Self-Driving Cars Hit UK Roads: The Challenging Journey Ahead

Posted on October 18, 2025 by

The timeless inquiry from the backseat remains relevant as we approach a new age of driverless vehicles. “Are we close?” For those in the UK, the promise of fully autonomous cars has been long-awaited, and the answer is “yes, almost”—but not quite there yet.

A pivotal advancement in the journey toward autonomous driving is on the cusp of realization. Waymo, known for its successful robotaxi operations in San Francisco and several other U.S. cities, announced recently that it plans to introduce its vehicles to London.

Specifics are limited, yet the potential is intriguing. The groundbreaking California-based firm stated that its self-driving service “will be providing driverless vehicles on this side of the Atlantic in 2026… We’re excited to cater to Londoners and the millions visiting London next year.”

These visitors may want to grab a London Underground Oyster card just in case. This past summer, the UK government announced initiatives aimed at enticing major tech companies, aiming to hasten the rollout of self-driving vehicles, with robotaxis potentially entering regulated public trials as early as spring 2026. However, regulations are still being finalized, which may mean that safety drivers remain in the mix for a while longer.

The British company Wave, in collaboration with Uber, has unveiled plans to develop a more modest Level 4 fully autonomous vehicle and to commence public road tests in London.

While Americans are leisurely experiencing self-driving vehicles, the UK’s winding road to this technology has been met with commitments that vanish like pedestrians in the rain. Back in 2018, Addison Lee, in conjunction with researchers from the University of Oxford, promised robotaxis by 2021.

Waymo has indicated plans to bring its successful robotaxis from San Francisco and four other U.S. locations to London. Photo: ZUMA Press, Inc./Alamy

A year ago, Nissan nearly achieved having one of its Leaf models drive itself without incident near Becton, east London. The then-transport secretary, Chris Grayling, forecasted self-driving cars arriving within four years, with small pods autonomously navigating around the O2 in Greenwich. The offspring of a British innovation, the Union Jack-patterned Sinclair C5 Tardis, was showcased in a Milton Keynes car park back in 2015. Vince Cable, the business secretary at the time, confidently stated that 100 of these would soon ferry passengers across town for just £2 each.

Meanwhile, in regions like the U.S. and parts of China, self-driving taxi services are nearing routine functionality, rendering Waymo’s impending arrival more significant compared to earlier aspirations and predictions.

In San Francisco, Waymo’s home base, self-driving cars have integrated seamlessly into daily life, traversing the city’s challenging hilly streets at a deliberate pace.

Since its full implementation in June 2024, it has established its place alongside electric scooters and city buses within the urban landscape. Riding a Waymo has become a must-try attraction for visitors, akin to experiencing the city’s historic trolley cars.

Democratic Mayor Daniel Lurie has advocated for expansion to rejuvenate the downtown district, but the streets still host many people experiencing homelessness, creating a stark contrast as high-tech AI-driven vehicles pass by individuals living in extreme poverty.

The modified white Jaguar iPace resembles surveillance equipment, featuring rapidly rotating cameras on each side and roof akin to a police siren. Advertised similarly to Uber or Lyft rides via an app, the absence of a human driver and the steering wheel twirling under its digital command serve as a poignant reminder of the economic upheaval these vehicles may precipitate.

Uber, which debuted in San Francisco in 2010, disrupted traditional taxi practices and created precarious gig jobs for drivers. Now, they are facing another wave of technological change.

Since Uber’s launch in 2010, the job landscape for taxi drivers has significantly changed, leading to precarious working conditions. Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

In 2024, data referenced by The Economist indicated that the number of people employed by taxi firms in San Francisco increased by 7%, alongside a 14% rise in salaries. The newspaper noted that Lyft’s CEO David Risher predicted that self-driving taxis “will actually grow the market.”

Yet, those on the front lines may not share this optimism. An Uber driver from Venezuela expressed doubts when asked about Waymo while in San Francisco’s Mission District: “I think I have about a year left in this job.”

For passengers, riding a Waymo evokes a sense of entrusting their journey to artificial intelligence. Upon hailing the vehicle via the app, a warm welcome greets them, initially displaying their initials on the digital screen atop the car. Tapping the app unlocks the doors, while a friendly voice reminds riders to buckle their seatbelts. A broad selection of music is readily available, creating a truly intimate atmosphere behind the tinted rear windows.

Pressing the ‘Start Ride’ button on the touchscreen allows the car to smoothly merge into traffic. The gear shift, adorned with a message that reads “Keep your hands out of it,” spins like a ghostly fairground attraction.

Soon enough, riders cultivate a sense of comfort while remaining cautious enough to avert dangers. A scrolling map on the screen displays their route and updates the estimated time of arrival. The ‘Stop Now’ button will only engage once it’s safe to do so, but the option to change the original destination is appreciated.

Passengers in a Waymo find themselves surrendering to the capabilities of artificial intelligence during their ride. Photo: Tamamario/Getty Images

Waymo has sparked diverse social reactions. Recently, three individuals stalled at a busy intersection in the Marina District, visibly disoriented with blinking lights, attracting cheers from onlookers, while one man executed multiple backflips off a nearby vehicle.

In July, a prankster gathered a crowd at a dead-end street, leading everyone to summon a Waymo simultaneously, creating a spectacle featuring 50 robocars. Earlier in 2024, one such vehicle was vandalized, covered in graffiti, and set ablaze during the Lunar New Year celebrations in Chinatown.

If the black taxi driver does not react directly, it’s possible a similar reception will greet the driverless taxis. Steve McNamara, executive director of the Licensed Taxi Drivers Association, remarked: “We observe kids hacking Lime bikes, but how long until surfing atop a Waymo becomes the latest TikTok sensation?”

McNamara maintains a calm demeanor: “This proposes a solution to a problem we don’t currently have. These vehicles may be performing excellently in San Francisco and Los Angeles, but London is unlike anywhere else. I’d like someone to elucidate how this self-driving car intends to navigate streets like Charing Cross Road at 11 p.m., where pedestrians are continually crossing.” [sensor] “When you’re on top of a Waymo, you know it will stop, so you just get out or disembark.”

Christian Wolmer, author of *Driverless Cars: On a Road to Nowhere*, echoes this skepticism, stating: “There are no pedestrian crossing rules in this environment. If Google expects adherence to pedestrian crossing norms for cars…”

Despite the experiences in the U.S., he staunchly doubts that fully autonomous taxis will hit the streets here next year, asserting: “Unless a human operator is present, the likelihood of that happening is zero.”

‘London is like nowhere else’: Can driverless cars adapt to transportation systems outside the US by 2026? Photo: Paolo Paradiso/Alamy

Waymo revealed its London plans partly to mitigate any surprise over test vehicles on the roads, initiating a lengthier mapping initiative. They feel emboldened after a self-driving trial spanning approximately 100 meters in San Francisco, which is a far from orderly or flat city, in addition to over a dozen other trials.

Carriers have long argued that regulation trumps technological hurdles. Even swift progress has limitations. The consultation’s outcome, which wrapped up last month, should pave the way for the pilot program, though confirmation is still pending.

While this may have spurred Waymo’s plans, transforming the testing program to operational vehicles still involves numerous challenges with the Department for Transport and Transport for London, indicating that broader legislation may take at least another two years to enact. Insurers have particularly raised concerns regarding liability in these scenarios.

Previous pre-legislative testing frameworks stalling other innovative transport modalities, such as electric scooters, are currently set to persist for eight years. Tony Travers, a professor at the London School of Economics, posits that self-driving cars may be more favorably received: “They will have to abide by regulations. Sure, they might contribute to congestion, but they’re not likely to induce chaos like electric scooters have.”

However, even with the arrival of driverless taxis, one might wonder, “So what?” suggests Walmer.

According to Waymo co-CEO Tekedra Mawakana, the answer lies in the fact that their vehicles are “reliable, safe, and magical,” with an emphasis on safety. Up to now, Waymo cars have been involved in a fewer number of accidents compared to human-driven vehicles over equivalent distances.

They also aim to provide a new form of autonomy to those previously lacking it. The Royal Institute for Blind People praised the Waymo announcement as the inception of “technology that allows for safe, spontaneous, autonomous movement.”

Waymo stated that its entrance into the UK market would entail investments in warehouses, infrastructure for charging, cleaning services, support teams, and would temporarily employ “human experts” in the driver’s position.

Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander has mentioned that the upcoming self-driving car revolution could generate 38,000 job opportunities within the UK.

However, it is professional drivers who face the greatest threat. Approximately 300,000 individuals hold private hire licenses, with an additional million expected to be in roles related to HGV and delivery services moving forward. Many of the UK’s 82,000 bus drivers have recently secured significant pay rises, while its 27,000 train operators are well-regarded for their labor efforts.

Consequently, surveys indicate that public sentiment in Britain is cautiously optimistic regarding self-driving vehicles, primarily stemming from fears surrounding job displacement due to artificial intelligence, even if human jobs haven’t been entirely eradicated yet.

Licensing and legal clarifications are still pending. McNamara expressed hope: “Who will grant approval? If I aimed to become a successful politician, I wouldn’t add my signature to that document.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Are We Out of Work? Film and TV Industry Worries About On-Set Body Scans | AI

Posted on October 17, 2025 by

FIt’s common for actors on film and TV sets to be asked to enter a booth lined with cameras prepared to capture their likeness from multiple perspectives. However, the cast and crew are increasingly anxious about the implications of AI in the industry, complicating this process further.

“It occurs unexpectedly,” Olivia Williams notes. She recalls being scanned more times than she can count throughout her career, from *The Sixth Sense* to *Dune: Prophecy*.

“You’re on set, in costume, with a friendly assistant director who knows you well, bringing you tea or managing your phone while you act. Then VFX says, ‘You’re on set. The visual effects team is here today—can you please head to the VFX bus as soon as the scene wraps?’ And off we go.

“Actors often strive to please. Being approached for a scan mid-scene can be detrimental to your creativity and instill a fear of never working again or losing your agent. So you comply.”

Lead and supporting actors, stunt performers, and dancers have shared similar experiences with the Guardian, where they’ve been ushered through scanners on set, often unclear about their rights regarding the biometric data collected.

Williams mentioned that the cast was informed that a scan was needed “if they wanted to be part of the scene or to create visually interesting moments, like aliens coming out of their brains.”

Olivia Williams stated that scans “happened unexpectedly” and that actors complied out of “the fear of never working again.” Photo: David Bintiner/Observer

While anxiety regarding this issue has lingered, recent discussions about “AI doubles” and the rise of “AI actors” have sparked a pressing need to clarify the fate of data captured on set.

This concern was highlighted by reports of an AI character named “Tilly Norwood.” Although it may seem improbable that a production company will unveil the first AI star, it underscores the ongoing struggle to establish performers’ rights.

Worries about the future for emerging actors and the existential threats faced by performers, often referred to as support artists (SAs), prompted Williams to speak out.

Dave Watts, a seasoned SA with experience in numerous superhero films, has also encountered scanning several times and pointed out the wider implications for the industry.

“I can easily envision crew members saying, ‘We don’t need to cast anyone anymore. We can just have the AI create a crowd of 1,000 people based on our existing data,’” he remarked.

“If the usual 100, 200, or 500 SAs aren’t necessary for big productions, there’s no need for an assistant director to oversee them. We wouldn’t need hair and makeup artists, costumers, caterers, or drivers. AI threatens nearly every job out there.”

An AI-generated image of actor Tilly Norwood has raised significant concerns among cast members. Photo: Reuters

An anonymous dancer, fearing repercussions for voicing their opinion, echoed these sentiments regarding the pressure associated with scanning and data usage. “Filming is challenging. You’re awake at 3 a.m. and can’t leave until the day’s over at 8 p.m. Situations like this arise, leaving you with limited options.

“We all ponder whether we might as well quit our jobs, don’t we? It seems somewhat foolish when you frame it that way.”

Alex Lawrence Archer, a data rights attorney at AWO, which is navigating this issue with actors, stated that performers are hindered by a labyrinth of complex and overlapping regulations. He emphasized the necessity for clearer agreements regarding production, rather than scrambling to address data issues after they occur.

“Contracts are often vaguely written and standard industry language that is outdated,” he explained. “They weren’t made to address this technology. There exists a vacuum of ambiguity, wherein AI developers and studios can maneuver as they please.”

Skip past newsletter promotions

“Actors and their representatives need to focus on this upcoming training case. They must negotiate clearer contracts that accurately convey fair agreements between performers, studios, and AI developers.”

Signs of a rebellion are beginning to appear. On a recent shoot, the cast was informed in advance about the scan following concerns that were voiced.

One cast member, speaking anonymously, shared, “Performers are collectively resisting an environment that feels ambushing. We managed to add an addendum to our contract that essentially prevents the use of our digital scans for any purpose outside of the show without our written consent.”

Filming in Cardiff for *Mr. Burton*. In addition to actors, many jobs within the industry, including assistant directors, hair and make-up artists, costume designers, caterers, drivers, and location managers, are at risk due to AI, according to one supporting actor. Photo: Sara Lee/The Guardian

The struggle for rights may appear daunting in the face of the data-hungry AI industry, which can gather information from countless sources without involving professional performers. However, there’s a shared understanding of the need to regain some control.

Theo Morton, a professional stunt performer and member of the British Stunt Register, stated, “This technology could either reduce the need for human performers drastically or enhance creativity in a positive manner. But the uncertainty looms large, highlighting the necessity for contractual safeguards to prevent a loss of control.”

Yet, Williams expresses a deep concern about the potential loss of control.

A key unknown is the origin of data-trained AI models. Lawrence Archer highlighted that this remains a closely guarded secret that must be revealed. He also warned against reducing the discourse to merely compensation issues for performers.

“The AI industry depends on vast amounts of data,” he explained. “Someone is gathering it. We recognize these are sensitive topics for AI developers and studios. We are assisting performers in making data access requests to learn more. I know several performers who have been compensated by AI companies to withdraw such requests.”

“We must foster an environment where human creativity, actor connectivity, and performance are valued. If we focus solely on legal and compensation matters, we risk relegating actors to the status of data gig workers instead of recognizing them as creative artists.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Overconsumption and Destruction: Visualizing Technology’s Impact on Our Planet Through Before and After Images

Posted on October 17, 2025 by

In a project that emphasizes the environmental consequences of technological consumption, artists have created pieces that illustrate the effects of the climate crisis on some of the world’s most renowned landscapes.

Locations such as Venice in Italy, the Giant’s Causeway in Northern Ireland, Iguazu Falls at the border of Argentina and Brazil, and the River Seine in Paris serve as study points for potential impacts from the climate crisis anticipated by the end of the century. An exhibition in London will showcase the findings.

Giant’s Causeway Present and Visualization

Current status and visualization of the Giant’s Causeway. Written by Alex Griffiths

Mark Maslin, a professor of earth system science at University College London, employed climate modeling to evaluate the minimum and maximum damage at each site. A group of artists interpreted his findings for a display at Back Market’s Last Shot Gallery. The aim of the artwork is not to forecast exact conditions in these locations, but to elevate consciousness regarding the threats posed by climate change.

Maslin addressed the environmental repercussions of technological consumption. Estimations suggest that human actions account for 6% of the climate crisis, which is double that of the airline sector.

