lawsuit that originally began in 2020, Epic Games argued that Apple’s control over in-app purchases and Apple’s actions in banning the Fortnite app were an abuse of market power, and that it significantly reduced competition in app development. He claimed to have lowered it. The company also claims that Google has harmed Australian app developers and consumers by preventing them from distributing apps and choosing in-app payments on Android devices.

    As with mobile phone operating systems, the litigation between Apple and Google has many similarities, but there are also important differences. Apple’s iOS and App Store are completely closed and controlled by Apple. This means that if you have an app on your phone and a payment is made through that app, it has to go through Apple.

    Similar rules apply to the Play Store in Google’s Android operating system, but Google also allows apps to be “sideloaded,” or installed directly onto a phone without using the app store. It also allows phone manufacturers like Samsung to have their own app stores. Fortnite is still available on Android, but only through sideloading or the Samsung Store.

    Companies charge fees for transactions in their app stores. In Google Play, he charges a commission of 15% for the first million dollars a developer earns each year, and above that he increases to 30%. If an Apple developer’s revenue in the previous year was less than $1 million, he would pay a 15% fee, but if it was more than that, he would pay a 30% fee.

    Fees are common in the industry, with Epic’s own store charging developers a 12% fee.

    Epic argues that it should be able to offer its store as a competitor to Apple’s store, and that it should also be able to offer alternative payment options within its official game store apps.


    Google claims to be more open than the Apple App Store, but it was this openness that hurt the tech company in the US lawsuit. The jury found that tying the Google Play Store to in-app payments was illegal and that the company had entered into anti-competitive agreements with some developers to keep their apps on the Play Store.

    In the Apple case, the judge took a narrower view, considering mobile game transactions specifically rather than app stores as a whole. The judge found that Apple is not a monopoly and is in competition with Google and other companies. The judge also upheld Apple’s concerns about the security implications of opening the App Store and sided with the company’s pursuit of intellectual property royalties through in-app payments.

    Apple is expected to file a similar lawsuit in Australia. The company believes there is little difference between the cases and that the principles underlying Australian competition law are similar to US antitrust principles.

    Apple sees Epic not as David the Goliath, but as a multibillion-dollar company seeking more profits at the expense of iPhone users’ safety.

    Google claims that it not only offers customers a choice in the app store, but also offers alternative options for developers to sell their content outside of Google Play. It also points to permissions that allow sideloading of apps while maintaining user security, which Epic claims it is trying to water down.

    “It’s clear that Android and Google Play offer more choice and openness than other major mobile platforms, and are a good model for Australian developers and consumers,” Google’s Government Affairs statement said. Vice President for Public Policy Wilson White said in a post this week. .


    “We continue to have a right to sustainable business models that keep our users safe, grow our businesses in partnership with developers, and keep the Android ecosystem thriving and all Australians healthy. We will vigorously defend it.”

    Apple forced to make changes to EU App Store

    Initial submissions will last two weeks, followed by three months of evidence from fact witnesses and experts, followed by two weeks of final submissions, ending in mid-July.

    Witnesses expected to testify include Epic CEO Tim Sweeney, who is in Melbourne for the hearing, as well as key executives from Apple and Google.

    A concurrent class action lawsuit on behalf of Australian developers and consumers will fail if Epic’s lawsuit fails.

    The case is unlikely to be resolved by the end of the year, and Beach is not expected to issue a verdict within six months, after which it could be appealed.

    Whether or not Epic wins the battle, Apple and Google may ultimately lose the app store war. Apple has been forced to implement changes to its App Store in the European Union, including allowing alternative payment options and marketplaces, under the Digital Markets Act. As a result, Apple last week reinstated Epic’s developer account in the EU.

    Epic says Apple’s implementation of these changes is incomplete, but other governments, including Australia, may follow suit.

    Source: www.theguardian.com

    Insights from China’s Huge Cyber Breach: The Market for Hackers

    A significant data breach from a Chinese cybersecurity company has offered a rare glimpse into the inner workings of Beijing-linked hackers.

