Should I store my car keys in a Faraday box? Perhaps. With the advent of keyless entry, you can unlock your car just by approaching it, which is particularly handy when you’re carrying shopping and need to access the trunk.
However, depending on electromagnetic signals for locking and unlocking your vehicle—rather than using a traditional key—means there’s a risk. With the right technology, someone could intercept and misuse that digital communication.
In the UK, there were almost 130,000 vehicles stolen from April 2023 to March 2024. Furthermore, more than half of these incidents involved thieves manipulating the signal from the car key without ever having physical access to it.
This problem mainly affects vehicles with passive keyless entry systems, which enable you to unlock the door just by being within a certain range of the car without pressing any buttons. These systems work by emitting a signal detectable by nearby cars.
The distance at which this works varies by manufacturer, but theoretically, if your keys are inside the house and your car is in the driveway, the keys and the car are far enough apart that no signal should reach them.
Nevertheless, thieves may use devices to extend the key’s signal range, executing what’s known as a relay attack, which typically involves multiple devices.
The first thief situates themselves outside the house within range of the keys and captures the signal to relay it to a second accomplice positioned next to your vehicle.
While keyless cars offer convenience, they also present potential security vulnerabilities – Credit: Getty
They utilize their devices to capture the exact data contained within the signal, which is then relayed to their accomplice with a second device near your car. The vehicle recognizes the key-specific signals and unlocks as if the key were present.
To prevent this scenario, apart from switching to a lower-tech vehicle, ensure that your key doesn’t emit any signals when you don’t need to unlock your car.
Some manufacturers are offering “sleeping fobs” in newer models that employ motion-sensor technology to halt signal transmission when the key is not likely to be needed.
Additionally, some companies are developing keys that operate on bandwidths much more difficult to relay.
One day, we may eliminate keys entirely, replacing them with biometric technologies like fingerprint or facial recognition for car access.
For now, if your vehicle employs keyless entry and a sleep mode isn’t available, it’s advisable to find alternative ways to block the signal.
This is where a Faraday box or pouch becomes useful. These containers are lined with conductive material to prevent signals from entering or exiting.
You might also wrap the key in aluminum foil or store it in a microwave or refrigerator—just ensure the latter is turned off.
This article addresses the query (submitted by Radhika Bhatia): “Should I keep my car keys in a Faraday box?”
If you have any questions, please reach out to us at:questions@sciencefocus.com or message us onFacebook,Twitter, orInstagram(please include your name and location).
Discover our ultimatefun facts and explore more fascinating science content.
3p: The cost per mile for an electric vehicle is minimal, yet it represents a significant shift in the UK’s approach.
Ministers have historically opposed any type of road pricing due to its potential political fallout. This stance might change next week. Rachel Reeves, likely accustomed to facing criticism over fundraising schemes, is expected to propose charges specifically based on the mileage of EVs.
The Treasury has nearly confirmed that some financial measures will be revealed in next week’s budget, though no specifics have been disclosed. As reported first by the Telegraph, starting in 2028, EV users will be able to pay an additional fee atop their yearly road tax or vehicle excise duty (VED) according to the miles driven that year. This could involve a self-reported distance estimate or an odometer check during an MOT.
The uptake of battery electric vehicles, which are cheaper to operate compared to petrol cars, is increasing. By 2024, these vehicles are projected to be driven an average of about 8,900 miles, based on statistics from the Department for Transport (DfT). At a rate of 3p per mile, the current 1.4 million EVs on the roads could generate £267 per vehicle, amounting to around £375 million annually.
The Treasury has effectively confirmed that a form of fee for EVs will be announced when Rachel Reeves presents her Budget. Photo: Carlos Jasso/AFP/Getty Images
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander had difficulty dismissing a national road pricing scheme during Thursday’s Commons questioning, but a later “clarification” indicated that pay-per-mile for EVs remains a possibility.
Looking ahead, a worrying deficit in vehicle tax revenue is anticipated as the transition to EVs diminishes fuel tax revenue. While petrol and diesel vehicles contribute taxes based on fuel consumption, the shift to electric will alter this dynamic.
Latest forecasts from the Office for Budget Responsibility indicate that a fuel tax of 52.95p per liter (roughly 5p per mile for the average car) will yield £24.4 billion this year, but billions of this income will decline starting in 2030 when sales of new petrol and diesel cars are phased out.
The key challenge lies in identifying fair alternatives to an unsustainable tax structure, particularly as there is enduring opposition from the right to all types of road pricing, which has become entangled in a culture war over London’s Ultra Low Emission Zones (ULEZ) and low-traffic areas, arguing for increased surveillance and reduced freedoms.
Last year, London’s mayor, Sadiq Khan, abandoned a review of pricing after being overwhelmed by anti-ULEZ sentiment. Photo: PA Images/Alamy
Some economists are in favor of time- and congestion-based road pricing, which may serve as a fairer method for managing road usage, although it also raises concerns about additional tracking.
Steve Gooding, director of the RAC Foundation, asserts that any plan should prioritize simplicity. However, regarding privacy, he notes, “The volume of data generated by modern vehicles is substantial. If the DfT or DVLA began monitoring Fahrzeugen, people might feel closely scrutinized. Yet Elon Musk has a different view: [Musk] – They don’t seem to mind.”
A broader issue is that pay-per-mile may deter drivers from switching to electric vehicles, which is vital for reducing carbon emissions. Manufacturers, businesses, and motoring organizations like Ford, Autotrader, and the AA have expressed concerns about the timing of introducing new charges amid this transition. Under the UK’s ZEV obligation, car manufacturers are required to ensure that one in three cars sold next year is a zero-emission vehicle, escalating to 80% by 2030 (the remaining 20% can be hybrids).
Current grants for new electric cars can be as high as £3,750, making running costs more reasonable for some consumers; however, several discounts and tax exemptions have ceased. Transport for London recently confirmed that EVs will have to pay the capital’s congestion charge starting next year, with zero-emission vehicles also subject to VED from April onward.
New Zealand is raising alarms, according to a report from the Social Market Foundation (SMF). Electric vehicles became liable for road tolls last year, a system previously reserved for diesel cars, where drivers purchased permits in increments of 1,000 km (621 miles). This change, alongside the cessation of buyer incentives and tax exceptions, resulted in a dramatic drop in new EV sales, with market share plummeting from a peak of 19% to just 4%.
Electric car at a charging station in Auckland, New Zealand. Last year, EVs were made responsible for road user charges. Photo: Michael Craig/AP
The SMF noted that Iceland also implemented a pay-per-mile system for EVs last year, but maintained incentives and pricing differentials, resulting in a much less pronounced decline in market share.
Advocates of this emerging technology proceed with caution. The Electric Vehicle Association England, representing motorists, expressed to the Prime Minister that consumer confidence in EVs remains tepid.
For many individuals, particularly in lower-income neighborhoods or those reliant on public charging without driveways, operational costs no longer present the same appeal. Ginny Buckley, CEO of Electrifying.com, an EV review platform, stated: “For numerous people, the expense of running an EV could exceed that of a gasoline vehicle if they lack access to affordable home charging and depend on public networks.”
Graham Parkhurst, a professor of sustainable mobility at the University of the West of England, highlighted that the stark disparity between home chargers and public charging stations (which are subject to a 20% VAT surcharge) represents a “political time bomb,” further dividing socio-economic classes.
