Bond Market Influence: Rachel Reeves’ Push to Safeguard the £2.7 Trillion ‘Beast’

By 12:30 PM on Wednesday, systems will be active, trading algorithms set, and billions in buy and sell orders prepared for Rachel Reeves’ budget announcement.

For the first time, a custom artificial intelligence tool will be tuned in to a Prime Minister’s speech at Deutsche Bank’s London trading floor. It will transcribe her address, detect shifts in tone, and notify you when figures fall short of expectations.

“Once the information is available, we can analyze it in real time,” explained Sanjay Raja, chief UK economist at the bank. The natural language model has been trained on Reeves’ recent public appearances, including media interviews, speeches at conferences, the spring Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) forecast, and last year’s budget, all designed to give banks a competitive edge in this highly anticipated budget.

“As we approach November 26th, there are heightened expectations regarding the city’s budget,” Raja stated.

We are now in the era of bond market budgets, following a decade of soaring government borrowing. With rising debt interest costs and the lingering effects of Brexit and Liz Truss’ mini-budget, market reactions will be critical.

Deutsche Bank’s trading floor in London. Photo: Roger Parks/Alamy

Mr. Reeves has clashed with major players in Britain’s £2.7 trillion debt market for months, engaging with top government officials from Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan in an effort to smooth over a multi-billion pound tax and spending plan.

What comprises the market? Think of it as the embodiment of electronic trading executed in systems around the globe, extensively analyzed by commentators leading up to the budget. There is concern that market turmoil could trigger stock declines and elevate borrowing costs for governments, mortgage holders, and businesses, potentially leading to political upheaval for Mr. Reeves and Keir Starmer.

Mr. Reeves experienced the bond market’s influence firsthand earlier this month when government borrowing costs surged after announcements that he scrapped income tax hikes, breaking his manifesto commitment.

The British government bond market, known as gilts, isn’t governed by a single entity but rather by a group of institutions and individuals working behind trading desks in the City, Canary Wharf, and other financial hubs.

graphic

At Phoenix Group’s trading room, a FTSE 100 insurance firm by London’s Old Bailey, Summer Refai gets ready behind a Bloomberg terminal. Budget day is significant as they manage £300 billion in assets, which includes billions of pounds in gold backing pensions, savings, and life insurance for 12 million clients.

“You might recall the famous quote from Bill Clinton’s advisor,” the firm’s head of macro markets commented. (Former strategist James Carville remarked in 1993 that a “bond market” would wield more power than any president or pope.)

“It really intimidates folks. No force makes governments move faster than the bond market,” he noted.

“You can see how the market dynamics certainly have an effect.”

The influence of bond traders has intensified in recent years as government debt and borrowing costs have surged globally, partly due to rising inflation and sluggish economic growth. The UK faces distinct challenges.

Following multiple economic shocks and consecutive budget deficits, Britain has amassed over £2.7 trillion in debt, nearly 100% of its national income. Inflation remains among the highest in the G7, and ongoing speculation regarding the government’s financial position is troubling.

Simultaneously, the Bank of England is offloading government bonds from its quantitative easing program, releasing vast amounts of gilts into the commercial market to support government borrowing.

Historically, pension funds managed most of the debt, but their demand has been dwindling due to the decline of defined benefit and final salary plans. Foreign investors have increasingly entered the market, now accounting for about a third of it.

The OBR has cautioned that this could render the UK more susceptible. Foreign investors could easily opt to invest elsewhere. For Reeves, preserving the bond market’s stability will be a top priority.

graphic

Amidst this context, the UK’s annual debt interest expenses have soared to £100 billion, about £1 for every £10 spent by the Treasury. This added financial pressure is exacerbated by the mounting costs of refurbishing damaged public services and catering to an aging population.

The yield (real interest rate) on 10-year bonds has reached 4.5%, the highest among G7 nations and nearly at a three-decade peak since 1998.

Simon French, chief economist at Panmure Liberum, mentioned that part of Reeves’ strategy involves reducing yields to alleviate this interest overhead. Bringing the UK back to a mid-ranking position could translate to billions in savings annually.

“Comparing the UK to the G7 is akin to determining who is the most inebriated at a party. But that’s a serious embarrassment regarding fiscal disparity. That’s a vital opportunity.”

Lower interest rates could yield “muted returns,” he suggests. This contrasts with the “stupid premium” witnessed during the Truss government. “By avoiding self-inflicted harm, we could see a market rebound.”

To achieve this, Reeves will need to bridge a possible £20 billion budget gap while addressing inflation. Raising taxes and cutting spending could intensify challenges, especially without stalling economic progress or violating Labor’s manifesto pledges.

graphic

The amount of debt investors will need to absorb will be a pivotal moment in the budget. The city anticipates that Mr. Reeves will have to rebuild considerable leeway, contrary to fiscal regulations. This would cap deficits and consequently reduce future gilt issuances.

“We’re closely monitoring the possibility of new budget rules being announced. That’s our focal point,” remarked Moeen Islam, head of UK rates strategy at Barclays.

In the spring, Reeves had set aside £9.9 billion as a cushion. However, this reserve is likely to be impacted by rising borrowing costs, a reversal in welfare policies, and downward adjustments to the OBR’s productivity forecasts.

Investors are hoping for a figure exceeding £20 billion, he adds. “That would be incredibly optimistic.”

However, a political approach focused on satisfying city investors may not be a comfortable route for Labor, especially when many are urging Mr. Reeves to ensure welfare spending does not rise.

Geoff Tilley, senior economist at the Labor Congress, stated that the city backed the Conservative Party’s austerity measures during the 2010s. “Rather than mending public debt, it has harmed it.”

“Our perspective is that markets are not inherently rational, but they do appreciate growth, and there’s evidence they respond favorably to policies that steer the economy in a positive direction.”

Investors had expected a manifesto-breaking increase in income tax. Implementing this would be the simplest route to generate billions for the Treasury, rather than relying on a mix of smaller, harder-to-execute measures.

“We underestimated the complexity of such a decision, and how high the bar would be. [a breach of manifesto] This decision lies with the prime minister, any prime minister,” remarked Islam.

Curiously, this could temper reactions on Wednesday, as numerous investors fear Reeves may be ousted from No. 11. “The market has recognized that such decisions can often be more intricate and nuanced than originally perceived.”

graphic

On Panmure Liberum’s trading floor, Marco Varani anticipates turbulent trading conditions.

“In this industry, what you’re truly after is movement and volatility. It generates more business. Days like Brexit and the onset of Covid were peaks of chaos. It was absolute madness.”

Once Reeves’ speech appears on Bloomberg, retail trading leaders expect an immediate impact. “You’ll see the gold market react, becoming a bit unsettled. Expect considerable volatility.”

During her address, he predicts that gold fluctuations, currency shifts, and movements in UK-listed company stocks will primarily be influenced by “fast money” (the City’s term for hedge funds).

Their involvement in the gold market has doubled from 15% of transactions in 2018 to roughly 30%, according to the Bank of England. Many are speculating with debt from a limited number of companies.

However, a clear judgment may unfold over several days. A crucial factor will be Threadneedle Street’s response regarding its scheduled rate cut on December 18 in the following weeks, as well as the UK’s growth trajectory and global circumstances.