“There is an unawareness regarding how much the devices people constantly use and replace are contributing to overconsumption, vast pollution, and climate change,” he states. “We aim to raise that awareness. Many who utilize their phones daily are oblivious to the impact on the planet.”

Current status and visualization of Moraine Lake in Canada

Current status and visualization of Moraine Lake in Canada. Written by Hugh Jardine

The environmental damage from rapid technological advancement stems from the extraction of materials such as tantalum, cobalt, and tin—a process notoriously damaging socially and environmentally—and the disposal of e-waste, which emits harmful greenhouse gases like methane and carbon dioxide when burned or pollutes soil and water with toxins when irresponsibly discarded in landfills.

He mentioned that the EU is implementing legislation aimed at curbing built-in obsolescence, which includes regulations on universal chargers to reduce the chaos of myriad wires and plugs piling up in homes.

Tech companies are resisting accusations from Bullock and other lawmakers of disrupting the free market. In June 2024, the EU passed a directive that requires a broader selection of product repairs, extends legal guarantees, and forbids manufacturers from obstructing third-party components.

Current status and visualization of Iguazu Falls

Iguazu Falls, present day and visualization by Osman G.

In the UK, regulations have been active since 2021 concerning certain household appliances. However, there are ongoing concerns about their overall effectiveness.

“Our studies indicate that while individuals are aware of the shifts occurring around them, many still lack an understanding of how their daily choices, particularly regarding technology, relate to the broader context,” stated Luke Forshaw, head of brand and marketing at Back Market, a global marketplace focusing on regenerative technology, which collaborated with Maslin to organize the exhibition.

Venice – now and visualized

Venice – present and visualization. Written by Archie McGrath and Josiah Naggar

A record was set in 2022 with 62 million tons of e-waste produced, marking it as one of the world’s fastest-growing waste streams. Forshaw points out that it’s crucial now more than ever to reevaluate our relationship with technology, opting for sustainability over contributing to landfills. “Making sustainable choices more affordable, accessible, and transparent is essential to bridging that gap,” he remarked.

5 Ways to Reduce Your Carbon Footprint

Your phone contains valuable materials that can be reused. Photo: Maxim Emelyanov/Alamy

Choose the technology that suits you and stick with it.
Remember that mobile phones hold valuable materials that should be reused, not discarded.
Sell your old device either to a reputable reuse shop or privately.
Maintain your phone’s battery between 20% and 80% for optimal longevity.
Keep your device clean, removing dust from charging ports.

The exhibition is at the Last Shot Gallery on October 17th in Fitzrovia, central London.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Keeper Review – A Dazzling Eco-Fantasy Born from Imagination

Posted on October 17, 2025 by

TThe world of the Keeper flows from the screen like a vivid dream painted with psilocybin hues. It’s an intricate land filled with bubblegum blues, soft pinks, and bizarre glowing creatures, where evolution seems to happen in an instant. The stunning visuals evoke the charm of a 1980s fantasy film, complete with lovingly crafted practical effects. Keeper is the newest creation from Double Fine, known for their quirky platformer Psychonauts 2, the Kickstarter sensation Broken Age, and various other unique titles. This action-adventure game highlights the beauty of life’s imperfections, resembling a scene sculpted from papier-mâché instead of polished digital designs.

The main character is even more peculiar—the player embodies a lighthouse, illuminating this enchanting ecological landscape. Long shadows trail behind glowing objects, revealing the outlines of colossal plants and tiny creatures. Light projection serves as your means of interaction with the environment, often causing flora to sprout right before your eyes while some rare inhabitants stay nourished by it. As you explore serene lagoons or sunlit canyons dotted with cacti, you’ll find delight in simply observing, embracing the oddity, and nurturing it into even more extraordinary life.

Solve the mystery…Keeper. Photo: Xbox Game Studios

Your role as a life-giving lighthouse develops when you find a companion—a bird named Twig with a driftwood beak. You assume dual responsibilities, having your feathered friend assist in various tasks (on this distant future Earth, the organic blends with the mechanical, reminiscent of a steampunk Henry David Thoreau). However, these puzzles fall short of matching the visual creativity and don’t resonate with the game’s biological themes; early on, you merely rotate the analog stick to align gears.

Often, puzzles feel like barriers to exploration rather than facilitators. Yet, gradually, Keeper embraces the surreal elements of its world to unveil surprises. At one point, a cotton candy-like substance envelops the lighthouse, rendering it weightless. Instead of stumbling awkwardly, it gracefully leaps, gliding through the air.

Soon, the Keeper taps into an evolutionary rhythm as the lighthouse transforms into a fish-inspired boat. The thrill of swaying and swirling in azure waters is delightful! However, the gameplay takes a darker, more abstract twist, as players become disks of red-hot metal, slicing through tangled underbrush like a primitive Sonic the Hedgehog.

Surreal setting…keeper. Photo: Xbox Game Studios

Marketed as “a story told without words,” Keeper communicates most vividly through its expansive visuals. However, this claim is misleading. Throughout the game, button prompts intermittently appear, instructing players on actions like pressing X to “peck.” This clarity detracts from the world’s intended ambiguity.

A similar issue arises towards the game’s conclusion, albeit from a different perspective. Without revealing too much, players confront the profound and unfathomable essence of existence. How can we engage with such transcendental depth? Unfortunately, some puzzles rely on memorization of shapes, including a kaleidoscopic crystal and a black hole. In essence, Keeper struggles with a limited interactive vocabulary to fully harness the extraordinary imagery crafted with such vivid imagination.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Concerns Rise Over OpenAI Sora’s Death: Legal Experts React to AI Missteps

Posted on October 17, 2025 by

LThat evening, I was scrolling through dating apps when a profile caught my eye: “Henry VIII, 34 years old, King of England, non-monogamous.” Before I knew it, I found myself in a candlelit bar sharing a martini with the most notorious dater of the 16th century.

But the night wasn’t finished yet. Next, we took turns DJing alongside Princess Diana. “The crowd is primed for the drop!” she shouted over the music as she placed her headphones on. As I chilled in the cold waiting for Black Friday deals, Karl Marx philosophized about why 60% off is so irresistible.

In Sora 2, if you can imagine it—even if you think you shouldn’t—you can likely see it. Launched in October as an invite-only app in the US and Canada, OpenAI’s video app hit 1 million downloads within just five days, surpassing the initial success of ChatGPT.

AI-generated deepfake video features portraits of Henry VIII and Kobe Bryant

While Sora isn’t the only AI tool producing videos from text, its popularity stems from two major factors. First, it simplifies the process for users to star in their own deepfake videos. After entering a prompt, a 10-second clip is generated in minutes, which can be shared on Sora’s TikTok-style platform or exported elsewhere. Unlike low-quality, mass-produced “AI slop” that clouds the internet, these videos exhibit unexpectedly high production quality.

The second reason for Sora’s popularity is its ability to generate portraits of celebrities, athletes, and politicians—provided they are deceased. Living individuals must give consent for their likenesses to be used, but “historical figures” seem to be defined as famous people who are no longer alive.

This is how most users have utilized the app since its launch. The main feed appears to be a bizarre mix of absurdity featuring historical figures. From Adolf Hitler in a shampoo commercial to Queen Elizabeth II stumbling off a pub table while cursing, the content is surreal. Abraham Lincoln beams at the TV exclaiming, “You’re not my father.” The Reverend Martin Luther King Jr. expresses his dream of having all drinks be complimentary before abruptly grabbing a cold drink and cursing.

However, not everyone is amused.

“It’s profoundly disrespectful to see my father’s image—who devoted his life to truth—used in such an insensitive manner,” Malcolm told the Washington Post. She was just two when her dad was assassinated. Now, Sora’s clips show the civil rights leader engaged in crude humor.

Zelda Williams, the daughter of actor Robin Williams, urged people to “stop” sending AI videos of her father through an Instagram post. “It’s silly and a waste of energy. Trust me, that’s not what he would have wanted,” she noted. Before his passing in 2014, he took legal steps to prevent his likeness from being used in advertising or digitally inserted into films until 2039. “Seeing my father’s legacy turned into something grotesque by TikTok artists is infuriating,” she added.

The video featuring the likeness of the late comedian George Carlin has been described by his daughter Kelly Carlin as “overwhelming and depressing” in a Blue Sky post.

Recent fatalities are also being represented. The app is filled with clips depicting Stephen Hawking enduring a “#powerslap” that knocks his wheelchair over, Kobe Bryant dunking over an elderly woman while yelling about something stuck inside him, and Amy Winehouse wandering the streets of Manhattan with mascara streaming down her face.

Those who have passed in the last two years (Ozzy Osbourne, Matthew Perry, Liam Payne) seem to be missing, indicating they may fall into a different category.

Each time these “puppetmasters” revive the dead, they risk reshaping the narrative of history, according to AI expert Henry Ajdar. “People are worried that a world filled with this type of content could distort how these individuals are remembered,” he explains.

Sora’s algorithm favors content that shocks. One of the trending videos features Dr. King making monkey noises during his iconic “I Have a Dream” speech. Another depicts Kobe Bryant reenacting the tragic helicopter crash that claimed both his and his daughter’s lives.

While actors and comedians sometimes portray characters after death, legal protections are stricter. Film studios bear the responsibility for their content. OpenAI does not assume the same liability for what appears on Sora. In certain states, consent from the estate administrator is required to feature an individual for commercial usage.

“We couldn’t resurrect Christopher Lee for a horror movie, so why can OpenAI resurrect him for countless short films?” questions James Grimmelman, an internet law expert at Cornell University and Cornell Tech.

OpenAI’s decision to place deceased personas into the public sphere raises distressing questions about the rights of the departed in the era of generative AI.

Legal Issues

It may feel unsettling to have the likeness of a prominent figure persistently haunting Sora, but is it legal? Perspectives vary.

Major legal questions regarding the internet remain unanswered. Are AI firms protected under Section 230 and thus not liable for third-party content on their platforms? If OpenAI qualifies for Section 230 immunity, users cannot sue the company for content they create on Sora.

“However, without federal legislation on this front, uncertainties will linger until the Supreme Court takes up the issue, which might stretch over the next two to four years,” notes Ashken Kazarian, a specialist in First Amendment and technology policy.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman speaks at Snowflake Summit 2025 on June 2 in San Francisco, California. He is one of the living individuals who permitted Sora to utilize his likeness. Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

In the interim, OpenAI must circumvent legal challenges by obtaining consent from living individuals. US defamation laws protect living people from defamatory statements that could damage their reputation. Many states have right-of-publicity laws that prevent using someone’s voice, persona, or likeness for “commercial” or “misleading” reasons without their approval.

Allowing the deceased to be represented this way is a way for the company to “test the waters,” Kazarian suggests.

Though the deceased lack defamation protections, posthumous publicity rights exist in states like New York, California, and Tennessee. Navigating these laws in the context of AI remains a “gray area,” as there is no established case law, according to Grimmelman.

For a legal claim to succeed, estates will need to prove OpenAI’s responsibility, potentially by arguing that the platform encourages the creation of content involving deceased individuals.

Grimmelmann points out that Sora’s homepage features videos that actively promote this style of content. If the app utilizes large datasets of historical material, plaintiffs could argue it predisposes users to recreate such figures.

Conversely, OpenAI might argue that Sora is primarily for entertainment. Each video is marked with a watermark to prevent it from being misleading or classified as commercial content.

Generative AI researcher Bo Bergstedt emphasizes that most users are merely experimenting, not looking to profit.

“People engage with it as a form of entertainment, finding ridiculous content to collect likes,” he states. Even if this may distress families, it might abide by advertising regulations.

However, if a Sora user creates well-received clips featuring historical figures, builds a following, and begins monetizing, they could face legal repercussions. Alexios Mantsalis, director of Cornell Tech’s Security, Trust, and Safety Initiative, warns that the “financial implications of AI” may include indirect profit from these platforms. Sola’s rising “AI influencers” could encounter lawsuits from estates if they gain financially from the deceased.

“Whack-a-Mole” Approach

In response to the growing criticism, OpenAI recently announced that representatives of “recently deceased” celebrities can request their likenesses be removed from Sora’s videos.

“While there’s a significant interest in free expression depicting historical figures, we believe public figures and their families should control how their likenesses are represented,” a spokesperson for OpenAI stated.

The parameters for “recent” have yet to be clarified, and OpenAI hasn’t provided details on how these requests will be managed. The Guardian received no immediate comment from the company.

The copyright-free-for-all strategy faced challenges after controversial content, such as “Nazi SpongeBob SquarePants,” circulated online and the Motion Picture Association of America accused OpenAI of copyright infringement. A week post-launch, the company transitioned to an opt-in model for rights holders.

Grimmelmann hopes for a similar adaptation in how depictions of the deceased are handled. “Expecting individuals to opt out may not be feasible; it’s a harsh expectation. If I think that way, so will others, including judges,” he remarks.

Bergstedt likens this to a “whack-a-mole” methodology for safeguards, likely to persist until federal courts establish AI liability standards.

According to Ajdel, the Sola debate hints at a broader question we will all confront: Who will control our likenesses in this age of composition?

“It’s a troubling scenario if people accept they can be used and exploited in AI-generated hyper-realistic content.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

OpenAI Diverges from Technology Council of Australia Amidst Controversial Copyright Debate

Posted on October 17, 2025 by

Open AI has severed its relationship with the Technology Council of Australia due to copyright limitations, asserting that its AI models “will be utilized in Australia regardless.”

Chris Lehane, the chief international affairs officer of the company behind ChatGPT, delivered a keynote address at SXSW Sydney on Friday. He discussed the geopolitics surrounding AI, the technological future in Australia, and the ongoing global discourse about employing copyrighted materials for training extensive language models.

Scott Farquhar, CEO of the Tech Council and co-founder of Atlassian, previously remarked that Australia’s copyright laws are “extremely detrimental to companies investing in Australia.”

_{Sign up: AU breaking news email}

In August, it was disclosed that the Productivity Commission was evaluating whether tech companies should receive exemptions from copyright regulations that hinder the mining of text and data for training AI models.

However, when asked about the risk of Australia losing investment in AI development and data centers if it doesn’t relax its fair use copyright laws, Mr. Lehane responded to the audience:

“No…we’re going to Australia regardless.”

Lehane stated that countries typically adopt one of two stances regarding copyright restrictions and AI. One stance aligns with a US-style fair use copyright model, promoting the development of “frontier” (advanced, large-scale) AI; the other maintains traditional copyright positions and restricts the scope of AI.

“We plan to collaborate with both types of countries. We aim to partner with those wanting to develop substantial frontier models and robust ecosystems or those with a more limited AI range,” he expressed. “We are committed to working with them in any context.”

When questioned about Sora 2 (Open AI’s latest video generation model) being launched and monetized before addressing copyright usage, he stated that the technology benefits “everyone.”

“This is the essence of technological evolution: innovations emerge, and society adapts,” he commented. “We are a nonprofit organization, dedicated to creating AI that serves everyone, much like how people accessed libraries for knowledge generations ago.”

AI opened on Friday stopped the ability to produce a video featuring the likeness of Martin Luther King Jr. after his family’s complaints about the technology.

Lehane also mentioned that the competition between China and the United States in shaping the future of global AI is “very real” and that their values are fundamentally different.

Skip past newsletter promotions

“We don’t see this as a battle, but rather a competition, with significant stakes involved,” he stated, adding that the U.S.-led frontier model “will be founded on democratic values,” while China’s frontier model is likely to be rooted in authoritarian principles.

