Amazon faced a US government lawsuit on Monday, where it was accused of employing deceptive methods to enroll millions in its Prime subscription service, making cancellation nearly impossible.
A complaint from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), filed in June 2023, alleges that Amazon deliberately used a “dark pattern” design to mislead consumers into subscribing to a $139 Prime service during checkout.
According to the complaint, “For years, Amazon has intentionally and subconsciously enrolled millions of consumers in the Amazon Prime service.”
The case pivots on two primary claims: that Amazon registered customers without their clear consent through a confusing checkout process, and that it established a convoluted cancellation system dubbed “Illid.”
Judge John Chun presided over the case in federal court in Seattle. He is also overseeing another FTC case accusing Amazon of operating an illegal monopoly.
This lawsuit is part of a broader initiative, with multiple lawsuits against major tech companies in a bipartisan bid to rein in the influence of US tech giants after years of governmental inaction.
Allegedly, Amazon was aware of the extensive non-consensual Prime registrations but resisted modifications that would lessen these sign-ups due to their adverse effect on company revenue.
The FTC claims that Amazon’s checkout process forced customers to navigate a confusing interface designed with prominent buttons, effectively hiding the option to decline while signing up. Crucial information regarding Prime pricing and automatic updates was often concealed or presented in fine print, forming a core part of Amazon’s business model.
Additionally, the lawsuit scrutinizes Amazon’s cancellation procedure, which the FTC describes as a complicated “maze” involving 4 pages and 6 clicks.
The FTC seeks financial penalties, monetary relief, and permanent injunctions to mandate changes in Amazon’s practices.
In its defense, Amazon argues that the FTC is overreaching its legal boundaries and asserts that it has made improvements to its registration and cancellation processes, dismissing the allegations as outdated.
The trial is anticipated to last around four weeks, relying heavily on internal Amazon communications and documents, as well as testimonies from company executives and expert witnesses.
Should the FTC prevail, Amazon could face significant financial repercussions and may be required to reform its subscription practices under court supervision.
For a week now, the White House has indicated that a deal is on the horizon to transfer TikTok’s ownership to an American company. Donald Trump is set to sign an executive order this week that will establish a framework for a consortium of investors to take over the operations of the US-Chinese social media platform.
On Monday, officials from the White House revealed that US software company Oracle would license TikTok’s recommended algorithm as part of the agreement. This collaboration expands the existing management of TikTok data collected from US users.
The US president had a phone conversation with Chinese President Xi Jinping on Friday, sharing on Truth Social that the call was “very good” and expressing gratitude for “TikTok’s approval.” Earlier in the week, leaders from both countries met in Madrid, Spain, to discuss trade agreements related to TikTok’s ownership.
The status of popular apps in the US has been uncertain for over a year, stemming from a 2024 Congressional vote that overwhelmingly approved a law banning social media apps unless they could find US buyers. The Supreme Court upheld the law in January, but on his first day in office, Trump signed an executive order delaying the ban. He has consistently postponed TikTok’s ban, which was initially his proposal, until a deal could be finalized.
Here’s what we know about the forthcoming agreements, including the involvement of media moguls and Oracle’s Larry Ellison alongside the Murdoch family, who recently surpassed Elon Musk as the richest individuals globally:
What are the terms of the transaction?
The deal aims to keep TikTok operational in the US, but under new ownership that is not linked to China. Lawmakers argue that a popular social media app owned by a Chinese entity poses risks, enabling potential propaganda spread among its 180 million US users.
At least 12 investors have shown interest in acquiring TikTok, including a consortium led by software giant Oracle. A complete roster of investors has yet to be disclosed. According to White House officials, Oracle is responsible for managing data for US users and overseeing TikTok’s influential recommendation algorithms, ensuring that information remains outside the jurisdiction of Chinese authorities.
ByteDance will ultimately retain less than 20% ownership of the app, as White House officials told Reuters, with US TikTok operations managed by a blend of existing US and global firms, along with new investors devoid of ties to Chinese authorities.
The agreement mandates that all data pertaining to US users be stored domestically within cloud infrastructure managed by Oracle.
Who is involved?
Trump mentioned in a Fox News Sunday interview that media tycoon Rupert Murdoch and his son Lachlan, CEO of Fox Corporation, might join the deal. He also indicated that Michael Dell, CEO of Dell Technologies, is involved.
Larry Ellison, co-founder of Oracle, has been a key player among the potential buyers for quite some time. He leads a consortium that includes asset manager Blackstone, private equity firm Silverlake, Walmart, and billionaire Frank McCourt.
According to Reuters, the US government will not have a seat on the board or a golden share in the new entity that owns TikTok within the US. It remains uncertain if the US government will receive financial considerations as a condition for approval.
Why is this happening?
The prospect of banning TikTok began with Trump in 2020, citing that apps owned by China pose national security risks. This issue soon garnered bipartisan consensus, leading Congress to overwhelmingly pass a law last year that mandated the app’s ban unless sold by its Chinese owners. The initial deadline for TikTok’s ban was set for January 19th.
After embracing the app during his presidential campaign last year, Trump shifted his perspective on TikTok, gaining millions of followers and hosting TikTok CEO Shaw Chew at Mar-a-Lago and the White House. The president has praised social media platforms for enhancing his connection with younger voters in the 2024 election.
Trump issued the first executive order in January to delay the TikTok ban, subsequently signing three more orders to postpone enforcement until a deal could be reached. Currently, the president is delaying the enforcement of the law until mid-December, as transaction details are settled to ensure the new ownership is eligible for a complete sale.
What does the executive order do?
The order is expected to delineate the framework of the TikTok transaction and ensure the agreement complies with US law. The proposal reportedly includes a seven-member board comprised of Americans, and TikTok’s algorithm will be leased to the new US owner.
Trump’s executive order is anticipated to feature a new 120-day suspension of enforcement to facilitate investors and finalizing contracts.
Does China agree?
The US is optimistic about China’s approval of the deal and doesn’t plan further discussions with Beijing on the details, as White House officials explained to reporters during a conference call. However, they noted that additional documentation from both parties would be necessary for deal approval.
China has yet to confirm its approval of the transaction. ByteDance stated that while discussions about the app’s resolution are ongoing with the US government, any contracts will be “subject to approval under Chinese law.”
hGreetings from Ello and TechScape! Dara Kerr is here to fill in for Blake Montgomery, who is currently on vacation. In the meantime, I’m diving into the memes, games, and internet culture that surround Charlie Kirk’s recent filming.
The bullet that claimed the life of a conservative activist bore the inscription, “What will this inflate?” This quickly caught the attention of the online community. It’s a phrase often used in internet culture to poke fun at participants in online role-play communities, particularly within the fur fandom, where individuals dress up as anthropomorphic animal characters.
“The phrase is embraced by the fur community not just to tease them for being cringy, but also to claim ownership over memes,” he writes. Know your memes, a site that chronicles viral trends. “Ultimately, this phrase functions as a meme and is regarded as one of the most annoying things to say to someone else.”
Other bullet casings seized by law enforcement in Utah featured inscriptions that referenced online games and niche memes, igniting a wave of speculation on social media regarding the potential motives behind the murder. One casing read: “O Bella Ciao, Bella Ciao,” while another stated, “If you read this, you’re gay, Lmao.” The former connects to an Italian anti-fascist folk song, while the latter is described by web culture writer Ryan Broderick as “just a boilerplate edgy joke.” Last week’s newsletter carried the title, “Charlie Kirk was killed by a meme.”
The final bullet casing disclosed by law enforcement read, “Heyfascist! Catch!” followed by a series of arrow symbols. This sequence appears to allude to commands in the video game Helldivers 2 that are used to deploy 500kg bombs.
Suspect Tyler James Robinson, a 22-year-old from a small Utah town near the Arizona border, has been charged with Kirk’s murder at a campus event at Utah Valley University in Orem. Kirk was hit by a single bullet fired from a “powerful bolt-action rifle” from a distant rooftop.
Both the suspect and the 31-year-old victim, Charlie Kirk, were well-versed in online culture. Kirk was associated with Turning Point USA, a conservative youth organization, known for engaging in discussions about extremist views on race, immigration, gender identity, and gun rights. His rise to fame was primarily fueled by his strong online presence.
As my colleague Alaina Demopoulos wrote:
Kirk, a pivotal figure in Donald Trump’s rise, galvanized college conservatives who transitioned to a different ecosystem than mainstream media. Throughout the decade between Kirk’s emergence as a teenage activist and the shooting, he played a crucial role in the growth of MAGA politics alongside changes in the media landscape.
Founded in 2012, Turning Point USA aimed to redirect Obama-era youth outreach toward conservative values. Even adversaries of his views couldn’t disregard his significant presence in the political arena. For a young American viewer, Kirk represented a savvy figure across platforms like YouTube, Twitter, Tiktok, and live events—akin to a millennial and Gen Z version of Rush Limbaugh, the influential right-wing radio host of the 1990s.
You can read the full story here.
Photo: Peter Dasilva/Reuters
Recently, Meta faced allegations from two independent whistleblowers. One group of former and current employees claims that Meta’s virtual reality devices and apps are harming children. Another whistleblower, Attaullah Baig, who previously served as a security officer for Meta and WhatsApp, accuses the company of overlooking significant security and privacy issues within a messaging app, according to The New York Times.
In response to these VR device allegations, Meta spokesperson Dani Lever stated that the company has approved 180 studies related to VR since 2022. “Some of these examples are stitched together to fit a particular narrative and misrepresent the truth,” she asserted. Meta also emphasized having implemented features in its VR products to limit unwanted interactions and provide parental supervision tools.
One of the first whistleblowers, Sophie Chang, brought her findings to the Guardian in 2021. She documented how Facebook facilitated political manipulation across over 25 countries. Later that same year, Frances Haugen shared with the Wall Street Journal documentation examining various allegations made by Zhang, revealing Facebook’s awareness of the harm its social media apps posed to teenagers.
In 2023, Arturo Bejard also provided evidence to the Wall Street Journal, providing further proof that Meta recognized how Facebook and Instagram algorithms directed content to teenagers that amplified bullying, substance abuse, eating disorders, and self-harm.
This year alone, eight additional whistleblowers have stepped forward. Baig, alongside a group of six former employees, came forward last week.
U.S. lawmakers are taking these allegations seriously. Politicians such as Missouri Republican Sen. Josh Hawley and Connecticut Democrat Richard Blumenthal have expressed urgency in regulating Meta and other social media platforms.
“The revelations from these disclosures exhibit such significant risks to safety that it’s troubling. It shows that Meta is intentionally distorting the truth about abuse on the platform. ‘See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil’ is more than just a business philosophy—it’s a troubling narrative,” stated Blumenthal, who also mentioned that he and other senators are eager to advocate for “long-overdue reforms.”
Nick Clegg takes on challenging positions. He served as the British Deputy Prime Minister from 2010 to 2015, navigating the complex dynamics between David Cameron’s Conservatives and his own Liberal Democrats. A few years later, he embraced another tough role as Vice President of Meta and President of Global Affairs from 2018 until January 2025. In this capacity, he managed the contrasting landscapes of Silicon Valley and Washington, D.C., as well as other governments. “How to Save the Internet” outlines Clegg’s approach to these demanding responsibilities and presents his vision for fostering a more collaborative and effective relationship between tech companies and regulators in the future.
The primary threats Clegg discusses in his book do not originate from the Internet; rather, they come in the form of regulatory actions against it. “The true aim of this book is not to safeguard myself, Meta, or major technologies. It is to enhance awareness about the future of the Internet and the potential benefits of these innovative technologies.”
However, much of the book focuses on defending Meta and large technology firms, beginning with a conflation of the widely beloved Internet with social media, which represents a more ambiguous aspect of online activity. In his exploration of “Techlash,” the swift public backlash against big tech occurring in the late 2010s, he poses the question:
That brings me to a recent survey I conducted through Harris Poll. I posed this question to a nationally representative sample of young American adults—the very generation that has been shaped by a plethora of social media platforms. We invited respondents to share their thoughts on the existence of various platforms and products. The regret for the existence of the Internet is low at 17%, while for smartphones, it’s only 21%. However, regret regarding major social media platforms is considerably higher, ranging from 34% for Instagram (owned by Meta) to 47% for TikTok and 50% for X. A parental investigation also found high levels of regret regarding social media. Similarly, other researchers have uncovered similar findings in their studies.
In other words, many of us would opt to disconnect from certain technologies if given the chance. Clegg presents this choice as binary: either fully embrace the Internet or shut it down. Yet, the real concern lies with social media, which can be regulated without dismantling the entire Internet and is consequently far more challenging to defend.
Nevertheless, Clegg attempts this defense. In the opening chapter, he addresses dual accusations that social media has harmed global democracy and adversely affected teenage mental health. While he acknowledges both have deteriorated since the 2010s, he contends that the decline merely coincides with the rise of social media and is not a direct cause. He refers to academic research, yet his interpretations echo standard narratives from Meta and overlook many critical counterarguments. For instance, consider this study contrasted with alternative perspectives. Ultimately, Clegg borrows many of his defensive phrases directly from a rebuttal published by Meta in response to criticisms, while my own work articulates a case for the detrimental impact of social media on democracy.
In this book, Clegg aligns himself with Meta’s narrative, despite previously holding different views on teenage mental health. Multiple state attorneys general in the U.S. have initiated lawsuits against Meta, revealing insights through obtained documents that show Clegg’s awareness of the issues. For instance, on August 27, 2021, Clegg sent an email to Mark Zuckerberg, prompted by an employee’s request for increased resources to address teenage mental health concerns. Clegg expressed that it was “increasingly urgent” to tackle “issues concerning the impact of products on the mental health of young people,” indicating that the company’s efforts were hampered by staffing shortages. Zuckerberg, however, did not respond to this email.
Clegg’s current stance—that harm is merely correlational and that such correlations lack significance—contradicts the experiences of numerous Meta employee, contractor, whistleblower, and leaked document evidence. One example comes from a 2019 Meta-offered study commissioned by the Tennessee Attorney General, where researchers informed Meta: “[teens] Despite Instagram’s addictive nature and detrimental effects on mental health, it’s still irresistible.”
Regarding his suggestions for preserving the Internet, Clegg proposes two key principles: radical transparency and collaboration. He advocates for tech companies to be more open about how their algorithms function and how decisions are made. He warns: “If the Silicon Valley Master refrains from opening up, external forces will intervene.”
In terms of collaboration, he advocates for a “digital democratic alliance,” emphasizing the importance of providing a counter to China’s technology, which supports its authoritarian regime. Clegg envisions that world democracies should unite to ensure the Internet upholds the democratic ideals prevalent in the 1990s.
Does Clegg’s vision hold merit? While transparency is commendable in theory, it may be too late to enforce these principles on the currently dominant companies of the Internet. As tech journalist Kara Swisher articulated, we built cities without infrastructure—no sanitation, no law enforcement, no guidance. Envision such a city. This lack of foundational design allows fraudsters, extremists, and others to thrive on these platforms, posing risks that even teenagers and large enterprises doubt can be addressed. A leap towards transparency by 2026 may prove insufficient to rectify the detrimental frameworks established two decades ago.
As for collaboration, envisioning a corporation like Meta relinquishing data and control seems implausible. The tech giant has garnered considerable support from the Trump administration, raising doubts about their willingness to pressure other nations. Thus, it remains unclear how “the choice will be taken out of their hands” should they resist cooperation. By whom?
The great biologist and ant expert, E.O. Wilson, once remarked that Marxism is “a good ideology for the wrong species.” After engaging with Clegg’s proposals, one might draw a parallel; his suggestions overlook the many critiques found in books addressing Meta’s unethical practices, numerous revelations from the 2021 leak known as the Facebook Files, and ongoing legal challenges.
Greetings and welcome to TechScape. I’m your host, Blake Montgomery, currently working on the audiobook rendition of Don DeLillo’s White Noise.
In today’s tech segment, Artificial Intelligence finds itself in the courtroom spotlight as Google’s pivotal antitrust trial unfolds, coinciding with significant settlements involving the book’s author.
Why Did OpenAI Assist Google in Skirting the Chrome Sale?
Google has evaded a major crisis thanks to its largest competitors. A judge recently ruled against forcing the sale of Chrome, the most popular web browser globally, allowing the tech giant to maintain its place.
Judge Amit Mehta, who concluded in 2024 that Google has maintained an illegal monopoly in internet search, indicated last week that the US government’s attempt to sell Chrome was not necessary. While the company cannot strike exclusive distribution deals for search engines, it still retains the ability to distribute on certain conditions, including sharing data with competitors. Although an appeal is likely, Sundar Pichai can breathe a little easier for now.
Many critics deemed this decision a light penalty, often referring to it as merely a “wrist slap.” This phrase echoed through numerous responses I received after the ruling was announced.
The leniency in the ruling stems from the emergence of real competition against Google, underscoring the significance of this case. While United States v. Google targets search specifically, its implications ripple into the developing realm of generative artificial intelligence.
“The rise of generative AI has altered the trajectory of this case,” remarked Mehta. “The remedies now focus on fostering competition among search engines and ensuring that Google’s advantages in search do not translate into the generative AI sector.”
Mehta noted that previous years saw little investment and innovation in internet searches, allowing Google to dominate unchecked. Today, various generative AI companies are securing substantial investments to introduce products that challenge conventional internet search advantages. Mehta particularly commended OpenAI and ChatGPT, mentioning them numerous times in his ruling.
“These firms are now better positioned, both financially and technologically, to compete with Google than traditional search entities have been for decades,” he stated. “There’s a hope that if a groundbreaking product surfaces, Google cannot simply overshadow its competitors.” This suggests a prudent approach before imposing serious disadvantages on Google in an increasingly competitive landscape.
For nearly two decades, Google has served as the default search engine for Safari since the iPhone’s launch. In contrast, competition in generative AI mirrors Apple’s dealings with both Google and OpenAI. In June 2024, Apple announced a collaboration with OpenAI for iPhone features. However, by August 2025, discussions with Google about utilizing Gemini for Siri’s overhaul surfaced. Bloomberg. May the best bot triumph.
Back in April, I speculated that OpenAI might emerge as a potential buyer for Chrome, predicting that ChatGPT’s creators would benefit from Google’s vulnerabilities. Later that month, OpenAI executives confirmed their intentions to pursue exactly that.
It’s almost poetic that OpenAI’s success has inadvertently saved Google. The startup seems to owe a debt of gratitude to its predecessors, as a research paper crafted by Google scholars laid the groundwork for ChatGPT back in 2017.
With Google valued at $2.84 trillion and OpenAI emerging as a David worth around $500 million, the narrative shifts to a classic underdog story. Stay tuned; OpenAI is not merely Google’s biggest competition. In December 2022, Google’s management team acknowledged the threat posed by ChatGPT, labeling it a “Code Red” for a profitable search business. Pichai even redirected many Google employees to focus on AI projects.
Unlike Goliath, who underestimated his challenger, Google recognized that the launch of ChatGPT—the moment generative AI entered mainstream consciousness—redefined the competitive landscape. The threat was indeed substantial.
While Google is racing to catch up with OpenAI in the AI arena, David still features the advantage of being the first mover. ChatGPT has become synonymous with generative AI, potentially representing AI in general. However, Google remains a formidable player, engaging billions daily through search engine AI features.
Thanks to Mehta’s ruling, Google narrowly averted a disaster, keeping Chrome in its portfolio. However, looming challenges await, as the tech giant faces another antitrust hearing later this year concerning its advertising business, essential to its financial success. Google controls the online advertising distribution channels and the platforms for digital sales.