Even longstanding advocates for pay-per-mile, like Parkhurst, caution that such systems require careful consideration. “Charging based on mileage makes sense, similar to how fuel taxes function. However, we need time to devise how to integrate this into a broader transport taxation framework. If you need a vehicle, an electric car is undoubtedly the smarter choice,” he asserted.
Proponents of pay-per-mile warn that they need to be cautious in moving forward. Photo: nrqemi/Getty Images/iStockphoto
The think tank Resolution Foundation suggests that any mileage and weight-based charges should apply only to future EV sales.
Tanya Sinclair, chief executive of UK Electric Vehicle, agrees on the need for fundamental reform of car taxation, but emphasizes that the government must convey a clear intent to encourage the shift to electric vehicles. “Any actions that create confusion, like providing subsidies while also launching pay-per-mile charges, blur the message for consumers,” she notes.
A government spokesperson stated the administration would “consider further support” for EVs but emphasized: “While fuel tax applies to petrol and diesel, an equivalent for electric vehicles is lacking. We are aiming for a fairer system for all drivers, while facilitating the transition to electric vehicles.”
“The best time to integrate road pricing would have been in the past, but the political landscape is complicated,” noted Gooding. The cross-party Transport Select Committee advocated for urgent road pricing implementation in 2022 to replace all vehicle taxation for every vehicle type. Yet, no minister has shown enthusiasm for this. Mayor Sadiq Khan of London was compelled to reject the possibility of pricing last year due to overwhelming anti-ULEZ sentiment, despite earlier indicating it was a viable option.
According to Mr. Gooding, introducing new policies is “most effectively undertaken with the minimum number of vehicles involved, and limiting it to EVs could be more manageable than developing complex charges for the 34 million vehicles already in circulation.”
For some, including Buckley and the Transport Improvement Campaign, a controversial yet clear solution remains: terminate the 15-year freeze on fuel taxes and the temporary 5p reduction currently in effect since 2022.
The SMF reported that had the levy remained consistent in real terms, nearly £150 billion would have been accumulated in public funds. Regardless of how the pay-per-mile model evolves, Reeves stated, “We must ensure that taxes on EVs for businesses remain lower than those on petrol.” “The simplest method of preserving this variance is by increasing fuel taxes.”
When Anthony Santos sought a substitute for his Audi Q3 diesel SUV, he hesitated to consider an electric vehicle.
“We thought about it, but it didn’t seem right for us,” shared Mr. Santos, a sales manager at Liverpool’s RWinvest. However, as I explored my options, the chance to lease a pre-owned electric vehicle (EV) piqued my interest.
Just a few years back, finding a used EV, let alone leasing one, was quite challenging, but that’s changing swiftly.
Anthony Santos is leasing a Mercedes EQA for £360 monthly instead of the typical £570 via a salary sacrifice scheme.
Currently, there are one million EVs on UK roads, with early adopters’ vehicles making their way to the second-hand market.
EVs typically depreciate faster than petrol or diesel cars, which is problematic for leasing firms, rental companies, and corporate fleet managers. However, this means consumers can access more affordable lease deals.
Used car leases in the UK surged by 166% in Q2 2025 compared to the previous year, with electric vehicles driving this growth, according to the British Vehicle Rental and Lease Association (BVRLA).
“Three years ago, leasing used EVs was minimal due to a lack of supply,” stated Tom Groot, CEO of Electric Car Scheme. Now, used EVs comprise almost half of their business, up from about 15% in 2024.
At Octopus EV, the UK’s largest energy provider, the number of used EV leases has doubled over the past year.
Additionally, leading leasing firms like Lloyds Banking Group’s Lex Auto Lease, BNP Paribas’ Arval, and independent group Zenith are now offering leases for used EVs.
New electric car prices average around £50,000, making them unaffordable for many UK residents. In response, the government initiated a subsidy scheme last summer, while the used market offers a more accessible path to electric vehicle ownership.
Santos found he could lease a lightly used Mercedes-Benz EQA without any down payment. Through his company’s electric vehicle scheme, he opted for a salary sacrifice and ended up paying £360 per month for a car typically priced at £570.
“We had no savings; the tax benefits were a game changer,” says Santos. “That’s what motivated me.”
Lease Structure
Leasing a car generally involves monthly payments over two to three years, allowing individuals to avoid a hefty upfront cost. This often includes not just the car’s cost but also road tax, breakdown assistance, service, maintenance, etc., although insurance is typically separate.
Leasing a used EV is significantly cheaper than acquiring a new one, even if it’s only a few years old and well-maintained. This opens up pricier models at more budget-friendly rates, making it easier for those on lower incomes to shrink their carbon footprint.
In standard leasing, a new Skoda Enyak costs about £567 a month, while opting for a used model through salary sacrifice reduces it to £292. Photo: Arndt Wiegmann/Reuters
For example, leasing a new Skoda Enyak SUV starts at approximately £567 monthly, but for a used version, it can drop to £292 with a salary sacrifice. Volkswagen’s ID.4 SUV similarly goes from £506 to £296 monthly, representing a 42% decrease.
However, not all expenses are covered by the owner. Lessees could incur charges for damages that exceed ordinary wear and tear and may face excess mileage fees. A 10p per mile overage might seem trivial, but frequent drivers should consider the potential extra charges upon car return.
Salary Sacrifice
Top deals are often exclusive to employees in salary sacrifice programs. This arrangement allows costs to be deducted from pre-tax salaries, effectively lowering tax obligations. Savings vary by tax bracket—20% for basic rate taxpayers, 40% for higher rate taxpayers (earning between £50,271 and £125,140), and up to 45% for those with even higher incomes.
Ian Hughes, CEO of Zenith Group’s corporate and consumer business, noted that salary sacrifice significantly helps transition to electric vehicles by providing tax benefits through reduced National Insurance contributions for employers.
Salary sacrifice programs are available from a variety of employers, ranging from small businesses to major corporations like HSBC, BT, and Jet2, as well as multiple NHS Trusts. Typically, there are no costs to the employee, but the employer is liable to pay the scheme provider the equivalent of tax savings.
Employers may impose conditions, such as a minimum employment term or a base salary threshold. Additional eligibility checks ensure lessees can manage the monthly payments.
A 2022 Mini Cooper S electric model with 17,400 miles is available for £256 monthly with a salary sacrifice. Photo: Malcolm Haynes/Alamy
For those without access to a salary sacrifice scheme, alternatives exist. Carwow’s Leasey leasing service, for instance, provides used EVs. A 2022 Mini Cooper S electric car with 17,400 miles costs £256 monthly. While higher than the £209 for those in employer schemes, it’s still more affordable than the £310 monthly rate (plus a £3,000 upfront fee) for a new model from Mini.
Gary Comerford of the EV Thoughts Podcast described his experience leasing a used EV as “very smooth”, though not perfect. While unable to test drive before signing through Car360, he had a no-questions-asked return policy within a week. He deposited £1,200 and is paying £310 monthly for his 2021 Polestar 2.
“As long as you stay within your budget, getting a rental agreement is straightforward,” Comerford noted but added concerns about tax benefits being exclusive to salary sacrifice schemes, which he felt was unfair to self-employed individuals like himself.