“Ultimately, one of the two will emerge as the player that supports the global community,” he added.

When asked if he had confidence in the U.S. maintaining its democratic status, he responded: “As mentioned by others, democracy can be a convoluted process, but the United States has historically shown the ability to navigate this effectively.”

He also stated that the U.S. and its allies, including Australia, need to generate gigawatts of energy weekly to establish the infrastructure necessary for sustaining a “democratic lead” in AI, while Australia has the opportunity to create its own frontier AI.

He emphasized that “Australia holds a very unique position” with a vast AI user base, around 30,000 developers, abundant talent, a quickly expanding renewable energy sector, fiber optic connectivity with Asia, and its status as a Five Eyes nation.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Spotify Collaborates with Global Music Firm to Create ‘Responsible’ AI Solutions | Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Posted on October 16, 2025 by

Spotify has revealed a collaboration with the globe’s largest music enterprise to create “responsible” artificial intelligence tools that honor artists’ copyrights.

The leading music streaming service is teaming up with major labels Sony, Universal, and Warner to develop innovative AI solutions, featuring renowned artists like Beyoncé, Ed Sheeran, and Taylor Swift.

While Spotify has yet to disclose specifics about the new product, the company assures that artists will not be compelled to participate and that copyright protections will be upheld.

In a blog post announcing the partnership, Spotify pointedly referenced the radical views on copyright present in some segments of the tech industry. Ongoing tensions have already prompted three major labels to initiate lawsuits against AI companies that offer tools for generating music from user input.

“Some in the tech sector advocate for the elimination of copyright,” Spotify stated. “We do not. Artist rights are important. Copyrights are vital. Without leadership from the music industry, AI-driven innovations will occur elsewhere, lacking rights, consent, and fair compensation.”

Copyright, a legal protection preventing unauthorized use of one’s work, has become a contentious issue between creative sectors and technology firms. The tech industry often utilizes publicly accessible copyrighted material to build AI tools, such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Anthropic’s Claude.

Three key music companies are suing two AI music startups, Udio and Suno, for alleged copyright violations, alongside similar legal actions in other creative domains. Both Udio and Suno maintain that their technology aims to generate original music rather than replicate the works of specific artists.

Universal Music Group’s head, Sir Lucian Grainge, indicated in a memo to staff that the label will seek approval from artists before licensing their voices or songs to AI firms.

One notorious music deepfake emerged in 2023: “Heart on My Sleeve,” featuring AI-generated vocals by Drake and The Weeknd, was removed from streaming platforms after Universal criticized it as infringing on rights related to AI-generated content.

Skip past newsletter promotions

With 276 million paid subscribers, Spotify also announced the establishment of an advanced generative AI research laboratory to create “innovative experiences” for fans and artists. The company from Stockholm stated that these products will open new revenue avenues for artists and songwriters, ensuring they receive fair compensation for their work while also providing clarity regarding their contributions.

In conjunction with its AI initiative, Spotify is also collaborating with Merlin, a digital rights organization for independent labels, and Believe, a French digital music label. Currently, Spotify employs AI to curate playlists and create customized DJs.

Leaders from the three prominent companies welcomed the agreement, with Sony Music Group Chairman Rob Stringer noting that this would necessitate direct licensing of artists’ work prior to introducing new products. Universal’s Grainge expressed his desire for a “thriving commercial ecosystem” in which both the music and tech industries can prosper. Warner Music Group’s Robert Kinkle voiced support for Spotify’s “considerate AI regulations.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Italian News Publisher Urges Investigation into Google’s AI Overview | Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Posted on October 16, 2025 by

An Italian news publisher is urging an investigation into Google’s AI profile, asserting that the search engine’s AI-generated summary feature is a “traffic killer” that jeopardizes its survival. FIEG, the federation representing Italian newspapers, has formally lodged a complaint with Agcom, Italy’s communications watchdog.

Similar grievances have emerged in other EU countries. Coordinated by the European Newspaper Association, the initiative aims to prompt the European Commission to investigate Google under the EU Digital Services Act. One of the primary concerns for European news organizations is the threat posed by AI summaries, which condense search results into text blocks at the top of results pages, offering information without requiring users to click through to the original source.

FIEG expressed particular anxiety regarding newer AI models that gather information from various sources and present it as a chatbot. The federation argues that Google’s services “violate fundamental provisions of the Digital Services Act and negatively impact Italian users, consumers, and businesses.”

“Google is becoming a traffic killer,” FIEG stated, highlighting that these products not only compete directly with content from publishers but also “reduce visibility, discoverability, and ultimately advertising revenue.”

“This, along with the risks associated with a lack of transparency and the spread of disinformation in democratic discussions, poses serious challenges to the financial sustainability and diversity of the media,” the statement continued.

A study released in July by the UK-based analytics firm Authoritas indicated that Google’s AI Overviews, introduced last year, decreased click-through rates by as much as 80%. This study was submitted as part of a legal complaint to the UK competition regulator about the impact of Google AI Overview, which also revealed that links to YouTube—owned by Google’s parent company Alphabet—were more prominently displayed than in traditional search results.

A second study from the US think tank Pew Research Center showed a significant decline in referral traffic from Google AI Overview, with users only clicking on a link under AI Overview once in every 100 attempts. Google responded by claiming the study was based on inaccurate and flawed methodology.

Google AI Overview made its debut in Italy in March. In September, Italy became the first EU country to enact comprehensive legislation regulating artificial intelligence, including restrictions on access for children and potential prison sentences for harmful uses, such as generating deepfakes. Giorgia Meloni’s government asserted that the legislation aligns with the EU’s groundbreaking AI law and represents a decisive action that will shape the use of AI in Italy.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Barrister Discovers AI Assistance in Hearing Preparation After Referencing ‘Hypothetical’ Case

Posted on October 16, 2025 by

A judge discovered that an immigration barrister had utilized AI for his court proceedings by referencing “completely fabricated” or “entirely irrelevant” cases.

Chaudhry Rahman was reported to have employed tools like ChatGPT in preparing for legal inquiries, as presented in court. It was revealed that Rahman not only relied on AI for his preparations but also “failed to perform necessary accuracy checks” on his work.

Superior Court Judge Mark Blundell stated that Rahman attempted to obscure his use of AI, effectively “wasting” the court’s time. Blundell indicated he might report Rahman to the Bar Standards Board. The Guardian has reached out to Rahman’s firm for a response.

This situation emerged during the case involving two Honduran sisters seeking asylum due to threats from criminal groups in their homeland. Rahman represented the sisters, aged 29 and 35, and the matter progressed to Superior Court.

Mr. Blundell dismissed Mr. Rahman’s claims, asserting: “Nothing articulated by Mr. Rahman, either verbally or in writing, indicates any legal error by the judge, and the appeal should be rejected.”

In an exceptional statement, Blundell later noted there were “significant issues” with the appeal’s grounds as presented to him.

He remarked that Rahman’s documentation referenced 12 authorities, but upon reviewing the evidence, he discovered that “some of these authorities did not exist, while others did not substantiate the legal claims made in the evidence.”

In his ruling, he enumerated 10 such instances and clarified “what Mr. Rahman claimed regarding those incidents, whether real or hypothetical.”

Mr. Blundell remarked: “Mr. Rahman appeared to lack any knowledge of the authorities cited in the appeal, which were purportedly resolved in July of this year. It was evident he did not intend to accept my views on any of the judgments submitted.”

“Certain decisions were nonexistent. Not a single decision supported the legal proposition presented in the basis.”

Mr. Blundell pointed out that Mr. Rahman’s assertion of using “various websites” for his research was thus deceptive.

Blundell asserted: “The most plausible explanation…is that the appeal grounds were drafted, wholly or partly, by generative artificial intelligence like ChatGPT.”

“I am acutely aware that one of the cases mentioned in Mr. Rahman’s appeal was recently misapplied by ChatGPT to endorse a similar argument.”

Rahman explained to the judge that the discrepancies in his rationale were “a consequence of his drafting style” and admitted there might have been some “confusion and ambiguity” in his submission.

Mr. Blundell stated: “The issue I’ve outlined is not merely a matter of drafting style. The authorities referenced in the rationale either did not exist or failed to support that rationale.”

He added: “In my opinion, it is overwhelmingly probable that Mr. Rahman employed generative artificial intelligence to formulate his grounds of appeal in this case and endeavored to conceal that from me during the hearing.”

“Even if Mr. Rahman believed, for any reason, that these cases somehow bolstered the argument he intended to present, he cannot justify the entirely fictitious citations.”

“In my view, the only plausible scenario is that Mr. Rahman heavily relied on AI generation while preparing his evidence and sought to hide that fact during discussions with me at the hearing.”

The judge’s ruling was issued in September and made public on Tuesday.

Source: www.theguardian.com

ROG Xbox Ally X Review: A Unique Handheld Gaming Experience, for Better or Worse

Posted on October 16, 2025 by

TThe ROG Xbox Ally X, a handheld console resulting from a partnership between Asus and Microsoft, stands out as an impressive yet costly gaming device. The sleek all-black ROG Xbox Ally X, set to launch on October 16th, is the pricier of the two portable gaming options at £799 (€899/$999/AU$1599). (In comparison, the less powerful ROG Xbox Ally in white is priced at £499/€599/$599/AU$999.) Fortunately, the higher price tag brings with it enhanced features and performance.

Over the past few weeks, I’ve been enjoying the ROG Xbox Ally X while navigating through various indie hits and major RPGs throughout my home. Although its price is quite eye-catching (consider that its main rival, the Steam Deck OLED, starts at £479/€569/$549/AU$899), the power contained within its compact dimensions (291 x 122 x 51 mm) is truly unparalleled in the portable gaming sector.

This remarkable power, combined with the capability to stream Xbox titles via cloud gaming and the Play Anywhere initiative (interconnecting purchases between Xbox and PC), allows access to a diverse array of PC games from various storefronts, appealing to both Xbox enthusiasts and portable gaming fans. While I encountered a few minor glitches and user interface hiccups during my time with the ROG Xbox Ally X, most were easily rectifiable and quickly became forgotten as I immersed myself in gameplay.

Play at home or on the go…ROG Xbox Ally X. Photo: ROG

Setting up ROG Xbox Ally X

Configuring the ROG Xbox Ally X is a straightforward task. The device launches a full-screen Xbox experience that replicates both the Xbox console and PC app environments; however, as a handheld operating on Windows 11, it requires an initial update before usage, which took a bit of time. This might feel unusual for a gaming handheld, given the pop-up notifications and prompts typical of a standard Windows setup.

On the first day, despite promptly adding my Xbox account, the device indicated that I lacked Xbox Game Pass Ultimate, Microsoft’s highest-tier gaming subscription service, and my efforts to relink the account proved fruitless. Strangely, it randomly began functioning correctly the next day. I also faced issues connecting to my home Wi-Fi upon waking the device from sleep mode, yet this too rectified itself after the first 24 hours.

Once I successfully connected my various accounts (the ability to download PC game launchers like Steam, Epic Games Store, and Blizzard’s Battle.net is a benefit of being a Windows handheld), the ROG Xbox Ally X operated quite efficiently.

A handy feature allows direct access to the familiar Xbox user interface while aggregating games from other launchers for seamless transitions back to your gameplay, regardless of where it’s hosted.

However, should you be playing a Steam game, switching back to the Xbox-only launcher and starting a game from a different store requires taking note that ROG Xbox Ally X does not automatically close the previously opened game, nor does it ask if you wish to do so, which can affect performance. There were instances when the Xbox interface lagged or became unresponsive to my inputs.

At times, the handheld experienced difficulties downloading an RPG, repeatedly disconnecting whenever idle, necessitating a manual restart of the process. Nevertheless, subsequent to rebooting, the remaining files downloaded successfully.

Switching between applications…ROG Xbox Ally X. Photo: ROG

ROG Xbox Ally performance

I remain hopeful that these issues can be addressed with a simple user interface (UI) update. With a bit of attention, the ROG Xbox Ally X demonstrates exceptional performance. Although it shows some sluggishness when starting up with a low battery level (below 15%), titles like Hades II, Supergiant Games’ acclaimed roguelike sequel, load quickly and run flawlessly with negligible load times between areas. Heavier games like Avowed and traditional PC favorites such as Backyard Baseball maintain outstanding performance with impressive frame rates and rapid load times.

While the ROG Xbox Ally X lacks an OLED screen, the 7-inch, 1080p display more than compensates with stunning visuals. The vibrant details of Hades II’s nearly stationary characters are a visual delight. The first time Moon Goddess Selene appeared adorned in a luminous gown of blue and seafoam green, it was a breathtaking moment.

Xbox and Asus have strategically allocated some system resources for heightened frame rates, a decision that pays off in visually demanding games like Hades II. You’ll never be left so overwhelmed by the action that you lose track of the battle at hand.

The audio experience is equally immersive. In a particular sequence in Hades II, as I strolled past the goddess Artemis in a moonlit glade, I could hear her singing softly from the left speaker, signifying her presence even when out of view—such lovely details truly stand out.

Regarding its appearance, the ROG Xbox Ally X may initially seem peculiar, resembling two halves of an Xbox controller fused with a screen, yet the matte black finish is visually attractive, and the adjustable LED lights accentuating the joysticks add to the gaming aesthetic.

Powerful hardware…ROG Xbox Ally X. Photo: ROG

Game on the go or on the couch

Throughout my experience with the ROG Xbox Ally X, I’ve utilized it while lying in bed, relaxing on the couch, leaning against the kitchen counter waiting for pasta water to boil, and sitting at my desk during writing breaks. Initially, after just 10 minutes of use this summer, I questioned whether the relatively large handheld would be comfortable for extended sessions. Surprisingly, it remained comfortable to hold even after hours of gameplay. Although weighing in at 715g, it is heavier than the less powerful ROG Xbox Ally (670g) and Steam Deck OLED (640g), the difference in weight is minor, especially given how ergonomic the controller-like grips are. The only discomfort arose when I propped it against the couch without any elbow or wrist support, which caused some strain on my pinky finger due to bearing the weight.

The battery life is commendable considering the specifications (80Wh, surpassing the ROG Xbox Ally’s 60Wh). I was able to play Hades II for a solid two hours without hitches. After 20 minutes of gameplay at 22% battery, it only dropped to 10%. Although some components of the handheld warmed up during extended play, it never reached a point of overheating.

https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/VTaboYwSyuc?wmode=opaque&feature=oembed" title="Inside the ROG Xbox Ally: Game Access and Compatibility" height="480" width="854" allowfullscreen="

ROG Xbox Ally X game library

In terms of gaming, this device ingeniously utilizes the Xbox Play Anywhere initiative. This reflects Microsoft’s efforts to enable access to games across multiple devices, allowing gameplay on PC, Xbox consoles, and the ROG Xbox Ally handheld, all while retaining your progress, with access to over 1,000 available Xbox and Xbox Game Pass games.

Having formerly owned a Steam Deck and been a long-term Xbox Game Pass subscriber, the ROG Xbox Ally X represents the ideal handheld console for me. I favor the feel of an Xbox controller, and this device captures that essence perfectly. It allows me to access my Xbox Game Pass library to experiment with new titles, all while offering portability. Plus, for Play Anywhere titles, which a majority of the games are, there’s no need to stress over internet access.