Anthony O’Brien, head of market strategy at Phoenix Group, emphasized, “The market’s initial reaction should never be taken as definitive. It’s typically just individuals caught off guard, and it may require several days for clarity on the situation.”

“In the end, the economy dictates the valuation of national debt. Focusing on reducing inflation is vital. We must eliminate this uncertainty.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Students Push Back Against AI-Taught Course: ‘I Could Have Just Asked ChatGPT’

Students at Staffordshire University expressed feeling “deprived of knowledge and enjoyment” upon realizing that the course they intended to pursue for their digital careers was primarily delivered through AI.

James and Owen were part of 41 students who enrolled in a coding module last year at Staffordshire, looking to make a government-supported career transition. apprentice A program aimed at preparing individuals to become cybersecurity experts or software engineers.

However, as AI-generated slides were intermittently narrated by an AI voiceover, James began to lose confidence in the program and its administrators, fearing he had “wasted two years” of his life on a course designed “in the most cost-effective manner.”

“If I were to submit something created by an AI, I’d be expelled from the university, yet we are being instructed by an AI,” James remarked during a confrontation with an instructor recorded as part of a course in October 2024.

James and his peers have engaged in several discussions with university officials regarding the use of AI in their coursework. Nonetheless, the university seems to persist in utilizing AI-generated materials for instruction. This year, it posted a policy statement on its course website rationalizing the use of AI, detailing a “Framework for Academic Professionals to Leverage AI Automation” in their academic activities and teaching.

The university’s foreign policy states that students who outsource assignments to AI or present AI-generated work as their own are breaching the integrity policy and could face academic misconduct charges.

“I’m in the midst of my life and career,” James lamented. “I don’t feel I can just leave and start over now. I feel trapped on this path.”

The situation at Staffordshire resembles this more and more. Universities are integrating AI tools to assist students, develop course materials, and provide tailored feedback. A Ministry of Education policy document released in August welcomed this trend, asserting that generative AI “has the potential to revolutionize education.” A survey conducted last year by education technology firm Jisc among 3,287 higher education faculty revealed that almost a quarter use AI tools in their teaching.

For students, AI education seems to be more demoralizing than transformative. In the US, students have voiced their discontent online in reviews about professors using AI. In the UK, undergraduates turned to Reddit to express frustration over instructors copying and pasting feedback generated by AI. Chat GPT or using AI-generated content in coursework images.

“I recognize there’s pressure compelling instructors to use AI, but I’m just disappointed,” commented one student. I wrote.

James and Owen realized “almost immediately” that AI was being utilized in their Staffordshire course last year, notably during their first class when the instructor presented a PowerPoint with an AI audio reading the slides.

Shortly thereafter, they began to notice indications that some course materials were AI-generated, including inconsistent editing of American and British English, suspicious file names, and “general, surface-level information” that sometimes cryptically referenced U.S. law.

Signs of AI-generated content persisted this year. In one course video uploaded online, the narration introducing the material shifted to a Spanish accent for approximately 30 seconds before reverting to a British accent.




Narration accent changes during lesson in allegedly AI-generated course – video

The Guardian examined the course materials at Staffordshire and utilized two distinct AI detectors (Winston AI and Originality AI) to assess this year’s content. Both indicated that numerous assignments and presentations were “highly likely to have been generated by AI.”

Ms. James reported her concerns during a monthly meeting with student representatives early in the course. Later, in late November, it was discussed in a lecture and incorporated into the instructional materials. In the recording, he requests the instructor refrain from worrying about the slides.

“Everyone knows these slides were generated by AI. We would prefer if they were discarded,” he stated. “I don’t want guidance from GPT.”

Shortly after, the student representative for the course responded, “We conveyed this feedback, James, and the reply was that instructors can use diverse tools. This answer was quite frustrating.”

Another student commented: “While there are some helpful points in the presentation, only 5% of it is useful. There’s valuable content buried here, but perhaps we can extract that value ourselves by consulting ChatGPT.”

The lecturer laughed awkwardly, saying, “I appreciate the honesty…” before shifting to discuss another tutorial he had created using ChatGPT. “Honestly, I did this on very short notice,” he added.

Ultimately, the course director informed James that he would not receive an AI experience in the final session, as the material would be evaluated by two human instructors.

In response to inquiries from the Guardian, Staffordshire University asserted that “academic standards and learning objectives were upheld” for the course.

“Staffordshire University endorses the responsible and ethical application of digital technologies in accordance with our guidelines. While AI tools may aid certain aspects of preparation, they cannot replace academic expertise and must always be utilized in a manner that preserves academic integrity and discipline standards.”

Although the university appointed a non-AI lecturer for the final lecture of the course, James and Owen indicated that it felt insufficient at this point, especially since the university seemingly continued to use AI in this year’s instructional materials.

“I feel as if a part of my life has been taken from me,” James stated.

Owen, who is in the midst of a career transition, explained that he opted for the course to gain foundational knowledge rather than merely a qualification, but he now believes it was a waste of time.

“It’s exceedingly frustrating to sit through material that lacks value when I could be dedicating my time to something genuinely worthwhile,” he remarked.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Apple Watch Series 11 Review: Extended Battery Life Lets You Push Your Limits without Worry

The Apple Watch Series 11 introduces a highly requested feature: extended battery life.


Aside from that, the new model serves as a direct successor to the Series 10, retaining its design, dimensions, and features. Most enhancements are software-based, solidifying its position as one of the top smartwatches available, despite limited physical changes.

Starting at just 369 pounds in the UK (449 euros/$399/$679), the Series 11 sits below the watch SE at the low end and 749 pounds Ultra 3 at the high end.




The Series 11 is available in Space Gray, a hue first seen with the iPhone 5s in 2013. Old trends make a comeback. Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

Similar to last year’s Series 10, this new version is only 9.7mm thick, making it comfortable to wear at night and easily tucked under cuffs. It’s lightweight and user-friendly.

The vibrant 2,000 knit OLED display is bright for indoor and outdoor use, and remains legible from various angles. The glass is reportedly twice as scratch-resistant as its predecessors, though it doesn’t quite match the hardness of the sapphire used in more expensive titanium models.

The new watch incorporates the same S10 chip as previous versions, now with optional 5G connectivity, ensuring strong reception for outdoor activities. Battery capacity has increased by 9% for 42mm models and 11% for 46mm models.

In sleep tracking tests without exercise, the 46mm version lasted two days. Most users can expect around two days and nights before needing a recharge, which takes 66 minutes with a power adapter over 20W (not included), reaching about 70% in just 30 minutes. During a run, it tracks for roughly eight hours—enough for one or two marathons.

Specifications

  • Case Size: 42 or 46mm

  • Case Thickness: 9.7mm

  • Weight: Approximately 30g or 37g

  • Processor: S10

  • Storage: 64GB

  • Operating System: WatchOS 26

  • Water Resistance: 50 meters (5 ATM)

  • Sensors: HR, ECG, SpO2, Temperature, Depth, Microphone, Speaker, NFC, GNSS, Compass, Altimeter

  • Connectivity: Bluetooth 5.3, WiFi 4, NFC, UWB, Optional 5G

WatchOS 26




The Flow Watch face is engaging, though reading the time at a glance can be challenging. Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

The Series 11 ships with WatchOS 26, compatible with all models from the Series 6 onward. A new liquid glass design introduces semi-transparent elements and two additional monitoring interfaces: a large digital face called Flow that reacts to movement, and an Analog Face that segments hours, minutes, and seconds into custom dials.