    Analysts suggest that the breach contains valuable information about the day-to-day operations of China’s hacking program, which the FBI claims is the largest globally. I-Soon has not yet verified the authenticity of the leak and has not responded to requests for comment. As of Friday, the leaked data has been taken down from GitHub, where it was originally posted.

    From staff complaints about salaries and office rumors to claims of infiltrating foreign governments, here are some key insights gathered from the leak.

    Who was targeted in the hack?

    Icesun employees were actively seeking high-profile targets on a daily basis.

    The leak exposed that government entities in neighboring countries of China, such as Kyrgyzstan, Thailand, Cambodia, Mongolia, and Vietnam, had their websites and email servers breached. The targets ranged from British government departments to Thai ministries. I-Soon staff also claimed to have gained access to communication service providers in various countries. They specifically mentioned targeting the Indian government, viewed as Beijing’s geopolitical rival, and accessing educational institutions in Hong Kong and Taiwan. However, they acknowledged difficulty in accessing data seized from government agencies in Myanmar and South Korea.

    Additional targets included domestic entities from Xinjiang to Tibet, covering topics from illegal activities to gambling establishments.

    Who were the clients of Yi Seung?

    Based on the leaks, most of Icesun’s customers were local police departments and state security agencies responsible for safeguarding the Communist Party against perceived threats to its authority. The company offered assistance in securing devices and communications with many contracts listed as non-confidential.

    There were indications of official corruption, with discussions of kickbacks in sales to law enforcement agencies. Complaints about business challenges in regions like Xinjiang were also highlighted.

    The leak mentioned the company’s focus on creating Trojans, compiling personal information databases, and developing technology for various hacking purposes.

    Who are the hackers?

    The leak sheds light on the daily operations at mid-sized Chinese cybersecurity firms, revealing internal issues like office politics, technical shortcomings, low pay, and customer retention challenges.

    Employee conversations included complaints about management decisions, such as extravagant purchases and salary disputes.

    The leak illustrates a less flattering side of the operations at these companies, showcasing a mix of competence and ethical concerns.

    Source: www.theguardian.com

    Reddit Prepares for Initial Public Offering and Stock Market Debut

    Reddit is on the cusp of its highly-anticipated stock market debut, which is expected to be the largest IPO by a major social network in four years. The company’s financial performance was revealed in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday, which also disclosed that OpenAI founder and CEO Sam Altman holds an 8.7% stake in the social media group, making him the largest shareholder.

    Trading under the ticker symbol “RDDT” on the New York Stock Exchange, Reddit’s long-awaited listing (scheduled for March) is set to be the largest social media IPO since Pinterest went public in 2019.


    The company has not yet determined the number of shares to be offered or the price range for the proposed offering, as stated in a statement by Reddit.

    The IPO filing also revealed that Reddit experienced a loss of $90.8 million in 2023, despite a roughly 21% increase in revenue. The platform boasts 267.5 million weekly active users, over 100,000 active communities, and 1 billion total posts.

    Advance Magazine Publishers holds the largest stake in the company at 30.1%, while Chinese multinational Tencent owns 11%.

    The planned IPO comes nearly 20 years after Reddit’s launch and will be a significant event for the platform, which still lags behind other social media giants such as Facebook and Twitter. The filing also outlined Reddit’s unique plan to allow its most active users to buy stock at the IPO. Additionally, Reddit plans to reward certain users with shares through a tiered system based on their contributions to the platform.

    Reddit was valued at $10 billion in a 2021 funding round, and it is anticipated that the company will aim for a similar valuation with its upcoming stock sale. It’s expected to ask to sell nearly 10% of its stock, as reported by Reuters.

    Skip past newsletter promotions

    Reddit also cited data licensing agreements as a source of revenue in its filing, disclosing a recent deal with Google worth $203 million. This deal, announced on Wednesday, will allow Reddit’s content to be used to train Google’s artificial intelligence (AI) models, generating approximately $60 million annually, as reported by Reuters.