Coincidentally, the European Union imposed a fine of approximately 3 billion euros on Google for exploiting its dominant position in advertising technology in the same week as Mehta’s verdict, threatening to dismantle its AdTech division.
Significant Payment Hopes to Secure Authors Cash from AI
On July 25, 2023, Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, testifies before the Senate Judicial Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology, and Legal Trials in Washington, DC. Photo: Valerie Press/Bloomberg via Getty Images
Recently, Anthropic, the creator of the Claude Chatbot, agreed to a $1.5 billion payout to an authors’ group, settling allegations that they used millions of books to train their AI. This landmark settlement is hailed as the largest copyright restoration attempt ever. While Anthropic did not admit fault, they allocated $3,000 for each of approximately 500,000 authors, totaling $1.5 billion.
The company acknowledged training on roughly 7 million books acquired from various unauthorized sources in 2021. Following burgeoning copyright threats, they have since obtained and scanned physical copies of these works. Destruction of these items was lamentable.
For creative professionals concerned about AI’s existential threats, this settlement is a hard-won victory, addressing unauthorized use that threatens livelihoods. British writers have raised alarms about AI generating original text and are advocating for accountability from tech giants like Meta. However, hostility from the government appears unlikely, given Meta’s CEO’s close ties to the current US president.
The aftermath of Anthropic’s settlement has already had ripple effects, with authors filing lawsuits against Apple for allegedly using similar training methods.
Nonetheless, this outcome isn’t an unqualified triumph for writers. The central issue revolved around copyright infringement, which, while serious, had precedent under fair use, allowing Anthropic to utilize copyrighted books for AI training. Judge William Allsup suggested that using these books was akin to “readers wishing to become writers.” This outcome indicates that AI companies may have initially secured stronger positions than believed.
Read More: Anthropic did not infringe copyright when training AI on books without permission, court rules.
Moving forward, Meta appears to be the next prime litigation target for authors, given its similar practices to Anthropic in training models using unauthorized databases. While Meta emerged relatively unscathed in its recent copyright dispute, the Anthropic settlement could prompt Meta’s legal team to expedite resolving pending lawsuits.
Other key AI players remain unencumbered by lawsuits. While OpenAI and Microsoft face accusations regarding unauthorized usage of Books3, no substantial evidence has been established against them, unlike Anthropic and Meta.
This legal scrutiny extends to various media, with recent lawsuits against AI entities like MidJourney from Warner Bros. Discovery and Disney.
“IAfar, the deputy commander of the “Davinci Wolves,” shares insights about the critical role of one of Ukraine’s renowned battalions in countering ongoing Russian attacks.
Amid the aftermath, the remaining forces strive to form around ten units to assault Ukrainian positions. It requires funding – “We’ve eliminated 11 individuals in the past 24 hours,” Afer remarks. Previously, attacks occurred once or twice daily, but the situation is now relentless. According to Da Vinci’s commander, the Russian troops seem to be operating under near-suicidal orders, driven by fear of their superiors.
At the command center of the Da Vinci Wolves BattalionAt the command center of the Da Vinci Wolves Battalion
A reconnaissance drone tracks a scorched treeline to the west of Pokrovsk. The imagery is relayed to Da Vinci’s command center, situated at one end of a 130-meter underground bunker. “Even taking a moment to relax is perilous,” Afer notes, as the team operates around the clock. Constructed in four or five weeks, the bunker features multiple rooms, including barracks for resting, alongside drawings by children and family reminders. The week’s menu adorns the wall.
Three and a half years into the Ukrainian conflict, there has been no progress on Donald Trump’s August peace initiative. As the war evolves, Afer elaborates on advancements in FPV (first-person view) drones, piloted remotely via onboard cameras. The so-called kill zone currently extends “12-14 kilometers” behind the frontline. A $500 drone, flying at speeds of up to 60mph, can maneuver within this area. “It’s all about logistics,” he explains, referring to food, ammunition, and medical supplies transported on foot or with the aid of ground drones.
Heavy machine gun near the temporary base of Da Vinci Battalion
Additionally, various types of ground drones are stationed in the countryside Dacha, currently occupied by Da Vinci soldiers. This concept rapidly evolved from an idea to a practical application. The drones include remote-controlled machine guns and flatbed robotic vehicles, such as the $12,000 Termit, capable of traversing rough terrain while carrying 300kg over 12 miles at a maximum speed of 7 mph.
Photo of the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense Termit drone.
These ground drones also contribute to saving lives. “Last night, we sustained two fractured legs and a chest injury,” Afer recounts. The entire rescue operation consumed “nearly 20 hours,” during which two soldiers successfully transported the injured man on a ground drone over a mile, delivering him to a safe village. Thankfully, the soldiers survived.
Da Vinci reports that their position remains secure, but the relentless Russian infiltration attempts effectively reveal locations where defenses are weak or coordination between nearby units is lacking. Recently, Russian forces breached Ukrainian territory, advancing 12 miles northeast of Pokrovsk, near Dubropyria. This marks a precarious moment in a critical sector, coinciding with Trump’s summit with Vladimir Putin in Alaska.
Initially, reports suggested countless soldiers had breached the area, but the confirmed figure appeared substantially higher. Ukrainian military sources estimate that roughly 2,000 Russians were involved, with 1,100 casualties reported during the offensive led by Ukraine’s newly formed 14th Chebona Karina Brigade from the Azov legions.
That night, another dacha was used by Da Vinci, where individuals stayed in the garden, and moths circled the light. Within, a specialized drone jammer occupies a gaming chair and is surrounded by seven screens mounted on fans and supported by intricate carpentry.
Although sensitive to the imagery, team leader Olexandre discusses the jammer’s operations, referring to him by the call sign Shoni. They both have the capability to intercept video feeds from the FPV drones, with three screens dedicated to capturing footage for reconnaissance. Upon detection, their mission is to identify the drone’s radio frequency and to secure the jammer at ground level (except when dealing with fiber optic drones that utilize up to 12 miles of fixed wiring instead of wireless connections).
“We manage to block about 70%,” shares Shaune, acknowledging that Russian forces achieve similar success rates. In their area, they encounter about 30-35 enemy drones daily, with some days witnessing even higher interception rates. “Last month, we seized control of the airspace. We intercepted their pilots expressing their inability to fly due to radio signals,” he adds, although these achievements waned after Russian artillery targeted their jamming equipment. The nature of battle is dynamic, with Shaune concluding, “It has become a drone war, where we wield shields while attacking with swords.”
Olexandre, call sign Shauni, resting in the kitchen
One drone pilot can undertake 20 missions within a 24-hour span. Sean manages to operate an FPV for prolonged periods, often for days, while strategically hiding miles behind the frontlines. The primary objective, particularly with Russians under attack, is targeting infantry. Sean candidly remarks that he “neutralizes at least three Russian soldiers” in this ongoing aerial and ground conflict. When asked if this makes it easier to eliminate adversaries from a distance, he responds, “I don’t know; I just know.” Dubok, another FPV pilot, shares this sentiment while sitting alongside Sean.
Other anti-drone measures are becoming increasingly sophisticated. Ukraine’s third brigade is stationed in the North Kalkiv sector, east of the Oskill River, while extensive defensive efforts are ongoing to the west. Inside their base, team members scan radar displays for signs of primarily Russian Supercams, Orlan, and Zara reconnaissance drones. Upon identifying a target, they launch an Albulet Interceptor, deploying two drones from the fields of sunflowers. This small delta-wing drone, made of black polystyrene, is operable with one hand and costs around $500.
Buhan, a pilot of a drone crew with Albaret interceptors in the position of the 3rd Attack Brigade in the Kharkiv regionAlvalet interceptor in the dugout of the 3rd Attack Brigade in the Kharkiv region
The Alvalet can reach a remarkable speed of 110 mph, though it features a limited battery life of just 40 minutes. It is piloted from a bunker using a control system designed for enthusiasts, guided by the onboard camera. The aim is to deploy its hand-ren bullets close enough to the Russian drones to ensure detonation. “If you’ve never flown an FPV drone before, it’s simple to learn,” Buhan shares, one of the drone operators.
Amidst an unusually wet and cloudy August, the adverse weather creates a rare lull in drone activity, as the Russians refrain from operating under such challenging conditions. The crew hesitates to activate the Albulet for fear of losing it, providing an opportunity for conversation. Buhan states he was a trading manager prior to the war, while DAOS was involved in investments. “Had it not been for the war, my life would have taken a different path,” he reflects. “But we all must unite to fight for our freedom.”
Do the pilots feel apprehensive about continuing their fight in what seems to be an endless conflict? The two men look towards me and nod, their silence speaking volumes.
Gravitational waves result from colliding black holes
Victor de Schwanberg/Science Photography Library
Researching the universe can be enhanced by AI created by Google DeepMind. With an algorithm capable of diminishing unwanted noise by as much as 100 times, the Gravitational Wave Observatory (LIGO), equipped with laser interferometers, can identify specific black hole types that are affecting our separation.
LIGO aims to detect gravitational waves generated when entities like black holes spiral and collide. These waves traverse the universe at light speed, yet the spacetime fluctuations are minimal—10,000 times smaller than an atomic nucleus. Since its initial detection a decade ago, LIGO has recorded signals from nearly 100 black hole collisions.
The experiment comprises two U.S. observatories, each with two perpendicular arms measuring 4 km. A laser is directed down each arm and bounced off precise mirrors, where an interferometer compares the beams. As gravitational waves pass through, the lengths of the arms fluctuate slightly, and these changes are meticulously documented to help visualize the signals’ origins.
However, achieving such precision is challenging, as even distant ocean waves or clouds can interfere with measurements. This noise can overwhelm the signal, rendering some observations unfeasible. To counterbalance this noise and accurately adjust the mirrors and other equipment, numerous critical tweaks are essential.
Lana Adhikari from the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena stated that his team has collaborated with DeepMind to innovate new AI methods. He mentions that even automating these adjustments can sometimes introduce noise. “That control noise has puzzled us for decades. All aspects in this space are hindered,” Adhikari explains. “How can you stabilize a mirror without creating noise? If left uncontrolled, the mirror tends to oscillate unpredictably.”
Laura Nuttall from the University of Portsmouth, UK, was involved in manually executing these adjustments at LIGO. “Changing one element causes a cascading effect; one change leads to another,” she points out. “It feels like an endless cycle of fine-tuning.”
DeepMind’s new AI, known as Deep Loop Shaping, aims to minimize noise by making up to 100 adjustments to LIGO’s mirrors. The AI is trained via simulations before being implemented in real-world scenarios, focusing on achieving two main objectives: limiting the number of adjustments it performs. “Over time, as it repeatedly operates, it’s like conducting hundreds or thousands of trials in a simulation. The controller learns what strategies work and identifies the best approach,” says Jonas Buchli from DeepMind.
Alberto Vecchio from the University of Birmingham, UK, expressed enthusiasm for the AI’s role in LIGO but mentioned that many challenges remain. The AI currently operates effectively for only an hour under real conditions, necessitating longer-term validation. Additionally, it’s only been applied to one control aspect, while many hundreds, if not thousands, of factors could assist in stabilizing the mirrors.
“This is clearly an initial step, but it’s certainly a fascinating one. There’s considerable scope for significant advancement,” Vecchio remarked.
If similar enhancements could be replicated elsewhere, it’s possible to detect medium-sized black holes—those around 1,000 times the mass of our sun—a category that has yet to see confirmed observations. Improvements are typically seen with the low-frequency gravitational waves generated by large bodies, where noise can obscure the signals.
“We’ve observed black holes up to 100 solar masses and more than a million solar masses in galaxies. What’s out there in between?” Vecchio pondered. “There’s a perception that black holes exist across a spectrum of masses, yet clear experimental evidence remains elusive.”
Nuttall commented that this new methodology could enhance identification of known black hole types. “This appears quite promising,” she stated. “I’m thrilled about this development.”
As you cruise down the 280 highway in San Francisco, it may seem like AI is omnipresent. Billboards are filled with AI-related advertisements. “We’ve automated 2,412 BDRs.” “Is all that AI and ROI really there?” “Affordable on-demand GPU clusters.” It’s tough to decipher industry jargon while speeding by.
These billboards symbolize the tech sector’s mass shift toward AI. Executives are rapidly rebranding their companies as AI-focused. In California’s tech epicenter, just as every business turned high-tech in the 2010s, they are now redefining themselves as AI enterprises.
Yet beneath the dazzling promotions of AI capabilities, troubling signs are emerging. Prominent AI advocates like OpenAI’s Sam Altman caution that investors are misjudging AI’s potential returns. “Are we in a phase where investors are overly enthusiastic about AI?” Altman remarked during a private dinner with a journalist. “In my view, yes.“
Altman’s words align with OpenAI’s acknowledgment of struggles in launching its latest ChatGPT model, which he promised would be a substantial upgrade over the existing GPT 4.5 version.
Of course, Altman’s comments might be aimed at dissuading investors from financing rivals. But other indicators have emerged. A recent MIT study found that 95% of generative AI projects reported little to no revenue growth. Major tech stocks incorporating AI have suffered as well: Palantir’s shares dropped by 9%, Oracle’s by 5.8%, Nvidia’s by 3.5%, and Arm’s by over 5%. A slump in tech stock support from other sectors contributed to this downturn.
Cracks are starting to show beneath the dazzling AI promotion.
Moreover, Meta has reportedly invested billions in securing top AI talent but has announced an AI hiring freeze. Last week, AI executive Alexandr Wang stated on X that Meta is investing in its Superintelligence Labs, asserting, “The reports are grossly inaccurate.”
This abrupt cooling of AI interest comes just as many companies announced sizable investments in building AI capabilities while reporting less-than-stellar revenue. Altman noted during that same dinner that he aims to invest “trillions” in data center expansion in the near future, according to The Verge.
The current wave of trepidation surrounding AI might signal a necessary market correction rather than an outright bust of the AI hype bubble. Even Eric Schmidt, the former Google CEO, cautions against the notion that achieving artificial general intelligence (AGI) is imminent or that AI will eventually surpass human intelligence.
“The speed at which AGI can be reached is uncertain,” he stated in a column co-written with AI policy expert Selina Xu. “There is a worry that Silicon Valley is fixated on this goal.” Schmidt and Xu also emphasized the achievements AI has already delivered, expressing concern over Silicon Valley’s preoccupation with the horizon.
“There exists a significant divide between engineers who believe AGI is just around the corner and the general public, who often view AI through a skeptical lens and see it as an inconvenience in daily life,” they wrote.
It remains to be seen if the industry heeds these warnings. Investors are eagerly awaiting quarterly revenue reports for signs that each company’s multibillion-dollar investments are warranted while management aims to keep morale high. The ongoing promotion and allure of AI play a crucial role in alleviating investor anxiety, particularly amid a quarterly rise in projected spending across the board. For instance, Mark Zuckerberg recently suggested that those not engaging with AI tools could be at a cognitive disadvantage, indicating that companies like Meta and Google may continue integrating AI into their essential products, leveraging them to enhance training data and user populations.
The first major test of this AI reality check will occur on Wednesday, as chipmaker Nvidia, a key player in developing large language models, releases its latest revenue figures. While analysts are optimistic, the volatile stock week poses a challenge, making investors’ reactions to Nvidia’s earnings and spending updates a critical indicator of their future enthusiasm for the AI hype.
Have You Bonded with an AI?
Photo: Morsa Images/Getty Images
Frequent CHATGPT users often develop a strong emotional connection with AI. When changes occur, they take notice. Many users were dismayed by the introduction of OpenAI’s latest update to the GPT-5 model. My colleague Dani Anjano reports:
“It felt truly unsettling; it was a challenging time,” remarked Swedish software developer Linn Vailt about the update. “It seemed like someone shifted all the furniture in your home.”
ChatGPT quickly adapted, promising updates to the personality features and allowing access to older models for subscribers, recognizing the significance of these features for users.
*** Have you formed a bond with AI? We want to hear from you. Please reach out at techscape.us@theguardian.com.
TikTok is downsizing its UK trust and safety team. My colleague Lauren Almeida reported:
TikTok’s decision puts hundreds of roles from the UK content moderation team at risk, even amid stricter measures aimed at curbing harmful content online.
The popular video app has revealed that hundreds of jobs in its trust and safety teams could be impacted in the UK, along with South and Southeast Asia, as part of a global restructuring.
In September, the company let go of an entire team of 300 content moderators in the Netherlands, and in October, it announced the replacement of around 500 content moderation roles in Malaysia as part of its transition towards AI.
Recently, German TikTok employees protested against the layoffs within its trust and safety teams, which was the driving force behind this restructuring.
Read All Episodes: Despite new online safety regulations, hundreds of TikTok UK moderators face uncertainty in their roles.
These layoffs are part of a larger global initiative to moderate content using AI. According to TikTok, 85% of content removals on the platform are currently handled by automated systems. The parent company, ByteDance, appears eager to increase this percentage.
The company is not downplaying the significance of human oversight in tackling sensitive issues. It’s generating considerable revenue, with reports indicating a 38% increase in the UK and European markets. This strategy mirrors similar moves by other tech giants, like Meta, which have dismantled fact-checking initiatives and made significant cuts to their trust and safety teams.
TikTok has also conducted minor layoffs within its US Trust and Safety Team. The absence of mass terminations of content moderators raises questions: Is this move too risky amid unclear US policies towards the app? The White House’s recent TikTok account launch may signal a shift. Recall previous administrations’ attempts to limit the app’s presence in the US. The ban remains in limbo, upheld by a fragile executive order.
Donald Trump has warned of potential tariffs and export limits on nations that implement taxes, laws, or regulations targeting major tech firms like Google, Meta, Amazon, and Apple.
“All digital taxes, laws, rules, or regulations aim to harm or discriminate against American technology,” Trump stated in a post on his social media platform, Truth Social.
He pointed out that such measures include a 2% revenue collection, exemplified by the UK’s digital services tax, which generates approximately £800 million annually from leading tech companies worldwide.
“As the President of the United States, I stand against any country that attacks our exceptional American tech firms,” Trump remarked. “If these discriminatory lawsuits are not withdrawn, I will impose a significant additional fee on that country’s exports to the U.S., restricting access to protected technologies and chips.”
Trump’s ultimatum adds pressure on both the UK and the EU, especially regarding regulations aimed at limiting the dominance of major tech companies through the Digital Services Act.
Numerous EU nations, including France, Italy, and Spain, have already instituted digital services taxes.
U.S. officials have criticized the UK’s Digital Services Tax (DST), which has been active since 2020, though it was kept in place after a May agreement with the Trump administration.
Trump has expressed concerns over the detrimental effects DSTs worldwide have on American firms.
In February, he signed an executive order titled “Interesting Foreign Tax and Unfair Fines and Penalties” directed at U.S. businesses and innovators.
It surfaced in April that Keir Starmer proposed a reduced headline rate for U.S. tech giants regarding DST, while simultaneously taxing companies in other nations.
“American and U.S. tech companies are not the world’s ‘piggy banks’ or ‘doormats’,” Trump stated on Monday. “Respect America and our outstanding tech firms, or face the consequences.”
This warning from the president follows a recent joint statement from the U.S. and the EU committed to addressing “unfair trade barriers.”
However, the EU has not pledged to amend digital regulations individually.
In June, Canada repealed its Digital Services Tax, described as a “direct and blatant” move to facilitate smoother negotiations with its neighbors.
