In the beginning, God created man in His own image, granting him authority over all living things on Earth. While many do not turn to the Bible for insight into human existence, the belief in human superiority over nature and other beings lingers.
Characteristics often claimed to distinguish humans—such as reasoning, tool use, experiencing pain, and moral judgment—are not exclusive to us. Other species like chimpanzees and crows exhibit advanced intelligence, hold complex social structures, and utilize tools. Fish and crustaceans experience pain, while bees demonstrate cultural behaviors, and plants may possess senses akin to ours.
Primatologist Christine Webb posits that the so-called “human dominance complex” may be the root of nature’s hierarchies. In The Arrogant Monkey: And a New Look at Humanity, she seeks to dismantle this perceived superiority through a compelling and meticulously researched examination based on a course she taught at Harvard. Webb traces this notion back to religious traditions and other human constructs, revealing how it misrepresents scientific understanding and accelerates ecological decline.
The belief in human uniqueness contradicts Darwin’s vision of species continuity, and emphasizing differences among species is problematic. As Webb writes, “the degree of kindness,” reflects a hidden bias in research.
This bias is apparent in our fascination with primates and “charismatic” mammals, which we tend to view as more relatable, while disregarding plants, fish, and the vast majority of Earth’s life. It also reveals itself in our inconsistent standards for evaluating animals. For instance, comparisons between human and chimpanzee intelligence often pit captive chimps against their wild counterparts, ignoring the limitations that captivity imposes.
Concerned about ethical issues surrounding captivity and its potential to skew research findings, Webb focuses exclusively on great apes in their natural and protected habitats. These profound interactions have shaped her belief that many non-human species likely possess some form of consciousness or “conscious life.”
Webb anticipates that critics may dismiss her views as anthropomorphism, labeling it a “serious scientific error.” However, she argues that the reluctance to acknowledge similarities between humans and other species complicates scientific inquiry and undermines its conclusions. She questions the certainty with which humans claim to understand consciousness beyond their own.
Dismantling these beliefs is crucial for appreciating the wonder and diversity of life, marking the first step towards a “radically humble approach.” By recognizing ourselves as fellow animals and integral to nature, we can confront the destructive forces of capitalism that fuel zoonotic diseases, mass extinctions, climate change, and ecosystem collapse.
Webb advocates for broadening the concept of “good science” to incorporate indigenous knowledge about the uniqueness and interconnection of all life forms. She acknowledges the immense challenge this poses, declaring that human exceptionalism is “the most pervasive implicit belief of our era.” Yet, she believes that unlearning this can foster a deeper connection to nature, spark awe, and inspire advocacy for both animal welfare and environmental protection. In The Arrogant Monkey, she highlights this “stubborn ideology” and its detrimental impacts, modeling the humility, curiosity, and compassion essential for countering it.
Devi Sridhar argues that we have misaligned health priorities. Many of us obsess over personal choices like diet and exercise while ignoring the crucial role of government in health outcomes. This crucial factor: effective governance.
Public health initiatives—including universal healthcare, access to clean drinking water, breathable air, and safe transportation—actually have a far greater effect on longevity than individual commodities like gym memberships or health food. As a professor of global public health at the University of Edinburgh, Devi has authored a new book titled How Can I Not Die (Too Early), which builds a compelling case that emphasizes both personal endeavors and public health as keys to a long, healthy life.
In her interview with New Scientist, she tackles the illusion of personal responsibility for health, discusses how to elevate public health appeal, and shares her vision if she were in a position of authority.
Graham Lawton: Are you suggesting that focusing on our own health is futile?
Devi Sridhar: Not at all! Personal health initiatives can be highly effective if resources, time, and education are available. However, placing sole responsibility for health on individuals ignores the broader societal factors at play. The environment and circumstances you reside in profoundly impact your lifespan. Society often forgets the systemic issues tied to health, where individuals’ agency is critical. Yet, large-scale health improvements typically originate from governmental initiatives.
How did we come to believe that health is solely our responsibility?
This belief is empowering. People think, “What can I do today?” and “If I’m disciplined enough, I can succeed!” However, broader structural barriers often limit their ability to make changes. We’re inundated with self-help narratives while less attention is paid to systemic factors, which many perceive as not directly relevant to their own lives. Additionally, there’s significant skepticism about politicians, with a prevailing notion that nothing will change.
What’s the right balance between personal and public health measures?
The answer varies by the specific issue. Individual efforts can influence areas like diet and exercise, but for critical areas such as air quality and water safety, individuals are often at the mercy of governmental decisions.