    The filing outlined Reddit’s belief that its growing platform data will become a key element in training large-scale language models and will also serve as an additional monetization channel for the company.

    Reddit initially filed for an IPO in 2021 but postponed its public offering due to challenging economic conditions and poor performance among listed technology stocks. Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs have been named lead underwriters for the IPO, along with more than a dozen other banks.

    Source: www.theguardian.com

    OnePlus 12: Falling behind top competitors in the smartphone market

    OnePlus' latest top smartphone can't shake the feeling of being left behind by its rivals.

    The OnePlus 12 has a sleek look, fast software, and long battery life, but it lacks the much-touted AI tools built into devices from the likes of Samsung and Google. It feels more like a 2020 cell phone than a new era of artificial intelligence.

    This may appeal to those looking for a pared-down, relatively clean experience. Its price of £849 (€969/$799) is also less than its £1,000 full-featured rival. But by modern standards, it feels lacking.




    The curved glass and aluminum sides make the phone narrower than its competitors, but the OnePlus 12 is still a very large phone. Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

    The design is very similar to last year's OnePlus 11 (which cost £120 less at launch), a sleek metal and glass sandwich that feels as slick as it looks. The huge 6.82-inch OLED screen is crystal clear, smooth, and very bright. The large circular camera bump on the back is a standout design element, along with the fan-favorite alert slider on the side.

    Inside the OnePlus is Qualcomm's latest top Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chip, which is 30% faster and 20% more power efficient than its predecessor. This is a very powerful chip that is only found in a small number of new cell phones.

    The OnePlus certainly feels fast and smooth in normal operation, but to get maximum performance, i.e. running at full tilt, you'll need to enable the “High Performance” mode embedded in the settings, or when playing games. must be used in mode. The phone is therefore tuned more for power efficiency than raw performance, resulting in extremely long battery life.

    It lasts 52-55 hours between charges, and the default settings provide over 9 hours of active screen use. This is significantly longer than last year’s model, making it the best in the industry. OnePlus also charges very fast, reaching 100% within 30 minutes using his included 100W charger.




    The aluminum frame has curved corners, but the top and edges of the phone are flat. Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

    specification

    • screen: 6.82 inch 120Hz QHD+ OLED (510ppi)

    • Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 3rd generation

    • Ram: 12 or 16GB

    • storage: 256 or 512GB

    • operating system: OxygenOS 14 (Android 14)

    sustainability

    Oxygen OS 14




    OxygenOS is generally smooth to use with a reasonable amount of customization, but it is noticeably lacking in advanced smart features. Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

    The phone runs OxygenOS 14, a modified version of the latest Android 14 software. Overall it's very polished, with plenty of customization options covering everything from gestures, the look and feel of the software, and various multitasking tools. But it lacks the AI ​​tools and smart systems that have become the mainstay of rivals in both the Android camp and his iPhone camp.

    Source: www.theguardian.com

    Increase in Stablecoin Supply Indicates Strong Capital Influx into Crypto Market – Blockchain News, Analysis, TV, Employment Opportunities

    Written by Enoch Muthembei

    Over the past week, Bitcoin has experienced a bullish rally, topping the coveted $52,000 mark and recouping almost all the losses incurred since the FTX collapse. The milestone is crucial for an industry grappling with a prolonged bear market.

    Consistent with Bitcoin’s upward trajectory, there has been a notable increase in the total market capitalization of major stablecoins, including: USDT, USDC, BUSDand Big. The market capitalization of these four stablecoin giants increased from $131.232 billion to $138.993 billion from February 13th to February 20th, indicating growing demand.

    Stablecoins play a vital role as a bridge between fiat and crypto markets, making up the majority of crypto trading pairs and, as a result, becoming a major source of funding. market liquidity. The rise in market capitalization highlights the increasing adoption of stablecoins, solidifying their position as the preferred medium for engaging with cryptocurrencies.

    Looking at the broader picture, we can see that the supply of the top four stablecoins has surged by 3.475% in the past 30 days. While a variety of factors may be contributing to this increase, it is primarily due to the overall market movement of assets into stablecoins, whether fiat or cryptocurrencies, in anticipation of future trading activity. It shows the trend. This suggests that the market is gearing up for a quick entry or exit from Bitcoin.