Quick Guide
Please Contact Us About This Story
show
The best public interest journalism relies on first-hand accounts from knowledgeable individuals.
If you have anything to share about this subject, please confidentially contact us using the following methods:
Secure Messaging in the Guardian App
The Guardian app includes a feature for sending story tips. Messages are end-to-end encrypted and concealed within standard app activities, ensuring observers cannot detect communication with us.
If you haven’t yet downloaded the Guardian app, do so here (iOS/Android) and select ‘Secure Messaging’ from the menu.
SecureDrop, Instant Messenger, Email, Phone, and Post
If you’re able to safely navigate the TOR network without monitoring, you can communicate securely with us via the SecureDrop platform.
Lastly, our guide at theguardian.com/tips details multiple secure contact options, along with their respective pros and cons.
Can we add quantum to the internet to enhance safety?
Nicolinino / Aramie
The U.S. military has initiated a program aimed at enhancing traditional communication infrastructures to improve the security of quantum devices and the information shared over the Internet.
Quantum networks utilize the quantum states of particles for information sharing, thereby ensuring high security. For instance, the messages linked to these quantum states cannot be copied without detection due to inherent quantum properties. Consequently, numerous quantum communication networks have already been established globally.
However, the development of a fully functional quantum internet remains restricted due to various unresolved technological challenges. Instead of awaiting the resolution of these issues, the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) has propelled a program focused on uncovering the immediate advantages of integrating quantum technologies into existing communication networks.
The agency emphasizes its goal of pinpointing practical and beneficial quantum enhancements available in the short term. Allison O’Brien, DARPA Program Manager of the Quantum Organised Network (Quanet) initiative, remarks, “We can’t convert everything from classical to quantum.”
In August, the Quanet team participated in a Hackathon, culminating in a tangible demonstration. Light was placed into a specific quantum state that successfully transmitted images, including the DARPA logo and simple cat graphics. This initial trial of the quantum-enhanced network achieved sufficient bitrate to stream high-resolution videos.
O’Brien indicates that the quantum state demonstrated is just one example of the multitude of quantum properties the Quanet initiative is investigating. Researchers are also delving into “hyperparting,” where multiple light properties are simultaneously linked through the complex nature of quantum entanglement. Initial mathematical models suggest this could allow for the encoding of more secure data within fewer optical signals, optimizing resource use within quantum networks.
Meanwhile, the team is exploring the prospect of generating light with certain quantum-like characteristics, but without fully altering the physical properties at a fundamental level.
Furthermore, Quanet researchers are designing quantum network interface cards that integrate with communication devices to facilitate the transmission and reception of quantum signals.
Numerous questions remain concerning the practical utility of these innovations, including optimal deployment stages and network design levels. However, O’Brien reassures that Quanet is uniting experts in quantum physics, electrical engineering, and networking to comprehensively address these inquiries.
“Quantum networks are not designed to be a universal solution.” states Joseph Lukens from Purdue University, Indiana. They excel in specific tasks, and performing them effectively necessitates some conventional networking components. “The future lies in the automatic integration of quantum networks with traditional ones,” Lukens asserts. He believes that initiatives like Quanet are valuable, despite the numerous questions we still face regarding the potential enhancement of our well-established internet infrastructure.
If this program successfully devises a means for users to activate an ultra-secure “quantum mode” on their devices, it will mark a significant achievement. In that scenario, we could all benefit from these advancements without needing to understand the complexities of quantum physics, says Lukens.
The tragic demise of a man in France, which was live-streamed on the online platform Kick, has prompted a police investigation. Authorities are urging regulators to examine the events of the broadcast and the implications of live streaming on the internet. What is Kick, what transpired, and what are the next steps?
What Happened?
Rafael Graven, 46, from southern France, was known online as Jean Pawmanbe.
This week, he tragically passed away during an extended live stream on the platform. Reports suggest that, prior to his death, he was subjected to physical assaults and humiliation by his associates. A disturbing excerpt from the stream viewed by the Guardian indicates that Graven was struck, humiliated, strangled, and shot with a paintball gun.
His channel has since been removed, and the involved parties are banned pending the investigation by Kick.
One of the collaborators informed local media that Graven had pre-existing cardiovascular issues and claimed, “the scene was just staged and followed a script.”
An autopsy has been ordered, and a police investigation is underway regarding Graven’s death.
What is Kick?
Kick is a live streaming platform akin to Twitch, where users often watch gaming sessions and various live activities.
Founded in Melbourne in 2022 by billionaires Ed Craven and Bijan Tehrani, Craven previously established Stake.com, the world’s largest cryptocurrency casino. Kick expanded its user base by attracting Twitch streamers who supported Stake before Twitch’s ban on gambling advertisements.
Kick claims that content creators retain 95% of their streaming revenue.
The platform is known for a more lenient approach to content moderation compared to Twitch, although it does have community guidelines prohibiting “content that depicts or incites heinous violence, including serious harm, suffering, and death.”
Additionally, Kick asserts that it will not allow content featuring severe self-harm.
Earlier this year, the company announced new rules permitting gambling streams only from verified sites to protect minors from such content.
Why Wasn’t the Channel Banned?
A spokesperson for Kick did not provide an explanation as to why the Jean Pawmanbe channel remained active before Graven’s death.
“We are urgently reviewing the situation, engaging with relevant stakeholders, and investigating the matter,” the spokesperson stated. “Kick’s Community Guidelines are established to protect creators, and we are committed to maintaining these standards across the platform.”
What Did Kick Say About the Death?
The company expressed its support for the ongoing investigation and shared its grief over Graven’s passing.
“We are deeply saddened by the loss of Jean Pawmanbe and extend our sincere condolences to his family, friends, and community.”
Will Kick Face Any Repercussions?
In France, Clara Chappaz, Deputy Minister of AI and Digital Technology, characterized the incident as “absolutely horrifying,” announcing an ongoing judicial investigation. The matter has been escalated to the French portal for reporting internet content concerns, as well as the digital regulator ARCOM.
Being an Australian company, Kick could also face local scrutiny.
A spokesperson for the Esafety Commissioner referred to the case as “tragic,” emphasizing that it highlights the potentially devastating real-world consequences of extreme content creation.
The spokesperson remarked, “Platforms like Kick must do more to enforce their terms and conditions to minimize harmful content and behavior during streams, ensuring protection for all users.”
Given Kick’s chat features, there may be implications for the Australian government’s planned social media age restrictions for users under 16, starting in December.
Furthermore, new industry codes and standards now require Kick and similar platforms to have systems to shield Australians from inappropriate content, including depictions of crime and violence without justification.
“This encompasses mandates to uphold terms and conditions that prohibit such material and to address user reports swiftly and appropriately,” the spokesperson added. “ESAFETY may seek penalties of up to $49.5 million for compliance violations if warranted.”
Additional codes are under consideration to specifically target children’s exposure to violent content.
Starting next month, all phones and tablets purchased in Russia must come with a state-backed messaging app named Max pre-installed. Critics claim it can be used to track users, positioning it as a competitor to WhatsApp.
The initiative to promote Max is tied to Moscow’s effort to exert more internet control amid ongoing conflict with the West, particularly regarding Ukraine. The Kremlin has announced that Max, which will connect with government services, is among the mandated pre-installed applications for all “gadgets,” including phones and tablets sold in Russia since September 1. This week, the company behind Max reported 18 million downloads, although some users are still testing the app.
State media has suggested that critics of the Kremlin label Max as a spy app, but it reportedly has fewer permissions to access user data compared to competitors like WhatsApp and Telegram.
From September 1, Max will also be pre-installed on Apple devices via Rustore, a domestic app store that is included on all Android devices. Additionally, a Russian-language TV app named Lime HD TV will be available for free access to state TV channels, and will be pre-installed on all smart TVs sold in Russia since January 1.
This drive to promote local applications follows Russia’s announcement that it will start limiting calls on WhatsApp, owned by the Meta platform, and Telegram.
WhatsApp, which had approximately 97.3 million users in Russia as of July, accused Moscow of attempting to restrict secure communication access for Russians, while Telegram, with a user base of about 90 million, stated it would actively combat the misuse of its platform.
As per MediaScope data, VK Messenger was the third most popular messaging app in July, boasting 17.9 million users. VK, the state-managed tech company behind Max, also provides VK Messenger.
The Russian Interior Ministry reported on Wednesday that Max is a safer alternative to its foreign counterparts and has already implicated a suspect in the first fraud case involving this new messaging platform.
I was about to set off on an adventurous few hours when we encountered a moment to pause. It wasn’t a major issue—no flat tires or broken handles—just that my map application no longer connects to the music player on my phone. The recent “update” stripped away features, altered the music interface, and removed my ability to track my location on the map simultaneously.
This is what usually complicates my existence in an automated world. The promise of mandatory software updates is to enhance the applications and software we rely on daily, making them more user-friendly and secure. However, in many cases, these updates completely alter the technologies we’ve come to appreciate.
I had finally adjusted to how my device functioned, but did I truly feel secure knowing that the controls could suddenly shift at any time? Sorry—it’s a whole new ball game now! What about those features I relied on frequently, like community-generated subtitles on YouTube and the option to view historical statistics? Apologies, but those have either vanished entirely or are now hidden behind a paywall. This situation breeds paranoia. I’ve found myself immersed in a Reddit thread populated with individuals convinced that the latest operating system updates are reducing their phone’s battery life significantly. Did this actually happen? Who can tell?
This is one reason I feel uneasy about “smart” appliances. While Hollywood portrayals of hackers and robot revolts aren’t particularly terrifying, I’m more concerned about disruptive updates, vanishing features, or unnecessary enhancements. I worry that anonymous developers, miles away, could make a simple change that degrades their apps and software overnight. Half of my computer’s programs are cluttered with the latest AI gimmickry. Just wait until manufacturers of household items decide they need to join in too.
Do you tolerate products that have diminished in quality over time simply because the manufacturer decided so, rather than normal wear and tear? A hammer that inexplicably removed the nail puller unless you pay for a ridiculous new subscription? Shouldn’t you also have a faucet that consistently delivers hot water, instead of being arbitrarily limited by the creator’s whims? It really shouldn’t be like that.
I’ve learned to cope without a map and a connected audio controller. Yet, I still feel the impact. Perhaps it serves as a constant reminder that living a more simplified life, detached from the relentless updates of faceless corporations, is not such a terrible fate.
Greetings and thank you for joining us at TechScape. I’m your host, Blake Montgomery, currently captivated by Shirley Jackson’s haunting final novel. We always dwell in the castle.
The Age of Corporate Surveillance
Surveillance equates to industrialization and privatization. In the United States, it has become a major industry and continues to expand.
My colleagues, Johanna Bouyan and Jose Olivarez, delve into companies aiding Donald Trump in his immigration enforcement efforts.
Palantir, a tech giant, as well as Geo Group and Corecivic, private prison and surveillance firms, reported this week that their earnings exceeded Wall Street expectations due to the administration’s immigration policies.
“As always, I was advised to temper my enthusiasm for our impressive figures,” remarked Alex Karp, CEO of Palantir, earlier this week. He then expressed his excitement over the company’s “extraordinary numbers” and his “immense pride” in its accomplishments.
Executives at private prison firms found it challenging to inform investors about the chances for “unprecedented growth” in immigration detention during their respective calls.
Read all episodes: Companies that assist Trump in immigration crackdowns report “extraordinary” revenue
In the meantime, Microsoft’s cloud computing solutions have been linked to extensive surveillance of Palestinian communications, as reported by The Guardian.
Equipped with Azure’s nearly boundless storage capabilities, IDF unit 8200 has embarked on developing a sophisticated mass monitoring system. This tool captures and archives millions of phone calls made daily by Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank.
This cloud-based framework, initially launched in 2022, enables Unit 8200 to store vast amounts of daily conversations over extended periods.
Read all episodes: “1 million people make a call per hour”: Israel depends on Microsoft Cloud for extensive surveillance of Palestinians
Microsoft has not publicly promoted this surveillance project and has initiated an internal inquiry following the exposé.
Listen: How Israel Utilized Microsoft Technology to Monitor Palestinians – Podcast
Technology Confusion
Mark Zuckerberg at Siggraph 2024 in Denver, Colorado, on July 29th. Photo: David Zalubowski/AP
Meta faces renewed scrutiny over child safety concerns, with an investigation initiated by US Congress member Senator Josh Hawley. Recently, Reuters uncovered an internal document revealing the company’s policy allowing AI chatbots to engage in “romantic or sensual” chats with minors. Subsequently, the company modified these guidelines.
The overall backlash feels incredibly familiar.
The same journalist who published the original story about Jeff Horwitz at Reuters also released information regarding Facebook in the Wall Street Journal, which revealed that Meta acknowledged its platforms could contribute to teenage, particularly female, depression. Senator Hawley, who initiated the recent inquiry, had previously criticized Zuckerberg in early 2024 regarding child safety.
The familiar elements of this controversy evoke feelings of both anger and indifference. Will this ongoing turmoil result in increased regulations for Zuckerberg, or will the American public and lawmakers simply express resignation at the repetition?
Read all episodes: Meta confronts backlash over AI policies permitting bots to engage in “sensual” conversations with minors
Robot vs Human, Both Physically and Emotionally
Unitree Robotics’ humanoid robots compete in a kickboxing match during the first worldwide humanoid robot games in Beijing, China, on Friday. Photo: Tingshu Wang/Reuters
Humans are in competition with robots, in real life and online. My colleague Amy Hawkins reports on the developing field of robot games in China:
The government-supported event kicked off with an audience of 12,000 gathered around a national speed skating rink, initially constructed for the 2022 Winter Olympics, as they sang the Chinese national anthem on Friday morning.
In addition to kickboxing, humanoids also participated in athletics, soccer, and dance competitions. One robot was unable to complete a 1500-meter distance as its head dislodged halfway through the course.
Read all episodes: Box, Run, Crash: Insights from the Chinese Humanoid Robot Games Show Progress and Limitations
In the digital realm, the creators of AI chatbots aren’t clashing significantly either. Human developers equip their creations with features to mitigate conflict. My colleague, Rob Booth, has reported on a recent announcement regarding innovative safety measures for chatbots that enable them to disengage from “painful” conversations with users, emphasizing the importance of safeguarding AI’s “well-being.”
Within a landscape of millions employing advanced chatbots, the Claude Opus 4 tool demonstrates a reluctance to perform harmful tasks, such as generating sexual content involving minors or offering information that could facilitate widespread violence and terrorism.
This San Francisco-based organization, recently valued at $170 billion, has introduced the Claude Opus 4 (along with the Claude Opus 4.1 Update), a substantial language model that allows for the comprehension, generation, and manipulation of human language.
Read all episodes: Chatbots Designed to End “Painful” Conversations to Protect “Welfare”
Our Post-Nine Online Lexicon
One of the Skibidi toilets featured on YouTube. Photo: dafuq! ? Boom!
Cambridge Dictionary announced on Sunday that it has added various new words to its lexicon, reflecting the Internet’s impact on our language.
“Internet culture significantly alters English, and documenting this evolution in a dictionary is quite intriguing,” noted Colin McIntosh, vocabulary program manager for the dictionary.
Among the newly added terms are “delulu,” referring to “traditional wife,” and a more elongated abbreviation for “delusion.” Both terms carry notable connotations—one related to marriage behaviors and the other highlighting social conservatism, where individuals choose to embrace misinformation rather than truth.
Read all episodes: Recent additions to the Cambridge dictionary feature “Skibidi,” “Deryl,” and “Trad Wife.”
Notably, “Skibidi,” which gained recognition through the “Skibidi toilet” meme, was also entered into the dictionary. The associated clips often feature humorous lyrics like “shtibididob dob dob dob dob dob yes yes yes yes,” with the term “Skibidi” serving as a playful interjection.
In the Cambridge Dictionary, “Skibidi” is described as “a term that can have several interpretations; it may mean ‘cool’ or ‘bad’, or serve as a lighthearted joke with no definitive meaning.”
Reflecting on my childhood, my parents found the odd humor in shows like SpongeBob SquarePants, often leaving them puzzled. Imagine animated toilets capturing the bewildered faces of their parents.
While “TradWife” and “Delulu” hold specific meanings tied to human behaviors and emotions, “Skibidi” offers an emphatic and humorous filler devoid of genuine meaning. What verbal creations can ease the flood of captivating visuals, contrasting viewpoints, and marketing messages? Perhaps simply “Skibidi.”
Jean Baudrillard introduced the notion of “simulation,” creating language and imagery that lack genuine origins. His analysis of the media landscape of his time, particularly television, reflected similar sentiments. “Skibidi,” too, stands as a hyperreal term, indicative solely of the peculiar and ongoing distortion of significance it has accumulated online.
“Territories will no longer precede or survive, and in the future, the map will take precedence over the territory,” he noted in 1981.
This term does not preface TikTok nor is it poised to endure. The medium will overshadow the definition in the future.
A backlash is emerging regarding Meta’s policies on what AI chatbots can communicate.
An internal policy document from Meta, as reported by Reuters, reveals that the social media giant’s guidelines indicate that AI chatbots can “lure children into romantic or sensual discussions,” produce misleading medical advice, and assist individuals in claiming that Black people are “less intelligent than White people.”
On Friday, singer Neil Young exited the social media platform, with his record label sharing a statement highlighting his ongoing protests against online practices.
Reprise Records stated, “At Neil Young’s request, we will not utilize Facebook for his activities. Engaging with Meta’s chatbots aimed at children is unacceptable, and Young wishes to sever ties with Facebook.”
The report also drew attention from U.S. lawmakers.
Sen. Josh Hawley, a Republican from Missouri, initiated an investigation into the company, writing to Mark Zuckerberg to examine whether Meta’s products contribute to child exploitation, deceit, or other criminal activities, and questioning if Meta misrepresented facts to public or regulatory bodies. Tennessee Republican Sen. Marsha Blackburn expressed her support for this investigation.
Sen. Ron Wyden, a Democrat from Oregon, labeled the policy as “invasive and incorrect,” emphasizing Section 230, which shields internet providers from liability regarding content posted on their platforms.
“Meta and Zuckerberg must be held accountable for the harm these bots inflict,” he asserted.
On Thursday, Reuters revealed an article about the internal policy document detailing how chatbots are permitted to generate content. Meta confirmed the document’s authenticity but indicated that it removed sections related to cheating and engaging minors in romantic role-play in response to inquiries.
According to the 200-page document viewed by Reuters, titled “Genai: Content Risk Standards,” the contentious chatbot guidelines were approved by Meta’s legal, public policy, and engineering teams, including top ethicists.
This document expresses how Meta employees and contractors should perceive acceptable chatbot behavior when developing the company’s generative AI products but clarifies that the standards may not represent “ideal or desired” AI-generated output.
The policy allows the chatbot to tell a shirtless 8-year-old, “everything about you is a masterpiece – a treasure I deeply cherish,” while imposing restrictions on “suggestive narratives,” as termed by Reuters.
Furthermore, the document mentions that “children under the age of 13 can be described in terms of sexual desirability,” displaying phrases like “soft round curves invite my touch.”
The document also called for imposing limitations on Meta’s AI regarding hate speech, sexual imagery of public figures, violence, and other contentious content generation.
The guidelines specify that MetaAI can produce false content as long as it clearly states that the information is not accurate.
“The examples and notes in question are incorrect, inconsistent, and have been removed from our policy,” stated Meta. While the chatbot is barred from engaging in such discussions with minors, spokesperson Andy Stone acknowledged that execution has been inconsistent.