After a £1,200 deposit, the 2021 Polestar 2 costs £310 monthly. Photo: ZarkePix/Alamy
Extras like insurance, home chargers, and even electricity can often be bundled in with the car leasing, sometimes offering additional tax benefits via salary sacrifice.
At lease end, you’ll usually decide to extend the lease or return the vehicle, with some firms presenting a purchase option. However, be cautious—early returns often attract termination fees, though some salary sacrifice terms may waive fees if leaving due to job changes.
According to Zenith’s Hughes, leasing a used EV can greatly facilitate the transition to electric vehicles if structured properly. “It significantly lowers the entry cost from an affordability perspective,” he remarked, referring to their new used EV salary sacrifice plan that “balances taxpayer savings.”
Combatting Depreciation
Leasing companies aren’t offering these deals out of goodwill. By providing used EVs, they’re mitigating the dreaded issue of depreciation. They acquired many electric cars at inflated prices in previous years, but the overall demand drop has led to unexpected price falls.
BVRLA CEO Toby Poston indicated leasing firms now face an abundance of rapidly depreciating cars. They prefer to lease rather than sell at significant losses.
The number of EVs leased in the UK surged by 166% in Q2 2025 from last year, totaling 40,600. Photo: ZarkePix/Alamy
By maintaining ownership of electric vehicles, leasing firms can keep profiting. Industry experience demonstrates that EVs generally require fewer repairs compared to gasoline or diesel vehicles, thus reducing large maintenance bills over time.
Hughes anticipates that Zenith cars will likely go through two to three drivers over an eight-year period before being sold, potentially minimizing residual loss. Addressing common concerns, he emphasized that significant battery degradation is “not a significant issue” for standard vehicles, as most EVs come with an eight-year battery warranty, covering leased cars as well.
The lower likelihood of costly breakdowns makes it easier to provide leases since there’s “less risk involved,” noted Poston. At the same time, there’s “an overproduction of vehicles globally,” leading to remarkable bargains currently available.
Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) release nearly five times more greenhouse gas emissions than reported statistics suggest. I found a report detailing this issue.
These vehicles can operate on electric batteries as well as internal combustion engines and have been promoted by European manufacturers as a means to travel longer distances while lowering emissions—offering an alternative to fully electric cars.
Research indicates that PHEVs emit just 19% less CO2. An analysis from the nonprofit organization Transport and Environment was released on Thursday, showing laboratory tests estimated 75% less pollution.
Researchers examined data from fuel consumption meters in 800,000 vehicles registered in Europe between 2021 and 2023, discovering that the real carbon dioxide emissions from PHEVs in 2023 were 4.9 times greater than those from standardized lab tests, an increase from 3.5 times in 2021.
“While official emissions are declining, actual emissions are on the rise,” remarked Sofia Navas Goelke, a researcher at the Institute for Transport and Environment and co-author of the report. “This widening gap is becoming a significant issue. Consequently, PHEVs are now polluting nearly as much as traditional petrol vehicles.”
The researchers identified that much of this disparity stems from an overestimation of the “utility factor” (the proportion of miles driven in electric mode compared to total miles), finding that only 27% of driving was done in electric mode, versus the official estimate of 84%. The analysis noted that the European Commission proposed two amendments to the utility coefficient ratio, which lessened the gap but didn’t eliminate it entirely.
Even when operating in electric mode, pollution levels were found to be significantly higher than official figures suggest. Researchers indicated this was due to the electric motor being insufficient for sole operation, with the engine burning fossil fuels for almost one-third of the distance traveled in electric mode.
Patrick Plotz, head of energy economics at the Fraunhofer Institute for System Innovation, who did not participate in the study, described it as a “very useful contribution” to ongoing discussions, as some in the automotive industry have claimed there’s insufficient data to accurately gauge real emissions.
“Without a doubt, the disparity between official and actual fuel consumption and CO2 emissions for PHEVs is substantial,” Plotz remarked. “Their emissions are much higher than those of gasoline or diesel cars,” referring to the study on the topic. “Any policy adjustments regarding PHEVs should be thoughtfully considered in the context of this data.”
Hybrid vehicles have re-entered political discourse as automakers urge the EU to ease carbon emission targets. The push to ban new internal combustion engine vehicles by 2035 is facing strong lobbying from the auto sector, along with resistance from member states with significant automotive industries.
“There should be no significant reductions in 2035,” stated German Chancellor Friedrich Merz following a summit with Germany’s struggling automotive sector, committing to “do everything possible in 2035.” Other senior German leaders have cited plug-in hybrids as an example of “flexibility” that could be integrated into the legislation.
Researchers calculated that the undervaluation of PHEV emissions artificially facilitated compliance with the EU’s average vehicle CO2 regulations, enabling four major car manufacturers to evade over €5 billion (around £4.3 billion) in fines between 2021 and 2023. The study indicated that PHEV drivers are likely to incur approximately €500 more in annual running costs than expectations based on lab tests.
“The exaggerated claims made by manufacturers regarding their plug-in hybrid vehicles are clearly misleading,” observed Colin Walker, a transportation analyst at Energy and Climate Intelligence.
“Consumers are misled into thinking that by choosing a PHEV, they are aiding the environment and saving money,” he pointed out. “In reality, PHEVs are only marginally more efficient than regular petrol and diesel vehicles concerning fuel and CO2 consumption, resulting in higher operation costs.”
During a year of driving his daughter to school in a new electric vehicle, Phil Bellamy realized that she was anxious about taking a 10-minute ride every day.
While Bellamy, 51, had no issues with the car, his teenage daughter experienced nausea each time she got in. Research indicates that this is a common problem: many individuals who do not suffer from motion sickness in traditional vehicles find themselves affected by it in electric vehicles (EVs).
Concerned about his family’s aversion to riding in his car, Bellamy altered his driving style and considered purchasing a different vehicle, but the issue persisted. His daughters try to avoid traveling with him whenever they can.
“If we go on a trip, they make sure to take motion sickness tablets immediately. They wouldn’t even think of getting in the car without them,” he explains.
Bellamy appreciates driving electric cars for their quietness and smoothness compared to traditional combustion engine vehicles, though he hopes manufacturers will address the concerns of passengers affected by motion sickness.
Factors contributing to motion sickness include the relatively rapid acceleration of EVs compared to gasoline vehicles, the regenerative braking system, and the absence of sensory cues such as engine noise and vibrations while driving.
Research from China, a major electric vehicle producer, has found that EVs tend to induce more severe motion sickness symptoms than traditional vehicles.
Content creator Atia Chain from London shared her experiences on TikTok about suffering from car sickness in an EV this summer when she relied on Ubers for transportation.
Chain reports feeling “extreme nausea” shortly after getting in the EV, which ceased soon after she exited. It took her some time to realize that this happened only in electric vehicles. Now, she tends to avoid Ubers due to the prevalence of EVs.
“Usually, the nausea started right away as soon as the trip began. The first minute was particularly bad. I would roll down the window and find something to distract myself,” she shares. “The sickness lingered throughout the journey. If the Uber ride was 20 minutes long, I’d count down the minutes until I could get out.”
John Golding, a professor of applied psychology at Westminster University in London, explains that motion sickness has a particularly strong effect on passengers because it relates to their ability to anticipate changes in movement.
While the driver controls the vehicle, passengers, especially those seated in the back, may feel helpless. This could pose challenges for the future of self-driving cars.