Are celebrity diets and social media influencers further skewing this balance?
Absolutely. It’s all about marketing. We tend to believe that products with the right branding are more effective. Public health struggles with marketing challenges. Recent years have not helped, as public health messaging often comes across as oppressive rather than liberating.
How can we reshape perceptions of public health?
We need to shift the narrative around public health. It shouldn’t just be about societal benefits, but also about simplifying life. People want to understand, “How does this benefit me?” This may sound cynical, but it’s the reality we operate within.
Vaccinating children for measles is a lifesaver, but social media influencers may spread doubts
Morwan Ali/EPA/Shutterstock
Given the misinformation surrounding vaccinations, why do many people fall prey to such fallacies?
A lot of this is rooted in social media culture, where popularity seems to supersede accuracy. For example, when Joe Rogan discusses his experiences with measles on his podcast—where he asserts it was commonplace during his childhood—this message carries more weight than that of actual health experts. Despite being neither a medical professional nor a public health authority, his influence is substantial. If I claimed that the secret to longevity was gin and tonics, it would go viral, posing a significant challenge for credible health messaging.
Implementing effective public health policies seems complicated, isn’t it?
Change often meets resistance. Consider the initial pushback against smoking bans in pubs or seat belt laws. Though there’s resistance early on, over time, people adapt, and these measures become normalized.
Your book presents various instances of successful government interventions. Which one stands out to you?
As someone in Scotland, I have to mention the Dunblane gun laws enacted following a tragic school shooting in 1996. The resistance to these laws was fierce, yet they have effectively prevented mass shootings in British schools, saving countless lives and establishing a model for other nations.
In high-income countries, 20% of deaths are preventable. What insights can we draw from nations with lower preventable mortality rates?
Countries like Japan, which have high cancer survival rates and low chronic disease prevalence, serve as models for what can be achieved. In Japan, preventable mortality rates are estimated at about 10%, showcasing the potential for better outcomes.
Our objective should be to extend life expectancy, ideally reaching ages of 80, 90, or even 100. If one can age successfully and die of natural causes, that signifies a healthy approach to living.
However, longer lifespans mean an older population. How should we respond to this shift?
Aging should be perceived as a strength, not a detriment. The focus should be on encouraging healthy aging, allowing individuals to maintain independence without overwhelming healthcare systems.
How realistic is it to align preventable mortality rates with those of Japan?
It will likely take a decade or two, as changing urban design and reversing childhood obesity cannot be done overnight. Nevertheless, the return on investment can be considerable over time. A significant challenge is the current governmental tendency to prioritize short-term headlines over long-term planning.
Typically, there is initial resistance to new public health regulations, such as the essential use of seat belts, but people will adapt over time.
CrackerClips Stock Media/Alamy
If you were in charge of the UK National Health Service (NHS), what reforms would you prioritize?
I believe there’s a strong need for focus on preventive care. Currently, the UK invests significantly in acute care while neglecting prevention. The emphasis right now is on addressing hospital and ambulance waiting times, which will worsen as the population ages. My approach would be to prioritize preventive measures. Identify and invest in cost-efficient strategies to detect health issues early. What are the prevalent reasons behind hospital admissions, and how can we tackle them?
For instance, hypertension is known as a silent killer. Regular annual blood pressure checks could lead to early detection. Though the initial costs may be higher, savings can accumulate over the years. Regular assessments of waist circumference, abdominal fat, blood sugar, cholesterol levels, and grip strength should also be incorporated.
I interviewed you during the COVID pandemic, when you mentioned that it was an opportunity to address long-standing public health challenges. Did we capitalize on that?
No, quite the opposite. If anything, there has been a backlash against public health and government intervention. Strict lockdowns and mask mandates led to significant pushback. Rather than seizing the opportunity for systemic change, the focus has shifted back to individual responsibility.
Do you feel we’ve learned valuable lessons from the pandemic, and is the world better prepared for the future?
It depends on the perspective. In terms of public health, I would say no; we’ve regressed. The UK’s testing infrastructure has been dismantled. However, in terms of scientific advancement, yes, we’re now better equipped for vaccine development and more efficient research processes. If a bird flu strain spreads among humans, the UK government already has a vaccine ready for distribution.
A quote from your book resonates: “We don’t need to conduct any more studies.” Is that your position?