    Supporting this trend is the notable rise in the stablecoin supply rate (SSR). SSR is a key metric that measures stablecoin supply relative to Bitcoin’s market capitalization, indicating the depth of market liquidity and potential purchasing power. A rise in SSR means a larger proportion of stablecoins compared to Bitcoin, and if these stablecoins are converted to Bitcoin, this could impact Bitcoin price growth.

    SSR that exceeds the top bollinger bands This represents an unusual surge in potential purchasing power in February 2024. This suggests that investors may be poised to migrate to Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies in line with the Bitcoin price increase observed since January 2024.

    The soaring price of Bitcoin, combined with the expansion in market capitalization and supply of major stablecoins, signals a significant influx of capital into the crypto market. For stablecoins, these trends highlight their important role in the ecosystem, serving not only as a safe haven during times of volatility, but also as an important means of putting money into Bitcoin. .

    The trends observed last week highlight the interconnectedness of the stablecoin market and Bitcoin and highlight how fluctuations in stablecoin supply and market capitalization act as indicators of impending market activity. I am.

    Source: the-blockchain.com

    Elon Musk prioritizes expanding Tesla’s market share over pursuing AI ambitions.

    Tesla CEO Elon Musk stated that in order to help Tesla become a leader in artificial intelligence and robotics, he would require at least 25% of voting power, which is almost double his current holdings. He mentioned facing resistance in achieving this goal.

    On a social media platform, Musk mentioned that it is not impossible to achieve this goal. Tesla aims to have its products manufactured outside of electric car manufacturers.

    Musk has been promoting Tesla’s partially automated “fully self-driving” software and prototype humanoid robots. However, the majority of Tesla’s revenue comes from its auto business.

    According to Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas, some analysts have highlighted the significance of technology such as Tesla’s Dojo supercomputer, used to train its AI models, in the valuation of the EV maker. He mentioned that “Dojo could add nearly $600 billion to the company’s market value.”

    Following Musk’s comments, Tesla shares dipped about 2% in premarket trading on Tuesday.

    As the world’s wealthiest individual, Musk currently owns approximately 13% of Tesla shares. He had sold billions of dollars in stock in 2022 to finance his $44 billion acquisition of Twitter.

    In another post, Musk mentioned, “A crazy meta multi-class stock structure that gives control to the next 20+ generations of the Zuckerberg family is fine before the IPO, but even a rational dual class is not allowed after the IPO. That’s strange,” referencing Mark Zuckerberg, the founder of Facebook’s parent company.

    A dual-class structure in a company involves two or more classes of stock with different voting rights, typically giving more voting rights to the founders and early investors than to other shareholders.

    Tesla did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    Musk is currently facing a lawsuit over his compensation package. In 2018, Tesla shareholder Richard Tornetta sued Musk and the board, alleging that Musk had used his advantage over Tesla’s board to secure excessive compensation without being required to work full-time at the EV maker. They are aiming to demonstrate that he has earned the package.

    With regards to Company X, Musk stated that there was no “dispute” with the board over the new compensation package, and mentioned that the pending verdict was affecting discussions.

    Source: www.theguardian.com

    SEC Approval of Spot Bitcoin ETF Leads to Increased Volatility in the Market – Blockchain News, Opinion, TV, Jobs

    Bitcoin (BTC) closed last week at around $41,750, down 5.0% from the first week of the new year, to close at around $43,750. The price showed significant fluctuations, mainly influenced by the increased market dynamics due to the approval of the BTC Spot ETF. The week began with a strong uptrend in anticipation of approval on Monday, with prices rising 9.0% to nearly $47,000. BTC approached $48,000 on Tuesday, but the false news about confirmation encountered significant volatility, causing a drop below $45,000 before stabilizing near $46,000 overnight.