One of the standout features is the wrist flick gesture. This allows you to quickly twist your wrist to dismiss notifications and return to the watch face without lifting your wrist to look at it, enabling you to silence alarms with a satisfying motion.

Hypertension, Sleep, and AI Workouts




Hypertension alerts utilize the optical sensor located on the back, the same one used for heart rate and blood oxygen readings; no pressure cuffs needed. Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

The Apple Watch retains the extensive health monitoring tools of its predecessor while introducing new features and a revamped training app.

Hypertension alerts now observe potential high blood pressure over 30 days, notifying users if heart rate data indicates possible hidden issues.

The updated sleep score metric simplifies Apple’s sleep tracking, akin to offerings from competitors like Google and Samsung. Each morning, users receive a score out of 100 based on factors such as duration, bedtime, and interruptions, all easily understood within the iPhone health app.




A sleep score helps you gauge sleep quality, allowing for detailed assessments as needed. Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

Workout Buddy acts as an AI coach, leveraging past training data to offer motivational talk before and after workouts. It tracks your training frequency and effort level, providing audible updates during your exercise, including alerts for milestones like pace, heart rate, distance, and time.

Three voice options deliver updates through Bluetooth headphones in any of the 12 supported activities, including walking, running, and cycling. However, functionality may depend on being in proximity to an iPhone 15 Pro or later to avoid interruptions while training.

Sustainability




The recycled aluminum frame offers a premium, slim, and comfortable fit. Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

Apple states that the battery should last for 1,000 or more charge cycles while retaining at least 80% of its original capacity, and can be replaced for £95. Repair costs range from between £295 and £389, depending on the model.

The watch comprises over 40% recycled materials, including aluminum, cobalt, copper, glass, gold, lithium, rare earth elements, steel, tin, titanium, tungsten, among others. Apple provides trade-in options and free recycling of devices, addressing the environmental impact of its products.

Price

The Series 11 is available in two sizes (42 and 46mm) with options for materials and 5G support, which necessitates a compatible phone plan for eSIM. Prices start at £369 (€449/$399/$679), with the 5G model requiring an additional £100 (€120/$100/$170).

For reference, the Apple Watch Ultra 3 retails at £749, while the Apple Watch SE 3 starts at £219, and the Google Pixel Watch 4 is priced at £349. The Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 is available for £294.

Verdict

The Series 11 keeps the successful Apple Watch formula intact, enhancing it with improved glass and longer battery life.

With its slim profile, quick charging, and two-day battery life, it proves convenient for sleep tracking and silent alarms. The wrist flick gesture stands out as a feature every watch should embrace, and compatibility with earlier Apple Watch straps and chargers is a significant advantage. Price drops in the UK are also appreciated.

Users may need time to adjust to the glass-like appearance of WatchOS 26, but the software operates similarly while introducing valuable additions like hypertension alerts. The Workout Buddy proves particularly useful, offering positive experiences though reliant on mobile exercise.

Overall, the Series 11 ranks among the finest smartwatches for iPhone users. Those with older models, like the Series 6, can expect a substantial upgrade. However, this year, it faces competition from the revamped Watch SE 3, which serves as a compelling alternative.

Pros: Exceptional screen visibility, sleek design, double tap and wrist flick gestures, top-notch health monitoring, impressive activity tracking, AI coaching via Workout Buddy, 50m water resistance, two-day battery life, optional 5G connectivity, long software support, eco-friendly materials, and backward compatibility with previous Apple Watch straps.

Cons: Premium pricing, limited to iPhone users, lacks customizable faces for third-party watches, and maintains a similar aesthetic to prior models.

Source: www.theguardian.com

The Trump Administration’s Push for Underwater Mining: What Are the Implications?

Life beneath the Pacific Ocean is characterized by slowness, darkness, and tranquility. Unusual creatures shine and glimmer, while oxygen seeps mysteriously through rugged mineral rocks. The residents of these deep waters seldom interfere with one another.

“This area hosts an extraordinary form of life,” noted Bethany Orcutt, a geobiologist at the Bigelow Institute for Marine Science.

Given the harsh conditions, conducting deep-sea research is both challenging and infrequent due to its high costs.

On Thursday, President Trump endorsed a Presidential Order aimed at permitting industrial mining in underwater areas for the first time. Scientists have voiced strong concerns that such mining could irreversibly damage deep-sea ecosystems before their value and functions are fully understood.

Undersea mining can target three types of metal-rich sediments: nodules, crusts, and mounds, with current focus on nodules. Nodules are particularly valuable as they contain metals essential for the production of electronic devices, advanced weaponry, electric vehicle batteries, and other technologies crucial for human advancement. Nodules are also the simplest type of underwater mineral deposits to extract.

Economically viable nodules have been forming over millions of years, resting on the seabed indefinitely. They develop when small pieces of material, such as shark teeth, become embedded in the seabed. Minerals containing iron, manganese, and other metals gradually accumulate, resembling snowmen. Some can grow as large as grapefruit.

Life also thrives among these nodules. Microbial organisms, invertebrates, corals, and sponges inhabit them.

Lisa Levin, an oceanographer at the Institute of Oceanography, states that approximately half of the known marine life inhabiting the vast Abyssal Plains exists in these nodules. However, she explained, “I am unsure about the distribution of these species and whether individuals from mined sites can recolonize other areas.” “That’s a significant unknown.”

Two primary methods have been developed for harvesting nodules. One resembles a claw that drags along the seabed collecting nodules, while the other acts as a vacuum used in underwater operations.

In both methods, nodules are lifted to surface ships several miles above the seabed, with any remaining water, rocks, and debris released back into the sea.

Both approaches are invasive and can harm the underwater habitat itself. The extraction of nodules equates to the removal of essential ecosystem components, according to scientific consensus.

Mining operations introduce light and sound pollution, affecting not only the seabed but also the sea surface around the extraction vessels.

A major concern is the sediment plume generated by mining activities, described by Jeffrey Drazen, an oceanographer at the University of Hawaii at Manoa, as “the clearest seawater” at about 1,000 meters, which contributes to obscured environments. Sediment plumes can travel significant distances and harm marine life unpredictably.

The sediment can suffocate shrimp and sponge-like fish, obstructing filter feeders. It can also block essential light, impacting lantern fishes and making it difficult for them to find mates or prey. Furthermore, it may lead to contamination of seafood for human consumption.

“What are the chances of contaminating food supplies?” Dr. Drazen questioned. He expressed a desire for answers regarding this issue before mining commences, as the information is currently lacking.

The mining industry claims to be adopting a sustainable and environmentally responsible approach to deep-sea mining through research and collaboration with the scientific community.

Their research includes fundamental studies in seabed geology, biology, and chemistry, documenting thousands of species and providing valuable imagery and footage from the deep sea. Dr. Drazen noted that interest in undersea mining could promote research efforts that might otherwise be hard to fund.

Initial tests of recovery equipment have revealed some insights into the anticipated effects related to sediment plumes, yet modeling is limited in forecasting outcomes at a commercial scale.