Yes. We have a wealth of knowledge already. Perhaps 90% of what we need to know to improve population health is already available. While there’s always room for further research, repeating studies that confirm what we already know can become a distraction and delay necessary actions.
Are we evolving positively on a global level regarding public health?
Overall, yes. Life expectancy is increasing, and quality of life is better than it was a century ago. Progress may not be rapid or uniform, and in some regions, there are setbacks, but the overall trend shows significant advancement.
What message do you want readers to take from your book?
Politicians have the power to effect change. Take the NHS, for example; its establishment was a deliberate decision, not a coincidence. Everything we have today is the result of policy choices made decades ago, and we are currently reaping the benefits. While the improvements from today’s decisions may not be immediate, future generations will benefit from them. My aim is to inspire hope for what is possible.
The immune system is intricate, consisting of a vast network of cells, proteins, and organs that serve as the body’s primary defense against infections. Given its vital role, it’s essential to maintain its health.
So, how can you achieve that? Similar to other crucial bodily functions, numerous supplements and products claim to enhance your immune system’s performance. However, the reality is that your body may not require these so-called enhancements. In fact, it often functions best when left to its natural processes.
Misconceptions About Immune Boosting
The idea of vitamins that “boost” immunity can be quite misleading. In theory, the immune system is self-sufficient and operates optimally if you maintain a healthy lifestyle.
Moreover, “boosting” the immune system is a somewhat ambiguous notion. Simply increasing the quantity of immune cells or similar components in your body may not be beneficial and could potentially be harmful.
Consider your immune system as a finely tuned machine, operating at peak efficiency as long as it receives proper maintenance. Attempts to push this machine into overdrive may lead to overheating or malfunction.
The same principle applies to the immune system; an overstimulated immune response can inadvertently attack healthy cells, resulting in autoimmune disorders.
“The immune system can typically maintain its own balance. As long as you adhere to a relatively healthy lifestyle, no additional enhancement is necessary,” stated Dr. Bobby Cherayil, author of The Logic of Immunity, in an episode of BBC Science Focus.
“This includes a nutritious diet, sufficient sleep, regular physical activity, and avoiding harmful practices such as smoking or excessive alcohol consumption.”
Though a decline in lifestyle can affect our immune system, this deterioration is gradual, often requiring severe circumstances for visible infection to occur.
“A diet lacking essential nutrients or severe vitamin deficiencies can negatively impact your immune system, but such deficiencies are generally quite extreme.”
Risks Associated with Vitamin Supplements
If you maintain a healthy lifestyle—eating well, sleeping adequately, and exercising regularly—what risk is there in taking supplements aimed at enhancing your immune system?
Often, the risks are minimal, with the primary concern being the lack of effectiveness. The body can only absorb a certain amount of vitamins, and excess amounts typically pass through the body and are expelled in urine.
This applies mainly to water-soluble vitamins; however, vitamins A, D, E, and K do not leave the system so easily, and an excess can lead to toxicity. For instance, too much vitamin D can cause nausea, weakness, and may ultimately lead to bone and kidney pain if left untreated.
Many immune-boosting supplements are categorized as “multivitamins,” which encompass various vitamins and minerals in a single tablet or capsule.
Clinical trials revealed no notable variation in mental or physical health outcomes between those taking multivitamins and those who were not. However, individuals consuming multivitamins often believe these products contribute positively to their health.
The danger is that individuals might assume multivitamins can substitute for other health-boosting practices, leading to neglect in other health areas such as maintaining a balanced diet.
Research indicates risk may increase with age. A study from the University of Minnesota found that among over 38,000 women aged 62 and older, those taking supplements had a 2.4% higher mortality risk.
This area of research continues to evolve, and not all studies reach such dire conclusions. For instance, another study found no significant correlation between multivitamin use and overall mortality rates.
Vitamins Have Their Place…for Some
For many, a healthy lifestyle is all that’s needed to keep the immune system in optimal condition. However, there are individuals with significant vitamin deficiencies that require attention.
Vitamin supplements can be beneficial, particularly for older adults who struggle with chewing or swallowing. This is also true for pregnant individuals or those with digestive issues (always consult a healthcare professional).
Ultimately, the immune system remains a highly advanced, self-regulating entity. For the average person, it functions effectively on its own. Immune-boosting supplements may not pose significant risks, but they often result in “expensive urine.”
About Our Expert, Bobby Cherayil
Cherayil is an associate professor of Pediatrics at Harvard University and author of The Logic of Immunity. His research focuses on the immune system and its response to infection and inflammation.