    On Wednesday, the SEC granted approval for the BTC Spot ETF, leading to heightened volatility, especially on Thursday when ETF trading began. After soaring to around $49,000, BTC began a significant downtrend, especially on Friday, when the price fell by 7.7% to below $43,000. Prices gradually declined over the weekend, ultimately ending the week at around $41,750.

    The launch of the BTC Spot ETF has increased market activity. An analysis of daily trading volume on centralized exchanges for the seven-day period from January 8th to 14th showed that daily trading volume reached nearly $50 billion, the highest since November 2022. The launch of ETFs has increased activity in the entire market, and not just in BTC.

    From January 8th to 14th, BTC's daily trading volume was recorded at $17.8 billion, an increase of 26% from the $14.1 billion recorded the previous week. Ethereum (ETH) recorded a total daily trading volume of $7.7 billion during the same period, an 83% increase from the $4.2 billion recorded the previous week, indicating increased activity across the market.

    The recent strength of the market compared to BTC is further substantiated by analyzing BTC's dominance in terms of market capitalization relative to the overall digital asset market. At the end of the week, BTC's share was 51.1%, down 5.4% from 54.0% the previous week.

    BTC price trends, coupled with volume data and the performance of specific altcoins, indicate that it adheres to the typical “buy the rumor, sell the news” pattern associated with major market events. Market participants predicted the ETF's approval 90% of the time and adjusted their portfolios accordingly prior to SEC approval.

    During Q4 2023, BTC showed significant strength, with the price increasing by 57% to around $42,300 from $27,000 at the end of Q3. As BTC reached almost $49,000 after approval, investors took profits on positions initiated at lower BTC price levels and transferred their capital to altcoins, as evidenced by its decline in dominance over the past week. began to be redistributed.

    This pattern is common and does not indicate a failed ETF launch. In the first two days of trading, the 11BTC Spot ETF closed with approximately $1.4 billion in cumulative inflows, partially offset by $600 million in outflows from the Grayscale Bitcoin ETF (GBTC). Net inflows were approximately $800 million.

    The GBTC outflow was facilitated by the fact that it was not a new product launch, but rather a conversion from an existing Bitcoin trust holding over 600,000 BTC. Grayscale has higher management fees (1.5%) compared to most of its competitors (0.2%/0.3%), leading some investors to withdraw from Grayscale and opt for more favorable management fees. May reinvest in other BTC ETFs with fees.

    Source: the-blockchain.com

    Chinese AI Startup Profoundly Committed to Advancing Humanity through Science Looks to Expand into the US Market

    Amid rising geopolitical tensions, many Chinese tech companies are recalibrating their overseas operations, often avoiding mention of their origins. A bold startup DP technology Stand out in the crowd. Working on the application of artificial intelligence to molecular simulations, DP (short for “Deep Potential”) believes that the collective power of “scientific research for humanity” will pave the way for its global expansion.

    Founded in 2018 with renowned mathematician Weinan E as an advisor, DP provides a set of tools for performing scientific calculations. A process in which “computer simulations of mathematical models play an essential role in technology development and scientific research.” according to Definition by University of Waterloo. Areas that can benefit from scientific computing include: From biopharmaceutical research and automobile design to semiconductor development.

    While the world is currently focused on using AI to generate text, images, and videos, DP is focusing on machine learning, which allows computers to automatically learn from the data they are given, and the real world. We found ourselves in a less developed field of combining molecular simulations for analysis. Products and systems via virtual models. Machine learning can be applied in combination to improve the speed and accuracy of simulations to solve problems in the physical world.

    “Until now, in the absence of good computing or AI platforms, everyone relied on empirical trial and error. The process was often referred to as ‘cooking’ or ‘alchemy.'” DP CEO and founder Sun Weijie said in an interview with TechCrunch.

    This approach was relatively effective in the early stages of industrial development, when user expectations for iteration were not very high, but now [technological] “It’s progress,” he continued. “For example, consumers expect increased battery capacity every year and performance improvements with each new generation of vehicles. Traditional R&D models can no longer withstand these rapid market changes. you can’t.”