He suggests that individuals may also use motion sickness medication or adopt behavioral changes to cope. “The simplest solution is to sit in the front seat and have a clear view. It allows you to see and anticipate what will happen next, whereas sitting in the back means you can only see what has already happened,” he advises.
Consider motion sickness medication which can be obtained in patches or tablets from pharmacies, helping manage how your brain and body react to movement. It’s most effective when taken before travel.
Wear acupressure bands which some studies suggest may help, though results could primarily be attributed to the placebo effect. “If it works for you, don’t dismiss it,” Golding remarks.
Listen to low-frequency sounds. A study from Nagoya University in Japan indicates that certain vibrations at 100Hz may stimulate a part of the inner ear responsible for detecting gravity and acceleration.
Mobile phones and desktop computers have long been targets of cyber espionage, but how vulnerable are electric vehicles?
On Monday, a newspaper reported that a British defense company, engaged with the UK government, advised its staff against connecting mobile devices with Chinese-made electric vehicles due to concerns over potential data extraction by Beijing.
This article examines the security issues related to electric vehicles.
Can an electric car snoop on you?
Security experts quoted by the Guardian suggest that electric vehicles, being the most advanced vehicles on the market, could be vulnerable to hacking.
Rafe Pilling, director of threat intelligence at cybersecurity firm SecureWorks, notes that electric vehicles can produce a wealth of data that could interest a hostile state.
“There are numerous opportunities to compromise these vehicles as they collect data,” he states.
He further explains that WiFi or mobile connectivity can enhance data access for manufacturers through the “over-the-air” software update feature.
“Modern vehicles equipped with over-the-air updates, various sensors, and external cameras could potentially be repurposed as surveillance tools,” he adds.
A mobile phone connected to a car via a charging cable or Bluetooth is another significant data source, he mentions.
Should all car drivers be worried?
Experts indicate that individuals in sensitive sectors, such as government or defense, should exercise caution.
“If you’re working on a sixth-generation fighter jet and connect your work phone to your personal vehicle, be mindful that this connection could compromise your mobile data,” states a researcher at the Royal United Services Institute Think Tank.
Nate Drier, tech lead at cybersecurity firm Sophos, highlights the option to select “don’t trust” when connecting a phone charger to a car; however, this would forfeit many functionalities, such as music streaming or messaging.
“Most people tend to maintain that connection for the convenience it brings,” he acknowledges.
Pilling adds that even rental car users should remain vigilant.
“Generally, individuals may leave copies of their contacts and sensitive information in their car’s entertainment and navigation system, often forgetting to remove them before relinquishing the vehicle, making phone synchronization a risky move,” he advises.
Why are Chinese vehicles the focus of concern?
China is a significant producer of electric vehicles (EVs) through brands like BYD and XPENG. Coupled with the Chinese state’s practices in cyber espionage, this raises concerns. For instance, China’s National Intelligence Act of 2017 mandates all organizations and citizens to “support, assist, and cooperate” with national intelligence efforts.
“Chinese law compels companies to align with national security, so one must consider the possibility of surveillance capabilities in their vehicles,” he notes, albeit admitting that there is “no evidence” currently linking Chinese vehicles to espionage.
Experts believe that while electric vehicles are a concern, devices like mobile phones, smartwatches, and other wearables are more likely targets for spying.
What does the UK government say?
A government representative refrained from commenting on specific security protocols but affirmed that “protecting national security is our utmost priority, and strict procedures are in place to ensure government sites and information are adequately safeguarded.”
A more detailed statement released last month by Defence Minister Koker, indicated that the Ministry of Defence (MOD) is collaborating with other government bodies to understand and mitigate potential security threats from all types of vehicles, not just those manufactured in China.
Further reports state that while there are no overarching policy prohibitions on the movement of Chinese-made vehicles, EVs incorporating Chinese components have been banned from sensitive military locations.
Nevertheless, individual defense entities may impose stricter requirements for vehicles in particular settings.
BYD was reached for commentary, while Xpeng stated it is “committed to upholding and complying with applicable UK and EU privacy laws and regulations.”
SMMT, a trade association representing British automakers, responded:
“Our industry is dedicated to maintaining a high standard of customer data protection, which includes the responsible use of data. Features such as apps and paired phones can be removed from vehicles based on individual manufacturers’ guidelines, ensuring drivers feel secure.”
Illustrations of two types of traboa, or sledge, which may be used by ancient people in North America
Gabriel Uguet
Drugmarks and human footprints, composed up to 22,000 years ago, have been found at several sites in White Sands National Park in New Mexico. These are thought to have been made by people pulling long pieces of wood stacked with goods, and are the earliest evidence of such activities.
This type of primitive vehicle is known as the trabore. “It’s basically a wheelless wheel.” Matthew Bennett He is a member of a team studying track at Bournemouth University in the UK.
They were widely used all over the world, but this is the oldest evidence of their use, says Bennett. “Nothing is this old.”
There are many ancient animal footprints in the ancient arid lake of White Sands, but in 2017, human footprints were discovered. In 2019, the team found a long drug mark in connection with human footprints.
“They happen in many different regions, so it was widespread,” Bennett says. “It’s not just an original family using travois.”
Some of the drag marks are made up of a single row. The team believes this was made by a trabore made up of two long wood joined in the form of a triangle. One end of each piece is held in one hand, but there is only a single point of contact on the ground.
The other drag marks consist of two parallel lines. These were probably the result of a trabore where two wood intersected in an x-shape, providing two handles and two ground contact points, which would have been more stable.
Drugmarks often pass through the footsteps of people who are supposed to be pulling a travoy, as expected. In some cases, there are parallel tracks with footprints (often children’s footprints), indicating that others are walking together.
Drag marks created by ancient vehicles in White Sands National Park, New Mexico
Bournemouth University
Elsewhere in the world, Trabois was often pulled by dogs and horses, says Bennett, but there is no evidence that white sand people used animals.
Footprint dates, Announced in 2021 challenging the traditional idea that humans did not move to America until the ice sheet began retreating about 15,000 years ago.
“The people in the US debate are very controversial, but we’re pretty confident about the date,” says Bennett. “The traditional story is that the ice sheets have parted ways and they have come, but you can go through before the door closes.” Another recent discovery is that humans have 33,000 years ago. It suggests that they may have reached the Americas.
Bennett says it’s very likely that there are tracks around the world that are not aware of what they are. In fact, he says his team has already discovered similar markings elsewhere in the US.
The US State Department has allocated $400 million to purchase new Tesla armored vehicles, despite Tesla CEO Elon Musk leading efforts to reduce government spending during Donald Trump’s term.
Sector-generated procurement forecasts indicate a proposed expenditure of $400 million (£320 million) for “armored Teslas (production units).” These vehicles could potentially be the Cybertrucks, Tesla’s latest electric pickup model, touted by Musk as being bulletproof.
This revelation raises concerns about a possible conflict of interest for Musk, who is a major beneficiary of US government contracts through his various companies.
While Musk’s wealth primarily comes from Tesla, his rocket company SpaceX is a key contractor providing space launch services to the US government.
Despite Musk’s efforts to streamline government spending, particularly through his initiative named Doge, Trump has also involved him in government efficiency efforts. These actions have been criticized for potentially violating the US Constitution.
State Department documents suggest that the Tesla contract will be finalized by the end of September.