Impossible Metals, a California-based underwater mining firm, utilizes artificial intelligence to create a transport container-sized underwater robot designed to harvest large, free-living nodules. In 2022, the Metals Company, a Canadian deep-sea mining entity, extracted approximately 3,000 tons of nodules from the ocean floor and gathered data regarding the sediment plume generated during the process.

In March, the Metals Company indicated plans to bypass international regulatory bodies associated with the United Nations overseeing submarine mining, instead seeking authorization through NOAA.

During an interview on Thursday, CEO Gerald Baron stated that the executive order “does not serve as a shortcut” for previous environmental assessments, emphasizing that the company has “conducted over a decade of environmental research.”

White House spokesperson Anna Kelly affirmed that the United States would adhere to two domestic laws governing deep-sea exploration and commercial endeavors within U.S. waters. “Both laws mandate extensive environmental impact assessments and compliance with stringent environmental standards,” she noted.

Many scientists harbor skepticism regarding the well-understood environmental consequences of underwater mining, as viable predictions about long-term results remain elusive.

Disturbing the base of the food chain can have cascading effects on the entire marine ecosystem. For instance, if sediments dilute the food supply for plankton, they could face starvation due to an inability to extract sufficient organic matter from the clouds of sea dust.

Small plankton serve as a fundamental food source, whether directly or indirectly, for nearly every marine organism, including whales.

Understanding potential impacts poses challenges due to the slow life processes at the seabed. Deep-sea fish can live for hundreds of years, while corals can endure for millennia.

“The timeline of life here is significantly different,” Dr. Levin explained. “It raises numerous uncertainties regarding responses to environmental disturbances.” Conducting 500-year experiments to ascertain whether these ecosystems can recover or adapt is a daunting task for humans.

Additionally, there’s no assurance that damaged habitats will be restored or that harm to the seabed will be mitigated. Unlike terrestrial mining, “a strategy for deep-sea mining is absent,” Dr. Oucht remarked. “There is currently no scientific evidence supporting the restoration of ecosystems post-damage.”

Some experts have raised concerns about the necessity of undersea mining, arguing that land-based mining could meet the growing metal demands.

Proponents of deep-sea mining assert that the environmental or carbon footprint is less significant compared to traditional mining practices for those same minerals.

“To date, there has been no actual recovery of minerals,” stated Amy Gartman, a marine researcher leading the U.S. Geological Survey’s Undersea Minerals Team, referring to commercial-scale mining. “We are comparing theoretical scenarios with actual land mining methods. Once someone initiates extraction in any of these ventures, we will gain a clearer understanding.”

Eric Lipton Reports of contributions.

Source: www.nytimes.com

Trump’s encouragement prompts AI companies to push for reduced regulations

Technology leaders in the artificial intelligence sector have been pushing for regulations for over two years. They have expressed concerns about the potential risks of generative AI and its impact on national security, elections, and jobs.

Openai CEO Sam Altman testified before Congress in May 2023 that AI is “very wrong.”

However, following Trump’s election, these technology leaders have shifted their stance and are now focused on advancing their products without government interference.

Recently, companies like Meta, Google, and Openai have urged the Trump administration to block state AI laws and allow the use of copyrighted material to train AI models. They have also sought incentives such as tax cuts and grants to support their AI development.

This change in approach was influenced by Trump declaring AI as a strategic asset for the country.

Laura Karoli, a senior fellow at the Wadwani AI Center, noted that concerns about safety and responsible AI have diminished due to the encouragement from the Trump administration.

AI policy experts are concerned about the potential negative consequences of unchecked AI growth, including the spread of disinformation and discrimination in various sectors.

Tech leaders took a different stance in September 2023, supporting AI regulations proposed by Senator Chuck Schumer. Afterward, the Biden administration collaborated with major AI companies to enhance safety standards and security.

(The New York Times sued Openai and Microsoft over copyright infringement claims related to AI content. Openai and Microsoft denied the allegations.)

Following Trump’s election victory, tech companies intensified lobbying efforts. Google, Meta, and Microsoft donated to Trump’s inauguration, and leaders like Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk engaged with the president.

Trump embraced AI advancements, welcoming investments from companies like Openai, Oracle, and SoftBank. The administration emphasized the importance of AI leadership for the country.

Vice President JD Vance advocated for optimistic AI policies at various summits, highlighting the need for US leadership in AI.

Tech companies are responding to the President’s executive orders on AI, submitting comments and proposals for future AI policies within 180 days.

Openai and other companies are advocating for the use of copyrighted materials in AI training, arguing for legal access to such content.

Companies like Meta, Google, and Microsoft support the legal use of copyrighted data for AI development. Some are pushing for open-source AI to accelerate technological progress.

Venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz is advocating for open-source models in AI development.

Andreessen Horowitz and other tech firms are engaged in debates over AI regulations, emphasizing the need for safety and consumer protection measures.

Civil rights groups are calling for audits to prevent discrimination in AI applications, while artists and publishers demand transparency in the use of copyrighted materials.

Source: www.nytimes.com

A push to eliminate food dyes gains momentum nationwide, according to RFK Jr.

The movement to ban synthetic dyes in food across the US is gaining momentum, driven by critics who argue that these dyes pose a problem that should not be ignored.

States like West Virginia are referencing the Make America Healthy Movement, led by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., as a key driving force. There is no established monitoring for this issue.

In the first three months of the year, 20 states, including Oklahoma, West Virginia, and New York, have introduced nearly 40 bills aimed at restricting artificial dyes and other food additives, the highest number in any year according to the Environmental Working Group, a food safety advocacy group.

Advocate Brandon Cowd, who with his wife Whitney created the film “Documentary” cited by West Virginia lawmakers, expressed optimism about the progress being made. “We have bills on the table in states like Oklahoma, Tennessee, Florida, New York, Texas, and Arizona. There is a strong showing from all these states,” Cowd said.

The FDA has approved 36 color additives, including nine synthetic dyes used in food and beverages. Despite their approval, concerns have led to bans on certain dyes like Red No. 3 in January due to potential cancer risks.

These synthetic dyes are commonly found in products marketed to children such as candies, breakfast cereals, and soda, due to their bright and eye-catching colors.

Recently, West Virginia lawmakers passed a bill to ban seven dyes, including Red 40 and Green 3, effective 2028 upon the governor’s signature. This follows a previous ban on six dyes from foods served in public schools, similar to actions taken in California.

Lawmakers in Arizona also discussed a bill to ban certain chemicals, including synthetic dyes, from foods served in public schools.

Kennedy advocates for the elimination of artificial dyes

While the FDA has not established direct links, some government officials and groups claim a connection between these dyes and health issues.

Harvard nutrition professor Jerrold Mande noted the increasing attention to this issue and credited grassroots movements for the shift in focus. Studies have suggested possible links between dye consumption and behavioral issues in children.

Kennedy has been a vocal advocate for the elimination of artificial dyes, citing reports that indicate these dyes could disrupt normal behavior in children. He also plans to address major food company executives on this issue.

While scientific evidence regarding the effects of artificial dyes on health is inconclusive, many state lawmakers have taken action based on precautionary principles, pointing to stricter regulations in European countries.

Consumers like Wendy Bacos and Liz Dent have taken the initiative to avoid foods containing artificial dyes for their children, citing health concerns and seeking out alternatives to these additives.