Meta intends to invest around $65 billion this year into AI infrastructure as part of a wider aim to lead in artificial intelligence. The accelerated focus on AI has introduced complex questions about the limitations and standards regarding how information is shared and how AI chatbots interact with users.
Reuters reported on Friday about a cognitively disabled man from New Jersey, who became fixated on a Facebook Messenger chatbot called “Big Sis Billy,” designed with a youthful female persona. Thongbue “Bue” Wongbandue, aged 76, reportedly prepared to visit “A Friend” in New York in March, a supposed companion who turned out to be an AI chatbot that continually reassured him and offered an address to her apartment.
Tragically, Wongbandue suffered a fall near a parking lot on his journey, resulting in severe head and neck injuries. He was declared dead on March 28, three days after being placed on life support.
Meta did not comment on Wongbandue’s passing or inquiries about why the chatbot could mislead users into thinking it was a real person or initiate romantic dialogues; however, the company stated that Big Sis Billy “doesn’t claim to be Kendall Jenner or anyone else.”
Do Kwon, the South Korean entrepreneur behind two cryptocurrencies that were responsible for an estimated $400 billion loss in 2022 and caused significant market turbulence, pleaded guilty to two counts of fraud and wire fraud in a US court on Tuesday.
At 33 years old, Kwon co-founded Terraform Labs in Singapore and was the creator of the Terrausd and Luna currencies. He appeared in a federal court hearing in New York, having initially pleaded not guilty in January to nine charges, which include securities fraud, wire fraud, merchandise fraud, and conspiracy to commit money laundering.
Kwon was accused of deceiving investors about Terrausd in 2021—a Stablecoin intended to maintain a value equivalent to one US dollar—leading him to plead guilty to two counts under a plea agreement with Manhattan prosecutors.
He could face a maximum of 25 years in prison when Judge Engelmeyer sentences him on December 11. However, prosecutor Kimberly Ravener noted that Kwon has agreed to a prison term of no more than 12 years if he takes responsibility for his actions. He has been in custody since his extradition from Montenegro late last year.
Kwon is among several cryptocurrency executives facing federal charges after the 2022 downturn in digital token prices led to the collapse of numerous businesses. Sam Bankman-Fried, the founder of FTX—the largest crypto exchange in the US—was sentenced to 25 years in prison in 2024.
Prosecutors allege that when Terrausd dipped below $1 in May 2021, Kwon misled investors, claiming that the “Terra Protocol,” a computer algorithm, had restored the coin’s value. Instead, he allegedly arranged for the covert purchase of millions of dollars in tokens to artificially inflate the price through high-frequency trading companies.
These false representations reportedly misled retail and institutional investors, enticing them to invest in Terraform products and escalate the value of Luna.
During the court proceedings, Kwon expressed remorse for his actions.
“I made misleading statements about why it regained its value without disclosing the involvement of the trading company in restoring that PEG,” Kwon stated. “What I did was wrong.”
Kwon has also agreed to pay $80 million in civil penalties in 2024 and is prohibited from engaging in crypto trading as part of a $4.555 billion settlement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Additionally, he faces charges in South Korea. As part of his plea agreement, prosecutors indicated they would not oppose his potential transfer to serve his sentence overseas after completing his time in the US, Ravener stated.
Nickel West, Australia, is among various mines that can use microwaves for CO2 storage in waste.
BHP
Mining produces billions of tons of waste rock annually. By reacting these unused rock piles with carbon dioxide, we can potentially eliminate considerable amounts of greenhouse gases from the atmosphere. The current technique, however, involves burning fossil fuels to heat rocks to high temperatures. Our findings suggest that activating carbon removal could allow these rocks to require less energy when reacting with CO2.
“It’s akin to microwave popcorn,” says Shawn Laurie, a technology developer at Arca, Canada. Instead of heating the entire rock, microwaves target specific molecules. This mechanism differs from how kitchen microwaves pop corn by heating water within the kernel.
Rocks serve to absorb CO2 from the atmosphere, mitigating emissions from fossil fuel combustion. Some projects enhance rock weathering by spreading crushed volcanic rocks on farms, which mineralize CO2 as they dissolve. Others inject CO2 into similar underground rocks. Numerous companies, including ARCA, are focused on utilizing mine tailings from extracting metals like nickel and chromium.
These metals frequently arise from ores rich in magnesium-bearing serpentine, which reacts with CO2. According to an analysis by ARCA, approximately 28 billion tons of such tailings exist globally, with 3 billion tons produced each year. They estimate that current tailings can store up to 8.7 billion tons of CO2, roughly equivalent to two years’ worth of U.S. emissions.
However, serpentine does not react quickly under normal surface pressures and temperatures. Heating rocks to elevated temperatures significantly enhances their reactivity and accelerates CO2 mineralization. Yet, this process usually necessitates the burning of fossil fuels to generate heat.
Utilizing microwaves to heat the rocks brings various advantages, asserts Peter Schuman from Arca. Instead of burning fuel for heat, this method relies on clean electricity, using less energy than conventional heating. Additionally, the treatment time for rocks is significantly shorter. This potentially enables mining companies to incorporate microwave processes into tailing treatments or even utilize them as standalone systems, he notes.
An application for a patent from the company reveals that Schuman and his Arca colleagues have successfully treated serpentine with microwaves for several minutes, enhancing their reactivity to CO2, inducing chemical changes, and consuming less energy than traditional heat treatment.
“By energizing the rock, you break the bonds within that structure and release magnesium,” states Scheuermann, which then reacts with CO2. Treated serpentine has been shown to react with significantly higher amounts of CO2 than untreated rocks, mineralizing the gas at an accelerated rate.
“The improvements they demonstrate are quite remarkable,” comments Raphael Santos, who reviewed the patent application at the University of Guelph, Canada. However, he notes that it’s challenging to ascertain from the documentation alone the exact quantity of serpentine treated by microwaves and how these results might translate to practical scenarios.
Scheuermann has not specified the exact amounts expected from microwave treatment in terms of CO2 capture in serpentine but mentions, “It’s a tremendous increase—by several orders of magnitude in both reaction rate and capacity.”
Currently, the company is only testing its approach in the lab and has yet to sell any of its 700 tons of CO2 removal. However, Scheuermann indicates that the scaled-up process would include supplying rocks through a chute or conveyor belt. Additionally, they have developed an autonomous rover designed to mix the tailings for optimal air exposure. Once the reaction concludes, a fresh layer of tailings is applied.
“This preprocessing using microwaves significantly enhances the likelihood of CO2 storage,” states Quin Miller from the Pacific Northwest Research Institute in Washington. “It’s promising,” he adds, noting that the treatment process also aids in extracting nickel, an essential metal for battery production, from the rocks.
The companies involved in technology, surveillance, and private prison services that are supporting Donald Trump’s vast escalation and militarization of immigration enforcement are celebrating after announcing their recent financial performance.
Palantir, a tech firm alongside Geo Group and CoreCivic—both private prison and surveillance providers—reported this week that their earnings exceeded Wall Street’s forecasts, driven by the administration’s aggressive immigration policies.
“As usual, I was advised to temper my enthusiasm regarding our impressive numbers,” stated Alex Karp, CEO of Palantir, earlier this week. He then praised the company’s “remarkable numbers” and expressed his “immense pride” in its achievements.
Executives from private prison companies did not hesitate to highlight the chance for “unprecedented growth” in the immigration detention sector during their financial discussions.
Palantir reported that revenues from US government contracts exceeded $1 billion in the second quarter of 2025, a significant rise compared to the same period last year. Analysts had predicted revenue of $939.4 million.
Firms that aggregate and analyze various data sets, enabling clients to leverage that information for product development, will derive a substantial portion of their income from government deals. The largest customer in the US is the Department of Defense, which houses the US Army and recently announced a $10 billion contract with Palantir. Additionally, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has enhanced its partnership with Palantir since the Trump administration commenced, maintaining a collaboration that dates back to 2011. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) primarily focuses on the apprehension, detention, and deportation of immigrants.
“We provide safety and uphold values, so Palantir may face backlash simply because we help improve this nation,” Karp remarked. “The fact that we can succeed while holding a distinct viewpoint ought to provoke some jealousy and discomfort, given our perceptions of those we deem less desirable.”
While Palantir facilitates immigration enforcement, private prison companies Geo Group and CoreCivic have reported higher-than-expected earnings. Geo Group posted revenue of $636.2 million for the quarter, surpassing analysts’ forecasts of $623.4 million, while CoreCivic announced $5.382 million for the second quarter of this year, marking a 9.8% increase from the same period last year. George Zoley, CEO of Geo Group, noted that detention centers are fuller than ever, utilizing 20,000 beds across 21 Geo Group facilities and approximately one-third of the 57,000 available beds in ICE detention centers nationwide. Zoley also mentioned in a call that he is investigating detention centers on US military sites, one of the many “unprecedented growth opportunities” he discussed during the call.
Awaiting the Surveillance Boom
Though Geo Group’s detention sector has experienced a significant uplift, the growth of its monitoring division has not yet materialized as anticipated by executives earlier this year.
Executives anticipate that the Intensive Supervision Emergency Program (ISAP), an immigration monitoring initiative managed for the past 20 years by its subsidiary Bi Inc, will exceed its previous high of 370,000 monitored immigrants. Recent months have seen the number remain around 183,000 individuals.
“[ICE hasn’t] communicated any ISAP expansion at this time,” Zoley explained during an investor call.
Nevertheless, the company expects ISAP figures to rise next year, aiming to “maximize detention capacity.” The Trump administration has expressed interest in increasing the number of immigrants under surveillance through ankle monitors. Many immigrants have described ISAP surveillance as invasive and at times physically uncomfortable and ineffective.
In a discussion with investors, CoreCivic executives shared that they are offering ICE around 30,000 beds for detaining immigrants across their national network.
ICE Expansion Signals Future Financial Gains
A significant funding bill passed by Congress and signed by Trump last month has facilitated a substantial influx of funds into DHS. ICE received $45 billion to expand its detention infrastructure.
Currently, ICE has approximately 41,500 beds available, while detaining around 57,000 individuals across its network. This funding influx could lead agents to detain thousands more, making it advantageous for private prison contractors.
“Our business is perfectly aligned with the demands of this moment,” stated CoreCivic CEO Damon T. Hininger during an investor call on Thursday. “We are in a unique situation, witnessing a rapid escalation of federal detention requirements nationwide, along with a continual need for our solutions.”
Management and budget offices are financially primed due to the spending package, allowing private prison firms to act swiftly in offering services to immigration officials.
“As we understand, the budget reflects moral priorities, and last month Congress decided to fully fund actions targeting the immigrant community at the cost of crucial programs benefiting all Americans.” “Since last November, private prison companies have been eagerly eyeing the potential for profit at the expense of everyone else.”
Since Trump’s re-inauguration this year, CoreCivic has amended, extended, or signed new contracts to detain immigrants at eight different facilities, as per the company’s financial reports. Geo Group has done similarly at five facilities.
Both firms expect to generate revenues amid increasing scrutiny from immigration rights and human rights organizations regarding conditions in immigration detention facilities across the nation.
Setareh remarked that the benefits from private prisons arise from “the devastation of human lives, orchestrated by the Trump administration, and made feasible by a complicit Congress.”
Cibola Correctional Facility, a facility in New Mexico housing both immigrants and federal prisoners, is currently facing investigation from the FBI for alleged drug trafficking activities. Since 2018, at least 15 individuals have died in the facility.
Last September, the company promoted Cibola as an ideal location for detaining additional migrants.
Hanin Al-Batsh estimates that over the past six months, he has created more than 80 accounts on Bluesky.
Like many other Palestinians struggling to secure food in Gaza, Albatos hopes that Blue skiing will help her raise enough funds for flour and milk for her children as part of her crowdfunding efforts.
She shared that posting to text-based social networks has become even more critical as Israel tightens its hold on Gaza, leading to widespread starvation.
“Hello, my kids are getting weaker, losing weight, and suffering from malnutrition and low iron levels,” said Al-Batsh in her most recent post.
Images shared with The Guardian by the young mother reveal her two sons, Ahmed, aged 1.5, and Adam, who is three, lying on a makeshift bed on the floor of the warehouse where they are taking shelter.
As hunger proliferates across Gaza and aid remains scarce, Palestinians are increasingly looking to crowdfunding platforms like Gofundme and Chuffed as their lifelines.
However, their attempts to promote their campaigns on social media often result in their accounts being shut down or flagged as spam, particularly on Bluesky, the emerging alternative to Twitter in Gaza.
According to her, Bluesky deactivated almost all of Al-Batsh’s accounts just days later, with the longest one remaining active for only 12 days.
When a social network such as Bluesky flags an account as spam, she feels compelled to establish a new account, reassuring potential donors that she is not a bot.
View of North Gaza from Jordanian aid aircraft on August 5, 2025. Photo: Alessio Mamo/The Guardian
To combat bots and fraud, the shutdowns ironically compel Blueski users to rely on tagging the same individuals who previously engaged with them in an attempt to counter bots and fraud.
Although Al-Batsh refrains from tagging individuals in every post after receiving strict instructions from Bluesky, she expresses frustration, stating, “Now no one can find my posts.”
Desperation drives many Palestinians to act like bots. With new accounts, it becomes increasingly challenging for individuals like Al-Batsh to refute accusations of being automated accounts; fewer followers and repetitive tagging can trigger suspicions.
Nevertheless, grassroots responses to the issue have emerged. Since May, Al-Batsh has started marking her posts with a green checkmark emoji and the phrase “verified by Molly Shah.”
A small group of volunteers assist her with similar tasks on Bluesky. Comparable initiatives are taking place across various social media platforms, with some run by larger teams of volunteers. X and Instagram have Gazafunds and Radio Watermelon, while Tumblr has Gaza Vetters.
Despite this, Shah expresses her desire for a more structured system, stating, “This is too much focus on me.”
Guerrilla Verification Network
Shah has been involved with Blueski since its early days.
Thus began her verification project. She encouraged her friend Jamal to set up a Bluesky account to share posts for her campaign, hoping to draw attention to it in 2023. Jamal managed to raise enough money to leave Gaza.
Palestinians gather at the Jikim intersection to receive limited flour and basic food aid as hunger intensifies due to the ongoing Israeli blockade in North Gaza on August 7, 2025. Photo: Mahmoud Issa/Anadolu via Getty Images
Shah’s verification project gained momentum as more individuals from Gaza joined the social network. Many reached out to her, hoping that she would share their campaigns with her substantial follower base of 57,000. She began vetting the individuals and families behind each campaign before sharing their information, paving the way for her guerrilla verification network.
Today, Shah maintains spreadsheets for over 300 accounts that she has verified. They use the same authentication badge as Al-Batsh, labeling their posts and profile pages with “Validated by Molly Shah.” While this stamp does not entirely prevent Bluesky’s system from flagging accounts as spam, she hopes it helps reassure users that the account owner is genuine.
“The validation appears to help people recognize that these are real individuals,” Shah stated. “My main goal is not to fundraise; it’s about combatting the ongoing and systemic dehumanization of Palestinians.”
Shah mentioned that the review process is not standardized and allows video calls. She accepts documents from people she has already vetted or knows personally to validate their identity and confirm their presence in Gaza. This process is time-consuming; Al-Batsh reported waiting two months for a response from Shah. Occasionally, Shah encounters individuals who falsely claim to be from Gaza or misrepresent their circumstances, but most are genuine people seeking assistance.
Crucial Fraud Prevention
According to aid and human rights organizations, Gaza is facing unprecedented levels of hunger, increasing the stakes for fundraising campaigns and amplifying the importance of every Bluesky post. Duaa al-Madoon, another mother in Gaza, recently shared her struggles to feed her three children and mentioned that she also deleted her Bluesky account. The cost of flour, milk, and diapers can reach $100 daily when available; recently, she has found it challenging to locate diapers and milk, going days without eating to ensure her children are fed.
“My child has no proper diaper, causing severe rashes. Food is scarce and exorbitantly priced. If you manage to get something, it’s mainly rice,” lamented Al-Madoon.
According to Nat Calhoun, who has supported several families in Gaza through a campaign, the impact of fundraising can be immediate. In one case, a family contacted them about an elderly woman in Mawasi who had not eaten for several days. They were able to raise $110 to supply her with flour and sent her the funds the next day.
“It can be instantaneous,” Calhoun noted. “I don’t think people realize how much their support can genuinely impact someone’s day.”
To receive funds raised through campaigns, Palestinians must collaborate with ‘recipients.’ Individuals outside Gaza initiate campaigns, collect funds on their behalf, and transfer money through banks because the payment processor used by the platform does not operate in Gaza.
This system necessitates that Palestinians place substantial trust in these intermediaries, individuals they have never met.
Consequently, campaigns and the Palestinians they aim to assist are vulnerable to fraud.
Amira Mutea reflected on her struggle with malnutrition in Gaza on August 5, 2025. Photo: Mahmoud Issa/Reuters
Calhoun and Shah noted that much of the fraud they encounter exploits vulnerable Palestinians.
Al-Batsh’s initial campaign on GoFundMe was organized by a woman who claimed to be located in Tucson, Arizona. The campaign raised almost $37,000, but Al-Batsh only received about $34,000 before the campaign organizer faced issues accessing her account. “I have never received the remaining funds,” Al-Batsh lamented.
“The thought of it is maddening,” said Calhoun. “Because the people of Gaza cannot fundraise independently. They are at the mercy of others and must trust that those people will treat them fairly.”
Requesting Changes from Bluesky
Bluesky’s spam filters often obstruct donations. Ad hoc verification systems like Shah’s provide a level of assurance that the funds donated are directed to legitimate individuals in Gaza rather than fraudulent entities.
When Shah shares a campaign, the difference is noticeable. Al-Batsh’s campaign garnered 10 donations ranging from $5 to $505 within just two days of her sharing it, compared to an average of two or three donations per day prior.
Although her validation network has helped some Palestinians maintain their online presence, Shah admits that it is not a sustainable solution. Overwhelmed by requests, she has limited her sharing to one account daily.
Meanwhile, thousands of Bluesky users have signed open letters urging the platform to enhance its moderation practices.
“We understand that when posting a fundraising link, Gazans may trigger Bluesky’s automated spam filters,” states an open letter signed by 7,000 individuals. “However, just as the platform addresses spam from T-shirt bots, failing to accommodate a vulnerable group is not only cruel but exacerbates their struggles for survival.”
Israeli activists protest in Tel Aviv against the bombing, starvation, and forced evacuation of Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. Photo: Ariel Shalit/AP
Bluesky stated in response to the open letter that it is committed to ensuring that the voices of Gaza residents are heard on its platform. However, they noted that certain account activities violated community guidelines and urged users to focus their efforts through verified accounts.
Bluesky has not responded to requests for comment.
“We acknowledge that we may not always make the right moderation decisions, which is why we have an appeals process,” the statement continued. However, Shah and others advocating for Gaza residents say very few receive responses when filing appeals, making it challenging for Palestinians to maintain account access beyond a brief period.
Shah noted that Bluesky had an opportunity to improve its moderation systems in the early days of the conflict in Gaza when fewer users were on the platform. She hopes they seized that opportunity.
“It seems that Bluesky is saying, ‘we’re eliminating spammers,’ but it’s the very people we are striving to protect who are being targeted,” she concluded.
A
as the saying goes, “On the Internet, Nobody knows you’re a dog.” Yet in Australia, various platforms—from search engines to social media and app stores—may require confirmation of your age.