If you have the budget and seek a robust gaming handheld capable of not only playing PC games from your favorite digital platform but also an extensive selection of Xbox games, the ROG Xbox Ally X could be an excellent investment for the year-end splurge.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Study Reveals Plug-In Hybrids Emit Nearly the Same Pollution as Gasoline Vehicles

Posted on October 16, 2025 by

Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) release nearly five times more greenhouse gas emissions than reported statistics suggest. I found a report detailing this issue.

These vehicles can operate on electric batteries as well as internal combustion engines and have been promoted by European manufacturers as a means to travel longer distances while lowering emissions—offering an alternative to fully electric cars.

Research indicates that PHEVs emit just 19% less CO₂. An analysis from the nonprofit organization Transport and Environment was released on Thursday, showing laboratory tests estimated 75% less pollution.

Researchers examined data from fuel consumption meters in 800,000 vehicles registered in Europe between 2021 and 2023, discovering that the real carbon dioxide emissions from PHEVs in 2023 were 4.9 times greater than those from standardized lab tests, an increase from 3.5 times in 2021.

“While official emissions are declining, actual emissions are on the rise,” remarked Sofia Navas Goelke, a researcher at the Institute for Transport and Environment and co-author of the report. “This widening gap is becoming a significant issue. Consequently, PHEVs are now polluting nearly as much as traditional petrol vehicles.”

The researchers identified that much of this disparity stems from an overestimation of the “utility factor” (the proportion of miles driven in electric mode compared to total miles), finding that only 27% of driving was done in electric mode, versus the official estimate of 84%. The analysis noted that the European Commission proposed two amendments to the utility coefficient ratio, which lessened the gap but didn’t eliminate it entirely.

Even when operating in electric mode, pollution levels were found to be significantly higher than official figures suggest. Researchers indicated this was due to the electric motor being insufficient for sole operation, with the engine burning fossil fuels for almost one-third of the distance traveled in electric mode.

Patrick Plotz, head of energy economics at the Fraunhofer Institute for System Innovation, who did not participate in the study, described it as a “very useful contribution” to ongoing discussions, as some in the automotive industry have claimed there’s insufficient data to accurately gauge real emissions.

“Without a doubt, the disparity between official and actual fuel consumption and CO₂ emissions for PHEVs is substantial,” Plotz remarked. “Their emissions are much higher than those of gasoline or diesel cars,” referring to the study on the topic. “Any policy adjustments regarding PHEVs should be thoughtfully considered in the context of this data.”

Hybrid vehicles have re-entered political discourse as automakers urge the EU to ease carbon emission targets. The push to ban new internal combustion engine vehicles by 2035 is facing strong lobbying from the auto sector, along with resistance from member states with significant automotive industries.

“There should be no significant reductions in 2035,” stated German Chancellor Friedrich Merz following a summit with Germany’s struggling automotive sector, committing to “do everything possible in 2035.” Other senior German leaders have cited plug-in hybrids as an example of “flexibility” that could be integrated into the legislation.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Researchers calculated that the undervaluation of PHEV emissions artificially facilitated compliance with the EU’s average vehicle CO2 regulations, enabling four major car manufacturers to evade over €5 billion (around £4.3 billion) in fines between 2021 and 2023. The study indicated that PHEV drivers are likely to incur approximately €500 more in annual running costs than expectations based on lab tests.

“The exaggerated claims made by manufacturers regarding their plug-in hybrid vehicles are clearly misleading,” observed Colin Walker, a transportation analyst at Energy and Climate Intelligence.

“Consumers are misled into thinking that by choosing a PHEV, they are aiding the environment and saving money,” he pointed out. “In reality, PHEVs are only marginally more efficient than regular petrol and diesel vehicles concerning fuel and CO₂ consumption, resulting in higher operation costs.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Space Live: The Unending Channel Streaming Stunning Earth Footage

Posted on October 15, 2025 by

I acknowledge that there are already countless shows available at this stage. Every channel and streaming service is brimming with content that craves your attention, leaving us with limited hours to watch. However, I would like to suggest a new program called Space Live, which currently features just one episode. The only drawback is that the episodes seem to last indefinitely.

In truth, it’s not a program at all but rather a channel. The footage debuted on Wednesday morning and is available on ITVX, solely comprising live visuals of Earth transmitted from the International Space Station. This presentation is captivating, particularly for those unaware that one can feel both awe and boredom simultaneously.

It is claimed to be the world’s first. ITV has collaborated with the British space media firm Sen to utilize live 4K footage from their distinctive SpaceTV-1 video camera system on the International Space Station, providing three camera angles: one focused on the docking ports, a horizon view revealing sunrises and storms, and a downward camera as the ISS traverses over Earth. A tracker on the screen indicates the ISS’s real-time position, accompanied by an AI-driven information feed offering insights about geography and weather.

The Space Live footage is significantly enhanced compared to NASA footage. Photo: ITV

To be exact, one could argue that it’s not groundbreaking at all. NASA’s YouTube channel has been streaming footage from the ISS for years, attracting thousands of viewers consistently. Nevertheless, Space Live is a bit more sophisticated. The visuals are undoubtedly superior. For instance, at 8:30 a.m. Wednesday, Space Live presented stunning images of sunlight reflecting off the waters surrounding the Bay of Biscay, while NASA could only offer a piece of cloth inscribed with the word “Flap.” There’s even a relaxing soundtrack that loops repeatedly but doesn’t become overly irritating. In essence, it’s an upgrade.

And it’s truly captivating, at least during the first orbit. While we can’t wholly demonstrate the phenomenon known as the “overview effect,” which suggests that viewing Earth from space grants a fresh perspective on humanity, it is undeniably humbling to realize our planet’s smallness. The duration of the ISS’s journey from southeastern England (where I’m located) to conflict-ridden Ukraine is measured in mere seconds. Next, it would traverse across Asia to Australia. There’s hardly anything that separates us.

Inevitably, as the station glides around the Earth, eternally caught between sunrise and sunset, your thoughts drift to the people you know in various places. There’s a comforting quality to that.

However, one cannot remain in awe forever. The same goes for Space Live. Eventually, the enchantment of technology, perspective, and Earth’s beauty begins to fade, turning the experience akin to staring at a map on a plane when you’ve exhausted your movie options. Your focus starts to wander, and you realize that there are other live channels available on ITVX. One features Love Island, while others simply showcase Christmas movies. Then, with a sigh, you come to terms with the fact that the wonder of our only home, quietly revolving in the cosmos, has become just another content option—regardless of what ITV channel broadcasts American Ninja Warrior Jr.

The visuals are both breathtaking and reassuring. Photo: ITV

Nonetheless, it’s comforting to know that Space Live exists, even if it might not always capture your attention. It may not be something you’d typically expect to see on a large screen in a pub, unless a lively crowd gets excited about glimpsing the Ural River. As a background watch, though, it’s undeniably soothing. I suspect that for the select few, this channel will serve as a quiet companion as they navigate their daily routines.

And while that may not have been humanity’s initial motivation for achieving the incredible feat of breaking free from Earth’s constraints—let’s not forget that Neil Armstrong didn’t formally declare, “That’s one small step for a man, one giant leap for the screensaver industry”—the concept of Space Live is still delightful. I may not tune in all the time, but it will undoubtedly be my go-to source whenever I’m looking to reconnect with our essence and acknowledge how minimal the barriers are that divide us.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Battlefield 6: Just Another Standard War Game? We Think Otherwise | Games

Posted on October 15, 2025 by

And Battlefield makes its return. The iconic military shooter franchise, renowned for its large-scale online multiplayer battles featuring countless troops, tanks, and aircraft, is here with its sixth major installment. It’s exciting, monumental, and potent.

While I appreciated the single-player campaign mode, I found the overall experience lacking. The narrative follows familiar territory: extraordinary soldiers on a quest to safeguard global freedoms against a nefarious private military group, a terrorist faction, or an undercover CIA agent. This storyline could easily fit into any military shooter or modern war film featuring a Hemsworth. Unfortunately, it’s a standard 7-hour artillery campaign that demands constant player engagement.

The issue lies in the fact that players don’t typically buy Battlefield for its campaign. In reality, many titles in the series lack a comprehensive single-player mode. This provided the developers with a chance to innovate and take risks. While mainstream cinema has been criticized for transforming patriotic depictions of the military-industrial complex into entertaining action dramas, it has also given us classics like Paths of Glory, M*A*S*H, and The Deer Hunter. Battlefield 6 occasionally hints at the challenging realities of modern hybrid warfare, but it’s hard to care about the characters, who lack depth and are forever spouting military jargon.

There have been memorable games that scrutinize the narrative of a heroic soldier acting in the name of a mostly benevolent military. Titles such as Metal Gear Solid firmly address the tragedies of nuclear conflict, while Ubisoft’s Valiant Hearts offers a poignant reflection on love amidst war. Yet, a key example remains Yager Development’s intriguing 2012 title, Spec Ops: The Line. In this tale, you embody a commander of a covert Delta force dispatched to a devastated Dubai in search of a rogue U.S. military unit. As the plot unfolds, the characters spiral into fatigue and trauma, encountering increasingly surreal hallucinations. The intention was to illustrate warfare’s detrimental psychological impacts while still providing an engaging experience. This mission was indeed accomplished.

A profound narrative about war… Spec Ops: The Line stands out as a meaningful military game. Photo: Jaeger

In the ever-consolidating gaming sector, where major corporations invest fortunes to capture millions of players, narrative innovation appears increasingly unlikely. The same trend applies to any form of political commentary. However, today’s players have a plethora of shooter options. The success of unconventional films like Atomfall and Megabonk illustrates that it’s beneficial to venture off the beaten path.

Could Battlefield 6’s campaign have transformed into a tense, claustrophobic thriller reminiscent of Alex Garland’s Warfare, or drawn players into survival narratives akin to Until Dawn? Might it have been a sandbox-style adventure filled with diverse tasks, items, and enemies to uncover?

In recent years, we have seen numerous multi-million dollar projects axed and employees laid off. The “greenlight-only” approach, competing fiercely with the perpetual nature of Fortnite, Call of Duty, and Marvel Rivals, creates a zero-sum environment: win or perish. While some may deem this optimism misguided, it feels unsustainable (even considering the fact that these mega titles are faltering). Additionally, the human cost of widespread layoffs raises ethical concerns. Clichés cannot sustain games any longer. Our modern world, rife with shifting allegiances, unpredictable climates, and uprooted societies, presents a strikingly relevant backdrop for a new war story that carries significance. If only someone dared to share it.

What to Play

A heartfelt tribute to the instant messaging era… VideoVerse. Photo: Kinmoku

Originally launched on PC in 2023, VideoVerse serves as a touching homage to the age of instant messaging. It tells a clever and delightful tale of love and friendship between users on a fading social media platform. You step into the shoes of Emmett, a young gaming enthusiast who spends his days chatting with friends online. This changes when a new user stirs deeper feelings within him.

Scheduled for release on PS5, Switch, and Xbox on November 14th, it incorporates all the enhancements made since the initial launch. For those revisiting the game and yearning for the nostalgia of MSN Messenger, this title is essential.

Available: PC, PS5, Switch, Xbox
Estimated Play Time: 10 hours or more

What to Read

Console yourself… Discover news about the future of PlayStation and Xbox. Photo: Kazuhiro Nogi/AFP/Getty Images

It appears that Microsoft and Sony are on track to release a new generation console in 2027. VGC has compiled the latest rumors. Check out this captivating article for discussions from NeoGaf threads and gossip from tech news outlets.
An industry initiative titled Palestinian Voices in Games invites volunteers, including artists, coders, and designers, to contribute their expertise to upcoming projects while supporting developers from the region. This feature delves into this endeavor, sharing insights from several developers.
The exhausted remnants of the harassing Gamergate group seem to have resurfaced, with renewed interest surrounding the acclaimed historical adventure Ghost of Mt. Yotei, particularly due to its female protagonist and subtly progressive themes. For further details, read this comprehensive article.

Skip past newsletter promotions

What to Click

Question Block

For Kids… Shigeru Miyamoto showcasing the Nintendo DS at launch. Photo: Yoshikazu Tsuno/AFP/Getty Images

This week’s questions come from Peter:

“My 4-year-old daughter has started showing interest in video games. I want to purchase her an affordable handheld console instead of an iPad. What do you suggest?”

There are many options available. Leap Frog, known for children’s electronic toys, offers a range of devices. The Leapster is a handheld console typically available used with 2-3 game cartridges for around £20-30. It’s robust and safe for play. However, I would focus on the Nintendo DS or the newer, sturdier 2DS, both available for about £10-£50 depending on condition from eBay.

These systems boast a vast library of children’s games (original DS titles are compatible with both formats, and new 3DS games can be played on the 2DS, albeit not in 3D), and games can be found in charity shops or local CeX locations for as low as 50p. The original DS has a hinge connecting its screens that can be a weak point, depending on how carefully my daughter uses it. Both models include a stylus, which poses a choking hazard, so supervision is essential during its use. My sons have lost countless styluses! Fortunately, many games don’t require them. Any titles featuring Mario, Wario, Kirby, as well as Animal Crossing, Pokemon, or Lego are perfect choices.

If you have questions for the question block or any feedback regarding the newsletter, feel free to reply or email us at pushbuttons@theguardian.com.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Waymo Announces Launch of Driverless Taxis in London Next Year

Posted on October 15, 2025 by

Waymo has announced that its driverless taxis will be available for hire on the streets of London next year.

This makes London the first European city to implement Waymo’s technology for a self-driving taxi service, similar to what’s currently operational in San Francisco and four other cities in the US.

The company confirmed that its vehicles are en route to London and will start navigating the city’s roads in the coming weeks, with “trained human experts,” or safety drivers, overseeing operations.

Originally a spin-off of Google’s self-driving car initiative and part of the parent group Alphabet, Waymo stated it would collaborate closely with the London Department for Transport to secure the necessary permits for fully autonomous vehicles by 2026.

Uber and UK tech firm Wave have also revealed plans to trial their own driverless taxis in London next year, following the UK government’s decision to fast-track regulations permitting public trials of self-driving vehicles ahead of complete legislation.

Heidi Alexander, Secretary of Transportation, expressed: “We are thrilled that Waymo intends to bring this service to London next year, in line with our proposed pilot program.

“Revitalizing the AV sector will create jobs, draw investment, and provide opportunities within the UK, while expanding accessible transportation options. Advancements like this will support our goal of becoming a leader in new technologies and spearheading national rejuvenation.”

The comprehensive rollout of self-driving taxis in the UK is anticipated to happen after the Self-Driving Vehicles Act is fully implemented in the latter half of 2027.

Waymo has a solid relationship with the UK, having established its first European engineering hub in Oxford back in 2019. The firm is also launching a service in Tokyo utilizing Jaguar Land Rover electric vehicles, marking its only current venture outside the United States.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Tekedra Mawakana, co-CEO of Waymo, remarked that the technology is enhancing “road safety and making transport more accessible,” adding: “We have shown how to responsibly scale fully autonomous ride-hailing services, and we are eager to share the advantages of our technology in the UK.”

Waymo initiated its self-driving taxi services in 2020 and claims to have transported over 10 million passengers in the United States.