The department’s website originally included a forecast document dated December 13, 2024, showing the Tesla procurement plan. However, a later version corrected this entry after it was reported by Drop Site News, replacing “Tesla” with “armored electric vehicles” (EVs) without specifying the brand.
In addition to Tesla, the US government also procures armored vehicles from other manufacturers, as indicated in the procurement documents.
Charging station for electric cars in British Cornwall
Mat Cardie/Getty Image
Electric vehicles (EVs) are currently limited to gasoline and diesel. And the improved reliability is more than a fossil fuel -driven car every year because of the still technology.
Robert Elliott At the University of Birmingham, his colleagues analyzed nearly 300 million records from the forced British road. MotIt indicates the status, age, and mileage of all vehicles on the road between 2005 and 2022. This covers a total of about 29.8 million vehicles.
The results showed that the average life expectancy of EVS was 18, 4 years or more, it was 16 years, exceeding the average diesel vehicle in 8 years, and in 18. At present, the average EV covers 200,000 kilometers over a lifetime, exceeding 187,000 km, where the gasoline counter part clocked up, but has not reached 257,000 km, which reaches on average.
Elliott says that the result is not only a gasoline and diesel -run alternative, but also proves that it has already defeated them. The survey also shows that long -term reliability has improved. The possibility that the EV fails and reach Scrapheap in a specific year is about six times faster than the diesel, about twice the speed of gasoline vehicles.
“The early electric car was not so good and I couldn’t trust it,” Elliott says. “But I think the main point is that technology is very rapidly improved.”
“We are not an environmental crusade. I just want to give facts. Electric vehicles and batteries have been alive, have improved their skills, and have been improved again since this research,” he says. 。
MOT data does not contain information about the amount required for maintenance and repair cars between tests, but only overall life. Other research from the United States shows The maintenance cost of an electric vehicle is about $ 0.06 per mile, but for an internal combustion engine, the value is $ 0.10 per mile.
Rachel Aldred At Westminster University in the UK, it is said that if you leave the gasoline and diesel vehicles, you will be profitable to fight climate change and air pollution, but EVs emphasize that the EV is not a silver bullet.
“It’s still a very inefficient and limited solution,” ALDRED. “If most people are avoiding a private car, lack of physical activity, road injury, and [residual] The pollution is also the same -although it is obviously much better [than petrol or diesel vehicles]。 She says walking, or equivalent cycling and public transportation should be a priority for those who can use these modes.
President Donald Trump issued two executive orders targeting the promotion of electric vehicles and wind power by the Biden administration.
These technologies are crucial in combating climate change, but the orders could hinder their growth.
Advocates for electric vehicles and green energy criticized the decision.
On Monday, President Donald Trump significantly impacted two rapidly growing environmentally friendly technologies in the United States, electric vehicles and wind power, through two executive orders.
These orders were aimed at countering the Biden administration’s efforts to boost these technologies, which have been gaining momentum in the drive to reduce carbon emissions in the U.S. energy sector. President Trump also announced the withdrawal of the United States from the Paris Agreement, where countries commit to reducing carbon emissions to combat global warming.
One of Trump’s presidential orders rescinded several climate-focused directives, including standards on tailpipe emissions to promote electric vehicle adoption. This move was criticized by electric vehicle advocates, who argued that it could harm America’s competitiveness in the global automotive market.
Trump’s other order temporarily halted federal approvals for offshore wind energy projects in federal waters and restricted federal agencies from issuing new permits or loans for wind energy projects, both onshore and offshore. The order falsely claimed that wind power could lead to higher energy costs and harm marine life, such as whales, despite no known links according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
The orders faced backlash from advocates of electric vehicles and wind power. Jason Grumet, CEO of the American Clean Power Association, criticized the move, stating that it contradicted Trump’s goal of freeing up energy production in the U.S.
The adoption of electric vehicles and wind power has been increasing in recent years. Electric and hybrid vehicles accounted for 20% of new car sales in the U.S. in 2024, and sales are projected to continue growing. Wind power is also predicted to be a significant source of new energy capacity in the U.S. by 2050.
President Trump has been known to criticize wind power, attributing whale deaths to offshore wind projects and making unsubstantiated claims about health risks associated with wind turbines. Climate groups have warned that Trump’s executive orders could harm global environmental efforts and hinder green job growth.
Despite these challenges, advocates believe that clean technology will continue to progress, regardless of regulatory obstacles. President Trump’s orders could face legal challenges, particularly regarding California’s stricter tailpipe pollution standards, which aim to reduce air pollution and combat climate change.
aIn recent years, affordable new electric family cars have become scarce in Europe, particularly those manufactured in the EU. Campaign group Transport and Environment reports that no electric models produced domestically and priced below €25,000 (£20,740) will be available for sale across the EU in 2022-23.
However, the landscape has shifted in recent months with the introduction of new cars like the Fiat Grande Panda, Citroën ë-C3, Hyundai Instar, Dacia Spring, and Renault 5. This sudden influx has provided buyers with more options.
This change is not coincidental. As stricter EU carbon emissions targets take effect on January 1, car manufacturers are facing the need to sell more electric vehicles to avoid fines. The industry is pushing for relaxed rules, while environmentalists are advocating for a firm stance from the EU.
Globally, automakers are grappling with weak demand for both battery-powered and internal combustion engine models. This profit decline occurs at a challenging time as the industry seeks funding for the costly shift to electric vehicles (EVs).
While 2024 saw record-breaking electric vehicle sales worldwide, driven by China’s growing industry, European markets are experiencing a slowdown. Analyst Matthias Schmidt predicts a 1.4% sales decrease in the 18 largest Western and Northern European markets over the past year.
The decline can be attributed to the cessation of generous subsidies for new EVs in Germany, the largest EV market in Europe. The end of a €5,000 incentive per car has posed challenges, impacting EV sales not only in Germany but also in other countries like France.
Some automakers are faring better than others in meeting emissions targets. While Ford struggles with Cologne-made electric car sales, BMW, Stellantis, Tesla, Polestar, and Volvo are ahead of their targets, allowing them to sell “credits” to competitors.
The sales dip has put political leaders on alert, as automakers blame regulations for potential factory closures. Volkswagen announced plans to close up to three factories in Germany, while Ford is cutting jobs in Europe. This has led industry associations to lobby for relaxed emissions standards to protect jobs.
In the UK, manufacturers have successfully argued against fines, leading to calls for a unified approach. The European Automobile Manufacturers Association is urging the European Commission to provide clarity on emissions standards to safeguard jobs.
fiat grande panda. Stellantis has repeatedly halted assembly operations at its headquarters factory in Mirafiori, Italy. Photo: LaPresse/Alamy
European policymakers may consider easing emissions regulations, with discussions set to begin in January. Efforts to relax rules are being led by some EU governments.
However, concerns persist about the long-term impact of deregulation. Analysts and activists warn that relaxing targets could jeopardize European industry, allowing Chinese EV startups to gain ground in the market.
The U.S. government’s National Traffic Safety Administration has initiated an investigation into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles that are equipped with the company’s fully self-driving software following reports of four crashes, some of which were fatal.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) announced that it has launched a preliminary review after receiving reports of four incidents involving fully autonomous driving in conditions with reduced road visibility like sun glare, fog, and airborne dust.