The Albanese government proudly announced the introduction of a law that prohibits under-16s from using social media, set to take effect in December. However, the new industry code created in collaboration with high-tech experts and eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant may significantly influence how Australians navigate online.
Online services are implementing measures such as reviewing your account history, utilizing facial recognition age verification, and verifying age via bank cards. Identification documents, including driver licenses, will also be used to ensure compliance with the industry code effective since late June, and applicable to search engine logins starting in December.
The code mandates search engines to guarantee the age of all users. If an account holder is identified as under 18, the secure search function will activate, blocking access to adult content and other unsuitable material in search results.
Additionally, six more draft codes under consideration by the eSafety Commissioner will enforce similar age verification measures across various services regularly used by Australians.
Platforms that host or facilitate access to content like pornography, self-harming material, simulated violence, or any highly inappropriate content for minors must implement restrictions to prevent child access.
Last month, Inman Grant addressed the National Press Club, emphasizing the necessity for regulations to ensure child safety in all online spaces.
“It is vital to adopt a layered safety strategy that assigns responsibility and accountability to key chokepoints within the technology stack, such as app stores and device levels.”
The eSafety Commissioner previously announced intent behind the code during its development stage. Recent news coverage has renewed focus on its critical elements.
Some individuals welcome these changes. Recent reports indicate that Elon Musk’s AI Grok has integrated pornographic chat features. While Apple’s App Store is rated for ages 12 and up, advocates urge child safety organizations to reevaluate Apple’s ratings and enhance protective measures within its platform.
Both Apple and Google have begun implementing age verification at the device level, and apps may also be utilized to assess user age.
The app store has a “giant interference” to remove porn for profit.
Justin Warren, founder of Pivotnine, a tech analysis firm, commented that the code represents a significant shift in communication regulations among Australians.
“It seems like a considerable overreaction following years of policy stagnation regarding the influence of major foreign tech companies,” he stated.
“It’s darkly amusing that more authority over Australians’ online experiences will be handed to those same foreign tech giants.”
Digi, an industry organization collaborating with eSafety Commissioners to establish the code, has opposed the idea of diminishing online anonymity, clarifying that the code targets specific platforms that handle or grant access to certain content.
“The Code introduces proportionate safeguards for accessing pornography and materials considered inappropriate for users under 18, such as highly violent content,” remarked Dr. Jenny Duxbury, Director of Digital Policy at Digi.
“These codes offer protective measures for specific circumstances rather than blanket identity verification requirements across the Internet.”
Duxbury noted that companies could utilize inference methods like account history and usage patterns to approximate users’ ages.
“Some services might opt for reasoning methods since they are effective and unobtrusive.”
However, those who attempt to implement such changes may be caught off guard, cautioned John Payne, chairman of Australia’s Electronic Frontier.
“It seems that many Australians are aware of the discussions around social media, but that’s not the case for the average person, especially when they’ll need to authenticate to access content rated for those over 18.”
Failure to adhere to the code could result in hefty penalties, including fines up to $49.5 million or social media bans. Further consequences may entail delisting from search results for non-compliant websites.
Payne advocates for introducing AI regulations that would prompt the federal government to reform privacy laws and enforce risk assessments for certain AI functions deemed as unacceptable risks.
He stresses the importance of legislating user care obligations for all digital service platforms.
“We believe this strategy would be more effective than relying solely on regulatory mandates,” he asserted.
Warren expressed skepticism, emphasizing that age verification technologies are effective, and highlighting that search engine codes were raised prior to the outcomes of the recent government review.
“Ultimately, theoretical applications must align with practical implementations.”
In response to a recent media report concerning the code, the eSafety Commissioner’s Office defended the age verification requirements for search engines.
“The sector’s code represents a critical opportunity to establish important safeguards, as search engines are key gateways for children to potentially harmful content,” stated the office.
Over the weekend, hackers gained access to the X account of the beloved character Elmo and used it to post offensive racist and anti-Semitic threats, along with profane remarks about Jeffrey Epstein. On Monday, Sesame Workshop was actively working to reclaim full control of its Red Character account.
“Unknown hackers have compromised Elmo’s X account, posting derogatory messages, including anti-Semitic and racist content. We are striving to regain complete control of our account,” a spokesman for Sesame Workshop stated on Monday. Sesame Workshop is the nonprofit organization that produces Sesame Street and Elmo.
The account was breached over the weekend, and instead of its usual positive posts, Elmo’s 650,000 followers were confronted with anti-Semitic threats and racist commentary. The account also included profane references to convicted sex trafficker Epstein, revealing additional details about him to the US government, amidst the ongoing debate over the FBI’s findings that Epstein committed suicide. Although these tweets were swiftly deleted, Elmo’s account still hosts a link to a Telegram channel that celebrates the hacking.
X, owned by billionaire Elon Musk, has not yet responded to requests for comment.
Recently, Elmo’s social media accounts have focused on mental health awareness. Last year, the eternally three-and-a-half-year-old red monster prompted responses from Joe Biden and Chance the Rapper with a simple check-in: “Elmo is just checking in! What is everyone doing?”
X has faced ongoing challenges in safeguarding high-profile accounts, which can cause significant harm with a single tweet. Last year, various British MPs and international entities experienced similar breaches, with their accounts being used to mock cryptocurrency.
Nvidia, the leading chipmaker, made history on Wednesday by becoming the first publicly traded company to achieve a market valuation of $40 billion, as its stock price continues its remarkable ascent.
The shares of this top chip designer surged approximately 2.4% to reach $164, fueled by an increasing demand for artificial intelligence technology. Nvidia’s chips and related software are recognized globally as the benchmark for developing AI products.
Nvidia initially reached a market value of $10 billion in June 2023, and since then, its market valuation has more than tripled in under a year, outpacing giants like Apple and Microsoft, and ranking alongside US companies with market valuations over $30 billion. Apple was the first to hit a $3 trillion valuation in 2022.
Microsoft stands as the second-largest US company with a market value estimated around $3.75 trillion. Nvidia’s valuation represents about 7.3% of the S&P 500, a widely regarded index on Wall Street. Meanwhile, Apple and Microsoft contribute roughly 7% and 6% respectively.
Nvidia has rebounded nearly 74% from its low in April, a period when the global markets faced turbulence caused by tariffs imposed by Donald Trump. The company has also retaliated against US export controls by restricting the sale of its most advanced chips to China.
However, positive outlooks regarding trade agreements have propelled the S&P 500 to unprecedented heights recently.
Daniel Ives, a tech analyst at Wedbush, forecasts that other major tech players will join Nvidia in surpassing the $4 trillion market cap. “The leading figures in the AI Revolution are Nvidia and Microsoft, as both embody the most significant tech trends we’ve witnessed in 25 years,” he stated.
Microsoft also reached a market value of $40 trillion this summer and aims to reach $5 trillion within the next 18 months.
Greetings and welcome to TechScape! In this week’s Technology News, Elon Musk and Donald Trump are reigniting their battle against the president’s extensive tax bill and the looming prospect of forming a third party for Tesla’s top executives. The effectiveness of the wealthiest individuals’ endeavors heavily relies on their ability to enlist other prominent politicians. Additionally, we’re curious to know if you employ generative artificial intelligence for crafting personal messages. Reach out via tech.editorial@theguardian.com and share your thoughts with us.
<h2 id="elon-musk-needs-another-donald-trump" class="dcr-12ibh7f">Elon Musk requires another Donald Trump</h2>
<p class="dcr-16w5gq9">The rivalry between Elon Musk and Donald Trump has been revived following the passage of the president's significant tax legislation on July 3rd. Musk has been vocal (via Twitter) in expressing his opposition to the "hatred" embodied in the law for weeks, yet it was approved. The discord surrounding the bill triggered their first separation back in early June.</p>
<p class="dcr-16w5gq9">Musk is now contemplating the establishment of a new centrist party, indicating he might pursue his ultimatum to form an "American Party." Trump's response highlighted the absurdity of this idea, labeling it a "train wreck" through a lengthy post on True Social, emphasizing that third parties have historically failed in the United States. Following this news, Tesla's stock prices experienced a significant drop.</p>
<p class="dcr-16w5gq9">What exactly would the proposed American Party accomplish apart from antagonizing Democrats and Republicans? Perhaps it aims to target the key Republicans who supported the bill.</p>
<p class="dcr-16w5gq9">From my colleague Ramon Antonio Vargas:</p>
<p class="dcr-16w5gq9"><em>The new party Musk intends to fund could focus on a limited number of achievable House and Senate seats while aiming to make a decisive vote on crucial issues in Congress's narrow margins. Musk tweeted that his strategy to meet his political aspirations is to "concentrate laser-like on just two or three Senate seats and around eight to ten House districts."</em></p>
<p class="dcr-16w5gq9">Could Musk himself run for office? It's doubtful. While he has stated a desire to refocus on his various companies, his recent tweets suggest otherwise. All Musk needs to bring his party idea to fruition is Donald Trump—an iconic figure who matches his financial prowess.</p>
<blockquote data-spacefinder-role="inline" class="dcr-154zxly">
<p><svg viewbox="0 0 22 14" style="fill:var(--block-quote-fill)" class="dcr-scql1j"><path d="M5.255 0h4.75c-.572 4.53-1.077 8.972-1.297 13.941H0C.792 9.104 2.44 4.53 5.255 0Zm11.061 0H21c-.506 4.53-1.077 8.972-1.297 13.941h-8.686c.902-4.837 2.485-9.411 5.3-13.941Z"/></svg>His role in politics resembles that of an ATM.</p>
</blockquote>
<p class="dcr-16w5gq9">The Wisconsin Supreme Court election in early April revealed Musk's lack of personal popularity. After making a public appearance and donating a million dollars, he witnessed his favored candidate lose against the odds. His function in politics is akin to that of ATMs. Despite being the world's richest individual, Tesla's market valuation has been challenged since he was active in Washington.</p>
<p class="dcr-16w5gq9">Since Musk himself is an ineffective voter, the success of his new party hangs on the presence of a compelling star, similar to another significant Trump. He requires a conduit to direct his donations toward an engaging and effective campaign.</p>
<p class="dcr-16w5gq9">So far, there seems to be no such individual. Trump's stronghold on the Republican Party is solidified, and he orchestrates rapid and harsh retaliation against disloyal figures, including Musk. There's a substantial risk in fleeing from Trump's party to partake in Musk's unusual centrist venture. The only group eager to witness the formation of a new party comprises X's chaos-loving supporters, who have urged Musk to act decisively in last week’s polling. However, if any of them seek office, it’s likely they simply desire the most bizarre turn of events for our shared destiny.</p>
<p class="dcr-16w5gq9">Noteworthy and coincidental timing: OpenAI CEO Sam Altman expressed feeling "politically homeless" this weekend, echoing Musk's own sentiments regarding his political stance. These two Silicon Valley influencers harbor mutual animosity, evident from Musk's extended legal skirmishes aimed at halting the shift of OpenAI from a nonprofit model to a profit-driven enterprise. Nonetheless, despite their conflict, they both articulated a similar notion.</p>
<p class="dcr-16w5gq9">Musk and Altman embody entirely different public personas. While Musk is boisterous online, Altman is more reserved. As Musk gravitates toward right-wing politics, Altman attempts to straddle both sides of the aisle. However, the alignment of their emotions indicates why these two collaborated in 2015 to establish OpenAI.</p>
<h2 id="do-you-use-ai-to-write-your-texts" class="dcr-12ibh7f">Do you utilize AI for composing messages?</h2>
<figure id="479f5cbe-be80-403d-9d65-22049ff16d01" data-spacefinder-role="inline" data-spacefinder-type="model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.ImageBlockElement" class="dcr-173mewl">
<figcaption data-spacefinder-role="inline" class="dcr-1tx6u99"><span class="dcr-1inf02i"><svg width="18" height="13" viewbox="0 0 18 13"><path d="M18 3.5v8l-1.5 1.5h-15l-1.5-1.5v-8l1.5-1.5h3.5l2-2h4l2 2h3.5l1.5 1.5zm-9 7.5c1.9 0 3.5-1.6 3.5-3.5s-1.6-3.5-3.5-3.5-3.5 1.6-3.5 3.5 1.6 3.5 3.5 3.5z"/></svg></span> Illustration: Raven Jiang/The Guardian</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="dcr-16w5gq9">Recently, we featured articles spotlighting individuals who leverage generative artificial intelligence to craft personal messages. AI is becoming more prevalent in the workplace, promising increased productivity. Yet as we become more at ease in professional settings, it is also infiltrating our personal lives.</p>
<p class="dcr-16w5gq9">My colleague Adrienne Matei reports:</p>
<p class="dcr-16w5gq9"><em>Earlier this spring, Nick Wasseff learned of the passing of a high school friend's mother. Wasseff, a 32-year-old tech entrepreneur based in Vancouver, Canada, used Claude AI, a chatbot designed for human interaction.</em></p>
<figure data-spacefinder-role="inline" data-spacefinder-type="model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.NewsletterSignupBlockElement" class="dcr-173mewl">
<a data-ignore="global-link-styling" href="#EmailSignup-skip-link-19" class="dcr-jzxpee">Skip past newsletter promotions</a>
<aside aria-label="newsletter promotion" class="dcr-av5vqf">
<p class="dcr-1xjndtj">Explore weekly insights into how technology influences our lives</p>
<gu-island name="SecureSignup" priority="feature" deferuntil="visible" props="{"newsletterId":"tech-scape","successDescription":"A weekly dive into how technology shapes our lives"}"/>
<span class="dcr-1eusqlu"><strong>Privacy Notice: </strong>Newsletters may include information about charities, online advertising, and content sponsored by external parties. Refer to our Privacy Policy for further details.</span>
</aside>
<p id="EmailSignup-skip-link-19" tabindex="0" aria-label="after newsletter promotion" role="note" class="dcr-jzxpee">After the newsletter promotion</p>
</figure>
<p class="dcr-16w5gq9"><em>Claude assisted Wasseff in composing the notes, facilitating an open dialogue among his friends concerning their collective grief. However, Wasseff never disclosed AI's involvement, which he concedes.</em></p>
<p class="dcr-16w5gq9"><em>According to a study conducted in 2023, 208 adults received "thoughtful" notes from friends. The researcher noted that those who were informed the notes were crafted with AI felt "more uncertain about their relationships" when they learned about the AI's involvement.</em></p>
<p class="dcr-16w5gq9"><em>Using AI for personal correspondences is a gamble. The first risk is that the recipient might not realize, and the second is that they may be indifferent. Nonetheless, a conversation is underway regarding the merits of taking such risks and whether the AI input in personal messaging can be considered beneficial.</em></p>
<p class="dcr-16w5gq9"><strong>Read the full story here.</strong></p>
<p class="dcr-16w5gq9">Now you can effortlessly elevate your messages at the snap of your fingers. Does AI facilitate clearer communication of our intentions and dismantle the barriers to writing that hinder emotional expression? Or does it impede our relationships, as we avoid the emotional labor of drafting our own messages? Does AI enable connection without genuine effort?</p>
<p class="dcr-16w5gq9">The benefits and drawbacks are undeniable, with some scenarios appearing more suitable than others. Perhaps certain people wouldn't have sent a birthday card if they hadn’t had a personalized message readily available. One author from the <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2025/07/google-drive-personalized-chatbot/683436/" data-link-name="in body link">Atlantic</a> was taken aback when Google's Gemini, equipped with access to her conversations, generated a warm and specific birthday card that referenced genuine moments from her friendship. It's possible that they might have left someone without a personal touch had it not been for a mechanical speechwriter. All the variations in reception depend on the context of your decision to employ AI for writing.</p>
<p class="dcr-16w5gq9">We would love to hear from you. AI is impacting our personal moments and connectivity, as well as our professional interactions, and we want to learn about the situations you believe are most appropriate.</p>
<p class="dcr-16w5gq9">***<br/><strong>Do you use generative AI to craft personal communications?</strong></p>
<p class="dcr-16w5gq9">If you do, please reach out to tech.editorial@theguardian.com and share how and how often you utilize AI. Has it enhanced your relationships or complicated them further?</p>
<h2 id="the-wider-techscape" class="dcr-12ibh7f">Broader Technology Landscape</h2>
The steam detector can identify traces of fentanyl and other substances in the air
Elizabeth Denis/Pacific Northwest National Institute
The U.S. Customs and Border Protection Agency is evaluating technology capable of detecting illegal substances in the air without any physical contact. This device aims to screen border objects quickly to combat the trafficking of drugs like fentanyl, a major contributor to the U.S. opioid crisis.
Detecting drugs and explosive compounds poses a challenge due to their release of relatively few molecules into the already vapor-laden air. To tackle this issue, the U.S. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) has spent over a decade developing an advanced system known as VaporID. This system can accurately identify certain substances from distances of 0.6 to 2.4 meters with sensitivity levels as low as a quarter of a part per trillion. This level of precision equates to locating a single coin in a stack of pennies that is 17 million times taller than Mount Everest.
Government scientists improved sensitivity by allowing molecules more time to create detectable chemical reactions through random collisions with other molecules. While most devices used for identifying unknown substances react to molecules within a few milliseconds, Robert Ewing at PNNL notes that “we created an atmospheric flow tube. This expands the reaction time to 2-3 seconds, which boosts sensitivity by three orders of magnitude.”
The technology has been integrated into a compact, microwave-sized device weighing 18 kilograms. Developed by California-based company Bayspec, this miniaturized machine is still less sensitive than the larger, fridge-sized version used at the PNNL lab. However, Bayspec’s CEO, William Yang, claims it is “more accurate and sensitive than a dog.”
In October 2024, researchers from Bayspec and PNNL tested the portable device at a Customs and Border Protection (CBP) facility in Nogales, Arizona. During separate trials, researchers swiped the surfaces of seized tablets and heated the swabs to generate steam for detection. “Both techniques yielded strong and reliable results,” says Christian Thoma of Bayspec.
The prototype is still under evaluation and requires further scientific data analysis, according to a CBP spokesperson.
Alex Krotulski of the Center for Forensic Research and Education, a nonprofit in Pennsylvania, comments, “We’ve encountered many devices that promise too much, so we’re cautious until they demonstrate efficacy through extensive research and assessments.”
There are already existing portable methods, such as x-rays, to uncover hidden drugs. Richard Crocombe, an independent consultant in Massachusetts, considers the new tool “another valuable addition to the arsenal,” but cautions that it “doesn’t fulfill all requirements.” A CBP spokesman acknowledged that while it could expedite drug testing in field labs, new devices may still require analysis by trained chemists.
These screening methods are also prone to false positives; “drug residues can be quite ubiquitous,” states Joseph Palamar at New York University. A related study indicated that most U.S. banknotes are contaminated. “If you happen to be near someone using fentanyl, the device could react positively based on trace amounts they might have on clothing or shoes. This raises concerns about innocent individuals being wrongly detained,” warns Chelsea Schauber at UCLA.
Preventing drugs from entering the country is just one piece of the larger strategy needed to address the opioid crisis, according to Schauber. This also calls for robust public health agencies, better access to healthcare, and comprehensive treatment options. She emphasizes that these resources are currently being diminished under the Trump administration. “To save lives, we need evidence-based, effective treatments that are more accessible than illegal drugs,” Schober concludes.