Despite some concerning incidents, Waymo asserts that data indicates that human-driven vehicles are involved in pedestrian accidents 12 times more frequently than self-driving cars.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Meta Announces PG-13 Style System for Instagram to Safeguard Children

Posted on October 15, 2025 by

Instagram is set to implement a PG-13 style rating system to enhance parental control over their teens’ interactions on the platform.

Owned by Meta, Instagram will introduce guidelines akin to the U.S. “Parental Guidance” movie ratings established 41 years ago for all content viewed by teen accounts. Consequently, users under 18 will automatically be categorized under the 13+ setting, with the option to opt out only with parental consent.

Currently, teen accounts restrict or prohibit sexually suggestive material, graphic images, and promotions for adult content like alcohol and tobacco. The forthcoming PG-13 framework will impose even stricter regulations.

Meta indicated that it will limit visibility on posts promoting “harmful” activities, including strong language, risky stunts, or content featuring marijuana accessories. Additionally, search terms like “alcohol” and “gore” will be blocked, even if misspelled.

Mehta commented, “While there are distinctions between movies and social media, our modifications aim to provide a teen experience within a 13+ context that parallels viewing a PG-13 film,” emphasizing the desire to communicate the policy in a familiar framework for parents.

The closest equivalent to PG-13 in British film ratings is 12A. Notably, Instagram’s new rating doesn’t impose a complete ban on nudity, similar to how PG-13/12A films like Titanic include brief nudity that isn’t explicitly sexual. Moderate violence, akin to what is found in Fast & Furious films, will also remain accessible.

This initiative follows a study by a former Meta whistleblower, revealing that 64% of new safety features on Instagram are ineffective. The assessment was conducted by Arturo Bejar, a former Meta senior engineer, alongside academics from New York University, Northeastern University, and the Molly Rose Foundation in the UK. Béjart stated, “Children are not safe on Instagram.” Mehta dismissed the findings, asserting that parents possess robust tools at their disposal.

Ofcom, the UK communications regulator, urged social media platforms to adopt a “safety-first” strategy and warned that non-compliance could lead to enforcement actions.

Mehta announced that the Instagram update will begin in the U.S., UK, Australia, and Canada, with plans to expand to Europe and globally early next year.

Activists raised concerns regarding whether these changes will effectively enhance safety.

Rowan Ferguson, policy manager at the Molly Rose Foundation, remarked: “Despite Meta’s numerous public statements, we have not received substantial safety improvements for teens, and our recent report indicates that there’s still work to be done to shield them from harmful content.”

“These additional updates will need to be evaluated for their effectiveness, which necessitates transparency from Meta for independent testing of safety features.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

The Gospel According to Peter Thiel: Understanding the Engineer Svengali’s Obsession with the Antichrist

Posted on October 15, 2025 by

Greetings! Welcome to TechScape. Over the past week, I’ve been deep in thought about billionaire Peter Thiel’s intricate reflections on the Antichrist and Armageddon. I can’t help but absorb it all at this stage.

You might be questioning why billionaire perspectives on the Antichrist are significant. That’s a great inquiry!

To my team, aiding us in understanding Johana Bhuiyan, Dara Carr, and Nick Robbins – Early, we covered a series of talks by Thiel, an influential billionaire and political strategist.

Last month, Mr. Thiel conducted four lectures along San Francisco’s waterfront, delving into who he believes the Antichrist may be and cautioning that Armageddon is on the horizon. Thiel, who identifies as a “little Orthodox Christian,” suggests that the signs of the apocalypse could already be present, claiming that international institutions, environmentalism, and technological oversight may accelerate its occurrence. This is a notable discourse that sheds light on the interests of one of Silicon Valley’s and the United States’ most prominent figures.

Long before Silicon Valley shifted rightward during President Donald Trump’s second term, Thiel was a key player in conservative politics. He forged close ties with Trump nearly a decade ago, is credited with endorsing J.D. Vance for vice president, and is financing the Republican midterm campaign for 2026. Thiel, who co-founded PayPal and gained significant wealth at a young age, has also invested early in Facebook alongside SpaceX, OpenAI, and others through his firm, Founders Fund. His co-founded company, Palantir, has secured billions in government contracts for software development for the Department of Defense, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and the UK’s NHS. With unprecedented attention and political influence, Thiel is attempting to share a message about the Antichrist, although his political acumen and investments are better recognized than his theological insights.

During his third lecture, Thiel stated, “I’m a libertarian, or a classical liberal, but I diverge in some minor ways, and I am concerned about the Antichrist.”

Thiel’s lectures were lengthy and diverse, weaving in biblical verses, contemporary history, and philosophy, while often veering toward conspiracy theories. He blended references to video games and television with discussions about J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings, recalled exchanges with Elon Musk and Benjamin Netanyahu, and criticized Bill Gates as a “very terrible person.”

Read more: Inside tech billionaire Peter Thiel’s off-the-record lecture on the Antichrist

First off, these revelations possess such sensational qualities that they are entertaining to read. It’s bizarre that a $20 billion mogul gives sprawling lectures that resemble the ramblings of a perplexed graduate student.

However, that alone doesn’t justify this as a story. Journalists encounter various oddities that often go unreported.

While editing the piece on Thiel’s lecture, I grew concerned that The Guardian might inadvertently promote Thiel’s ideologies instead of genuinely informing its audience. The boundary between the two can be quite tenuous. Reporters covering Trump have navigated this path for much of the past decade.

A reporter who covered Thiel suggested that his speech was a method for raising funds and demonstrating that he was a “crazy contrarian.” There may be ulterior motives behind his lectures on the hidden Antichrist.

“I’m worried about the Antichrist”… Peter Thiel. Illustration: Guardian Design/Getty Images

Thiel remarked, “If you want people to hear about something without letting anyone into the room, that’s an effective marketing technique.” This indicates that labeling these lectures as off-the-record can generate considerable intrigue. Secretive ideas tend to attract undue attention due to their perceived exclusivity. What transpires behind closed doors is often more compelling than public occurrences. Have we inadvertently played into Thiel’s strategy by covering his talk?

Our reporting approach was twofold. One article, referenced and linked above, outlines the facts of the meeting. Thiel hosted these lectures and made statements which are extensively quoted. I included the following note with the article: The Guardian publishes meaningful quotes with contextual annotations to keep the public informed regarding influential figures in politics and technology speaking behind closed doors.

This approach allows you to assess what this eccentric billionaire has to say and whether it resonates with you. Once you are aware of his positions, they can be scrutinized. Are you at ease with this individual wielding significant influence over the Vice President in the U.S. or impacting the healthcare system in the U.K.?

In the context of Trump, it is valuable to hear him directly. Labeling the president’s statements as “shocking” or “unprecedented” without quoting them may prevent readers from genuinely grasping the impact of his words and could evoke backlash against news outlets perceived as narrow-minded or paternalistic. Allow the audience to evaluate for themselves. Conversely, reprinting the president’s two-hour address in its entirety isn’t necessarily beneficial. Digesting, structuring, and summarizing information is a critical function of journalism, and reporters need to encompass the entire speech to extract the most relevant portions. We applied these principles from political journalism to Thiel’s lecture.

Our second article on this matter – Peter Thiel’s off-the-record Antichrist Lecture reveals more about him than Armageddon – published alongside the first, took a different perspective. This piece interpreted Thiel’s lecture without extensive quotes, integrating his viewpoints on behalf of the reader to elucidate the significance of his remarks. While his nearly nonsensical interpretations of Revelation and other texts may appear to be the lecture’s primary focus, the essential content reveals more about how a highly influential man perceives his own authority.

In a critique of Thiel’s lecture, Stanford professor Adrian Daub meticulously examined the venture capitalist’s “strange thicket of his own references and interests,” often referred to as “the private world of the autodidact.”

In these winding discussions, it’s evident that Thiel seeks to emulate the mixed-thinking style he admires in philosopher René Girard, whom he encountered at Stanford and has long esteemed. Unfortunately, Thiel often resembles Dan Brown.

The overarching impression of Thiel that emerges from these discussions portrays someone striving to conceal his true essence from his own capabilities. While interpreting a Japanese manga, he conveyed to the audience, “As you might have noticed, my interpretation is… that it is somewhat like the Antichrist that governs the world.” Here stands a man, alongside a few Silicon Valley eccentrics, who would restore a fallen caudillo manifestly unfit for presidential office, using the considerable power of the U.S. government to reshape society and the globe. These are the individuals who exploit your data to finance companies that determine who gets their personal information collected, deported, or subjected to drone strikes, and who support far-right movements seeking to transform the landscape of liberal democracy.

This casts my mind back to a scene in Apocalypse Now where Martin Sheen’s character encounters a platoon and questions who is in charge. “Don’t you?” Peter, don’t you operate the world? If it’s not you, then who?

Read more: Peter Thiel’s Antichrist lecture reveals more about him than Armageddon

Skip past newsletter promotions

US tariffs on China threaten electronics supply chain once more

Panic triggered by AI bubble

Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen in Copenhagen last week. Photo: Mads Claus Rasmussen/EPA

Australia’s disapproval of social media has reached Denmark. From my colleague Miranda Bryant: “Danish Prime Minister has unveiled a ban on social media for those under 15, accusing mobile devices and social networks of ‘stealing children’s childhoods.’ Mette Frederiksen announced the initiative on Tuesday during a speech at the opening of the Danish Parliament Folketing, stating: ‘We have unleashed a monster.’ ‘Never before have so many children and adolescents suffered from anxiety and depression,’ added Frederiksen, who aims for the ban to be enacted next year. This rationale echoes Jonathan Haidt’s alarming bestseller, An Anxious Generation, yet I find it neither compelling nor convincing.

In November 2024, Australia enacted a law mandating that social networks implement strict measures to prevent children under 16 from creating accounts. The ban has faced various uncertainties over age verification, yet is still slated to begin on December 10 of this year, displeasing Meta Platforms and others.

The continued existence of this non-binding bill aimed at regulating social media companies has sparked similar legislative initiatives globally. Numerous state governments in the U.S. have introduced laws requiring social networks and other websites to confirm the ages of their users. In many of these states, pornographic websites have been disabled due to the requirements to validate user ages.

Wider TechScape

Source: www.theguardian.com

OpenAI Empowers Verified Adults to Create Erotic Content with ChatGPT | Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Posted on October 15, 2025 by

On Tuesday, OpenAI revealed plans to relax restrictions on its ChatGPT chatbot, enabling verified adult users to access erotic content in line with the company’s principle of “treating adult users like adults.”

Upcoming changes include an updated version of ChatGPT that will permit users to personalize their AI assistant’s persona. Options will feature more human-like dialogue, increased emoji use, and behaviors akin to a friend. The most significant adjustment is set for December, when OpenAI intends to implement more extensive age restrictions allowing erotic content for verified adults. Details on age verification methods or other safeguards for adult content have not been disclosed yet.

In September, OpenAI introduced a specialized ChatGPT experience for users under 18, automatically directing them to age-appropriate content while blocking graphics and sexual material.

Additionally, the company is working on behavior-based age prediction technology to estimate if a user is over or under 18 based on their interactions with ChatGPT.

In a post to

These enhanced security measures follow the tragic suicide of California teenager Adam Lane this year. His parents filed a lawsuit in August claiming that ChatGPT offered explicit guidance on committing suicide. Altman stated that within just two months, the company has been able to “alleviate serious mental health issues.”

The US Federal Trade Commission has also initiated an investigation into various technology firms, including OpenAI, regarding potential dangers that AI chatbots may pose to children and adolescents.

Skip past newsletter promotions

“Considering the gravity of the situation, we aimed to get this right,” Altman stated on Tuesday, emphasizing that OpenAI’s new safety measures enable the company to relax restrictions while effectively addressing serious mental health concerns.

Source: www.theguardian.com

iPhone Air Review: Apple’s Quest for Ultimate Slimness

Posted on October 15, 2025 by

The iPhone Air represents a stunning blend of technology and design, prompting the question, “What sacrifices are you ready to make for an ultra-lightweight, sleek device?”

More than just a marvel of engineering, the Air signifies a minimalist approach, condensing the iPhone experience into a premium chassis with essential features.

By eliminating the rear camera, reducing battery size, and forgoing stereo speakers while maximizing screen real estate, what remains is a striking combination of titanium and glass.

The cost reflects this craftsmanship. Priced at £999 (€1,199/$999/AU$1,799), the iPhone Air sits between the standard iPhone 17 at £799 and the £1,099 17 Pro variant.

The sleek design is subtly disrupted by a raised camera lens, adding to the phone’s overall thickness of around 11.3mm, reminiscent of Google’s Pixel series. Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

Images alone fail to showcase the Air’s beauty. Upon handling it, one immediately recognizes it as something unique. The slender 5.64 mm frame feels even lighter due to its rounded edges, making it 12 g lighter than the already featherweight iPhone 17.

The glass rear constitutes the majority of the phone’s structure, while the remainder houses the battery. Traditional iPhone buttons, including those for camera control and actions, line the sides. The top features only the ear speaker. While adequate, you’ll find the absence of stereo sound disappointing during video playback—especially since the 6.5-inch screen delivers a crisp and vibrant viewing experience.

Functionally, the Air operates like any contemporary iPhone. It features a glass-like aesthetic, runs iOS 26, offers all standard apps, includes Face ID, and boasts a highly responsive interface. However, it has a notable drawback: the iPhone Air lacks a nano SIM card tray, operating solely on eSim. In the U.S., Apple has only supported eSim since the iPhone 14, while earlier models sold in other regions included nano SIM slots.

The profiling of the phone’s edges is only marginally thicker than the buttons themselves. Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

Most major networks in the UK now support eSim; however, experiences with setup and transitions between devices can vary, especially among budget providers. Mobile network companies must enhance their eSim services to ensure wider accessibility.

Specifications

Screen: 6.5 inch Super Retina XDR (120Hz OLED) (460ppi)
Processor: Apple A19 Pro (5 core GPU)
RAM: 12GB
Storage: 256, 512GB, or 1TB
Operating System: iOS 26
Camera: Rear 48MP, 18MP front
Connectivity: 5G eSim only, Wi-Fi 7, NFC, Bluetooth 6, Thread, USB-C, Satellite, UWB, GNSS
Water Resistance: IP68 (30 minutes at 6 meters)
Size: 156.2×74.7×5.64mm
Weight: 165g

A19 Pro Chip

The Air takes approximately 105 minutes to charge fully, reaching 60% within 35 minutes using a 20W or higher USB-C power adapter (sold separately). Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

The Air is equipped with the same A19 Pro chip found in the iPhone 17 Pro, though it contains one less GPU core—resulting in somewhat slower performance during gaming and graphics-intensive activities. For routine tasks, it feels swift, yet the camera protrusions can cause it to warm up noticeably when under strain.

The reduced battery capacity marks a significant trade-off for the Air’s thin profile, despite much of the structure being allocated for the battery. Battery life is less than other iPhones, but surprisingly adequate. A moderate day with 5 hours of usage for browsing and video streaming on Wi-Fi saw the Air comfortably last 40 hours between charges.

A Qi2 or MagSafe magnetic wireless charger, like the Twelve South Power Bug, could significantly enhance daily usage of the Air. Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

On more hectic days filled with photography, 5G navigation, music streaming, messaging, and videos, the Air maintained about 30 hours of life, ending the day with around 25% of the battery remaining. A full overnight charge should suffice for most daily demands, but those heavily into gaming or intense tasks might find themselves requiring low-power mode.