Source: www.nbcnews.com

TechScape: The US Government’s Push to Make Google Sell Chrome | Technology

Google is facing challenges. According to my colleague Dan Milmo, the U.S. Department of Justice is looking into Google’s structure and business practices, including the potential sale of its Chrome browser to break its monopoly on Internet search. This comes after a court ruling finding Google in violation of antitrust laws for monopolizing search services. The Justice Department’s proposal is straightforward: Google should sell Chrome. As for Android, two options have been proposed: sell it or agree to government oversight.

Both demands present a significant challenge to Google’s advertising business, and could have severe consequences for the company.

In a blog post, Kent Walker, Google’s chief legal officer, criticized the Justice Department’s proposal, calling it “staggering,” “extreme,” and “unprecedented government overreach.” Google plans to submit its own proposal and appeal the court ruling. However, Walker’s response was somewhat exaggerated, referring to the requirement for two selection screens to access Google Search on Pixel smartphones as comically histrionic.

The Justice Department aims to increase competition by exposing Google to competition, denying the benefits of any legal violation, and preventing Google from dominating markets in the future.

Google’s advertising business relies heavily on its search service, with Chrome being a key component as the most popular browser globally. Losing Chrome would have a significant impact on Google’s advertising revenue. The debate also touches on U.S. leadership in the tech industry, with Google arguing that selling Chrome could undermine it.

There’s also talk of potentially selling Android, which plays a crucial role in data collection for advertising. The government could impose surveillance on Android, impacting Google’s business operations. The potential changes raise questions about the future aesthetic and control of smartphone operating systems.

Without Chrome, Google would lose a vital market, particularly in the education sector where Chromebooks are widely used in schools. Chrome OS is designed for web-based tasks, influencing user preferences towards Google products in the future.

If Google manages to retain Chrome, it may still need to reconsider its search engine default agreements, including the $20 billion contract with Apple. The company could be forced to adjust or terminate these contracts as part of the proposed remedies.

Review

Elon “First Buddy” Musk and his Sidekick Debut, Doge




Elon Musk and Donald Trump in October. Photo: Alex Brandon/AP

A recent development saw Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy appointed as heads of the Ministry of Government Efficiency, known as Doge, although it’s not an official government department. Musk has given it a governmental status on Twitter. They are advisors to President Trump and plan to use executive actions to reform non-governmental government agencies. Their approach focuses on efficiency but lacks detailed plans.

Musk and Ramaswamy target cost-cutting, aiming to eliminate programs that lack congressional approval. However, their approach faces criticism for potential repercussions such as cutting medical care for military veterans. Despite their intentions, the implementation of their ideas remains uncertain.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Resisting the Push for “Smart” Devices in My Home: A Tech Journalist’s Battle by Victoria Turk

TThis is one of the battles my husband and I have been fighting ever since we started living together. It’s about whether or not you want to include “smart” appliances in your home. An avid gadget fan, he happily connected all his household items to the internet so he could control them from his mobile phone. As a jaded technology journalist, I’m far too paranoid to have data-hungry surveillance machines around me.

So when I saw a recent article about a seemingly innocuous tool that apparently requires a little too much data, I felt somewhat vindicated. Consumer group “Which one?’ The company found that three of the air fryers it tested were connected to a phone app that requested permission to record audio. This is unlikely to be an important feature for an object whose sole purpose is to cook food. The device also wanted to know the exact location of the user.

To me, there’s no need to connect your air fryer, refrigerator, washing machine, or toaster to the internet, but I can see some merit to the concept. The main advantage of smart home appliances is that they can be controlled remotely. So you can finish a big load of laundry as soon as you get home from work, or check for missing groceries while you’re at the supermarket. However, many of these devices and the apps connected to them collect high levels of personal information with little transparency, despite regulations limiting the data they process.

All smart appliances need to collect some data in order to perform their promised functions. For example, voice activation services require audio access (obviously, some people want to talk to their light switches). However, devices often request more permissions than they actually need or use. Which are the most items? Reviewed also includes smart TVs, speakers, and watches
Connected to a third party tracker Data from your device can be monitored and used for various purposes such as marketing and advertising.

Many of us have a general feeling that technology is collecting more personal data than we are comfortable with. There’s a popular conspiracy theory that social media apps are spying on our private conversations, serving us ads, and secretly using our phones’ microphones to pick up on our consumer desires. I was talking to a friend about the tools I needed for a DIY project when I suddenly came across something. An ad for a power drill appears on your social feed.




“Consumer groups, which one?’ We found that the three air fryers we tested were connected to a phone app that requested permission to record audio.” Photo: Grace Carey/Getty Images

But if that sounds reassuring, all it really shows is that advertisers aren’t. need To listen to your private chatter in order to provide you with advertisements that are relevant to points that you find intrusive. They already have enough other data about you. And now it turns out that the innocent-looking appliance you bought to make dinner doesn’t respect personal boundaries either.

The problem is not just the possibility of eavesdropping. Smart devices can monitor us in all kinds of ways. A smart doorbell might monitor your coming and going from your home, and a fitness watch might track your location at all times. Even seemingly innocuous data collection can reveal more information than you expected. Robot vacuum cleaner can map and share the floor plan of your home. Connected sex toys can reveal your bedroom habits. Running the app could reveal the location of secret military bases. This also creates the possibility of abuse. Domestic abusers used
Smart doorbell, thermostat And even more
kids toys To stalk, surveil, and gaslight their victims.

As more and more things become “smart”, it becomes difficult to resist. My husband managed to sneak a color-changing light bulb into the house with an app, but I drew the line at Ring doorbell. I felt it was excessive to equip the door furniture with eyes and ears.

But in reality, you don’t have to completely avoid smart appliances just to protect your privacy. Despite my groaning, I actually like technology. We all want to use smart devices that make our lives easier without giving up a lot of personal data. In theory, regulations already cover this.
GDPR status What companies must do
be transparent about the data they collect, and
Limit data collection to what you need. But what is “required” is open to interpretation, and even if companies are honest about how they use data, how many people read the fine print when they’re just trying to set up an air fryer? Is it?

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO), the UK’s data protection regulator, plans to issue new guidance specifically for smart device manufacturers in spring 2025. Workshops with citizen juries earlier this year found that more people are learning about how smart devices handle personal information. They stopped trusting them. “The overwhelming feeling among participants was that IoT [Internet of Things] Products collect excessive and often unnecessary amounts of personal information.”
said
report We have prepared for the ICO.

This report includes a clearer privacy policy with bullet points and larger text, audio or visual signals that indicate a smart device is collecting information, and data not only during setup but also periodically over the life of the product. Some common sense solutions have been proposed, including collection reminders. Specific and prominent controls to opt-in or opt-out of having your personal data used for advertising.

It’s not exactly rocket science. The problem is that regulations are only effective if they are enforced. Editor, Harry Rose;
point out
to companies operating from other countries.

In the meantime, it might be a good time to check your phone’s settings to see what each app linked to your appliance can access. Or join the ranks of grumpy Luddites like me and think about how smart your kitchen appliances need to be.

Source: www.theguardian.com

League of Legends finals: A showcase of unmatched talent and pure joy captured in a button push

GGiven the influx of bad news from the gaming industry over the past 10 months, it’s no surprise that this weekend, sitting in a crowd of 20,000 happy and passionate fans, the biggest event on the esports calendar, The League Being able to watch the Of Legends World Championship was somewhat reassuring. Finals. The event, held at London’s O2 Arena, was the culmination of a five-week global competition to discover the world’s best teams. Having never been to one before, I had no idea what to expect, mainly because the finals are usually held in Asia, where the best players usually gather. Can we track what’s going on? Would you care? The answers to these questions were “fairly well” and “well, yeah.”