    “Meeting the expectations of these rapid iterations will require breakthrough advances in research and development approaches,” he added.

    To this end, DP has devised a software suite to help industry players discover and develop new products more efficiently. One is that we run a scientific computing platform that allows us to simulate physical properties such as magnetism, optics, and electricity. As a result of running these models, materials such as semiconductors and batteries can be designed faster and cheaper. He also operates his SaaS platform focused on preclinical research for drug discovery.

    DP goes one step further by not only supplying software to industrial researchers and designers, but by selling services tailored to their needs and carrying out research and development processes for customers who cannot fully exploit the potential of their tools. I’m here.

    This combination of SaaS and services business model has proven some early success in China. DP is expected to win contracts worth around 100 million yuan ($14 million) in 2023, up from “tens of millions of yuan” last year. The company is now preparing to bring that strategy to Western markets, where deep-pocketed giants like DeepMind dominate the space.

    “There’s an old saying in China: ‘Children from poor families grow up early.’ We’re the poor kids compared to the likes of DeepMind and OpenAI because we have much less money on hand.” Sun said.

    To date, the DP has focused on the following issues: $140 million Selected from a lineup of top Chinese VC firms, including Qiming Venture Partners and Hillhouse Ventures. For reference, 13-year-old DeepMind was acquired by Google in 2014 for over $500 million. The London-based AI giant made a whopping £477 million ($650 million) in 2020, reporting a profit of £44 million ($60 million). ) losses in 2019.

    Sun claimed that despite having its physical headquarters in Beijing, DP was conceived with a global mindset thanks to the open source scientific and technical computing community it founded. deep modeling. Early stops in China were also more accidental than intentional. “Since international exchange has stopped due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we decided to stop and work on monetization.” [in China] “For the first two years,” Sun said.

    DP’s international expansion begins in the United States, where it opens offices and works with partners to market its products and services. The startup, which is looking to establish a presence in new markets, is looking to boost its reputation by leveraging the open source community and participating in what Sun describes as a relatively “close-knit” basic research exhibition. There is.

    On the other hand, the DP’s international ambitions may run into obstacles from the ongoing decoupling that divides the United States and China in many areas, including scientific research. For example, back in August, Biden administration stretched narrowly The scientific partnership has underpinned U.S.-China relations since 1979.

    But Sun exuded confidence in science’s resilience in the face of geopolitical complexity. “Both the fields of basic science and biopharmaceuticals are shared by all of humanity and are relatively open and inclusive. Relatively speaking, I think these regions are doing okay,” he said.

    Source: techcrunch.com

    African-Owned Al Mada Ventures Raises $110 Million Fund for the African Market


    Al Mada Holding

    The Group is one of Africa’s largest private investment funds. The privately held company, headquartered in Casablanca, operates in a variety of sectors, including banking, telecommunications, renewable energy, and the food industry. For many years, Al Mada’s approach has focused on acquiring majority stakes in Morocco’s largest private companies, with its portfolio spread across 27 markets, 25 of which are in Africa.

    As part of its strategy and to remain relevant, the company is expanding its influence in these businesses, driving innovation within its portfolio, and increasing market share across the various sectors in which it operates while staying at the forefront of disruptive technologies that may emerge in the near future.

    Last March, Al Mada launched a venture capital firm, aligning these observations with its objectives. Al Mada Ventures (AMV) was spun out. With a capital pool of $110 million (approximately AED 1.1 billion), Al Mada’s overarching plan was to create an Africa-focused company to address the gap in growth-stage investments. However, rather than relying on capital from DFIs or foreign institutional investors, the company uses capital raised exclusively from Africa. Apart from the anchor, Evergreen Fund’s limited partners include top-tier corporates and institutional investors based on the continent.

    Mr. Laaresi co-founded the Cathay AfricInvest Innovation Fund (CAIF) before being selected to lead the Moroccan venture. The fund is a $100 million pan-African VC fund created through a partnership between private equity firm AfricInvest Group and Europe-based venture capital firm Cathay Innovation.


    Source: techcrunch.com