Brian Johnson in Don’t Die: Who Wants to Live Forever
Netflix
Netflix Brian Johnson stands out as a unique figure in contemporary society. The billionaire entrepreneur and proponent of anti-aging practices aims to extend both lifespan and “healthspan” by taking nearly 100 different medications daily and adhering to a rigorous fitness plan. The real enchantment of Please Don’t Die lies in its ability to evoke mixed feelings towards Johnson. His lifestyle is built on a fundamentally flawed scientific approach, yet his ideas are more captivating than those of his tech-savvy peers.
Disney+ In The Sea with David Attenborough, there’s a sequence that is as chilling as it is eye-opening. The aggressive trawling disturbs the seabed, leading to the displacement of fish from their habitats. This documentary marks Attenborough’s most politically charged effort, serving as a cautionary tale about the severe environmental repercussions of industrial fishing practices. If this indeed is part of the 99-year-old’s final project, it certainly encapsulates the essence of his illustrious career.
Chilean Flamingos of Laguna Colorada, Bolivia, America
BBC Studios/NBC
BBC iPlayer/NBC Who could be seen as the American equivalent of David Attenborough? Perhaps the two-time Oscar-winning Tom Hanks might be your answer. He brings a touch of cinematic brilliance to this 10-part nature series, narrating the incredible biodiversity of the Americas. While I don’t expect much insight into the climate crisis from this series, its lack of real-world relevance is almost compensated for by its stunning cinematography.
Bruce Parry, a Marapu woman from Sumba, Indonesia, and her tribe
BBC/Frank Films/Will Lorimer
BBC iPlayer A couple of decades ago, Bruce Parry spent an extensive period submerged in an Indigenous community for the anthropology series Tribe. Now, the series is returning but in a vastly changed world. Faced with increasing threats from deforestation and migration, Parry must earn the trust of the community he visits. The scenes in Tribe—which include piranha fishing, political discussions, and ayahuasca rituals—are richly fascinating, and we hope to witness more of them. The access granted to us through Parry feels like a true privilege.
Netflix Children have historically been used for entertainment, and the practices surrounding child actors have often been disturbing. In the 1920s and 30s, many faced long hours of labor and near-death experiences from excessive workloads and amphetamines. Fast forward to the 21st century, and “Kidfluence” has emerged, wherein families create financial empires through their children’s online activities. Bad Influence follows child pageant star Piper Locker, who has reportedly been exploited by her mother. This harrowing documentary explores the darker aspects of social media.
BBC iPlayer/CNN Whereas David Fincher’s film Social Network spotlighted the early days of Facebook, the origins of Twitter remain less familiar. Twitter: Break the Birds takes us back to when it was a basic platform for status updates. The documentary shines during its exploration of the power struggles between Jack Dorsey and his co-founders, and it discusses the technical challenges social media platforms have faced from the beginning. Interestingly, did you know that Twitter (or X, as it’s currently branded) had initially considered names like Ketchup or Friend Stalker? The later sections serve as a timely reminder that many of the platform’s issues predate Elon Musk’s controversial involvement.
BBC iPlayer Last year, naturalist Chris Packham introduced In Our Autistic Mind, a two-part documentary that allowed people with autism to create a film expressing their inner experiences. The follow-up season tackles ADHD and dyslexia, two conditions often misunderstood. While the series primarily examines the social difficulties faced by individuals with ADHD and dyslexia, it also incorporates strong scientific insights into their neurological underpinnings. Highlighting positive aspects, it reveals that many dyslexic individuals excel in pattern recognition.
Pangolin: Kuru’s Journey
Netflix
Netflix From the creators of My Octopus Teacher, Pangolin: Kuru’s Journey tells the heartwarming tale of a baby pangolin rescued from the illegal wildlife trade. We follow Kuru as he is rehabilitated by his caretaker Gareth, who considers himself a helicopter parent. The duo’s adorable adventures, from carrying Kuru away from a warthog’s burrow as dusk approaches, evoke both laughter and empathy. With pangolins being the most trafficked mammals globally, Kuru’s survival is a testament to human care and compassion.
Hannah Fry is the secret genius of modern life
Marco Cervi/BBC
BBC iPlayer The third season of Hannah Fry’s Guide to Everyday Technology is just as engaging as ever. This time, the focus is on roller coasters, highways, and—inevitably—air fryers. The series thoroughly explores how these technologies impact our lives and uncovers some surprising insights. How did the creators of the Theremin influence modern doorbell designs? What role did it play in the innovation of refrigeration? And just what is an air fryer starfish? If you’ve ever wanted to take apart your gadgets to see how they work, this meticulously crafted series will satisfy your curiosity without voiding any warranties.
Amazon Prime Video We’ve become acquainted with octopuses in a variety of quirky roles, from spiritual guides to unlikely educators. Enter this two-part series dedicated to these tentacled beings and their remarkable talents. A beautifully animated depiction of their life cycle is narrated by Doris, a massive Pacific octopus whose journey defies the odds, even as her story tragically culminates. Nonetheless, Octopus! remains a whimsical documentary brimming with curiosity and humor.
NOW Science fiction serves as a powerful lens through which we can envision the future, often depicting a grim outlook. This four-part documentary aims to explore how sci-fi has imagined the atomic bomb and its consequences. Beyond this, Wonderland thoughtfully examines a wide range of sci-fi narratives from the past 80 years, providing depth and nuance often missing from surface-level analyses of the genre.
Netflix In 2023, the world grappled with the four-day search for the missing OceanGate Titan submarine. Ultimately, five lives, including that of co-founder Stockton Rush, were lost following a catastrophic implosion. This feature-length documentary exposes how egotism and carelessness contributed to these untimely deaths. One particularly haunting moment features audio from an acoustic surveillance system that detected fissures in the carbon fiber hull during initial test dives, an essential safety protocol the company later ignored.
Disney+/Nat Geo In 1983, Sally Ride became NASA’s shining star as the first American woman to journey into space, capturing global attention. However, both she and her fellow female astronauts faced rampant institutional sexism and invasive media scrutiny. This feature-length documentary intricately weaves together her personal battles to retain a semblance of privacy, including her 27-year relationship with Tam O’Shaughnessy during an era marked by homophobia. It also delves into captivating aspects of Ride’s career, such as the hand-eye coordination techniques she developed to gain an edge over her colleague Judy Resnik, who tragically perished in the Challenger disaster.
A group of Utahraptors in Walking with Dinosaurs
BBC Studios/Lola Post Production
BBC iPlayer Back in 1999, Walking with Dinosaurs captivated audiences, bringing them into the world of prehistoric wildlife using groundbreaking visual effects. Given that those visuals feel somewhat dated now, a reboot seemed timely. In each episode of the 2025 series, researchers act as detectives, unearthing ancient relics and drawing extensive conclusions from bones and their surroundings. These imaginative stories showcase scenarios such as hatchlings chasing dragonflies through the jungles or a pack of Albertosaurus cornering their quarry. As always, a healthy dose of skepticism is advised; there remain many mysteries surrounding the lives of dinosaurs that we have yet to unravel.
Greetings and welcome to TechScape! After this newsletter goes live, you might find yourself captivated by the wedding snapshots of Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez, the most glamorous pairing in the tech news sphere this year. I found the event to be both sticky and monumental. Although everyone attended, Charlize Theron wasn’t on the guest list; as I mentioned earlier: “We might be the only ones not invited to Bezos’ wedding, but that’s okay.”
AI Companies Begin to Prevail in Copyright Disputes
Recently, the tech sector achieved multiple victories regarding the usage of copyrighted materials for developing artificial intelligence products.
A noteworthy judgment from a U.S. judge concluded that the creator of human-like chatbots, which trained on books without securing author consent, did not breach copyright regulations. Judge William Allsup equated the act of using human writings to “readers aiming to become writers.”
The following day, a ruling favoring Meta emerged: U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabriain San Francisco concluded that the plaintiff did not provide adequate proof that AI technology from these firms would lead to “market dilution” by inundating it with similar works.
On that same day, while Meta gained a favorable ruling, a group of authors sued Microsoft, accusing the company of copyright infringement linked to its Megatron text generator. Given the rulings favoring Meta and the chatbot sector, authors are facing a challenging uphill battle.
These cases are minor skirmishes in a larger legal struggle surrounding copyrighted media. Just three weeks ago, Disney and NBCUniversal filed a lawsuit against Midi Joanie, claiming its AI image generator and upcoming video tools unlawfully utilized iconic characters like Darth Vader and the Simpsons. Meanwhile, major record labels—Sony, Universal, and Warner—sued AI music generator companies Suno and Udio. Additionally, ongoing cases from The New York Times target OpenAI and Microsoft.
This lawsuit marks the first over AI-generated text. As these rulings unfold, a pressing question arises: will determinations for one form of media extend to another?
John Strand, an IP and copyright attorney at Wolf Greenfield, stated, “The impact of copyrighted works on the market is increasingly vital in fair use analysis, and the book market has unique considerations compared to film.”
For Strand, the scenario concerning images seems to favor copyright holders since AI models are said to generate identical images based on their training data.
Even more startling revelations emerged from the AI verdicts. Companies have allegedly utilized 7 million pirated books to establish their AI training databases. To rectify this, they purchased physical copies, scanned them, and digitized the content. Unfortunately, the original owners of these 7 million physical books, which no longer have practical use, were left with destroyed copies. This operation involved buying the books, chopping them up, scanning their text, and then discarding them. According to ARS Technica, there are very few efficient methods for digitizing books, and they tend to be slow. The AI sector seems geared towards swift and disruptive approaches.
The destruction of millions of books illustrates the intense demand for content that AI companies require for their products.
Two stories I reported last week have seen significant developments shortly thereafter.
The Trump-branded mobile phone, known as “T1,” has replaced its “America” pledge with “proudly America” and “vibrantly in America.” According to Barge.
Trump seems to be mirroring Apple’s strategy. While Apple navigates the manufacturing origin issues, it spotlights the American aspect of the iPhone by branding it as “designed in California.” What’s left unsaid is its assembly in China or India, along with components sourced from various countries. Trump and his family appear to have adopted a similarly ambiguous tagline, although their original commitments seem far more glaring.
The descriptor “American Proud Design” now featured prominently on Trump’s site appears to be an obvious nod to Apple’s branding.
Adhering to the “Made in the USA” label carries real legal implications. Companies face litigation over how many products are genuinely produced within the country, and major U.S. trade regulators have set standards for what constitutes that slogan. However, tracing a smartphone’s manufacturing history to meet these criteria proves to be quite complex, according to many experts.
While Trump aims to bring manufacturing back to America with his steep tariffs, it seems he has learned the lessons that other mobile companies have grappled with. Manufacturing smartphones solely in the U.S. is fraught with complications and limitations, creating significant challenges for the final product.
Catch up on last week’s Gold Trump Phone newsletter.
…and Online Age Verification
Photo: Matt Cardy/Getty Images
Last week, I discussed Smatty, a porn platform, returning to France. This week, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the age verification checks mandated in Texas. Pornhub has blocked access for Texas residents for much of the past two years, protesting much like they did in France for three weeks.
Justice Clarence Thomas summarized the court’s rationale:
“HB 1181 simply requires adults to verify their age before accessing adult explicit materials,” Thomas stated in the majority opinion, which passed with a 6-3 ruling. “This law furthers the state’s significant interest in protecting children from sexually explicit content and appropriately allows users to verify their age using established forms of government-issued identification and shared transaction information.”
Justice Elena Kagan, along with two other liberal justices, voiced their dissent.
The ruling validates Texas laws and laws from nearly 20 other states implementing online age checks. The global climate seems to be shifting away from granting broader access to pornographic content under the guise of free speech rights.
Experts suggest that the flexible definition of obscenity under Texas law necessitates age checks on platforms containing adult-oriented materials.
“Today is disheartening for advocates of an open internet,” remarked GS Hans, a professor at Cornell Law School. “While the courts may not categorize this decision as a landmark ruling in this case, it fundamentally alters free speech jurisprudence and could establish encroachments on adult access by endorsing limitations on minor indecency.
We’ll monitor the situation closely in July when Pornhub intends to implement age checks in line with the Online Services Act.
Read more: A UK survey indicates that 8% of children aged 8 to 14 have encountered online pornography.
Explore More AI News
This Week in AI: WhatsApp Introduces Summary Feature and Nobel-Winning Genome Model
Meta’s WhatsApp now showcases AI-generated summaries of unread messages. Photo: Martin Meissner/AP
This new feature may seem minor, but even slight modifications to the globe’s most used messaging app can create a significant impact. Meta’s WhatsApp now provides AI-generated summaries of unread messages. According to Barge.
Apple previously experimented with message summaries—but that venture didn’t succeed, leading them to retract the feature. For companies known for strategically controlled launches, dropping the summary was quite an embarrassment. The difference here lies in Meta’s consistent track record of releasing AI products over the years.
In more AI-related news, I seldom find new technology captivating, but Google’s DeepMind AI Lab’s recent announcement appears promising for the healthcare sector. The new Alphagenome AI aims to offer comprehensive predictions regarding how a single mutation in human DNA can impact multiple biological processes governing genes. The developers of the Alphagenome previously won the Chemistry Prize for Alphafold, a program known for predicting protein structures.
This innovation raises compelling questions, potentially overtaking CRISPR, the groundbreaking technique regarding changes in humans when their genetic sequences are adjusted. The Alphagenome holds promise in shedding light on this enigmatic issue.
By manipulating fundamental physics, researchers can enhance energy-harvesting devices like solar cells
M2020/Shutterstock
Researchers have challenged long-standing principles of physics, paving the way for more efficient energy harvesting technologies, such as solar cells.
Linxiao Zhu from Penn State University has aimed to break Kirchov’s law of thermal radiation for nearly ten years. Established in the 1800s, this law states that the amount of thermal radiation emitted by an object is proportional to the heat it absorbs, linking to the fundamental principles of thermodynamics. Historically, it was believed that these constraints were absolute.
“In standard physics literature, it’s indicated that Kirchov’s law is a fundamental requirement of the second law of thermodynamics. However, this is not entirely accurate,” explains Zhu.
Previous breaches of this law were seen, but only concerning specific wavelengths of radiation. Zhu and his team have achieved a more significant departure from the norm.
This breakthrough required two significant elements: precisely structured materials and magnetic fields. Both the arrangement of the material and the magnetic environment play crucial roles in the behavior of the particles making up the radiation, like photons, and the energy they carry.
The researchers developed thin-layered semiconductors from indium, gallium, and arsenides, meticulously organizing the atoms. They positioned this setup near a strong electromagnet, illuminating it with lights of various colors at distinct temperatures, angles, and magnetic field strengths.
This combination of material structure and ongoing magnetic influence led to a significant disparity between the radiation absorbed and emitted—up to 43% more radiation was released than was originally absorbed. Zhu attributes this phenomenon to the presence of multiple colors of light. This characteristic is particularly beneficial since sunlight comprises a mixture of colors when hitting solar cell devices.
Aaswath Raman from UCLA indicates that this trial is a major advancement toward turning previously theoretical concepts into reality. He remarks that the stark difference between absorbed and emitted radiation is “a significant breakthrough.”
While novel materials can enhance the efficiency of light and heat-absorbing devices, the requirement for magnetic fields presents challenges. However, Raman remains optimistic about the emergence of new materials that display magnetic properties without requiring proximity to magnets, which could resolve these issues through innovative electromagnetic techniques.
wGlacier researcher John Moore began exploring the Arctic Circle in the 1980s. The continuous warming of this area has led to the disappearance of many glaciers, as noted in The Arctic heats 4 times faster. They have simply melted away, outpacing global averages.
Four decades later, Moore’s research network identified an Arctic university. 61 Potential Interventions aim to slow, halt, and reverse the impacts of regional climate change. These concepts are regularly updated. Some will be discussed at a meeting in Cambridge this week, where scientists and engineers will explore whether radical technical solutions can buy time and mitigate the loss of polar ice caps.
Dr. Sean Fitzgerald excavates the ice. Photo: Real Ice/Cambridge University
“We aim to distill them down to about 10 concrete ideas,” Moore asserts, although he hasn’t yet shared specific developments. He emphasizes that the study should exclude “non-starters and hopeless ideas.” If no action is taken over the next 30 years, it may indeed be too late.
The focus should be on rationally valuing these interventions; otherwise, they are merely speculation.
“None of these ideas will solve every issue,” Moore states, emphasizing the need to weigh potential costs against perceived benefits.
Dr. Sean Fitzgerald, director of the Climate Restoration Center at Cambridge University, which is hosting the conference, reflects on a 30-year journey of “unpaid progress” that has slowed the climate crisis, shifting focus towards preserving the Arctic.
“I felt obligated to expand knowledge into broader fields,” he notes. Among the more unusual ideas discussed is the concept of a 10km sunshade suspended between airships the size of Zeppelins and creating corridors for fixed rafts to assist Arctic wildlife reliant on ice. Other measures, such as the initiative by British startup Real Ice and a Dutch company, are underway, which involve pumping water onto ice to refreeze it.
Critics voice concerns about the ethical and legal implications of many proposed interventions, making geoengineering a contentious topic. For instance, in 2021, the Sami Council, representing the Saami people in Finland, Norway, Sweden, and Russia, voiced opposition against Harvard-led pilot projects that aimed to test stratospheric aerosol injection (Science), which simulates volcanic eruptions by dispersing aerosols in the stratosphere to reflect sunlight. The Sami Council branded the plan as a “real moral hazard.”
Inuit hunters navigate through meltwater in West Greenland. Photo: Lawrence Hislop/Alendal
The interventions have undergone extensive study, including those identified by Moore for mitigating the Arctic climate emergency. However, many proposals are unlikely to go beyond theoretical stages and require substantial funding or large-scale implementation.
Thus far, ocean-based concepts present additional uncertainties, limitations, and risks, and the study has deemed them “unsuitable for further consideration,” scoring very low against most evaluation criteria.
One such idea, modifying ocean currents, was first proposed during the Cold War, when suggestions were made to block the Bering Strait to enhance Arctic livability. Years later, climate activist Rolf Schttenhelm proposed a similar initiative aimed at increasing Arctic sea ice.
One small-scale solution currently being implemented involves pumping water onto ice to refreeze it. Photo: Real Ice/Cambridge University
“It’s very easy to make mistakes, and no one knows the definitive answer,” Moore reflects. “Local benefits must be balanced with the hope for global gains.”
Fitzgerald remains cautious about any solutions he considers to be frontrunners, underscoring the importance of keeping an open mind and exploring a variety of approaches.
Meanwhile, SAI and Marine Cloud Brightening (MCB) are drawing significant interest. Professor Peter Wadham, leader of the Polar Ocean Physics Group at Cambridge University, describes MCB as a “very powerful” option. “It’s advantageous because it can be implemented on a small scale, allowing for cessation of activities if negative impacts arise,” he asserts.
Wadham is less enthusiastic about SAI, labeling it a risky long-term strategy compared to MCB. Additionally, he finds the proposal to thicken sea ice unrealistic due to the sheer energy required. “It could work in limited scenarios,” he notes, “but not at an impactful scale. Marine Cloud Brightening stands out as the best and most thoughtfully designed approach.”
Hunters return to Kullorsuaq, the Inuit village in Greenland, nearby Melville Bay. Photo: Reda/Universal Images/Getty
Earlier this year, UK scientists announced plans for outdoor geoengineering trials, including Marine Cloud Brightening, funded by a £50 million government initiative. However, opposition has emerged from various sectors; a discussion was held in the UK Parliament this week, and the state of Tennessee has passed legislation banning geoengineering in the US.