A potential new dwarf planet has been identified at the distant fringes of our solar system, taking approximately 25,000 years to complete one orbit around the Sun.
This celestial object, designated 2017, was discovered by a team from the Advanced Research Institute and Princeton University who were searching for a “Planet 9,” a hypothesized planet larger than Earth that is believed to orbit beyond Neptune. Some astronomers suspect that this elusive Ninth planet could shed light on the peculiar clustering of various objects and other oddities observed in the outer solar system.
While in pursuit of the elusive Planet Nine, researchers instead came across another resident of our cosmic neighborhood.
“It’s similar to the way Pluto was discovered,” remarked Sihao Cheng, a member of the Advanced Research Institute that spearheaded the research team. “This endeavor was a real adventure.”
If validated, the newly found dwarf planet could be what Chen refers to as Pluton’s “extreme cousin.” The findings were published on the Preprint site arXiv and have yet to undergo peer review.
Cheng and his colleagues estimate that 2017 measures approximately 435 miles in diameter.
Dwarf planets are categorized as celestial bodies orbiting the Sun that possess enough mass and gravity to be nearly round, yet unlike typical planets, they do not clear their orbital paths of asteroids and other objects.
Eritayan, a co-author of the study and a graduate student at Princeton University, noted that one fascinating characteristic of 2017 is its highly elongated orbit. At its most distant points from the Sun, it lies over 1,600 times farther than Earth does from the Sun.
The potential dwarf planets were discovered through a meticulous examination of a vast dataset from a Chilean telescope that was scanning the universe for signs of dark energy. By compiling observations over time, the researchers identified moving objects exhibiting clear patterns.
While 2017 may be one of the most distant known objects in the solar system, its discovery suggests that other dwarf planets may exist in that vast region of space.
“We used public data that had been available for some time,” explained Jiaxuan Li, a graduate student and co-author of the research at Princeton University. “It was just hiding in plain sight.”
Li mentioned that the object is currently located near the Sun, necessitating a wait of about a month for researchers to conduct follow-up observations using ground-based telescopes. They also hope to eventually study the object with the Hubble Space Telescope or the James Webb Space Telescope.
In the meantime, Chen stated he remains committed to the quest for Planet Nine. However, new findings may complicate long-held theories about the existence of such a planet.
The hypothesis surrounding Planet Nine suggests that planets several times Earth’s size in the outer solar system might clarify why certain groups of icy objects seem to have unusually clustered orbits.
“Under the influence of Planet Nine, any object lacking a specific orbital geometry would eventually become unstable and be expelled from the solar system,” Yang explained.
Despite 2017’s long orbit leading it away from clustered objects, Yang’s calculations indicate that its path will remain stable for the next billion years.
In essence, if Planet Nine existed, 2017 would not persist. Yet, Yang emphasized that further research is essential, and the discovery of a new dwarf planet candidate does not definitively rule out Planet Nine’s existence.
For one thing, the simulations currently utilize a single hypothetical location for Planet Nine, and scientists do not all agree on the locations of these planets.
Konstantin Batygin, a planetary science professor at the California Institute of Technology, first proposed the existence of Planet Nine in a 2016 study co-authored with Mike Brown from Caltech.
He remarked that the discoveries related to 2017 neither confirm nor deny the theory. Batygin noted that outer solar system objects that might demonstrate gravitational influences of Planet Nine must have their closest points of orbit remain sufficiently distant and not interact significantly with Neptune.
“Unfortunately, this object does not fall into that category,” Batygin told NBC News. “It’s in a chaotic orbit, so the implications are not significant, as it complicates the scenario.”
Batygin expressed excitement about the new research for providing additional context regarding how objects evolve in the outer solar system, praising the researchers’ efforts in mining public datasets as “heroic.”
Chen, however, remains optimistic about finding Planet Nine.
“The entire project commenced as a search for Planet Nine, and I’m still in that mindset,” he remarked. “This, however, is an enthralling tale of scientific discovery. Whether or not Planet Nine exists, the pursuit is a captivating venture.”
It’s been said that in times of intense stress or sudden anger, a primitive part of our brain takes control. This irrational aspect of ourselves doesn’t stem from our highly evolved human faculties, but rather from the remnants of our reptilian ancestors that have persisted in our brains despite the process of evolution. Some call it the “lizard brain.”
The lizard brain theory was formulated by neuroscientists in the 1960s, particularly by Paul McLean. As he studied the brains of humans and other animals to explore the origins of negative emotions, he found common behaviors between reptiles and mammals related to survival instincts like establishing routines and defending territory, as well as unique mammalian behaviors.