For the uninitiated, League of Legends is a multiplayer online battle arena game (Moba for short) in which two teams of five players choose a warrior from a pool of 170 warriors to destroy their opponent’s home base. Fight to control the fantasy-themed map. . The arena is divided into three lanes, with an area known as the jungle in the middle, and similar to traditional team sports, each team member patrols their own specific section. Adding to the complexity is the fact that every champion character has unique skills, weapons, and magical attacks, and throughout the game you must defeat monsters and dragons to earn experience points that make you more powerful. Masu. It’s both a deep strategy game and a tremendous riot of stomping warriors, galloping horsemen, and hovering wizards.

This year’s final was between experienced Korean team T1 and Chinese newcomer team Bilibili Gaming (abbreviated as BLG). The latter had gained momentum by defeating local rival Weibo Gaming in the semi-finals, but T1 was the firm favorite to win the tournament having already won four times. They were almost eliminated from the competition early on, but they seem to have a habit of getting back into it the moment everyone quits. At the arena, I managed to get a seat next to James Lynch of the esports news site dexerto volunteer to tell me about the action. He describes T1 as the League of Legends equivalent of the 1974 Netherlands World Cup team. Free-spirited, unconventional, and full of neurotic genius. Lee “Faker” Sang-hyuk is widely considered to be the greatest player in league history, and at the center of it all is the master Johan Cruyff. “His movements are very strange and unpredictable,” Lynch says. “It’s very difficult to kill him.”




South Korea’s T1 team celebrates their victory over China’s Bilibili Gaming in the League of Legends world finals. Photo: Benjamin Kremer/AFP/Getty Images

Before the finals begin, there will be a 10-minute mini-concert featuring American rappers Ashnikko and Linkin Park, complete with fireworks, giant LED displays and incredible art direction from dozens of dancers. The whole thing has the feel of a major sporting event mixed with live K-Pop, a riot of color, passion, and performing arts. In the hours leading up to the finals, fans flocked to the venue to purchase original merchandise, meet friends from the community and, of course, dress up as their favorite League of Legends characters.

It turns out I was extremely lucky that this was my debut watching League of Legends. It’s an exciting encounter. Once the showdown begins, the best-of-five format is pushed to its limits, with the two teams taking turns killing each other for the first four games. Throughout the finals, Faker is a formidable playmaker, continually jumping into skirmishes, taking out opponents, and managing to escape with only a millimeter of health left. In the arena, 10 young players can be seen competing on a giant screen suspended above the stage. These displays draw us in rather than taking us out of the game. The crowd of mostly 20 fans loudly applauds the smart move and chants as their team gains the upper hand.

The showdown was a deliberate affair, with warriors gingerly roaming the map, poking and prodding at each other. Eventually, the whole thing explodes into a massive clash, making the battle between the Bastards look like a mini-brawl outside a kebab shop.




During the battle between Bilibili Gaming and T1. Photo: Benjamin Kremer/AFP/Getty Images

T1 was victorious, but it was also a victory for the entire concept of esports. The scene has struggled to live up to its 2010s hype, at least financially. At the time, the team’s overestimated global value attracted large investors and sponsors, which led to a bloated team organization and soaring salaries for star players. Last year saw many organizations, events, and tournaments shut down, including Activision Blizzard’s much-hyped Overwatch League. But this weekend’s event drew a peak audience of 6.94 million viewers, most of whom watched from home on streaming platforms like Twitch and YouTube, setting a new record for esports.

It’s easy to think of video games as an industry rather than a culture that brings joy to people. Sometimes it’s more than just sales or viewership, it’s about sitting in an arena with 20,000 adoring fans. Outside the O2 Megaplex, I spoke to Morgan, an attendee perfectly dressed as Aphelios (or, more accurately, in his Heartsteel costume). He explained the appeal as follows: But he’s very friendly. Also, there are so many different communities in the league, and it’s great to see them come together and bond over something they have in common and one thing they’re really passionate about. That’s what’s really beautiful about this work.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Will the AI boom push Nvidia to a $4 trillion valuation, despite investor doubts?

During Nvidia’s annual meeting, Jensen Huang did not address the recent stock price decline. Despite briefly holding the title of the world’s most valuable company on 18 June, Nvidia experienced a significant drop in market capitalization, losing around $550 billion from its peak value as tech investors hesitated to take profits and raised concerns about the sustainability of rapid growth.

Speaking optimistically, Huang, the CEO, discussed the company’s rise in valuation from $2 trillion to $3 trillion in just 30 days this year and set sights on reaching $4 trillion. He emphasized the potential of the upcoming Blackwell chips, hinting at revolutionary advancements in AI that could automate a significant portion of heavy industry, talking about a future where robotic factories produce robot-like products with a new wave of AI.

Huang concluded by boldly stating, “We have reinvented Nvidia, the computer industry, and maybe the world.” These words set the groundwork for the company’s $4 trillion valuation and the hype surrounding AI. Despite the initial setback, Nvidia’s shares have been steadily climbing back up, surpassing $3 trillion this week, reaffirming its position as a top stock to invest in amidst the AI boom.

“We have reinvented Nvidia, the computer industry and maybe the world,” Jensen Huang said. Photo: Qian Yingying/AP

Analysts like Alvin Nguyen from Forrester are optimistic about Nvidia’s potential to reach $4 trillion, suggesting that only a significant genAI market collapse could hinder its progress. However, the competition with tech giants like Microsoft and Apple remains fierce, as they currently hold the top market positions in AI.

Nguyen speculates that the launch of OpenAI’s GPT-5 and other new AI models could further boost Nvidia’s stock price, potentially reaching the $4 trillion mark by the end of 2025. However, technological advancements and shifts in consumer demand for AI products may impact Nvidia’s journey to the $4 trillion milestone.

As the discussions around AI continue to evolve, private AI research institutions like OpenAI and Anthropic are making significant contributions to the generative AI landscape. Companies like Google, Microsoft, and Nvidia are investing heavily in AI technologies, each aiming to make a mark in the rapidly expanding industry.

chart

Nvidia’s stronghold in providing GPUs for AI research and applications has positioned it as a key player in the industry. The demand for high-performance chips to power AI models like GPT-4 and Claude 3.5 has been instrumental in Nvidia’s success, with companies investing in their technology infrastructure to leverage the benefits of AI.

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang said the company is “automating $50 trillion of heavy industry.” Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

As Nvidia aims for the next milestone of $4 trillion, challenges lie ahead in maintaining market dominance and profitability amid increasing competition. With market dynamics evolving and technological advancements shaping the industry, Nvidia’s path to $4 trillion valuation may face obstacles in the ever-changing landscape of AI.