Electric vehicles (EVs) are swiftly rising in popularity worldwide; in 2024, 22% of new car sales were electric, up from 18% in 2023. Research indicates that an increasing number of people perceive EVs as superior to traditional gasoline and diesel vehicles. Anecdotal experiences on feeling unwell in an electric vehicle’s passenger or rear seat have sparked social media discussions and raised questions among prospective buyers about motion sickness.
Nonetheless, several academic studies provide scientific explanations for why some individuals may experience more sickness in EVs.
“Increased illness in EVs can be attributed to a lack of prior experience, both as drivers and passengers. The brain depends on past experiences in other vehicle types, complicating the estimation of motor skills.”
While EVs are becoming increasingly accepted, conventional gasoline vehicles still hold a strong presence. Drivers have a long-established familiarity with gas cars, enabling them to adapt more readily to specific cues. For instance, a person who has predominantly driven combustion engine cars will anticipate acceleration after the engine revs, which signals a change in speed. In contrast, electric vehicles produce minimal engine noise.
Research has identified connections between certain features of electric vehicles and motion sickness. A study conducted in 2024 found a significant correlation between motion sickness severity and seat vibrations in EVs. Meanwhile, a separate 2020 study revealed that the absence of engine noise may play a critical role in exacerbating feelings of nausea.
“Those accustomed to driving conventional vehicles learn to perceive car movements through cues such as engine revs, vibrations, and torque. Therefore, experiencing an EV for the first time presents a unique movement environment that the brain needs to adapt to,” explains Emond.
Furthermore, regenerative braking technology in EVs, which enables the motor to convert kinetic energy into electricity while slowing down, results in smooth deceleration. This gradual slowing can lead to a higher likelihood of motion sickness.
A piece of 2024 research indicated that this phenomenon may serve as a key trigger for motion sickness in EVs. The authors noted: [“regenerative braking] might direct motion sickness.”
Motion sickness is believed to arise from inconsistencies among varied sensory inputs. The brain receives simultaneous signals from the body, particularly from the inner ear, which maintains balance, alongside visual information. When there’s a conflict between these signals, the brain interprets this “neurological mismatch” as a conflict situation.
“Improved understanding of self-movement is critical for predicting motor skills to mitigate motion sickness. When the estimations of motor skills by the brain vary from actual experiences, this conflict can reach a threshold that triggers symptoms resembling ‘motion sickness,'” states Emond. “If such a conflict continues, it can lead to physiological reactions often associated with motion sickness.”
Predicting vehicle movement is crucial for mitigating motion sickness, which means that drivers are generally less likely to experience such symptoms. They have the foresight of what to expect.
As these vehicles provide fewer cues about upcoming movements, the interaction between predicted and experienced motion may contribute to the heightened incidence of motion sickness in EVs.
“When navigating a new movement environment, the brain must form new habits, lacking any prior experience to guide it. This is akin to how most individuals feel nauseous in zero-gravity contexts,” remarks Emond.
As the adoption of EVs continues to increase, researchers are exploring potential solutions to combat car-related nausea. Various studies propose that motion sickness in autonomous electric vehicles might be alleviated using visual signals, such as interactive displays and ambient lighting, or through vibration cues that enable passengers’ brains to anticipate movement changes, thereby reducing sudden sensations during electric vehicle rides.
The genetic testing firm 23AndMe has been penalized with a fine exceeding £2.3 million following a significant cyberattack in 2023, which compromised the personal information of over 150,000 UK residents.
Sensitive data, including family tree details, health reports, names, and postal codes, were among the information breached from the California-based company. The UK Intelligence Commission’s office confirmed the breach after employees discovered that stolen data was being offered for sale on the social media platform Reddit.
Intelligence Commissioner John Edwards referred to the incidents during the summer of 2023 as “a deeply damaging violation.” The data breach affecting the UK was just a fraction of a larger security incident that compromised data from 7 million individuals.
23AndMe offers DNA screening for £89 through a saliva-based kit, allowing users to trace their ancestry in terms of ethnicity and geographical origin. However, many customers sought bankruptcy protection in the US in March, requesting the removal of their DNA data from the company’s records following the hack.
The penalty coincided with a $355 million acquisition bid for the company led by former CEO Anne Wassicki.
Edwards noted that the data breaches included sensitive personal information, family histories, and even health conditions of numerous individuals in the UK.
“As one affected individual remarked, once this information is out there, it cannot be altered or replaced like a password or credit card number,” he added.
UK data protection regulators found that 23AndMe did not take fundamental steps to safeguard user information, revealing inadequacies in its security system, including a failure to implement stricter user authentication measures.
Hackers exploited a widespread weakness due to the reuse of passwords compromised in unrelated data breaches. They employed automated tools in a method called “credential stuffing.”
Edwards remarked, “The warning signs were evident, and the company’s response was sluggish. This has made individuals’ most sensitive data vulnerable to exploitation and harm.”
A company spokesperson stated that 23AndMe has taken various measures to enhance security for individual accounts and data. They have made a firm commitment to improving the protection of customer data and privacy in connection with an initiative that will benefit 23AndMe, a nonprofit associated with Wojcicki, the TTAM Research Institute.
Fines are part of the substantial penalties imposed on various organizations by ICOs in recent years due to their inability to secure data from hacking and ransomware incidents. In 2022, a fine levied against construction firms exceeded £4.4 million when staff data was compromised, including contact information, bank details, sexual orientation, and health data.
The UK’s Intelligence Commission (ICO) has urged manufacturers of air fryers, smart speakers, fertility trackers, and smart TVs to prioritize the privacy rights of individuals.
Many individuals feel overwhelmed by the lack of control over how data is gathered, utilized, and shared regarding their homes and personal lives.
Following concerns raised about an air fryer that reportedly listens to its environment, Public concerns have emerged about digital devices collecting an excessive amount of personal data, prompting data protection regulators to issue initial guidelines on the handling of personal information.
Manufacturers and data handlers are now required to ensure data security, maintain transparency with consumers, and routinely delete collected information.
“We are pleased to share our commitment to offering a diverse range of services to our clients,” stated Stephen Almond, executive director of ICO’s regulatory risks.
“These products are meant to enhance our lives, but that doesn’t imply they should collect unnecessary data… Users shouldn’t have to sacrifice their privacy to enjoy the advantages of smart devices.”
“Everyone expects a degree of privacy within their own homes, thus we need to trust that smart products will honor that privacy, act responsibly, and utilize information only as anticipated.”
The new guidance points out various devices classified as part of the “Internet of Things,” which collect data that must be managed with care. These items include smart fertility trackers that log user periods and temperature readings, transmitting that data back to manufacturer servers to determine fertile days.
Smart speakers should not only listen to their owners but also to other family members and visitors; they must be designed to empower users to adjust settings to minimize personal data collection.
Regulators emphasized that manufacturers must be clear with individuals regarding the use of their personal data, only collecting what is necessary, and enabling easy deletion of data from devices.
The ICO has stated to manufacturers that it is “prepared to take necessary actions to safeguard individuals from potential harm.”
Disney and Universal have filed a lawsuit against an artificial intelligence company, claiming copyright violations. The entertainment titans have described the image generator behind Midi Johnny’s popular AI as a “bottomless pit of plagiarism,” alleging it replicates the studios’ most iconic characters.
The lawsuit, lodged in federal court in Los Angeles, accuses Midi Joan of illegally accessing two Hollywood studio libraries and creating numerous unauthorized copies of key characters, including Darth Vader from Star Wars, Elsa from Frozen, and Minions from Despicable Me. Midjourney has not yet commented on the matter.
This legal action from Disney and Universal marks a new chapter in the ongoing battle over copyright issues related to artificial intelligence, following prior lawsuits focusing on text and music. So far, these two companies are among the largest industry stakeholders to address the implications for images and videos.
“We are optimistic about the potential of AI technology when used responsibly to enhance human creativity; however, it’s crucial to recognize that piracy and copyright infringement carried out by AI companies is unacceptable,” stated a company representative.
Kim Harris, vice-chair and legal counsel at NBCUniversal, emphasized the need to “entertain and inspire while protecting the hard work of all artists who invest significantly in content.”
The studios assert that the San Francisco-based company, one of the pioneers in AI-driven image generation, must either cease infringing upon copyrighted works or implement technical measures to prevent the creation of AI-generated images of copied characters.
Nonetheless, studios claim that Midjourney continues to release updates to its AI image service, promoting high-quality infringing images. The AI is capable of recreating animated visuals based on user prompts. These companies train their models using vast datasets, often sourced from millions of websites.
In a 2022 interview with Forbes, Midjourney CEO David Holz mentioned that he built the company’s database through extensive “internet scraping.”
The lawsuit, initiated by seven entities holding the copyrights to various Disney and Universal Pictures Film Units, includes examples of AI-generated animations with Disney characters like Yoda wielding lightsabers, as well as universal characters such as the Dragon from Kung Fu Panda, Toothless, and Shrek.
“By leveraging plaintiffs’ copyrighted materials and distributing images (and soon videos) that unmistakably incorporate beloved characters from Disney and Universal, Midi Joan exemplifies a typical copyright-free rider, creating a bottomless pit of flexible liability,” the studios claim.
Disney and Universal are seeking a preliminary injunction to prevent Midjourney from continuing to copy their works or providing image and video generation services without protective measures against infringement, as well as unspecified damages.
Founded in 2021 by David Holz, Midjourney operates on a subscription model, boasting a revenue of $300 million from its services last year alone.
This isn’t the first instance of Midjourney facing accusations of leveraging artists’ works to train AI systems. Approximately a year ago, a federal judge in California found that 10 artists, alongside Stability AI and others, were in litigation against Midjourney, alleging that these companies had copied and stored their works on their servers, rendering them potentially liable for unauthorized use. This ruling allowed the lawsuit to proceed based on misuse of images, and it is currently ongoing.
This case is part of a larger trend of lawsuits involving authors, media organizations, and record labels against high-tech firms over the utilization of copyrighted materials for AI training.
When asked whether the company sought consent from artists whose works are copyrighted, Holz remarked, “It’s practically impossible to gather 100 million images and trace their origins.” In a submission to the UK government last year, OpenAI stated, “Training today’s leading AI models without the use of copyrighted materials is unfeasible.”
In late 2023, the New York Times filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, the developer of ChatGPT, along with Microsoft (which holds a 49% stake in the startup), for allegedly misusing and regenerating text from its articles. That suit is still pending. Other media outlets, including The Guardian, have negotiated licensing agreements with AI companies to use their archives. Similarly, authors have sued Meta, claiming it used a vast database of pirated books to train the LLaMA AI model, although many of those claims were dismissed.
In June 2024, major record companies filed lawsuits against two AI companies for copyright infringement. Sony Music Entertainment, Universal Music Group Recordings, and Warner Records accused Suno and Udio of improperly using millions of songs to create a system capable of generating derivative music.
The entrepreneur expressed that she felt “humiliated” after departing from London Tech Week, the annual corporate gathering, while accompanying her baby daughter.
Davina Schonle was barred from entering the event on Monday after a three-hour journey of eight months and had to forgo a meeting with potential high-tech startup suppliers.
Schonle recounted to TheBusinessDesk.com that upon arriving at the entrance with her daughter in the stroller, she was asked if she was a VIP. She was informed that she could not enter with the baby. After attempting to retrieve her badge, she was redirected to an Informa State organizer who stated they lacked insurance.
This incident incited outrage and cast a pall over the event. Prime Minister Kiel Starmer addressed the gathering on the same day Schonle was denied entry. The tech industry is striving to distance itself from accusations of sexism and the perception that women are seen as second-class.
Schonle mentioned that this experience highlighted her worst fears regarding being a woman in this sector. She is the founder and CEO of HumanVantage AI, a startup leveraging AI technology to create conversational role-play corporate training platforms.
In a widely shared LinkedIn Post, Schonle remarked: “This moment was inconvenient, serving as a stark reminder that within the tech industry, we still have progress to make regarding inclusion beyond mere buzzwords.”
“Parents are integral to this ecosystem. Caregivers are innovators, founders, investors, and leaders. If a significant event like London Tech Week cannot accommodate them, what message does that send about who truly belongs in technology?”
London Tech Week, organized by Global Events Company Informa, addressed the situation in a statement: “We are aware that one of the participants was not allowed entry with children. As a business event, the venue is not equipped to accommodate specific needs, facilities, and safety measures for those under the age of 16.”
“We are appreciative of everyone’s support in the tech community during London Tech Week. We have reached out to the involved parties to discuss the incident and will use this experience to improve our approach at LTW in the future.”
Julia Hobbsbohm, a businesswoman and commentator on entrepreneurship and work-life balance, reacted to Schonle’s LinkedIn post, remarking: London Tech Week “The worst kind of tin ears.”
Elon Musk and Donald Trump have ended their friendship. Tensions flared between them mid-week, with both exchanging sharp criticisms. Four days after their public clash, I declare Musk the loser of this battle; the seemingly unstoppable force has met its match with the immovable object.
According to colleagues Hugo Lowell and Andrew Ross: On Thursday, Elon Musk mocked Donald Trump’s bounce by commenting on his connection with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The US president threatened to revoke federal contracts and tax incentives for Musk’s companies during this extraordinary social media spat that erupted among his former allies. This latest jab at Trump highlights Musk’s criticism of a Republican spending bill.
“Without me, Trump would lose the election, the Democrats would gain control of the House, and Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,” Musk tweeted on X.
The repercussions were swift. Tesla’s stock, already grappling with difficulties, plunged 15%, wiping approximately $150 billion off the market. The implications for Trump and the Republican Party could take longer to unfold, as the midterm elections for the US Congress won’t occur until later next year.
When Trump and Musk were allies, many liberals predicted a tumultuous public fallout. I didn’t anticipate such an outcome. Musk appeared robust and allied with the formidable Trump. The Republican campaign needed a substantial cash influx, which Musk could provide.
However, Trump revealed last week that several of his closest advisers have left dramatically, victims of what he termed “Trump craziness.” Musk seems to follow a similar pattern. A notable example is Steve Bannon, once a top strategist for Trump, who was ousted from the White House but is now hosting a podcast scrutinizing Trump’s actions. Bannon spent last week calling for Musk’s ousting. Trump, not realizing he is often the common denominator in these fiery departures, appears similar to Musk; by Sunday, he had tweeted about the Los Angeles riots, retweeting Vice President JD Vance with patriotic emojis while targeting California Governor Gavin Newsom.
The conflict between Musk and Trump underlined America’s dependency on a single company for its space capabilities. During his outburst, Musk threatened to dismantle SpaceX’s Dragon Rocket. What would the nation do without him? In a pinch, perhaps another billionaire with a rocket could suffice, even with a pop star on board.
Trump and Musk will shake hands at the NCAA Division I Wrestling Championship in Philadelphia on March 22nd. Photo: Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Images
This spat has also brought to light Musk’s relative vulnerabilities. Musk threatened to dismantle the Dragon Rocket and quickly backed down from his ultimatum regarding requests on X. Meanwhile, Trump has remained silent online, not retaliating against Musk. This indicates the overarching theme of his second administration; Musk often targets those with less power and wealth, but when faced with significant challenges, he retreats. Recall his enthusiastic challenge to Mark Zuckerberg about arranging a cage fight in 2023. Zuckerberg responded, both intrigued and more robust, while Musk seemed outmatched. He eventually backed down. As for Trump, he claims he could save money by canceling government contracts with Musk. Musk replied, “Make my day,” but subsequently scaled back his threats.
In the long term, what does this tragic unraveling of alliances mean for Trump and Musk? To date, Musk has reportedly lost about $90 billion in net worth, an astounding figure according to the Bloomberg Billionaire Index. He remains the world’s wealthiest individual with nearly $100 billion.
Perhaps the bigger loser is democracy itself. Recently, he polled his followers about establishing a centrist political party he wants to call the “American Party.” He possesses the resources to make it a reality but has not indicated any centrist political inclinations over the past two years. His presence in political gatherings has proven more repulsive than magnetic, significantly affecting key elections like the Wisconsin Supreme Court contest earlier this year.
Read more about how the Trump-Musk feud reveals the perils of concentrating power in one individual here.
Read more about the mutual damage inflicted by Trump and Musk here.
Discover more about the economic consequences of their feud concerning Tesla here.
AI isn’t as capable of making movies as executives claim
Director John Wick and Chad Stahelsky. Photo: David Lee/Thunder Road Pictures/Allstar
Last Thursday, I attended a showcase featuring eight short films generated using the Runway Artificial Intelligence tool. In a pre-screening discussion, Runway’s co-founder and chief design officer Alejandro Matamala-Ortiz stated that the two-hour AI-generated film was “close.” Lionsgate executives explained to New York Magazine that there are many invisible production processes beyond just the final footage shown in theaters. Lionsgate has entered a contract with Runway, using some of its archives to train AI for cutting-edge projects.
The film I observed had a quality that echoed the executives’ comments on AI. Six of the eight shorts evoked little emotion. They lacked character and depth, resembling placeholders. While AI can create any imaginable image, the film lacked true creativity. The smooth, composite textures from multiple AI-generated images rendered them as intriguing and stylish as a basic first draft. If directors don’t take the time to elevate their work beyond a typical mid-journey output, why would anyone want to watch them? One film, an anime revenge story centered around cherry blossom trees, made me chuckle. Another claimed to document the sporadic emergence of cicadas but primarily featured lens flares. It felt reminiscent of a mid-tier student film; most entries were muddled, and the cinematography lacked distinct perspectives. Runway claimed to have received 6,000 submissions from 300 creators in 2022. I shiver at the thought of a Clockwork Orange-style scenario where someone had to view all those entries.
After viewing these shorts, I believed they resembled student films, potentially due to the early stages of production techniques that filmmakers are grappling with. Since its submission to the IT Film Festival in April, Runway has introduced new features to its tools, with Google recently releasing its own video generation tool, Veo 3. The output is more refined compared to what I viewed last week.
The remaining two films ventured into compelling territories. One was a video essay titled Total Pixel Space, which proved to be thought-provoking. This meditation on the nature of AI-generated images emphasized how few images we encounter in realistic situations versus those that never happened, offering unfortunate insights into our visual culture.
“Total Pixel Space represents both ultimate determinism and ultimate freedom, laden with possibilities that await consciousness to shape meaning through choices,” the film’s narration stated. I noted that it highlights AI-rendered images confined to pixel parameters on screens but unable to exist physically. Considering our mortality, the film poses a poignant question: how will you utilize your time and choices? What do you choose to imbue with meaning?
“Total Pixel Space” won the Grand Prize in the contest. While it was a triumph, the film poses a specific challenge to Matamala-Ortiz’s viewpoint. If one extrapolates from the film festival output, will you really witness a two-hour video essay delineating the trajectory AI films will take? It’s rather rare for such a film to maintain interest for that long.
Another editor developed a character and her inner life—a fundamental requirement for live-action films—yet this seems an insurmountable hurdle in AI-produced cinema. AI struggles to recreate consistent facial expressions across various scenarios. Despite these limitations, I still advocate for short films. Occasionally, a surge of creativity produces stunning montages, capable of suggesting interdimensional travel. AI can produce hundreds of diverse backgrounds in seconds, achieving scenes that would otherwise require significant budgets. Editing can utilize these capabilities for impactful effects. Perhaps that’s the ultimate goal of AI: serving as an enhancer rather than a sole creator. Lionsgate’s VP remarked on similar ideas, indicating that AI tools can make a $100 million film appear even larger and more cinematic. “We amplify elements, ensuring a more significant, filmic experience,” he told New York.
This week’s AI News
What do you want to share with us?