Through his research and advancements in neuroscience allowing for the comparison of brain structures, MacLean proposed that the human brain evolved from a reptilian brain with ancient lizard characteristics still preserved. He identified three distinct brains within the human brain, which he called the “brain trinity”: the oldest reptilian brain, the paleomammal complex or limbic system, and the new structures that emerged with higher primate evolution.
Paul MacLean's 'Trinity Brain' model now widely discredited by scientists – Photo credit: Getty
Despite the popularity of the triune brain theory, recent studies have challenged the notion of the lizard brain. Neuroanatomists have pointed out that the brain is not structured like an onion with successive layers resembling different species’ brains, as the Trinity theory suggests.
For instance, while the amygdala within the limbic system is more developed in primates than in rats, indicating a more complex evolutionary trajectory, the concept of progress in evolution suggests that older animals are more primitive and newer ones more sophisticated. Evolution is not just about adding new features while leaving the old ones unchanged.
Explore our fascinatingcollection of fun factsand delve into more intriguing scientific topics.
a The Chinese game Black Myth: Wukong has become a summer sensation, selling 10 million copies in just three days, as reported by developer Game Science. With over a million daily players on Steam, it marks China’s first major success in the console and PC gaming market, typically dominated by mobile games. The game’s popularity as a single-player experience contrasts with previous multiplayer failures, indicating a growing demand for this type of adventure. still The game industry executives may have underestimated the appetite for such immersive experiences.
Goku, the main character of the game, has also sparked interest for other reasons. IGN’s report shed light on public comments by Game Science employees, revealing a concerning pattern of sexism. This led to conversations about gender inequality in Chinese gaming and society as a whole. While some defended Game Science, others criticized the studio for its alleged attitudes. This controversy further fueled the debate in the gaming community.
Black Myth: Wukong’s success has placed it at the center of cultural debates in the gaming world. Recent incidents of limiting discussions around sensitive topics in game demos amplified the scrutiny on the game and its developers. The game’s guidelines reflect broader restrictions in China, raising questions about creative freedom in the country’s gaming landscape. Despite these controversies, the game continues to thrive, attracting attention from global audiences.
Gamers in Shanghai try out Black Myth: Wukong on release day.
Photo: Héctor Retamal/AFP/Getty Images
These events underscore the multi-layered significance of Black Myth: Wukong’s success, highlighting the changing dynamics in China’s gaming sector. With the game’s roots in Chinese cultural heritage, it has garnered support from nationalist sentiments. However, critiques about its gameplay quality raise questions about its lasting impact. Despite differing opinions, the game remains a pivotal example of the evolving gaming industry landscape.
What to Play
Astro Bot: “Overflowing with ideas”
Photo: Sony/Team Asobi
Dive into the imaginative world of Astro Bot on PlayStation 5, a platform game that offers endless fun and creativity. Explore the galaxy as Astro and his robot friends in a spaceship-shaped adventure. Experience the PS5’s capabilities in a captivating storyline. Stay tuned for a detailed review coming soon.
Available: PlayStation 5 Estimated play time: 20+ hours
What to Read
Concorde.
Photo: Sony Interactive Entertainment
Sony’s cancellation of Concorde highlights the challenges of the gaming industry, with a failed release prompting quick action. The game’s premature end raises questions about market demand and quality standards.
Explore the legacy of Mabel Addis, the pioneering female game designer who revolutionized the industry. Her contributions to storytelling and character development set new standards for interactive entertainment.
Go to the Farm: Stardew Valley.
Photo: Photo from ConcernedApe’s High Score column
leader Adam question:
“I game online with friends regularly, and have been looking for a new story-driven online co-op adventure for a while. I'm struggling to find something to fit in for a short Friday night session. Any suggestions? As a kicker, something where he can act planned and careful, and I impulsively make a mess that he has to clean up, would be ideal.”
Discover exciting co-op adventures like Stardew Valley and Monster Hunter World, offering engaging gameplay experiences where collaboration and chaos collide. These titles provide an immersive escape for short gaming sessions with friends, catering to different play styles and preferences.
If you have a question for Question Block, or anything else you'd like to say about the newsletter, please click “Reply” or email us at pushingbuttons@theguardian.com.
Controversy surrounds the popular new Chinese game, Black Myth: Wukong, as gaming influencers were instructed not to address news, politics, the coronavirus, or “feminist propaganda” when discussing the game publicly.