One of the accidents involved a Tesla vehicle hitting a pedestrian, resulting in a fatal outcome. Another accident under similar circumstances led to injuries, according to NHTSA.
The investigation covers Model S and X vehicles from 2016-2024, Model 3 from 2017-2024, Model Y from 2020-2024, and Cybertruck vehicles from 2023-2024 with optional systems.
A preliminary evaluation is the initial step before a vehicle recall is required if the agency determines that the vehicle poses an unreasonable safety risk.
Tesla states on its website that its “full self-driving” software for on-road vehicles necessitates active supervision from the driver and does not render the vehicle completely autonomous.
NHTSA is assessing the engineering controls of FSD to detect and respond appropriately to reduced roadway visibility conditions.
The agency will investigate if other similar FSD accidents have occurred in conditions of low road visibility and if Tesla has made any updates to its FSD system that could impact such conditions.
“This review will also examine Tesla’s assessment of the timing, purpose, functionality, and safety implications of these updates,” NHTSA mentioned.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk is focusing on self-driving technology and robotaxis amidst competition and subdued demand in the automotive industry.
The company did not respond to requests for comment. Tesla’s shares were down 0.5% before the market opened.
Musk recently unveiled a concept for Tesla’s “CyberCab” robotaxi, which is a two-seat, two-door vehicle that uses cameras and AI for navigation, eliminating the need for a steering wheel or pedals. NHTSA approval would be necessary for deploying these vehicles without human control.
Tesla’s FSD technology has been in development for years aiming for high automation levels, enabling the vehicle to manage most driving tasks without human intervention.
However, there have been at least two fatalities associated with the technology, leading to legal scrutiny. Some experts are concerned about Tesla’s reliance on a “camera-only” approach for self-driving systems in low visibility conditions due to the absence of backup sensors.
Industry experts like Jeff Schuster, Vice President of GlobalData, suggest that weather conditions can affect the camera’s functionality and regulatory requirements may impact the technology’s progress.
“This could be a significant obstacle in the near-term launch of this technology and product,” Schuster added.
Tesla’s competitors in the robotaxi space use costly sensors like lidar and radar for environment detection while operating.
In a December recall, Tesla called back over 2 million vehicles in the U.S. to incorporate new safety features in its Autopilot advanced driver assistance system. NHTSA is still reviewing the appropriateness of this recall.
pictureRon Musk is making headlines lately, with controversial posts and support for Donald Trump’s campaign. However, his negative comments are starting to affect Tesla owners, leading to a decline in sales for the second consecutive quarter in July.
Despite this, Tesla produces excellent electric cars like the latest Model 3, which is one of the best options available. Many other major and newer car manufacturers are catching up to Tesla in the electric car market. Here are the top 10 non-Tesla EVs you can buy now, excluding the upcoming Renault 5 set to launch in the UK in Q1 2025.
Lease A 48-month lease starts from around £152 per month, with initial costs of around £1,370. Selective Car Lease Sample lease, or OffersPrices vary when it comes to leasing, however, so we recommend you always shop around – check out our FAQs below for more information.
The Dacia Spring may not be the ultimate car in terms of refinement, but with a range of up to 140 miles and a comfortable ride, it’s perfect for city use.
There’s not a lot of space inside, but it can seat two adults and two children comfortably. The trunk is big enough for a carry-on or your weekly groceries. All models come with air conditioning, and more expensive models have a 10-inch touchscreen with wireless Apple CarPlay or Android Auto smartphone connectivity. There’s also an app that lets you control charging and turn on the heat and air conditioning before you get in the car.
Most people will avoid entry-level cars, especially since the monthly costs won’t be that high. Take out a finance deal and upgrade to a better-equipped, more powerful version, with prices not exceeding £16,995.
Lease A 48-month lease starts from around £423 per month, with initial costs of around £5,501. Lease.com Sample lease, or Volvo Cars.
Volvo’s EX30 is a smart small car that feels premium but doesn’t come with a steep price tag.
The audio system uses a full-dash sound bar instead of speakers in the doors to produce impressive sound, the window switches have been moved to the center of the car – all to save costs – and you can operate most…
IIf you’re considering trading up to an electric vehicle but think it’s too costly, think again. Used Tesla Model 3 or Kia e-Niros, capable of 250-300 miles on a single charge, can now be purchased for just £14,000.
Last year, prices for used electric vehicles dropped significantly, making previously unattainable models now accessible to many families.
In fact, Autotrader reported that EVs are now almost as affordable as petrol cars, with the average price of a three- to five-year-old EV in July being £18,964, compared to £18,076 for a petrol car of the same model year.
Ground-breaking ultra-efficient models from three to four years ago are now available on the second-hand market at much more affordable prices, despite initially costing between £40,000 and £50,000 new.
According to David Smith of Cleveleys Electric Vehicles, there are some incredible deals available, with cars offering nearly the same driving range as new models, proven reliability, and warranties still intact, all at a fraction of the price.
One EV specialist highly recommends the Kia e-Niro, especially with its 64kWh battery. Photo: Sue Thatcher/Alamy
Smith also recommended the Kia e-Niro with its 64kWh battery for families under £15,000, citing its efficiency, range, and reliability.
Another model to consider is the MG5, which has proven to be extremely reliable according to Cleveleys Electric Vehicles.
Smith mentioned that longer-range EVs are not as risky as perceived, with many cars maintaining their mileage even after extensive use.
Buying a used, fuel-efficient EV eliminates the issues that new electric vehicles may face, making them a practical choice for many buyers.
For those looking to purchase, there are several affordable options available, like the Kia e-Niro and Tesla Model 3, both offering long-distance capabilities at competitive prices.
Charging at home is much cheaper than using public charging points, making EVs even more cost-effective in the long run.
The Tesla Model 3 has proven to be capable of long distance driving. Photo: Taina Sohlman/Alamy
Consider the warranties, charging options, and overall cost before making a decision on purchasing a used EV.
Charging at home is much cheaper than using a public charging point. Photo: Christopher Thomond/The Guardian
Consider the charging infrastructure, insurance costs, and warranty coverage when buying a used EV to ensure a wise investment.
picture
Electric cars scares some people of the dark: their batteries produce much less carbon dioxide but require more power to run, prompting ominous warnings that Britain and other wealthy countries could plunge their citizens into darkness if they ban new petrol and diesel sales.
In recent months, UK net-zero skeptic newspapers have warned that a shift to EVs “risks overwhelming the grid and causing catastrophic blackouts” if intermittent solar and wind don't provide the needed power. Another article argued that “we don't need an enemy force to plunge us all into darkness – just some electricity customers doing their normal thing on a normal winter's night.”
But many who work in the electric vehicle industry believe these fears may be unfounded, arguing that the transition to electric vehicles is an exciting, potentially lucrative opportunity to build a smarter, greener energy system.
In the UK, polluting coal-fired power plants have been largely replaced by wind farms and solar panels. These renewable energies do not emit carbon dioxide, but they suffer from intermittency problems and cannot provide enough power on cloudy days or at night when there is no wind. Add in the prospect that all new cars will be electric by 2035 and it is not an exaggerated question how the power grid will keep supply and demand in balance.
Shifting demand
The transition to electric vehicles will undoubtedly require more electricity generation as electric vehicles, rather than land-based fossil fuels, become the primary source of energy for transportation, but smart technology can be used to shift demand away from peak times, such as 5pm in winter, when demand for electricity risks outstripping supply.