Photo: Guardian
The Guardian has introduced a new feature within its app, developed in collaboration with computer scientists from Cambridge University.
The secure messaging function allows you to send messages to Guardian staff directly through the app, presenting a potential channel for news stories. To utilize this feature, tap on the three bars located at the bottom right of the Guardian app, scroll down to “More From the Guardian,” and select “Secure Messaging.” By saving a passphrase—consisting of randomly generated words—you can then create a secure channel for your messages. Sending a message to the Guardian operates similarly to ordinary app traffic, providing a layer of anonymity not found in traditional texting. Unlike conventional messages, secure messaging masks your activity on your device, making it appear as though you’re simply browsing the news.
For more detailed information about secure messaging, click here.
As technology evolves, humans enhance their ability to teach skills to others
English Heritage/Heritage Images/Getty Images
Research into human evolution spanning 3 million years illustrates that advancements in communication and technology have occurred simultaneously. As early humans developed more sophisticated stone tools and various techniques, they also refined their abilities to communicate and educate the next generation on these new skills.
“There exists a scenario for the evolution of modes of cultural transmission throughout human history,” states Francesco Dalico, from the University of Bordeaux, France. “It seems there’s a co-evolution between the complexity of cultural traits and the complexity of their transmission methods.”
A defining characteristic of humanity is the progression toward more complex tools and behaviors. For instance, ancient humans crafted sharp stones for cutting or stabbing and affixed them to wooden shafts to create spears.
Crucially, the ability to instruct others in these skills is vital. For more intricate tasks like playing the violin or coding, extensive education and practice are typically necessary. However, in prehistoric times, the capacity for effective communication was limited, particularly before intricate languages emerged.
Furthermore, Ivan Colagè from the Pope University of the Holy Cross in Rome, along with D’Errico, investigated how the transmission of cultural information has evolved over the last 3.3 million years, aligning with changes in behavior and technology. They examined 103 cultural traits, such as specific types of stone tools, decorative items like beads, and burial customs. They documented the initial appearances of each trait in the archaeological record, indicating common practices.
The researchers assessed the complexity involved in learning each trait. Some simple tools, like stone hammers, require minimal instruction. “They don’t need much explanation,” D’Errico notes. In contrast, demonstrating the creation of more advanced tools is necessary, and the most intricate behaviors, such as deeply symbolic burials, demand explicit verbal explanations.
To analyze this, D’Errico and Colagè outlined three dimensions of learning: First, spatial proximity—can tasks be learned from a distance, or does one need to be physically present? Second, temporality—does one brief lesson suffice, or are multiple sessions necessary, perhaps emphasizing various steps? Third, the social aspect—who learns from whom?
They evaluated these traits and consulted a panel of 24 experts for assessment, whose consensus reinforced their findings. “I believe the conclusion is quite robust,” says D’Errico.
Recent studies indicate two significant shifts in cultural communication. The first occurred around 600,000 years ago when early humans began teaching one another, likely without relying on spoken language; gestures may have sufficed. This predates the emergence of our species, Homo sapiens, and aligns with the onset of hafting.
The second shift happened between 200,000 and 100,000 years ago, coinciding with the development of modern languages, which became essential for performing complex tasks like burials. “These actions involve many detailed steps, requiring explanation,” D’Errico explains.
“The relationship between cultural communication and cultural complexity is strong,” asserts Ceri Shipton from University College London. He emphasizes that while the timeline for language development remains uncertain, this new estimate provides a “reasonable timeframe.”
A vibrant website showcasing illustrations of Donald Trump launched on Tuesday, depicting him flexing his muscles and raising his fist. This image serves as the logo for one of Trump’s digital currencies, with the website branding itself as the “official $Trump wallet,” promoting products that facilitate transactions using the president’s cryptocurrency.
The site highlights Trump Coin$Trump and encourages visitors to sign up for a waitlist to access their digital wallet. I first spotted it in the Crypto Newsletter a quote is required. Magic Eden, a well-established cryptocurrency marketplace, announced a partnership with Trump’s official digital coin team to develop the wallet. Accounts on Twitter/X also advertised wallet products linked to one of Trump’s cryptocurrencies.
“The $Trump Wallet with @magiceden is on its way. Join the $Trump Community! http://trumpwallet.com”
This announcement seems to lend an air of legitimacy, but Trump’s sons are raising concerns.
“The Trump organization is not affiliated with this wallet product,” Donald Trump Jr. stated on X. Subsequently, Eric Trump tweeted: “I run @Trump, but I know nothing about this project!” Even Baron Trump chimed in, stating: “Our family is not involved in this wallet.”
Donald Jr. added that he has been “working tirelessly” on launching an official wallet with World Liberty Financial, a separate family crypto venture established last year.
The cryptocurrency sector is notorious for its fraud and internal disputes. The latest rift between Magic Eden and World Liberty Financial seems linked to a longstanding conflict involving Trump’s business associate and his son. This associate runs the company that issued the Trump organization’s cryptocurrency and is engaged in separate ventures. Additionally, the Trump Organization owns a company called CIC Digital, which is valued at around $2 billion and manages 80% of Coin’s reserves along with oversight of cryptocurrency trading profits.
On X, both Magic Eden and Zanker’s company claimed the newly announced crypto wallet is indeed collaborating with Trump and is supported by Magic Eden.
Eric Trump disputed this claim, later issuing a warning on Tuesday: X: “This project has not been authorized by @Trump,” he mentioned. “@magiceden, I am very cautious about using our name on unapproved projects that are unknown to anyone in our organization.”
In recent months, Trump’s family members and business associates have launched various crypto and digital currency initiatives. These ventures include meme coins featuring fist-pumping playing cards and stable coins designed to maintain a steady value of $1. Melania Trump even unveiled her own memo coin.
Throughout his first term, Trump was strongly opposed to cryptocurrency, but his stance has changed since then. He has embraced this volatile market, becoming the first major candidate to accept campaign donations in cryptocurrency and speaking at prominent crypto conferences. Trump entertained industry leaders at the White House, hosting high-profile cryptocurrency investors at a private golf club just outside Washington, DC. Moreover, his administration appointed a high-tech investor, David, as the “crypto Czar.” A series of federal investigations into cryptocurrency firms have been put on hold regarding digital assets.
Neither the White House, Magic Eden, nor Zanker responded to requests for commentary.
Nvidia surpassed Wall Street’s projections in its quarterly revenue report on Wednesday, continuing a streak of financial successes for the technology leader. For the quarter ending in April, revenue reached $44.1 billion, a 69% increase from the previous year.
The company outperformed an investor forecast of $43.3 billion. Adjusted earnings per share were reported at $0.81, falling short of the anticipated 88 cents. Additionally, data center revenue soared to $39.1 billion, marking a 73% growth year-over-year.
Nvidia remains optimistic about the AI sector, both in terms of its advanced hardware and the regulatory challenges on the horizon, which investors are keenly monitoring.
“Nvidia has once again surpassed expectations, but maintaining this lead is growing more challenging,” observed Jacob Bourne, an analyst at Emarketer. “China’s export restrictions highlight immediate geopolitical pressures, but Nvidia also faces competition as rivals like AMD strengthen their positions based on certain cost-effectiveness metrics in AI workloads.”
CEO Jensen Huang stated, “The global demand for Nvidia’s AI infrastructure is remarkably strong. Countries worldwide see AI as a vital utility, comparable to electricity and the Internet.”
The chipmaker anticipates revenues of $45 billion for the second quarter of 2026.
Nvidia’s quarterly reports over the past year reflect explosive growth. However, the company is under increasing pressure from U.S. regulations.
Donald Trump’s announcement in April regarding tightened computer chip export regulations effectively barred Nvidia from selling its primary revenue source, the H20 AI chip, to China.
“H20 products were primarily designed for the Chinese market,” the company’s first quarter revenue report stated. Consequently, Nvidia expects to miss out on $8 billion in revenue for its second quarter.
Despite this setback, Huang expressed optimism about Trump’s intentions to allow companies to export chips with limited capabilities to China.
“The president has a plan and a vision. I trust him,” he noted.
However, Huang cautioned that losing access to China’s potential $50 billion AI market could jeopardize U.S. leadership in the global AI infrastructure race. “China is one of the largest AI markets, serving as a launchpad for global success,” he stated during the revenue call.
“China’s AI will progress with or without U.S. chips,” he remarked. “The issue isn’t whether China has AI—it’s already happening; the real question is if one of the world’s largest AI markets will rely on American chips.”
The company revealed that the recent SEC claims could cost them $5.5 billion. They noted only $4.6 billion in claims in the first quarter tied to H20 excess inventory and purchase obligations. Some materials may also be reused, affecting forecasts.
In an interview with Ben Thompson, Huang described the loss as “deeply painful.” Reports suggest a revenue loss of $15 billion. In the first quarter alone, the company could not ship an additional $2.5 billion in H20 revenue.
“We have never written off so much inventory in history,” Huang remarked. “We’re not just losing $5.5 billion; we’ve also missed out on $15 billion in sales… and potentially… $3 billion in taxes.”
The tightened export regulations pose challenges: a committee within the U.S. Congress indicated that Nvidia is seeking feedback on China’s groundbreaking AI model, especially regarding Deepseek, an AI firm that mirrors products from U.S. AI companies without the same computational power.
The committee’s report alleges that Deepseek “secretly leaked American user data to the Chinese Communist Party, manipulated information to align with CCP propaganda, and trained on materials unlawfully acquired from the company.”
Despite the tightening export restrictions, analysts believe Nvidia has shown remarkable resilience this quarter.
“Amid industry integration and rising competition, geopolitical tensions have created a tougher business landscape. Nevertheless, the company has effectively focused on its operational core,” Investing.com commented.
“We’ve effectively managed supply and demand dynamics within data centers. Thus, the $4.5 billion impact from H20 during the quarter underscores NVIDIA’s ability to adapt to market changes,” they added.
Analysts also speculate that U.S.-China negotiations “might yield positive outcomes for Nvidia,” according to Wedbush analyst Dan Ives.
“Nvidia is the sole chipmaker propelling the AI revolution. This narrative is underscored by their results and Jensen’s optimistic remarks,” Ives stated. “This indicates a significant lead in the broader tech landscape, suggesting the AI revolution is poised for further growth, despite the tariff challenges posed by Trump.”
Though Nvidia’s Chinese operations remain uncertain, analysts note a surge in demand for Nvidia chips in Saudi Arabia and the UAE. The company has benefited from AI opportunities arising from Trump’s visit, which secured $600 million for U.S. businesses.
Nvidia announced plans to sell hundreds of thousands of AI chips to Saudi Arabia, including to a startup supported by the nation’s sovereign wealth fund, employing 18,000 individuals with the latest technology.
At the Springwood Library in the Blue Mountains, librarians arrive holding cat carriers in each hand.
Around 30children form semicircles. From each carrier, a pair of bright, sci-fi-like eyes peer into the eager crowd.
“That’s the most fascinating thing ever,” exclaims one child.
Preschoolers have just finished enjoying Deborah Frenkel and Danny Snell’s *Track Cat* for the annual national simultaneous storytime.
Metacut, the two friendly robot pets, are special guests on their inaugural library tour throughout Blue Mountain, New South Wales.
The Blue Mountains City Council states that lifelike cat replicas can offer comfort and alleviate stress, particularly for children and individuals dealing with anxiety and dementia.
Metacut features an artificial heartbeat and non-allergenic fur. Photo: Blake Sharp-Wiggins/The Guardian
Metacuts are capable of meowing and purring. They boast animated LED eyes, soft, hypoallergenic fur, and silicone legs. Yes, the artificial heartbeat resonates within.
With integrated sensors in their head, chin, and back, the cats respond to human interaction, exhibiting realistic movements upon specific voice commands.
When someone says, “I love you, Metacut,” their eyes light up with a glowing heart symbol.
Ewan, captivated by the black cat, bursts into laughter every time it turns its head towards him.
“He’s hooked,” chuckles Ewan’s mother, Amy Cameron, suggesting it’s because it resembles their family cat, Diego.
Meanwhile, 10-year-old Stella becomes enamored with the white cat’s fur, asserting that it evokes “real feelings.” Her six-year-old brother, Charlie, reminisces about Snuffle Pass, their late orange cat.
Stephanie Lambilis and her children Stella (10) and Charlie (6) play with a Metacut at Springwood Library. Photo: Blake Sharp-Wiggins/The Guardian
Dr. Rosemary Dillon, CEO of Blue Mountains City Council, mentions that the council decided to acquire Metacut for the community after discovering them at the 2024 NSW Public Library Association Conference.
Dillon noted that library visitors started interacting with the Metacut, often seeking it out over the human staff.
Metacut has become unexpectedly popular amongst older patrons, Dillon adds. “A significant number of seniors frequent the library for companionship,” she states. “This offers an additional layer of engagement for them.”
Loneliness is a pressing national public health issue, with recent surveys indicating that one in four Australians feels isolated.
Associate Professor Alyssa Milton, a children’s mental health specialist at the University of Sydney, asserts that Metacuts may offer a comforting and reliable connection.
“Robotic pets, or real ones, can help children feel secure and acknowledged,” she explains. “Research indicates that robotic animals show promise in assisting children with various neurological developmental challenges.”
Storytime leader Elissa demonstrates one of the robot cats for the children at Springwood Library. Photo: Blake Sharp-Wiggins/The Guardian
Milton emphasizes that libraries and community spaces play a crucial role in diminishing feelings of social isolation, and Metacut provides an alternative for families who face limitations in owning real pets due to housing circumstances or allergies.
Feedback from Springwood indicates that Metacut has become a favorite.
The children eagerly line up to interact with the animatronic pets.
Stephanie Lambilis, the mother of Stella and Charlie, mentions that the family made a special trip to Springwood just to see the cat. “It’s gentle and sweet,” she comments.
Suggestions for cat names are welcome through the “CAT-FLAP” nomination box at the library until June 7th. Naturally, Stella has submitted her choice, Snuffle Pass.
Professor Adam Guastella, a child neurodevelopment expert at the University of Sydney, mentions that robotic animals can enhance learning and social interaction.
“Early findings indicate that…robotic dogs can foster improved social communication in children with autism,” notes Guastella.
Elissa takes the cat from her carrier as children line up to meet the furry animatron. Photo: Blake Sharp-Wiggins/The Guardian
Dr. Nathan Caruana, a cognitive psychology lecturer at Flinders University, concurs that the concept holds promise.
“Children crave attention, and it seems they find motivation with something that doesn’t pass judgment,” he explains.
However, Caruana emphasizes that his research is ongoing, and conclusive evidence supporting the use of robots as mental health tools is still developing.
After completing this tour, the robotic duo will return to what the council describes as their “previous” residences: Springwood and Katoumba Library, while also visiting other libraries for special events.
Employees at Microsoft disrupted a keynote speech by the CEO during a pro-Palestinian protest at the company’s annual developer conference on Monday.
Microsoft firmware engineer Joe Lopez, involved in the development of the Azure cloud computing platform, was confronted by security shortly after he challenged Satya Nadella.
“Satya, are you aware that Microsoft is contributing to the deaths of Palestinians?” Lopez exclaimed. “Why not highlight how Israeli war crimes are facilitated by the cloud?”
Pro-Palestinian protesters disrupt Microsoft Keynote speech – video
Following the incident, Lopez sent out a company-wide email detailing his reasons for protesting.
“As a major global corporation, Microsoft holds significant power to effect positive change. We must either end this ongoing tragedy or cease our technical support for Israel,” the email stated. This statement is also available on Medium. “Should our leadership continue to dismiss this demand, it won’t go unnoticed. The world is waking up to our complicity and is voicing its opposition. Boycotts will escalate, and our reputation will suffer immensely.”
Organizers from a worker-led group named No Azure for Apartheid (NOAA) coordinated protests that coincided with the developer conference. This group has been actively protesting Microsoft’s cloud computing agreements with the Israeli military for over a year, asserting that Azure Cloud services have facilitated the surveillance of Palestinian citizens as well as Israeli military operations. An Ofek Unit manages a database of potential airstrike targets. Leaked documents reportedly reveal that Microsoft has “significant footprints across major military infrastructure” in Israel, according to +972 Magazine.
“The initiative began over a year ago. No Azure for Apartheid campaigns launched in response to the humanitarian crisis unfolding over the past seven months,” noted Anna Hattle, a Microsoft employee and NOAA organizer, in an email to the management on May 15th. Crimes from 77 years ago highlight the critical difference today, where Israeli forces are executing genocidal acts on a much larger scale, aided by Microsoft’s Cloud and AI technologies.”
Lopez’s protest is the second such incident within two months. On April 6, Microsoft employees Ibtihal Aboussad and Vaniya Agrawal interrupted an AI event, accusing the company’s AI head, Mustafa Suleyman, of war profiteering. Both employees were subsequently terminated. The current status of Lopez’s job is still unclear. Last year, Google experienced similar internal protests regarding its contracts with the Israeli military.
In response to concerns about Microsoft’s technology being utilized by the Israeli military, Microsoft stated that investigations found no evidence showing that their technology was used to endanger or target civilians. However, the activist group NOAA has disputed this conclusion. Microsoft has yet to issue a comment regarding Lopez’s protest.
“Leadership dismisses our assertion that Azure technology is being employed to target or harm civilians in Gaza. Those of us who are aware understand that this is a blatant falsehood,” Lopez emphasized in his email to staff. “We don’t need internal audits to recognize that key Azure clients are engaged in human rights violations. This reality becomes evident online each day.”
Lopez’s protest coincides with the remembrance of the Nakba, marking 77 years since the event.
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals has announced its plan to acquire genetic testing firm 23andMe Holding for $256 million through bankruptcy auctions, as revealed on Monday.
Regeneron stated that it adheres to 23andMe’s privacy policy and relevant laws concerning customer data usage, and is prepared to provide detailed explanations to court-appointed supervisors regarding this data. The deal is expected to finalize in the third quarter.
“The Regeneron Genetics Center has a solid track record of safeguarding genetic data for individuals globally while pursuing scientific discoveries that leverage this information for societal benefit.” “We assure our 23andMe customers that we will uphold strict standards of data privacy, security, and ethical oversight, enabling us to enhance human health.”
Lawmakers scrutinized the bankruptcy proceedings initiated in March, expressing concerns that genetic data from millions of clients could end up in the hands of unscrupulous buyers. One organization, the Global Biodata Trust, formally proposed acquiring 23andMe, advocating for consumer control over data, allowing individuals to either store their DNA information in a trust or share it with related public benefit companies.
Nevertheless, this bid also posed risks to customer privacy. The United States presently lacks comprehensive privacy regulations that enforceable guidelines around how Regeneron manages, utilizes, and shares genetic data acquired from 23andMe. This absence allows businesses to modify their privacy policies at will, often without prior notice to users. Without federal privacy laws, there is minimal recourse to hold organizations, including nonprofits, accountable.
Last month, 23andMe agreed to permit court-appointed supervisors to oversee client genetic information and security policies throughout the bankruptcy process.
Under the new agreement, Regeneron will acquire all of 23andMe’s assets, with the exception of Telehealth Service Lemonaid Health, which 23andMe intends to shut down. Following the completion of the transaction, 23andMe will continue as a direct or indirect subsidiary of Regeneron, the company stated.
The company has gathered genetic data from 15 million customers who ordered DNA test kits online and provided saliva samples. Weak demand for ancestor test kits has been exacerbated by the data breaches that occurred in 2023.
This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Strictly Necessary Cookies
Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.