Released last week, the game is China’s first “triple-A” rated game, based on the renowned 16th-century Chinese novel “Journey to the West.”
Developers reported selling more than 10 million copies globally in three days.Game Science.
However, controversy arose over guidelines given to influencers and content creators, instructing them on specific topics to avoid while live streaming the game.
Don’t insult others or use offensive language. Avoid politics, violence, nudity, feminist propaganda, and other negative content. Stay away from trigger words like “quarantine,” “isolation,” or “Covid-19.” Refrain from discussing China’s gaming industry policies and news.
The avoidance of “feminist propaganda” raised eyebrows, especially with reports of alleged sexist behavior by Game Science employees.
Game Science and co-publisher Hero Games, reported issuers of the guidelines, have been contacted for comment.
Online fans have engaged in heated discussions regarding the guidelines, linking them to prior reports of sexism within the gaming industry.
The directive, not extended to traditional publications or peer reviewers, is legally unenforceable and has sparked mockery and backlash in the gaming community.
The game’s global success has been notable, with over three million concurrent players in its first week, including two million on Steam.
Chinese authorities and media have praised the game for promoting Chinese culture and countering prejudice.
Recent reports refute Western media’s criticisms, accusing them of politicizing China’s gaming achievements to attack the country.
B
Missing Myth: Wukong is a video game that focuses on spectacle, but true awe requires confidence. This confidence is often lacking in big-budget games where developers play it safe, concerned about mainstream appeal. Despite its cutting-edge graphics, Black Myth: Wukong stands out as a potential hit, but surprisingly, it’s developed by the Chinese indie studio Game Science. The game’s polished experience is so impressive that it’s hard to believe it’s the studio’s first “premium” game.
Based on the classic 16th-century novel, Journey to the West, Black Myth: Wukong allows players to step into the shoes of the novel’s main character, the stone monkey, Son Goku. Son Goku possesses incredible strength, speed, and the ability to transform into various creatures and objects, manipulate the weather, and even create clones of himself. The game introduces these abilities through an exhilarating tutorial where Wukong faces off against gods and armies, providing a constant adrenaline rush throughout its 40-hour playtime.
Black Myth: Wukong draws inspiration from modern action games, particularly the challenging “Soul-like” genre known for epic boss fights. The game’s combat mechanics feel heavy and swift, with attention to detail like the use of soaking gourds to enhance abilities, immersing players in an authentic world.
Unlike many action games, Wukong isn’t open-world, devoid of mini-maps and quest logs. The lack of handholding encourages exploration and trust in the game’s process, leading players through dangerous terrains and breath-taking landscapes without distractions.
Capturing the allure of exploration…Black Myth: Wukong.
Photo: GameScience
In addition to exploration, Wukong caters to curiosity with hidden areas that only become visible once players acquire specific items or interact with certain characters. These optional sections, called “Attachment,” play into Buddhist themes of attachment leading to suffering, adding depth to the game’s narrative and gameplay.
Black Myth: Wukong’s success is a testament to its captivating gameplay and storytelling. Despite initial surprise at its origin from a country known for mobile games, the game’s accessibility to Chinese audiences has contributed to its massive popularity. It’s a game that transcends market expectations and delivers an exceptional gaming experience.
circle
When Chinese developer Game Science announced its first console game, Black Myth: Wukong, last year, it immediately created a stir. Inspired by the great 16th-century Chinese novel Journey to the West, the action-packed film sees the titular mythical monkey Sun Wukong battling demons from Buddhist folklore and sword-wielding anthropomorphic foxes in beautifully rendered forests. Smartphone games are extraordinarily popular in China but console game developers remain scarce, so anticipation for Wukong was at an all-time high in Game Science’s home country. Within 24 hours, the trailer had garnered two million views on YouTube and more than 10 million on Chinese video-sharing site Bilibili, surprising and delighting its creators. One excited fan said: Breaking into the developer’s office
eager for more information about the game.
After playing Wukong for an hour and a half in a London hotel suite, with a few Game Science folks nervously watching, I was convinced that, by some miracle, this masterful Dark Souls-infused take on Chinese mythology lived up to the promise of its splashy trailer, blending fluid combat with reflex-testing difficulty and the expensive cinematic sheen of God of War. Sprinting through Wukong’s jungles, ducking and dodging between hordes of terrifying flora and fauna, you’ll face everything from gi-clad toads to nightmarish giant-headed infants. Unlike many of its brutally difficult FromSoftware-esque brethren, Wukong’s difficulty feels judged by experts. My ape-man avatar met a gruesome end more times than I’d like to admit, but I persisted. Eventually I defeated enough foes to unlock new abilities. Soon I was perched on a staff mid-attack, gaining the upper hand against the savage monsters of myth. I can flit through the forest like a stealthy cicada, summon flames with my sword, and eventually take down a werewolf the size of a truck roaring atop a crumbling temple.