This isn't just a pipe dream: home charger company MyEnergy calculates that if balancing services were enabled across all installed compatible chargers, it could “provide over 1GW of demand-shifting flexibility to the grid, more than 98% of the UK's major fossil fuel power stations.”
Octopus Energy, which has quickly grown to become the UK's largest electricity supplier, says its Go electricity tariff manages the charging of the batteries of 150,000 electric vehicles. Charging them all at once would require 1GW of power, but smart chargers hold off charging until off-peak hours at night, shifting demand away from peaks. Electricity is also cheaper during off-peak hours, with clear benefits for consumers: Octopus says its customers save an average of about £600 a year.
In the UK, polluting coal-fired power stations have largely been replaced by wind farms and solar panels, which suffer from “intermittency issues”. Photo: Martin Meissner/AP
One gigawatt is the equivalent of a medium-sized power station, enough to power 600,000 homes. Electric vehicles on UK roads are already on the rise in the UK. Peak electricity demand in winter is 61.1GWAccording to the National Grid, delaying charging for just a few hours can help reduce energy consumption.
Jack Fielder, chief strategy officer at MyEnergy, said: “If every EV charger could provide a grid balancing service and every driver took part in a grid balancing program, we could collectively eliminate periods of strain on the grid.”
It could also be useful when power supply exceeds demand, such as on warm, windy nights, said Chris Pateman-Jones, chief executive of charging company Connected Curve.
“Instead of wasting renewable energy, I see EVs as a giant sponge,” he says. For consumers, there will be little change: Connected Curve data shows that most cars are already charged by midnight, leaving them idle for hours before they're needed.
Powered by car battery
It's not just the timing of when electrons flow into car batteries that will help the National Grid Electricity Supply Operator (NGESO), the company responsible for balancing the U.K. power grid: It calls demand shifting a “low-regret action that will help reduce the impact on peak demand and reduce renewable curtailment,” but it also wants electrons to flow in the other direction.
Vehicle-to-grid technology is an attractive prospect: instead of building power plants, hydroelectric storage, or stationary battery fleets, the idea is to harness the energy stored in car batteries. Cars could become portable power packs, providing backup for homes in the event of a blackout, and even allowing drivers to earn money by selling power back to the grid.
NGESO is Annual estimate It predicts what the UK electricity system will look like in 2035 and 2050. It sees a growing role for cars feeding power back into the grid, and in the most optimistic scenario, capacity could reach 39GW (equivalent to one-tenth of the vastly expanded generating capacity).
The Biden administration revealed updated vehicle emissions standards on Wednesday, described as the most ambitious effort yet to reduce global warming emissions from passenger vehicles.
While the new regulations relax the original tailpipe limits proposed last year, they will ultimately align more closely with the stringent standards established by the Environmental Protection Agency.
These standards will be enforced in conjunction with the sale of electric vehicles, which must meet the requirements. The auto industry had opposed the EPA’s initial standards, announced in April last year, citing a slowdown in sales growth. The administration, however, remains committed to its ambitious plans to decrease emissions from passenger cars contributing to global warming.
Under the finalized rule, the EPA will mandate that by 2032, 56% of new vehicle sales should be electric vehicles, with at least 13% being plug-in hybrids or partially electric vehicles, along with more fuel-efficient gasoline-powered cars that get higher mileage.
The EPA estimates that these new standards will result in annual savings of $100 billion, over 7 billion tons of avoided global warming carbon emissions over the next three decades, reduced healthcare costs, fewer deaths, and more than $60 billion in healthcare savings, ultimately leading to overall cost savings in fuel, maintenance, and repairs.
On January 2, 2008, exhaust gas blows out of a car’s tailpipe in San Francisco. David Paul Morris/Getty Images File
The EPA rule pertains to model years between 2027 and 2032, covering new emissions from new passenger cars, light trucks, pickup trucks, as well as greenhouse gas emissions like nitrogen oxides and particulate matter that contribute to global warming. It will also significantly reduce other forms of air pollution. The EPA asserts that the rule will help combat the climate crisis by substantially decreasing air pollution while promoting the adoption of cleaner vehicle technologies. The finalization of the rules follows a record increase in sales of clean vehicles, including plug-in hybrids and fully electric vehicles, last year.
The revised rules will push back the strict pollution standards’ implementation from 2027 to 2029 after the auto industry argued against the feasibility of the proposed benchmarks. By 2032, the rules will be bolstered to nearly meet the EPA’s recommended thresholds.
EPA Administrator Michael Regan affirmed to reporters that the final rule will yield pollution reductions equal to or greater than those outlined in the proposal. In addition to addressing carbon pollution, Regan emphasized that the ultimate standard will also lessen other severe air pollutants contributing to heart attacks, respiratory issues, exacerbating asthma, and diminishing lung function.
Regan stressed the critical nature of these new standards for public health, American jobs, the economy, and the planet. The standard is designed to be technology-neutral and performance-based, granting auto and truck manufacturers the flexibility to choose pollution control technology that aligns with their customer needs while meeting environmental and public health objectives.
The adjustments in the regulations seem aimed at addressing the strong industry resistance to the accelerated adoption of electric vehicles and the public’s hesitation to fully embrace new technology. Legal challenges in conservative courts also pose a legitimate threat.
With a conservative majority, the Supreme Court has increasingly restricted the power of federal agencies, including the EPA, in recent years. The court has limited the EPA’s ability to combat air and water pollution, further hindering their capability to regulate carbon dioxide emissions from power plants that contribute to global warming.
President Joe Biden has made fighting climate change a central feature of his presidency, with a focus on reducing carbon dioxide emissions from gasoline-powered vehicles, the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S.
To achieve these goals, a Democratic president needs cooperation from the auto industry and political backing from auto workers, a crucial voting bloc. The United Auto Workers union, supporting Biden, endorses the transition to electric vehicles but aims to safeguard jobs and ensure that industry pays competitive wages to workers involved in producing EVs and batteries.
White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre expressed confidence in the EPA’s final rule, stating that the administration understands that achieving such goals takes time and remains committed to climate action.
Nearly all Tesla vehicles sold in the U.S. are being recalled due to small warning lights in the instrument panel. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration announced the recall of about 2.2 million vehicles on Friday, indicating increased scrutiny of electric vehicle manufacturers. Additionally, the agency upgraded its 2023 investigation into Tesla’s steering problems to a technical analysis, bringing it one step closer to a recall.
The update in response to the recall will enhance warnings and alerts for drivers. The document from NHTSA highlights that the font size for brake, parking, and anti-lock brake warning lights is smaller than required by federal safety standards, potentially making important safety information difficult to read and increasing the risk of a collision. The agency identified the problem during a routine safety compliance audit on January 8th. While Tesla has identified three warranty claims related to the issue, there are no reports of crashes or injuries.
The recall to fix the warning light issue will be done through a software update, affecting multiple models from 2012 to 2024. Tesla has already started releasing software updates, and owners will be notified by letter starting March 30th.
Following the announcement of the recall, Tesla’s stock fell another 2.7% in early trading on Friday, reaching its lowest level since May of last year.