Sustainability

The sleek design of the Air includes a replaceable battery that may require changing after about 1,000 charge cycles. Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

The battery lasts over 1,000 full charge cycles with at least 80% of its original capacity remaining; replacement costs £109 and is not covered by warranty. The screen repair costs £349. iFixit rated the iPhone Air a 7 out of 10 for repairability.

The Air comprises over 35% recycled materials, including aluminum, cobalt, gold, lithium, rare earth elements, steel, tin, titanium, and tungsten. Apple outlines the environmental implications of mobile devices in its annual report, and offers trade-in and complimentary recycling options, even for non-Apple products.

Camera

While functioning like other iPhone cameras, the Air is somewhat limited due to the absence of ultra-wide and telephoto options. Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

The camera represents a significant compromise. It features a single 48MP camera at the back and an upgraded 18MP selfie camera at the front, using Center Stage technology from the iPhone 17 series.

The primary camera parallels that of the standard iPhone 17 rather than the larger sensor of the 17 Pro, yet it delivers commendable performance. It captures impressive photos and videos in good lighting and handles dim indoor environments reasonably well. At times the images may appear soft and grainy. While it doesn’t often win awards, it typically produces satisfactory photos. A 2x crop zoom is available, excellent for brightly lit scenes, but further zooming reveals the downsides of a digital zoom—textures and distant subjects tend to lose clarity.

The Air’s zoom capacity is satisfactory in bright conditions, but is prone to detail loss when focusing on further objects. Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

The absence of ultra-wide and telephoto capabilities restricts creative options for photography. The only other iPhone model with a single rear camera is the more budget-friendly iPhone 16e.

The 18MP front camera dynamically pans and zooms to capture group shots, allowing you to take landscape selfies without rotating your device. This feature is particularly useful. Moreover, it enables simultaneous video recording from both the front and rear cameras, placing you in the frame within a small window.

Price

The iPhone Air starts at £999 (€1,199/$999/AU$1,799) and includes 256GB of storage.

For perspective, the iPhone 16e comes in at £599, the iPhone 17 at £799, the iPhone 17 Pro at £1,099, the 17 Pro Max at £1,199, and the Google Pixel 10 retails for £1,199. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge sells for £899 and the Fairphone 6 is priced at £899, with the Fairphone 6 available for £499.

Verdict

The iPhone Air is a notable design that effectively addresses a specific need. Many have wished that contemporary smartphones would focus on being thinner rather than just emphasizing battery life or camera quality.

The remarkably thin design feels distinctive at first, but the novelty quickly diminishes. Similar to Samsung’s equally slender Galaxy S25 Edge, the primary advantage lies in reducing weight, enhancing comfort during use and storage. Despite its expansive screen, the Air remains compact and easy to carry.

Battery longevity exceeds expectations; while it performs adequately on most days, it might not hold up as well over several years. Apple offers a smart MagSafe battery that can increase its capacity by an additional 65%. However, using it can compromise the device’s thin, lightweight advantages, as would placing it in a case.

A significant limitation is the sole rear camera; the absence of ultra-wide and telephoto features can be restricting for users who rely on their phones for photography.

If you’re an Apple enthusiast seeking a slim, eye-catching device that’s easy to maneuver, the iPhone Air is a remarkable option. Otherwise, there are alternatives that might be more suitable.

Pros: Ultra-thin and lightweight, excellent display, impressive single rear camera, enhanced center stage selfie camera, superior performance, long-term software updates, and Face ID.

Cons: Lacks ultra-wide and telephoto capabilities, high price point, comparatively short battery life, best suited for use without a case, and lacks cutting-edge AI features.

The iPhone Air is visually striking and offers a unique feel compared to other models in the iPhone lineup. Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

Source: www.theguardian.com

Digital ID: Danes and Estonians Find It “Fairly Uncontroversial” | ID

Posted on October 15, 2025 by

For teenagers in Denmark, registering for MitID (My ID) has turned into a significant milestone.

Danish citizens can join the national digital ID system starting at the age of 13, allowing them to do everything from accessing online banking to signing documents electronically and scheduling doctor appointments.

Once they reach 15, every child and their parents receive a notification from the government stating that teenagers will now receive official communications through “digital post,” requiring a digital ID for access.

While individuals can choose to opt out and receive traditional mail, the number of people doing so is minimal. As of now, 97% of the Danish population over 15 is enrolled in educational institutions, and only 5% have opted out of digital communications. MitID

Recently, the UK government unveiled plans to establish a digital ID system by 2029, indicating it would “adopt the best practices” from global systems, including those in Denmark and Estonia.

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer mentioned that the new ID system will be app-based rather than a physical card, containing information such as residency status, name, nationality, date of birth, and photo. Possession of this ID will be mandatory for employment in the UK.

In Denmark, people gradually got accustomed to using digital IDs. Adam Rebeck, Deputy Director-General of Denmark, noted that integration with essential apps like banking was vital for its success. Additionally, the rollout of digital post has boosted adoption rates, according to the digital government agency.

To aid older generations, volunteers have been recruited to educate seniors on using digital IDs. “The usage statistics for those up to age 85 are quite high; beyond that, it starts to decline,” Rebeck noted.

The proportion of Danes using digital ID and digital post is reported to be “very high” up to the age of 85. Photo: Aleksander Nakic/Getty Images

Similar to the UK, Denmark has never implemented a physical national ID card, but has been working on a digital ID system since 2001. The transition to a third iteration, MitID, was finalized in 2022, and Leveque indicated it is more secure than its predecessor. Commonly used as an app on smartphones or tablets, it can also function via code display or voice code reader for those unable to access an app.

Peter Christian Beck Nielsen, technology correspondent for Ingeniolen, a Danish newspaper, stated that the digital ID program has functioned effectively and, thus far, has encountered minimal public resistance. “This is a country where most people have a high level of trust in politicians and the public sector, so it hasn’t stirred controversy,” he explained.

However, he acknowledged that views on surveillance are shifting, partly due to heightened awareness of online tracking and public discussions around the issue. “Denmark has been moving in one direction for the past two decades: increased surveillance and more control. This will undoubtedly have repercussions at some point,” he remarked.

In times of rising instability across Europe, combined with threats of sabotage and hybrid warfare, the move towards digitalization carries notable risks if systems fail.

“In the past, you could almost walk into City Hall, but now you can’t do that at all,” Beck-Nielsen noted. “This would be very challenging because you must reserve online.” [In case of a digital system failure] this significantly reduces societal resilience from a hybrid warfare standpoint.

Lebeck emphasized that the threat level to digital security is perpetually high and remains a “huge challenge.” He also stated that there are “constant threats against it,” chiefly through social engineering. “We need ongoing development and a relentless battle against criminals,” he asserted.

Skip past newsletter promotions

In Estonia, citizens “own their own data,” and there has been “limited opposition” to digital IDs, according to a spokesperson for the e-Estonia Briefing Center. “People recognize that the system functions effectively and saves them time.” Photo: Egorovnik/Alamy

Estonia’s journey towards a national digital identity card began earlier. The concept took root in the 1990s when Estonia reasserted its independence from the Soviet Union and aimed to rejuvenate its institutions.

“Governments with limited resources but abundant technological talent looked to digitalization as a means to deliver public services more efficiently and transparently,” stated Cristina Kriisa, a spokesperson for the e-Estonia Briefing Center. “The aim was to minimize paperwork, decrease bureaucracy, and enable citizens to engage with the state from anywhere.”

Estonia launched its national digital identity card in 2002, becoming one of the first countries globally to connect a physical identity document to secure online authentication and legally binding digital signatures. Citizens can now utilize it for digital voting, tax filing, and online banking, while analog alternatives remain available. The nation has also heavily invested in digital literacy in education.

Kriisa noted that while most Estonians are receptive to innovative ideas, concerns about privacy and security persist. “The government has tackled this issue by implementing a legal and technical framework founded on trust. Citizens have ownership of their data, can monitor who has accessed it, and are protected by robust data protection legislation,” she explained. “This transparency has resulted in limited opposition and has not posed a significant political barrier. People can observe the system’s efficacy and its time-saving advantages.”

Each card or mobile ID incorporates unique encryption keys, and access to sensitive information is documented. Citizens can review their own access logs, while national cybersecurity teams continually monitor for threats.

Leif Kaleb, a political science professor at Tallinn University, mentioned that Estonians tend to be “quite accommodating of minor reductions in personal freedom in pursuit of technological advancements and new prospects.” Despite this, the increasing accumulation of citizen digital data raises concerns for some individuals, he warned.

“Major concerns arise from the fact that this digital data accumulation enables an extensive array of analyses and insights about individuals and raises questions regarding reasonable limits, from banks and retail to law enforcement and tax authorities,” he elaborated.

Concerns regarding the electronic voting counting system also exist. “Of course, enhanced computing capabilities, such as those brought by quantum computers, will present challenges, but the specific nature of these challenges will evolve over time,” Caleb concluded.

Source: www.theguardian.com

UK Security Officials Report 50% Surge in Cyberattacks Over the Past Year | Cybercrime Insights

Posted on October 14, 2025 by

‘Extremely serious’ cyber-attacks have surged by 50% over the past year, with UK security agencies now addressing a new nationally significant attack every two days, according to the latest data from the National Cyber Security Center (NCSC).

In what officials are calling a “call to arms,” national security leaders and ministers are encouraging all organizations, from small businesses to major corporations, to develop contingency strategies for the possibility that their “IT infrastructure is compromised.” [is] Tomorrow, all screens could potentially be rendered [go] Blank.”

The NCSC, a division of GCHQ, stated in its annual report released on Tuesday that a “highly sophisticated” China, along with a “competent yet reckless” Russia, Iran, and North Korea, represent the primary national threats. This rise is fueled by ransomware attacks from profit-driven criminals and society’s growing dependence on technology, resulting in more potential targets for hackers.

Prime Minister Rachel Reeves, Security Secretary Dan Jarvis, and Technology and Business Secretaries Liz Kendall and Peter Kyle have contacted the leaders of hundreds of the UK’s largest companies, urging them to elevate cyber resilience to a board-level concern and cautioning that hostile cyber activities in the UK are becoming “more intense, frequent, and sophisticated.”

“We must not make ourselves an easy target,” stated Anne Keast-Butler, GCHQ’s director. “It’s critical to prioritize cyber risk management, integrate it into governance, and set a tone from the top.”

The NCSC dealt with 429 cyber incidents from the past year up to September, with nearly half considered to be of national significance, a figure that has more than doubled in the last year. Among these, eighteen incidents were categorized as “very serious,” indicating they profoundly affected governments, essential services, the public, and the economy. Many of these were ransomware attacks, with Marks & Spencer and Co-op Group among those heavily impacted.

“Cybercrime poses a significant threat to our economy’s security, businesses, and the lives of individuals,” Jarvis remarked. “We are working tirelessly to combat these threats and support organizations of all sizes, but we cannot do this alone.”

The NCSC refrained from commenting on reports suggesting it is investigating possible Russian involvement in the severe attack on Jaguar Land Rover, which has halted production. This report indicated that Russia is encouraging unofficial “hacktivists” to target the UK, the USA, as well as European and NATO nations.

Last month, a cyberattack disrupted passenger services at numerous European airports, including London Heathrow.
Photo: Isabel Infantes/Reuters

Overall, the number of attacks up to September signifies the highest level of cyber threat activity recorded by the NCSC in the last nine years. For the first time in a year, the UK and its allies have detected Russian military units executing cyber attacks, provided recommendations against a China-linked campaign affecting thousands of devices, and raised alarms over cyber attackers affiliated with Iran, as noted by the NCSC. Domestic threats also persist, with two 17-year-old boys arrested in Hertfordshire last week following an alleged ransomware hack of children’s data from the Kido nursery chain.

Hackers are increasingly incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance their activities, and although the NCSC has not yet encountered an AI-driven attack, they predict that “AI will almost certainly present cyber resilience challenges by 2027 and beyond.”

“We observe attackers improving their capacity to inflict significant damage on the organizations they compromise and those dependent on them,” commented Richard Horne, NCSC’s chief executive. “Their disregard for their targets and the harm they cause is clear. This is why all organizations must take action.”

He emphasized the psychological toll inflicted on victims of cyberattacks, stating, “I have been in numerous meetings with individuals profoundly affected by cyberattacks on their organizations. I am aware of the anxiety, the sleepless nights, and the consequent turmoil caused by such disruptions for employees, suppliers, and customers.”

quick guide

Contact us about this story

show

The best public interest journalism relies on first-hand reporting from those in the know.

If you have something to share on this matter, please contact us confidentially using the methods below.

Secure messaging in the Guardian app

The Guardian app has a tool to submit story tips. Messages are end-to-end encrypted and hidden within daily activities performed by all Guardian mobile apps, obscuring your communication from potential observers.

If you haven’t yet downloaded the Guardian app, you can do so here (iOS/android). Access the menu and select “Secure Messaging.”

SecureDrop, instant messenger, email, phone, mail

If you can use the Tor network securely, you can send messages and documents to the Guardian via our SecureDrop platform.

Additionally, our guide at theguardian.com/tips outlines various secure ways to contact us and discusses the pros and cons of each method.

Illustration: Guardian Design/Rich Cousins

Source: www.theguardian.com

What Does the Conclusion of Free Windows 10 Support Mean for Users? | Microsoft

Posted on October 14, 2025 by

Beginning Tuesday, Microsoft will cease offering standard free support for Windows 10, the operating system relied on by millions of computer and laptop users globally.

As of September, data indicates that four out of ten individuals worldwide still use Windows 10, despite the release of its successor, Windows 11, in 2021.

What’s Changing with Windows 10?

Effective October 14, 2025, Microsoft will no longer offer standard free software updates, security patches, or technical support for PCs running Windows 10.

While computers utilizing this software will continue to operate, their vulnerability to viruses and malware will increase as new bugs and security issues come to light.

Microsoft states that Windows 11, a more advanced system, “meets modern security demands by default.”

What Are the Risks?

If Windows users take no action, they might find themselves particularly exposed to hackers attempting to exploit vulnerabilities in large systems.

The consumer group Which? has highlighted that around five million British users intend to keep using devices running this software.

Regardless of location, continuing to operate on Windows 10 places users at risk for cyberattacks, data breaches, and fraud.

According to Lisa Barber, editor at Which?, criminals “will target individuals and exploit vulnerabilities to steal data.” – Technology magazine.

How Can I Mitigate the Threat?

The simplest solution is to upgrade to Windows 11 at no cost.

If your PC is less than four years old, it is likely capable of running Windows 11. To confirm, check your computer specifications. The minimum specifications for Windows 11 include 4GB of RAM and 64GB of storage, and the machine also requires a Trusted Platform Module 2.0 (TPM 2.0) that securely stores credentials, similar to modern smartphones.

Microsoft provides a free tool to determine if your Windows 10 PC is compatible with Windows 11. For additional compatibility checks, you can use online tools based on your CPU.

What If My Computer Lacks the Necessary Hardware to Upgrade to Windows 11?

If you don’t take any action, you could be exposed to malware and security risks. One option is to enroll in a one-year agreement with Microsoft for Extended Security Updates, which will be available until October 13, 2026.