“We feel a lot of pressure,” recalls one of Game Science’s co-founders, Ted (who Game Science declined to reveal his full name), through an interpreter. “This is our first time working on PC and console games, and we’re a new studio, so we’re really grateful for the players’ and the market’s openness towards us. Their enthusiasm encourages us. But the Chinese mindset tends to be risk-oriented, so when faced with such great encouragement, the best we can do is to do our best to meet players’ expectations… and communicate with them in a very sincere way.”
Unfortunately, when I talk about this, I rarely get any honest communication. Report from IGN
The email was about alleged sexist comments made by multiple developers and people in leadership positions at Game Science. I offered Ted the opportunity to speak about the alleged misogynistic posts and whether or not he thought they were representative of Game Science’s values. However, I received a hasty “no comment” from the UK PR representative, followed after a long wait by a longer statement, also “no comment”, relayed through Ted’s translator. I was then told that Game Science’s US PR agency would follow up with a prepared statement later, which read, “Game Science is focused on demos at this time and will only answer questions about gameplay.”
The same thing happened to an IGN reporter. Demo in LA
It’s disappointing that Game Science chose to invite journalists to talk and play the game last month, but refuses to answer questions. Perhaps there’s nothing reassuring to say. A generous interpretation of the situation would be that the inexperienced studio is afraid to say the wrong thing. But by staying silent, Game Science is also failing to distance itself (and the game) from a number of crude, derogatory and misogynistic comments directed at its employees and management.
Journey to the West is, of course, no stranger to the world of video games; from Ninja Theory’s 2010 Xbox 360 adaptation Enslaved: Odyssey to the West, written by Alex Garland and starring Andy Serkis, to the late Akira Toriyama’s world-conquering Dragon Ball, its mythology and ape world are ripe for gaming. Black Myth: Wukong’s stunning visuals, cinematic beauty and exhilarating sense of speed make it the best playable adaptation of the fable to date, but the uninhibited excitement I would otherwise feel is trampled by the elephant in the room.
One of the most widely publicized examples of fossil legends is the Central Asian ceratopsid and Protoceratops And that GriffinA mythical creature that combines the characteristics of a lion and a bird and protects gold. This earth myth was first proposed in the 1990s. Protoceratops Fossils were transported west along trade routes from the gold mines of Asia, spreading griffin lore among the ancient Greeks. ProtoceratopsBut Griffin Link finds that unconvincing.
of Protoceratops-The geomyth of the griffin. The idea that horned dinosaur fossils in Mongolia inspired the myth of the griffin, an ancient chimera of bird and lion according to conventional archaeologists, is one of the most popular and publicized examples of fossil folklore in modern times. The idea was first proposed in the early 1990s but has received little academic scrutiny. Image credit: Whitton others., doi: 10.1177/03080188241255543.
The specific link between dinosaur fossils and the griffin myth was proposed more than 30 years ago in a series of papers and books written by folklorist Adrienne Mayolle.
This is because early ceratopsians in Mongolia and China ProtoceratopsIt was discovered by ancient nomads searching for gold in Central Asia.
story Protoceratops The bones then traveled along trade routes to the Southwest, influencing griffin stories and art.
Griffins are one of the oldest mythological creatures, first appearing in Egyptian and Middle Eastern art in the 4th millennium BC and becoming popular in Ancient Greece in the 8th century BC.
Protoceratops This is a 2-metre-long dinosaur that lived in Mongolia and northern China during the Cretaceous Period, 75 to 71 million years ago.
Like Griffin, Protoceratops It stood on all fours, had a beak, and had frill-like protrusions on its skull which some have argued could be interpreted as wings.
In the first detailed assessment of the claims, Mark Whitton of the University of Portsmouth and his colleagues looked at the historical fossil record, Protoceratops Fossils and classical sources related to griffins ProtoceratopsTo fully understand the non-traditional, fossil-based views of the griffin's origins, we consulted historians and archaeologists. Ultimately, we found that none of the arguments stood up to scrutiny.
idea Protoceratops For example, it is unlikely to be discovered by nomads searching for gold. Protoceratops Fossils have been found hundreds of kilometers away from ancient gold mines.