In addition to the warning light issue, Tesla has faced scrutiny for its Autopilot system. Last December, NHTSA pressured Tesla to recall over 2 million vehicles for software updates and fixes related to the flawed system designed to make drivers more careful when using Autopilot. The recall was prompted by a two-year investigation into crashes involving the use of Autopilot, some of which were deadly.
Additionally, Tesla is recalling over 1.6 million electric vehicles exported to China due to problems with automatic assisted steering and door latch controls. The State Administration for Market Regulation in China announced the recall in early January, with Tesla planning to use remote upgrades to resolve the issue.
Overall, Tesla has faced challenges in addressing various safety concerns with its vehicles, including steering problems and Autopilot system issues, leading to substantial recalls and regulatory scrutiny.
Tesla is recalling 120,423 vehicles in the United States due to the risk of doors unlocking in the event of a crash, according to a report on Friday.
According to Reuters, the country’s traffic safety regulator, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, on Friday announced a recall affecting 2021-2023 model year Model S and Model It said it did not meet federal safety standards. .
Tesla has released an over-the-air software update to address this issue.
Tesla last week carried out the largest recall ever in the Elon Musk-led company’s 20-year history, recalling more than 2 million vehicles in the U.S. and nearly all vehicles on U.S. roads. Vehicles were targeted.
Federal regulators say Tesla’s advanced driver-assistance system, Autopilot, has “inadequate” safeguards against misuse, and the company is warning drivers to remain on the road even when Autopilot is engaged. A voluntary recall has been launched to carry out “additional inspections” to remind people to be careful.
According to the Washington Post, NHTSA wrote last week that activating the driver-assistance system Autopilot “may increase the risk of a collision,” adding, “The driver is not responsible for operating the vehicle and is at risk of an accident.” “I’m not ready to intervene.” need. “
The recall applies to 2021-2023 Model S (above) and Model X vehicles, which do not meet certain federal safety standards for side-impact protection. APModel X is also subject to a recall. AP
Other major automakers also announced recalls this week.
Toyota Motor Corp. said Wednesday it is recalling 1 million vehicles due to a defect that could prevent airbags from deploying if a sensor in the passenger seat shorts out. According to the Associated Press, the recall applies to Toyota Avalon, Camry, Highlander, RAV4, Sienna, Corolla, and some hybrid versions of these models, as well as some Lexus models such as the ES250 sedan and RX350 SUV. It is said that she is a model.
Honda on Monday said it was shutting down more than 2.5 million vehicles due to fuel pump problems that could cause the engines to not start or stall while driving, increasing the risk of crashes and injuries, NHTSA said. announced that it had been recalled.
Elon Musk’s Tesla recalled more than 2 million vehicles last week over concerns about Autopilot. Getty Images
General Motors is discontinuing sales of some 2024 Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra trucks due to concerns about cracking metal in the passenger-side roof, according to a document released Wednesday by NHTSA. As a result, approximately 3,067 vehicles will be inspected.
Last month, Toyota recalled 1.9 million RAV4 SUVs due to battery deterioration that could cause a fire.
Toyota will recall 1.12 million vehicles worldwide due to a defect affecting airbags.
The recall applies to 2020-2022 model year vehicles, including Avalon, Camry, Corolla, RAV4, Lexus ES250, ES300H, ES350, RX350 Highlander, and Sienna Hybrid, that do not have a functional Occupant Classification System (OCS) sensor. It may disappear.
A short circuit in the sensor on these models could prevent the airbag from deploying as designed.
Sensors ensure that the airbag does not deploy if a small adult or child is seated in the front seat.
Toyota Lexus, a brand owned by Toyota Motor Corporation, will inspect the OCS sensor and replace it if necessary, free of charge to owners.
The Japanese auto giant plans to notify customers by mid-February 2024 if their cars are subject to a recall.
Toyota announced a recall of 3,500 RAV4 models in the United States in July 2022 due to interference between internal parts that could cause OCS sensors to falsely detect occupants.
According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, airbags in the front of vehicles have saved more than 50,000 lives in the United States over 30 years.
image: Front airbags have saved more than 50,000 lives in America over 30 years.file photo
read more: Tesla recalls more than 2 million cars in the US over Autopilot concerns
Older airbags have evolved over the years to deploy the same for all drivers and occupants.
This could cause injuries and, in rare cases, death to children, small adults and unbelted passengers who get too close to the airbags when they deploy, authorities said.
This year, the rise in popularity of electric vehicles (EVs) has been substantial. This is not good news for anyone. Even if you prefer a sturdy Cybertruck over a smaller vehicle, it is still not an ideal solution. In general, cars are not a sustainable mode of transportation, such as using trains or bicycles. However, due to budget and environmental factors, many people find themselves needing a larger, tank-like truck or SUV. Unfortunately, larger electric vehicles also require more materials and energy, leading to increased greenhouse gas emissions during and after production. Despite these drawbacks, automakers continue to build large vehicles because they are popular among buyers. Several vehicles from newer companies and traditional automakers have tried to challenge the concept of “bigger is better” with more compact designs and lower prices. However, they have not been successful. Some examples include the ElectraMeccanica Solo, Sono Sion, and Mazda MX-30, all of which have failed to gain traction in the North American market. Here, we will discuss the struggles of small, affordable EVs in the current market.
Electra Mechanica Solo
The ElectraMeccanica Solo was marketed as a small EV that was legally categorized as a motorcycle. It featured a single seat, a range of 160 miles, and a price tag of $18,500. However, the company recalled all Solos in April due to power outage issues and later decided to focus on four-wheelers. The company is now planning to merge with electric truck maker Tevva and has discontinued production of the Solo.
Honda e
The Honda e debuted in Europe and Japan with a range of 160 miles and a price range of $36,000 to $43,000. Despite its appeal to critics, it failed to attract buyers due to its high price. Honda eventually announced that it would stop producing the small vehicle in January 2024.
Sono Sion
German automaker Sono introduced the Sion, a five-seater hatchback with solar panels. Priced at $25,000, the production was initially planned for 2023. However, the company pivoted to selling to third-party automakers and laid off employees as it shifted its focus to integrating solar technology into other vehicles.
GM, Honda’s affordable EV
General Motors and Honda initially announced plans to jointly develop small, affordable EVs. They aimed to release a sub-$30,000 vehicle for North America by 2027 but later called off the partnership, citing “extensive research and analysis.”
Mazda MX-30 (USA)
The Mazda MX-30, while smaller than the Cybertruck, struggled to gain traction in the United States due to its limited range and availability. Ultimately, Mazda announced that it would discontinue EV sales in the US but continue sales in Japan and the EU.
Revel Moped
Revel, a moped sharing company, faced a decline in users due to fatal accidents, leading them to transition to electric cars instead.
VanMoof
Dutch e-bike startup VanMoof experienced rapid growth but struggled to sustain it, leading to difficulties in fund-raising. It eventually suspended sales and declared bankruptcy.
Lavoie
Electric scooter maker Lavoie acquired VanMoof’s remaining assets after it emerged from bankruptcy.
Despite the struggles of some small EVs, there are still positive developments in the electric vehicle space. Urban bike share programs are on the rise, and electrification is gaining momentum. Companies like Arcimoto and Telo Trucks are making strides in the development of rare three-wheeled EVs and light trucks, respectively. Additionally, the Fiat 500e will be introduced in North America in limited quantities, and GM has decided to continue producing the Bolt EUV.
This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Strictly Necessary Cookies
Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.