This provides an additional year to plan for the end of support and arrange for replacements.

Registration is free if you log in to Windows 10 with a Microsoft account to sync your settings. Otherwise, it will cost $30 (excluding tax) or you can redeem 1,000 reward points.

Are There Alternatives to Windows 11?

You can use your PC safely with other operating systems if it cannot be upgraded to Windows 11.

A viable solution is installing Linux, a free family of operating systems that offers various distributions.

Ensure you back up all your files to an external drive or secure storage, as switching from Windows may delete or complicate file access.

Among the most popular and user-friendly versions of Linux is Canonical’s Ubuntu, which is free, open-source, and regularly updated for security. Installing it in place of Windows requires a USB flash drive; Canonical provides a step-by-step installation guide.

While many applications support Linux, be mindful that not all Windows software is available for Linux.

Alternatively, if your computing needs can be met via a web browser, Google provides a lightweight version of ChromeOS, which can be installed for free on many PCs. Ensure your model is supported and refer to Google’s installation guide, which also requires a USB flash drive.

Buying a New Computer

If you cannot install alternative software or still require Windows, consider purchasing a new PC equipped with Windows 11 and ongoing support.

Many retailers offer trade-in programs where you can recycle your old computer and get a small discount on a new model. Refurbished Windows 11 devices are also readily available from various retailers. Check out options like Currys, Back Market, and manufacturers like Dell for affordable options.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Space Harrier at 40: How Sega’s Surreal Classic Redefined Immersion in ’80s Arcades | Games

Posted on October 14, 2025 by

DDuring my family’s vacations in the 1980s, primarily spent at classic British seaside resorts, I devoted all my time and pocket money exploring arcades. From Shanklin to Blackpool, I dabbled in them all, drawn in by their vibrant bulb-lit facades and enticing names (Fantasy Land! Treasure Island!), alongside the alluring sound of beeping video machines within. Although I spent countless hours on well-known classics like Pac-Man, Galaxian, and Kung Fu Master, there’s one particular game that has always captivated me. It features a distinctive design that is both quirky and exhilarating. It offers a complete experience that feels like a blend of a traditional arcade game, a flight simulator, and a roller coaster. At the time, it appeared remarkably futuristic. Now, I find myself at the age of 40.

Launched by Sega in 1985, Space Harrier is a 3D space shooter where players control a jetpack superhero named Harrier. Harrier emerges on the screen and shoots down surreal alien foes amidst a psychedelic landscape. Initially envisioned by designer Yutaka Suzuki as a detailed military flight shooter, the graphic constraints of that era rendered this impossible. The animations were too complex. Thus, drawing inspiration from the flying scenes in the fantasy film The Neverending Story, he conceived something surreal and different, replacing fighter planes with flying characters and creating alien adversaries reminiscent of stone giants and dragons. It was vividly colorful and wild, akin to a Roger Dean artwork animated by the Memphis Group.

https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/hKjhrnxwdoE?wmode=opaque&feature=oembed" title="Space Harrier: Arcade (1985) – Longplay" height="480" width="854" allowfullscreen="

However, what truly captivated players was the game’s motion cabinet. Sitting in a cockpit-style seat connected to two motors that provided rocking motion in eight directions, as Harrier leaped, so did you; as he tilted from side to side, you mirrored his movements. Enemies constantly approached from various angles, switching direction and altitude, keeping you swooping down, rising up, and spinning your body into action. Throughout, a synth-pop score by Hiroshi Kawaguchi, known for his work on Suzuki’s “Afterburner” and “Outrun,” resonated through the headrest speakers. Advanced speech synthesis enhanced the experience, allowing machines to shout encouragement and instructions: “Welcome to the Fantasy Zone, get ready!”

Space Harrier was a truly immersive experience and exemplified Suzuki’s talent for crafting engaging gameplay. It was just one of the many projects he was proud of at the time. Notably, Taikan offered a physical sensory experience. Games like “Outrun,” “Space Harrier,” “After Burner,” and “Power Drift” emerged in arcades featuring large motorized or hydraulically driven cabinets designed to enhance realism. Suzuki and his team also created an animation technology termed Super Scaler, which allowed manipulation of thousands of 2D animation frames to simulate a 3D environment. What I cherished most about Space Harrier was the way this motion intertwined within its fantastical realms of checkered planets and surreal aliens. It felt akin to participating in a vibrant 1980s interactive pop video. Like Pac-Man or Tetris, its timelessness lies in its unique abstract world.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Why does Space Harrier celebrate its 40th anniversary? This arcade cabinet could still entice players anywhere in the world (if one can still locate it), but sadly, such opportunities are diminishing. The machinery is aging, and the expertise to repair and maintain it is fading. Aside from a few adaptations for home computers and consoles (with the PC Engine and 32X versions being the most notable), I haven’t engaged with the game in years. Now, as I settle into that familiar seat, insert two 10p coins into the slot, and grasp the joystick in anticipation, I wonder: Will I ever rediscover that immersive gaming experience? Will I ever see my 13-year-old self exploring an arcade in northern England again? Regardless, Space Harrier remains fulfilling for whatever purpose.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Bose QuietComfort Ultra 2 Review: The Pinnacle of Comfort in Noise-Canceling Headphones

Posted on October 14, 2025 by

Bose has enhanced its flagship noise-cancelling headphones, introducing the longest battery life, USB-C audio support, and premium materials, making it an even more appealing choice for commuters.

The second-generation QuietComfort Ultra headphones carry a hefty price tag, starting at £450 (€450/$450/AU$700), which surpasses many of its competitors, including the Sony WH-1000XM6.

They exude an air of luxury and comfort. With a refined sliding aluminum arm and updated color, they maintain the same design, weight, and fit as their predecessor, resulting in some of the most elegant and comfortable headphones available.

Available in bolder color options. Composite: Bose

Controls for noise cancellation, immersion mode, and playback are intuitive and user-friendly. A touch-sensitive volume slider also serves as a shortcut for features, such as activating your phone’s voice assistant or starting music from apps like Spotify.

The battery offers up to 30 hours of playback with noise cancellation, providing an additional six hours compared to its predecessor, ensuring it stands toe-to-toe with the best competitors. This duration is ample for one or two flights. A new feature allows lossless music listening on devices while charging via Bluetooth, headphone cable, or USB-C.

Button and slider controls are located on the back of the right earcup, while USB-C and headphone ports are available on the left. Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

It supports Bluetooth 5.4 and can pair with two devices simultaneously, like a smartphone for calls and a laptop for music. In addition to the standard SBC and AAC audio formats, Bose includes Qualcomm’s aptX Adaptive for enhanced audio quality. Compatible Android device or a Bluetooth dongle.

Specifications

Weight: 250g
Size: 195×139×50.8mm
Connectivity: Bluetooth 5.4 with multipoint, 2.5/3.5mm, USB-C audio and charging
Bluetooth codec: SBC, AAC, aptX compatible
Battery life: 30 hours

Excellent Sound and Noise Cancellation

The headphone arms fit snugly against your head, with deep and well-cushioned ear cups offering a plush fit. Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

Bose is a pioneer in noise cancellation technology, consistently delivering exceptional performance. The new Ultra headphones include advanced noise reduction features that effectively handle sounds from airplanes, commutes, and more. While they may not completely eliminate higher-pitched noises like background chatter, they are still highly effective.

A refined transparency mode enables the headphones to dampen sudden loud noises, allowing for awareness of surroundings while retaining comfort. Call quality is impressive as well, ensuring clear communication in both quiet and noisy environments.

The Bose app for Android and iPhone manages settings, updates, and custom options. Composition: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

These headphones excel in everyday listening, boasting a bass-heavy profile tailored to modern music. The bass is impactful yet well-balanced, ensuring clarity across the musical spectrum. While some may find Bose’s sound to be overly clean or lacking in grit, the excellent tonal separation and sound management provide a pleasant listening experience, making them ideal for travel, commuting, and work.

New with the Ultras is Bose’s immersive sound system, Cinema Mode, which emulates surround sound for movies and TV shows. It functions effectively across all connected devices, making it versatile for users with various brands of electronics. This complements the standard immersive audio mode that simulates a stereo speaker setup.

Sustainability

Bose combines luxury with durability, making it travel-friendly. Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

The battery can withstand over 500 full charge cycles and is replaceable by Bose. The headphones are generally repairable, with replaceable components like ear cushions available. They do not include recycled materials. Bose has a trade-in program and offers refurbished products, but individual environmental impact reports are not available.

Price

The Bose QuietComfort Ultra headphones (2nd generation) retail for £449.95 (€449.95/$449.99/AU$699.95).

For context, the Sony WH-1000XM6 is priced at £399, the Sonos Ace is £299, the Beats Studio Pro costs £349.99, while the Sennheiser Momentum 4 Wireless is £199 and the Fairbuds XL is priced at £219.

Verdict

The second-generation Bose QuietComfort Ultra headphones represent a high-quality choice, delivering the brand’s trademark exceptional sound, leading noise cancellation, and luxurious comfort.

While the Sony WH-1000XM6 may have surpassed it in noise cancellation effectiveness, these remain among the most comfortable headphones available, perfect for both travel and extensive listening sessions.

They fold neatly for compact storage, boast a long battery life of 30 hours, and offer connectivity options through Bluetooth, an analog headphone cable, or USB-C, making them versatile for any device.

Although priced quite high, it aligns with competitors, and prices may decrease during sales. Replacement ear cushions and other components can be obtained from Bose or third parties, ensuring long-term value for your investment.

Pros: Extremely comfortable, leading noise cancellation, excellent sound quality, immersive/spatial audio capabilities, excellent connectivity (including Bluetooth multipoint and USB-C or analog audio), foldable design for travel, a comprehensive app for multiple platforms, and long battery life.

Cons: It is quite expensive, and while the sound and noise cancelling features are superb, the microphone cannot be used with an analog connection.

The headphones can be compactly folded and stored in their case. Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

Source: www.theguardian.com

MG Requests Over £500 to Repair Your Fraudulent Electric Car.

Posted on October 14, 2025 by

Our MG5 electric vehicles have spiraled out of control, and MG seems unresponsive to the situation.

After utilizing a charger at one site, the vehicle experienced a power system failure at a highway service station.

The car became unresponsive to all controls, including the off button. Consequently, we called the AA. The patrolman was able to start the engine and opted to take a test drive with my family onboard as it was pouring rain.

When the patrolman shifted the car into reverse, it surged forward and wouldn’t stop, even when he pressed the brakes. The vehicle collided with an AA van, and as it attempted to accelerate, its wheels spun and began smoking.

We all exited the vehicle safely, and eventually, a patrolman managed to switch the car off from outside. I was informed it wasn’t safe to drive.

The AA arranged for a tow truck to bring it to the dealership, covering the repairs (£2,500). A police vehicle was also damaged in the incident.

The dealership is scrutinizing the defect, and there will be a charge of £500 in costs. No issues were identified. MG insists the matter has been resolved and intends to pursue further investigation at their own cost.

Six weeks on, the vehicle remains with the dealership. I am reluctant to drive until I know it’s safe, yet I can’t afford continued investigations.

AB, East Lothian

You are not the sole MG owner facing issues. One individual was forced to ram his car into a police van due to brake failure.

I requested a technical report from the AA, confirming that the vehicle “jumped forward” when shifted to reverse.

It’s understandable to hesitate before getting behind the wheel until the issue is identified, and since the vehicle is still under warranty, it’s reasonable to avoid spending personal funds on the repairs.

MG Motor UK appears surprisingly indifferent, given the potential dangers posed by malfunctioning EVs. The dealership recommended that MG’s technical department investigate the issue and provide guidance, but MG let it go.

MG merely issued an apology for the “inconvenience” following your complaint.

My inquiries regarding whether the dealer-requested investigation was conducted prior to resolving the incident and how many similar cases they’ve acknowledged concerning power failures were side-stepped.

However, the company promptly initiated a more comprehensive assessment of the vehicle and conducted a 45-mile test drive, using various public charging stations. There will be no charges for this test or any previous evaluations.

“MG considers all reported issues related to malfunctions a priority. No associated faults with onboard equipment or the vehicle’s charging capabilities were discovered.”

“MG and our authorized dealer have meticulously examined the vehicle and concluded that an error occurred that isn’t linked to the vehicle itself. We will continue to provide support to our customers with relevant information and advice.”

This places you in a challenging position. Your car is deemed healthy, yet your trust in it has waned. Consequently, you’ve decided that selling it is the best course of action.

We encourage letters, though we cannot respond individually. Email us at Consumer.champions@theguardian.com or write to Consumer Champions, Money, the Guardian, 90 York Way, London N1 9GU. Please include a daytime contact number. The following conditions apply to all letter submissions and publications: Our Terms of Use.

Source: www.theguardian.com

India’s Identity Card System Sparks Mixed Reactions: ‘Life Infrastructure Will Be Monitored at Every Step’

Posted on October 14, 2025 by

It’s hard for many in India to envision life before Aadhaar. Digital biometric IDs, which claim to be accessible to all Indians, were rolled out just 15 years ago, yet they have become an integral part of daily life.

An Aadhaar number is now essential for purchasing a home, securing employment, opening a bank account, paying taxes, receiving benefits, buying a vehicle, obtaining a SIM card, booking priority train tickets, and enrolling children. Infants receive their Aadhaar number immediately after birth. Although it is not obligatory, lacking an Aadhaar effectively renders one invisible to the state, according to digital rights advocates.

For Umesh Patel, 47, a textile businessman in Ahmedabad, Aadhaar has been a welcome change. He reminisces about the days of hauling stacks of paperwork to government offices just to verify his identity, often with little success. Now, with a quick glimpse of his Aadhaar, “everything flows smoothly,” he said, viewing it as “a testament to how our nation utilizes technology for its citizens’ benefit.”

“It’s a solid system that has simplified our operations,” Patel asserts. “Moreover, it enhances our country’s security by minimizing the risk of forged documents.”

“Aadhaar has become an integral part of Indian identity.”

The initiative has been deemed so effective that it caught the attention of the UK government, which considered the introduction of mandatory ID cards for its citizens. However, digital rights groups, activists, and humanitarian organizations highlight a less favorable perspective of Aadhaar and its effects on Indian society.

For some of India’s most underprivileged and least educated individuals (those unable to engage with the Aadhaar system due to issues like illiteracy, lack of education, or missing documentation), the system can be exclusionary and punitive, denying essential access to welfare and employment. With increasing moves to link Aadhaar to voting rights and citizenship, concerns arise that it may further disenfranchise and stigmatize the impoverished.

Apal Gupta, founder and director of the Internet Freedom Foundation in Delhi, stated that Aadhaar has become a digital obligation for many people in India, as Aadhaar-based verification is required to access government services, enter public venues, or carry on with their daily activities.

Mr. Gupta asserted that Aadhaar has “metastasized” since its inception, morphing into an extensive bureaucratic network of unique IDs required for business operations. “The essence of your existence is scrutinized at every juncture,” he remarked.

Critics contend that the current draft of India’s data protection and privacy law is inadequate for safeguarding privacy or preventing potential misuse of the invaluable Aadhaar database, which includes biometric data such as photos, facial and iris scans, and fingerprints of over a billion Indians.

Indian media has uncovered multiple instances of Aadhaar data breaches over the years, including a 2018 incident where data pertaining to 1.1 billion individuals was found to be sold online for a mere 500 rupees (£5).