The economic landscape is shifting, and the role of AI in driving the Fourth Industrial Revolution presents both opportunities and challenges. For Nvidia and other AI companies, navigating these complexities will be crucial in realizing the full potential of AI while adapting to the changing market conditions.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Putting an end to the toxic rivalry between Xbox and PlayStation: The button to push

MLast week's big Xbox announcement from Microsoft turned out to be somewhat anticlimactic. Just four games, none particularly shocking, will be coming to PlayStation and Nintendo Switch in the near future. (Annoyingly, Microsoft executives declined to be named, but it was later reported by Famitsu and The Verge that the games in question were Sea of ​​Thieves, Grounded, Pentiment, and Hi-Fi Rush.) (This matches the game I have in mind; I've heard it from other sources.)

Microsoft has no intention of exiting the console market or making all its games multi-platform, as the Whiplash rumormongers have hotly speculated. And the (very valuable) Xbox Game Pass subscription service remains exclusive to Xbox and PC.

This is not essentially news. Microsoft is already one of the biggest publishers of PlayStation, especially now that it owns both Bethesda and Activision-Blizzard. So everything from Skyrim to Call of Duty to Minecraft is technically a Microsoft game. If Microsoft's head of games, Phil Spencer, announced last year that Starfield would be developed for the PlayStation 5, or if Xbox head Sarah Bond announced that Microsoft would develop an Xbox-only game, for example. If they had said they were abandoning the idea completely, well, that would have been the case. This is a big change worth reporting home (or, in my case, writing to you). Rather, it's a small extension of a strategy Microsoft has pursued for years. Every time I've talked to Microsoft executives over the years, they've always offered some variation of the line, “Play the games you want, with the people you want, wherever you want.” Last week's Xbox broadcast.

Instead, the announcement highlighted how harmful and outdated the idea of ​​console wars is.Adults are still overly invested in the idea of ​​a console identity, and some of the products Microsoft has spent billions of dollars developing or acquiring on other, far more popular gaming consoles. The very prospect of releasing it was enough to cause excitement. tantrums and emotional outbursts;. The Xbox community has been in an uproar over the issue for weeks, with X people posting wartime memes and YouTubers posting videos with titles like: “Xbox…it's over!”.

No doubt some of this anger is designed to get more clicks, but most of it is misplaced passion. Fans care a lot about Xbox and the games that Xbox Studios has brought us over the years, but fundamentally they care about which machine the video game is played on, Steam deck or Switch, Xbox or PlayStation. . Microsoft's own management has been saying this for years, and anyone who hasn't heard it hasn't.

Sea of ​​Thieves on Xbox One. Photo: Rare

The console wars were never anything more than a marketing strategy. Like when Sega vs. Nintendo created one of the great business rivalries of the 1990s (remember the catchphrase “What does Sega do that Nintendo doesn't do?”) and when Microsoft , there were times over the years when it was still very entertaining. ™'s continued fumbling with his Xbox One announcement in 2013 gave Sony ample opportunity. playful piss.

But that's no longer fun, now that the culture wars have turned every aspect of modern life, from politics to parkruns, into a hostile nightmare. It's ridiculous to see people arguing over video game consoles as if it were a matter of life and death.

But even if what we're discussing doesn't matter, how we discuss it does. Toxic fandom is a problem everywhere from football to video games to Star Wars, and its loud, illogical, and mean-spirited nature reflects trends in public discourse since 2016. doing. Bad actors have tried to use video game fandom as a weapon to direct their anger. If you set goals that align with their purpose, they will try again.

Getting back to Xbox, to me, the problem with Microsoft's presence in the gaming world is that it's a huge company focused on continued growth. Unlike Sony or Nintendo, the company has nearly limitless resources, as recent acquisition activity shows. We're still working on changing our history of acquiring great studios. crush them Through corporate intervention. I wonder if some companies have the power to buy out competitors in creative industries where competition is key to the diversity, innovation, and creative value of work. Microsoft has started bringing Xbox games to rival consoles, which actually suggests do not have It's desperate to dominate this space and allow more players to benefit from the fruits of its many studio efforts. This is safe.

This isn't the end of Xbox consoles, but let's take this opportunity to call for an end to the manufactured console wars. They really make us all look bad.

what to play

pacific drive. Photo: Ironwood Studio

I understand that pacific drive It's inspired by Jeff VanderMeer's bizarre novel, and playing it is like driving a beat-up car into the exclusion zone of Annihilation. There, strange and frightening things await you under eerie hues and thunderous skies. And your poor vehicle is the only thing standing between you and them. You ride into the zone over and over again, never knowing what you're going to see. Repair the car in the garage with what you found and try to further investigate what is going on.

Everything is very peaceful until it suddenly isn't so peaceful and you fumble to manually turn the lights and wipers on and off while running away from the storm.

Available on: PC, PS5
Estimated play time:
Still do not know…

what to read

Stroke Tthe Animals video game by TJ Gardner. Photo: TJ Gardner
  • If you've ever absentmindedly looked at the PlayStation Store, you may have seen it. pet the animal Game – A basic, eyebrow-raising game where you press a button and pet an animal (i.e. a JPEG of an animal) for a few minutes to earn a simple trophy. When Ellie Gibson looked into the contents of these games, he discovered an unexpected story.

  • Peripheral device manufacturers PDP It is coming out as new guitar controller Used in the festival music game component of Fornite (and Rock Band 4 for those still playing). Fun fact: Fortnite Festival was developed by Harmonix, the developer of the original Guitar Hero and Rock Band games.

  • If you can get to Asda, you might be able to buy a copy of last year's ill-fated Wizard FPS Immortals of Aveum On PS5 for 1 pound. It's not a bad game, but it was released in one of the busiest gaming years on record and sadly sank without a trace.

  • Embracer grouphas gone on a wild acquisition spree funded by Saudi speculative funds that suddenly disappeared last year, laying off 1,400 people, canceling 29 games and shuttering several of the studios it acquired. Therefore, the company's CEO Definitely a popular statement Layoffs are “something everyone has to overcome.”

Skip past newsletter promotions

What to click

Skull and Bones Review – Yo Ho Ho and some fun

Ever wanted to play Mario Kart to the accompaniment of a live jazz band? In Oklahoma, you can:

Report finds LGBTQ+ representation in video games lags behind movies and TV

Tomb Raider 1-3 Remastered Edition Review – A great remaster of Lara Croft’s Lost Ark

question block

sunset overdrive. Photo: Microsoft

This week's question from reader Paul:

“What game would you like to go back and re-score (if you could)? Were you too harsh or too lenient on the game back then?”

So, Paul, it's clear that I was right from beginning to end. Except when I'm not. Most of my early critical gaffes are thankfully hidden in the pages of his 10-20 year old magazines, but some remain in the public domain. Dear reader, may I humbly declare that I was wrong about Assassin's Creed 3? should have been more strict towards.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Federal Authorities Push for Introducing Drunk-Driving Prevention Technology in Cars, But Face Challenges

The in-vehicle technology used by Ford, GM and others to ensure drivers pay attention to the road has come a long way. However, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration says it is still not enough to prevent or reduce the harm caused by drunk driving.

This assessment is included throughout the agency’s new 99-page Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. released Tuesday was a pit stop of sorts on the way to enacting regulations that would require in-vehicle technology to recognize when a driver has been drinking.

NHTSA is currently seeking assistance in determining what technology should be incorporated into vehicles to completely reduce or prevent this problem, in part because NHTSA has no commercially available options. states that it does not exist. After the notice is published in the Federal Register, the public has 60 days to submit comments.