A century has passed since then. Protoceratops Although it was found, there have been no reports of gold buried alongside it.
Also, nomads Protoceratops Even if gold miners search for the area where the fossils were found, they will not find the skeleton.
“The hypothesis is that the dinosaur skeletons were found semi-exposed and left as if they were the remains of a recently dead animal,” Dr Whitton said.
“But generally speaking, only small parts of eroded dinosaur skeletons are visible to the naked eye and would likely go unnoticed by anyone but the most eagle-eyed fossil hunters.”
“It is almost certain that ancient peoples roaming Mongolia would have encountered it. Protoceratops. “
“We need to look further into these animals to develop a mythology, which will require us to extract fossils from the surrounding rocks.”
“Even with modern tools, adhesives, protective packaging and preparation techniques, it's no easy task.”
“probably Protoceratops The ruins have generally gone unnoticed – even though the gold miners were there and saw them.”
Similarly, the geographic spread of griffin art throughout history is not consistent with a scenario in which griffin lore originated from fossils in Central Asia and then spread westward. Protoceratops Fossils in ancient literature.
Protoceratops Its only resemblance to a griffin is that it is a quadruped with a beak. Griffin art lacks details that would suggest it was based on fossils; instead, it is clear that many griffins were modeled after features of modern cats and birds.
“Everything about the griffin's origins is consistent with the traditional interpretation that it is a mythical beast, and its appearance is perfectly explained by being a chimera between a big cat and a bird of prey,” Dr Whitton said.
“It evokes the role of dinosaurs in griffin lore, particularly species from faraway lands. Protoceratopsnot only introduces unnecessary complexity and contradictions into its origins, but also relies on interpretations and proposals that do not stand up to scrutiny.”
“It's important to distinguish between fact-based fossil folklore – links between fossils and myths that are attested to by archaeological finds or compelling references in literature and artwork – and connections that are speculative and based on intuition,” said Dr Richard Hing from the University of Portsmouth.
Team paper Published in this week's journal Interdisciplinary Science Review.
_____
Mark P. Whitton othersThe horned dinosaur Protoceratops Inspire Griffin? Interdisciplinary Science ReviewPublished online June 20, 2024; doi: 10.1177/03080188241255543
The immune system is a complex network of cells, proteins, and organs that acts as the body’s last line of defense against infection. Maintaining a healthy immune system is crucial for overall well-being.
While there are numerous supplements and products available to boost immune function, it’s important to understand that the immune system is a well-regulated system that typically functions optimally when you lead a healthy lifestyle.
Misconceptions about increasing immunity
Boosting immunity may seem like a good idea in theory, but in reality, the immune system is equipped to function efficiently on its own with the right lifestyle habits.
Attempting to supercharge the immune system with supplements can have negative consequences, as excess immune cells can lead to autoimmune diseases and other health issues.
According to Dr. Bobby Cherail, an expert in immunology, living a healthy lifestyle through proper diet, exercise, and avoiding harmful habits is the best way to support the immune system.
It’s important to note that the immune system may weaken with poor lifestyle choices, but infections typically occur only in extreme cases of malnourishment or deficiency.
Potential risks of vitamin supplements
While vitamin supplements may seem like a harmless way to boost immunity, there are risks associated with overconsumption of certain vitamins, such as vitamin A, D, E, and K.
Excess water-soluble vitamins are generally excreted by the body, but fat-soluble vitamins can accumulate and lead to toxicity if consumed in excess.
Studies have shown that multivitamins may not provide significant health benefits and can lead to a false sense of security, causing individuals to neglect other aspects of their health.
Long-term use of multivitamins has been linked to an increased risk of certain health conditions, especially in older individuals.
Vitamins still play a role…for some people.
While a healthy lifestyle is typically sufficient for maintaining a strong immune system, certain individuals with vitamin deficiencies may benefit from supplements.
People with difficulty chewing, swallowing, pregnant women, and those with digestive issues may require additional vitamin support to maintain optimal health.
Ultimately, the immune system is a highly efficient self-regulator, and for most people, immune-boosting supplements may not offer significant benefits.
About our expert Bobby Shereyle
Dr. Bobby Cherail is an associate professor of pediatrics at Harvard University, specializing in immunology and the immune system’s response to infection and inflammation.
This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Strictly Necessary Cookies
Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.