NHTSA says it evaluated 331 driver monitoring systems and found no commercially available systems that adequately handle the identification of alcohol impairment. The magazine noted that there are three DMS systems that claim to detect alcohol-induced impairment, but said they are still in the research and development stage. (We did not reveal the names of those systems.)

However, driver monitoring is not the only option at NHTSA’s disposal. NHTSA embarked on this mission after President Biden ordered the agency to find a solution in 2021 with bipartisan infrastructure legislation. The act charged NHTSA with developing federal motor vehicle safety standards that could determine whether a driver is impaired by passively monitoring the driver. Or it could be by passively (and accurately) detecting whether the blood alcohol concentration is too high, or a combination of both.

Accuracy is key, and NHTSA findings suggest that blood alcohol detection technology is a more viable solution in the short term. After all, dozens of states already require breathalyzer-based alcohol ignition interlocks for repeat offenders or high-BAC offenders. However, this technology is considered ‘active’, meaning that drivers must actively engage with it, which is contrary to the law’s passive requirement.

There may be another option.

Since 2008, NHTSA has been working with the Alliance for Automobile Traffic Safety (ACTS) on a public-private partnership called Driver Alcohol Sensing Systems for Safety (DADSS). As part of that program, DADSS has developed both breath-based and contact-based methods to detect driver impairment. Breath-based methods are also considered active and therefore non-starters, while touch sensors are designed to be embedded in something the driver needs to touch to operate the vehicle (such as a push-start button). NHTSA has “preliminarily determined that such touch sensors may be considered passive.”

ACTS CEO Robert Strassberger said he believes touch sensors may be the best option in the short term, given the technology’s limitations in being passive. He wants to know what the public thinks.

“That’s going to be one of the areas of interest for me when I read the comments that are ultimately submitted. How do people feel about it? Will it ultimately be accepted by consumers? It depends,” he says. “I think one of the things we definitely want to avoid doing is asking drivers to learn a new way of interacting with their cars.”

Timing is critical. Not only does drunk driving kill thousands of people each year and cost the country billions of dollars, final regulations need to be standardized by November 2024.

Judging by the number of questions NHTSA raises in its notice, achieving this goal may be difficult. The agency is raising all sorts of thorny questions, as well as seeking further comment on driver monitoring and the definition of “passive.” For example, if the start/stop button has a touch sensor, how does it know that the driver is pressing it? If the system determines that the driver is too drunk to start the car, Should you prevent your car from starting? What if the driver is trying to escape a wildfire?

“This is very complex rulemaking,” Strassberger said. “There are a lot of details that the agency needs to get right.”

Source: techcrunch.com

OpenAI investors and employees push back against Sam Altman’s firing, as he advocates for harmony within the company

Sam Altman on Monday threatened to walk away from his struggling AI startup, even as employees and major investors alike threatened to walk away from the struggling AI startup following the board’s shock move to oust him from the company. He insisted that he and OpenAI are “still one team” and have “one mission.”

Altman is now set to lead Microsoft’s new AI division, despite saying in an open letter that nearly all of OpenAI’s 770 employees will leave the company unless the entire board resigns. He insisted. Greg Brockman is back.

“We’re all going to collaborate in some way. We’re very excited,” Altman said.

“[Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella] My top priority is to ensure that OpenAI continues to thrive, and I am committed to providing full operational continuity to our partners and customers. The partnership between OpenAI and Microsoft makes this very possible. ” he added.

Mr. Altman’s remarks were met with a degree of skepticism, given the apparent chaos that followed one of the most unexpected and surprising coup attempts in Silicon Valley history.

The board announced late Friday that it “no longer has confidence in Altman’s ability to continue to lead OpenAI” because he “has not been consistently candid in his communications.”

His firing comes just a few of the announcements that despite having pumped more than $13 billion into OpenAI’s operations, he has blindly fired investment firms such as Thrive Capital and Khosla Ventures, as well as key partners including Microsoft. I found out a minute ago.

Investor Vinod Khosla slams OpenAI board of directors In a scorching column for “The Information.”its members wrote, had made a “serious miscalculation” and “set back the promise of artificial intelligence.”

Sam Altman said OpenAI will continue to operate as “one team.”
Reuters

“Every problem has a solution,” said Josh Kushner, founder of Thrive Capital. His company will be the lead buyer in the planned OpenAI stock sale, which values ​​the company at about $86 billion and is expected to close by the end of the year.

The battle over OpenAI’s future is getting stranger by the minute, with speculation mounting in the private market that a planned stock sale may fall through.

Ken Smythe of private capital advisor Next Round Capital told the Post that OpenAI’s funding plans are likely over, given the turmoil behind the scenes.

As of Monday, some major investors were “considering reducing the value of their holdings in OpenAI to zero.” reported by bloombergThis was reported by a person familiar with the matter. The newspaper said the possible move “appears to be aimed at putting pressure on the board to resign and encourage Mr. Altman to return.”

Satya Nadella
Reuters

Altman’s departure is a “material change in circumstances” and puts Thrive’s participation in the stock sale in doubt, although a sale could occur if Altman is reappointed as OpenAI’s CEO. Gender is still there. Sources told the Financial Times.

Thrive did not immediately respond to The Post’s request for comment.

Despite Altman’s public statements indicating he has stepped down, Altman himself reportedly has not yet closed the door on returning to his previous role as OpenAI CEO – people familiar with the matter said. The Verge He said he and Brockman are still open to returning, provided all remaining board members agree to resign.

Officials told the media that Altman’s comments about “work”[ing] “Together in some way” was “intended to indicate that the fight continues”.

Meanwhile, Microsoft has emerged as the big winner, having secured Altman’s services, and likely most of OpenAI’s employees, at a fraction of the valuation it would have been valued at last week.

Altman himself reportedly hasn’t closed the door on returning to his previous role as CEO of OpenAI just yet, with sources telling The Verge that he and the aforementioned Greg Brockman are still open to returning. Told.
Getty Images for SXSW

“Microsoft just pulled off one of the biggest coups in recent history, acquiring not only OpenAI’s technology but its employees within 48 hours,” Smythe said.

Nadella said Altman and Brockman will “join Microsoft to lead a new advanced AI research team.”

“We look forward to moving quickly to provide them with the resources they need to succeed,” Nadella said. He added that Microsoft remains “committed to our partnership with OpenAI.” [has] We are confident in our product roadmap. ”

In a scathing open letter, OpenAI staffers accused the board of lacking “competence, judgment, and consideration for our company’s mission and our people,” and said, “If they decide to… has ensured that all OpenAI employees will have a position in this new subsidiary.” stop.

OpenAI’s board of directors has named Emmett Shea, co-founder of the popular video game streaming platform Twitch, as interim CEO.
Reuters

The workers are demanding that OpenAI appoint two new lead independent directors, including former Twitter board chairman Brett Taylor and former U.S. congressman Will Hurd, who resigned from OpenAI’s board earlier this year. (Republican, Texas) emerged as a candidate.

At this time, the OpenAI board has named Emmett Shear, co-founder of the popular video game streaming platform Twitch, as interim CEO.

Mr. Shear is already scrambling to reassure employees and investors. In a lengthy statement posted to Company X, Mr. Shear pledged to reform the company’s management and conduct an independent investigation into the circumstances that led to Mr. Altman’s unexpected departure.

Source: nypost.com