Keir Starmer met Narendra Modi in Mumbai last week. During his visit, Mr. Starmer described the Aadhaar system as a “huge success”. Photo: Stéphane Rousseau/AFP/Getty Images

“According to this yet-to-be-notified law, there is no mechanism to ascertain if a data breach has been documented, and there is a lack of oversight on how Aadhaar data is consolidated with other databases, risking broader public surveillance and tracking,” Mr. Gupta noted. “Transparency is entirely absent.”

Although Aadhaar was initiated before Prime Minister Narendra Modi assumed office in 2014, his governing Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has significantly promoted and expanded the digital ID initiative. As India prepares to host the G20 summit in 2023, Prime Minister Modi referenced Aadhaar as one of the flagship achievements of ‘Digital India’, which he describes as an incubator for innovation. He asserts that India has saved over $22 billion by combating corruption in the welfare system.

The government highlights the extensive uptake of Aadhaar as an indicator of its success and inclusivity. As of last month, more than 1.42 billion Aadhaar numbers had been generated, corresponding to roughly the entire population of India, making it the largest digital identity program globally. Before this initiative, over 400 million Indians lacked any official identification and were unable to access banking services.

Yet the reality, particularly in rural and tribal regions, diverges sharply from the image portrayed by the government, as noted by Chakradhar Buddha, a senior researcher at Livetech India, an organization aimed at assisting those marginalized by India’s transition to digitalization.

Skip past newsletter promotions

“The deprivation of Aadhaar is pervasive among tribal communities, people in mountainous regions, and those in remote areas, and this reality is largely overlooked,” Buddha stated.

“This situation arises partly from a lack of proper documentation or incomplete documentation capture. Moreover, technological advancements create further obstacles that disproportionately affect the most vulnerable populations. Ultimately, this system undermines access to crucial social security and welfare for those most in need.”

Mr. Buddha challenged the government’s assertion that Aadhaar represents an infallible form of identification, recounting numerous instances where incorrect names and details led to significant issues for communities. For instance, in one village, tribal individuals lacked birth certificates and were assigned January 1 as their birthdate, while tribal names are often misspelled on Aadhaar cards due to unfamiliarity among officials.

Highlighting the recent example of millions of impoverished workers being erroneously removed from government support systems after the implementation of Aadhaar certification, Buddha cautioned that using Aadhaar as the universal standard for voting rights could result in “mass purges of the poorest from electoral registers.”

“These individuals have already been stripped of social equality. Now, Aadhaar is being utilized to deny them their right to political equality and universal suffrage,” Buddha stated.

Among those recently at risk of lacking an Aadhaar card was Ahram Sheikh, 34, an uneducated worker, who had important identification documents, including his Aadhaar card, stolen while on a train.

The aftermath was a nightmarish experience. He couldn’t recall his Aadhaar number from a decade earlier, rendering him unable to obtain a replacement card. Without it, he had to discontinue his construction job, losing crucial income for his family, and as a result, his son ultimately dropped out of school.

Months later, after traveling thousands of miles back to his village, Sheikh remained unable to resolve the issue and secure a new card. He now lives in constant fear of being declared an illegal alien without it.

“This Aadhaar system has turned into a nightmare for us. Why can’t the government establish proper institutions?” Sheikh lamented. “Everything in this country works against the poor, and this Aadhaar card is no exception.”

Aakash Hassan contributed reporting

Source: www.theguardian.com

Experts Warn AI May Complicate Accountability in Medical Errors

Posted on October 13, 2025 by

Experts are cautioning that the integration of artificial intelligence in healthcare may lead to a legally intricate blame game when determining responsibility for medical errors.

The field of AI for clinical applications is rapidly advancing, with researchers developing an array of tools, from algorithms for scan interpretation to systems for assisting in diagnosis. AI is also being designed to improve hospital operations, such as enhancing bed utilization and addressing supply chain issues.

While specialists acknowledge the potential benefits of this technology in healthcare, they express concerns regarding insufficient testing of AI tools’ effectiveness and uncertainties about accountability in cases of negative patient outcomes.

“There will undoubtedly be situations where there’s a perception that something has gone awry, and people will seek someone to blame,” remarked Derek Angus, a professor at the University of Pittsburgh.

The Journal of the American Medical Association hosted the Jama Summit on Artificial Intelligence last year, gathering experts from various fields, including clinicians, tech companies, regulatory bodies, insurers, ethicists, lawyers, and economists.

According to the report of results, of which Angus is the lead author, the publication discusses the nature of AI tools, their application in healthcare, and the various challenges they present, including legal implications.

Co-author Glenn Cohen, a Harvard Law School professor, indicated that patients might find it challenging to demonstrate negligence concerning AI product usage or design. Accessing information about these systems can be difficult, and proposing reasonable alternative designs or linking adverse outcomes to the AI system may prove unwieldy.

“Interactions among involved parties can complicate litigation,” he noted. “Each party may blame the others, have pre-existing agreements redistributing liability, and may pursue restitution actions.”

Michel Mello, a Stanford Law School professor and another report author, stated that while courts are generally equipped to handle legal matters, the process can be slow and create early-stage mismatches. “This uncertainty increases costs for everyone engaged in the AI innovation and adoption ecosystem,” she remarked.

The report also highlights concerns regarding the evaluation of AI tools, pointing out that many fall outside the jurisdiction of regulatory bodies like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Angus commented, “For clinicians, efficacy typically translates to improved health outcomes, but there’s no assurance that regulators will mandate evidence.” He added that once an AI tool is launched, its application can vary widely among users of differing skills, in diverse clinical environments, and with various patient types. There’s little certainty that what seems advantageous in a pre-approval context will manifest as intended.

The report details numerous obstacles to evaluating AI tools, noting that clinical application is often necessary for thorough evaluation, while current assessment methods can be prohibitively expensive and cumbersome.

Mr. Angus emphasized that investing in digital infrastructure is crucial and that adequate funding is essential for effectively assessing AI tools’ performance in healthcare. “One point raised during the summit was that the most respected tools are often the least utilized, whereas the most adopted tools tend to be the least valued.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Major Direct Action on Actor Image Use in AI Content Poses Fairness Concerns

Posted on October 13, 2025 by

The performing arts union Equity has issued a warning of significant direct action against tech and entertainment firms regarding the unauthorized use of its members’ likenesses, images, and voices in AI-generated content.

This alert arises as more members express concerns over copyright violations and the inappropriate use of personal data within AI materials.

General Secretary Paul W. Fleming stated that the union intends to organize mass data requests, compelling companies to reveal whether they have utilized members’ data for AI-generated content without obtaining proper consent.

Recently, the union declared its support for a Scottish actor who alleges that his likeness contributed to the creation of Tilly Norwood, an “AI actor” criticized by the film industry.

Bryony Monroe, 28, from East Renfrewshire, believes her image was used to create a digital character by the AI “talent studio” Xicoia, though Xicoia has denied her claims.

Most complaints received by Equity relate to AI-generated voice replicas.

Mr. Fleming mentioned that the union is already assisting members in making subject access requests against producers and tech firms that fail to provide satisfactory explanations about the sources of data used for AI content creation.

He noted, “Companies are beginning to engage in very aggressive discussions about compensation and usage. The industry must exercise caution, as this is far from over.”

“AI companies must recognize that we will be submitting access requests en masse. They have a legal obligation to respond. If a member reasonably suspects their data is being utilized without permission, we aim to uncover that.”

Fleming expressed hope that this strategy will pressure tech companies and producers resisting transparency to reach an agreement on performers’ rights.

“Our goal is to leverage individual rights to hinder technology companies and producers from binding collective rights,” Fleming explained.

He emphasized that with 50,000 members, a significant number of requests for access would complicate matters for companies unwilling to negotiate.

Under data protection laws, individuals have the right to request all information held about them by an organization, which typically responds within a month.

“This isn’t a perfect solution,” Fleming added. “It’s no simple task since they might source data elsewhere. Many actors are behaving recklessly and unethically.”

Ms. Monroe believes that Norwood not only mimics her image but also her mannerisms.

Monroe remarked, “I have a distinct way of moving my head while acting. I recognized that in the closing seconds of Tilly’s showreel, where she mirrored exactly that. Others observed, ‘That’s your mannerism. That’s your acting style.'”

Liam Budd, director of recorded media industries at Equity UK, confirmed that the union takes Mr. Monroe’s concerns seriously. Particle 6, the AI production company behind Xicoia, claimed it is collaborating with unions to address any concerns raised.

A spokesperson from Particle 6 stated, ‘Bryony Monroe’s likeness, image, voice, and personal data were not utilized in any way to create Tilly Norwood.’

“Tilly was developed entirely from original creative designs. We do not, and will not, use performers’ likenesses without their explicit consent and proper compensation.”

Budd refrained from commenting on Monroe’s allegations but said, “Our members increasingly report specific infringements concerning their image or voice being used without consent to produce content that resembles them.”

“This practice is particularly prevalent in audio, as creating a digital audio replica requires less effort.”

However, Budd acknowledged that Norwood presents a new challenge for the industry, as “we have yet to encounter a fully synthetic actor before.”

Equity UK has been negotiating with UK production industry body Pact (Film and TV Producers Alliance) regarding AI, copyright, and data protection for over a year.

Fleming mentioned, “Executives are not questioning where their data originates. They privately concede that employing AI ethically is nearly impossible, as they are collecting and training on data with dubious provenance.”

“Yet, we frequently discover that it is being utilized entirely outside established copyright and data protection frameworks.”

Max Rumney, deputy chief executive of Pact, highlighted that its members must adopt AI technology in production or risk falling behind companies without collective agreements that ensure fair compensation for actors, writers, and other creators.

However, he noted a lack of transparency from tech firms regarding the content and data used for training the foundational models of AI tools like image generators.

“The fundamental models were trained on our members’ films and programming without their consent,” Rumney stated.

“Our members favor genuine human creativity in their films and shows, valuing this aspect as the hallmark of British productions, making them unique and innovative.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Trio Awarded Nobel Prize in Economics for Research on Growth Fueled by Technology

Posted on October 13, 2025 by Igor Mitreski

This year’s Nobel Prize in Economics has been awarded to three experts who explore the influence of technology on economic growth.

Joel Mokyr from Northwestern University receives half of the prize, amounting to 11 million Swedish kronor (£867,000), while the remaining portion is shared between Philippe Aghion from the Collège de France, INSEAD Business School, and the London School of Economics, alongside Peter Howitt from Brown University.

The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences announced this award during a period marked by rapid advancements in artificial intelligence and ongoing discussions about its societal implications, stating that the trio laid the groundwork for understanding “economic growth through innovation.”

This accolade comes at a time when nations worldwide are striving to rejuvenate economic growth, which has faced stagnation since the 2008 financial crisis, with rising concerns about sluggish productivity, slow improvements in living standards, and heightened political tensions.

Aghion has cautioned that “dark clouds” are forming amid President Donald Trump’s trade war, which heightens trade barriers. He emphasized that fostering innovation in green industries and curbing the rise of major tech monopolies are crucial for sustaining growth in the future.

“We cannot support the wave of protectionism in the United States, as it hinders global growth and innovation,” he noted.

While accepting the award, he pointed out that AI holds “tremendous growth potential” but urged governments to implement stringent competition policies to handle the growth of emerging tech firms. “A few leading companies may end up monopolizing the field, stifling new entrants and innovation. How can we ensure that today’s innovators do not hinder future advancements?”

The awards committee indicated that technological advancements have fueled continuous economic growth for the last two centuries, yet cautioned that further progress cannot be assumed.

Mokyr, a Dutch-born Israeli-American economic historian, was recognized for his research on the prerequisites for sustained growth driven by technological progress. Aghion and Howitt were honored for their examination of how “creative destruction” is pivotal for fostering growth.

Skip past newsletter promotions

“We must safeguard the core mechanisms of creative destruction to prevent sliding back into stagnation,” remarked John Hassler, chairman of the Economics Prize.

Established in the 1960s, the professional National Bank of Sweden awarded the Economics Prize in memory of Alfred Nobel.

Source: www.theguardian.com

From Lab to Reality: Is the Graphene Revolution Finally Within Reach?

Posted on October 13, 2025 by Igor Mitreski

ASince graphene was first synthesized at the University of Manchester in 2004, it has been recognized as a remarkable material—stronger than steel yet lighter than paper. Fast forward 20 years, and not all UK graphene enterprises have been able to harness its full capabilities. Some view the future with optimism, while others face significant challenges.

Derived from graphite, the same substance used in pencils, graphene consists of a lattice-like sheet of carbon just one atom thick, boasting impressive conductivity for both heat and electricity. Presently, China is the leading global producer, leveraging this to secure an edge in the race for microchip production and construction applications.

In the UK, graphene-enhanced low-carbon concrete, developed by the Graphene Engineering Innovation Center (GEIC) at the University of Manchester in collaboration with Cemex UK, was recently installed at Northumbrian Waters in July.

“The material had an overwhelming amount of hype as it came out of academia… the real challenge lies in transitioning it from the lab to actual production,” explains Ben Jensen, CEO of 2D Photonics, a startup that originated from the University of Cambridge, specializing in graphene-based photonics technology for data centers.

Jensen was also behind the invention of Vantablack, a coating made from carbon nanotubes (rolled graphene sheets) renowned as the “blackest black” due to its ability to absorb 99.96% of light. He founded Surrey Nanosystems in 2007, where he sold exclusive artistic rights to sculptor Anish Kapoor, who featured the material on the X6 Coupe to achieve the “blackest black” effect six years ago.

Anish Kapoor’s untitled Vantablack piece was displayed in Venice in 2022. Photo: David Levin/The Guardian

“Shifting to new materials to replace existing technologies presents a significant challenge,” Jensen states. “The value proposition must be compelling, while also ensuring that the material can be manufactured efficiently at scale and priced competitively, otherwise, there’s little point in offering something ten times more costly than existing products.”

German company Bayer attempted to produce large quantities of carbon nanotube items but shuttered its pilot plant over a decade ago when a surge in demand failed to materialize. Currently, this material finds its primary use as a filler to enhance the strength of plastic products. Bayer has referred to the potential applications for nanotubes as “fragmentary.”

More promising is a graphene-based optical microchip created by CamGraPhIC, a branch of 2D Photonics, stemming from research at the University of Cambridge and CNIT in Italy.

Silicon photonics microchips currently translate electrical data into optical signals for transmission through fiber optic cables. The company claims its graphene-based chips can transmit more data in less time and at significantly lower costs.

Graphene single crystal. Photo: 2D Photonics

These chips consume 80% less energy and are capable of functioning across a broader temperature range, minimizing the requirement for costly water and energy-intensive cooling systems in AI data centers.

Transmitting data through silicon often leads to delays. Jensen compares this issue to a 16-lane highway unexpectedly narrowing down to one lane due to construction, slowing down traffic significantly. He argues that graphene photonics functions like an expansive highway with hundreds of lanes.

“Our breakthrough lies in the capability to cultivate stable, ultra-high performance graphene and effectively integrate it into devices,” he asserts. “Keep in mind, this material is only one atom thick, which makes the process particularly challenging.”

Ben Jensen, CEO of 2D Photonics. Photo: Ermanno Fissole

CamGraPhIC was established in 2018 by Professor Andrea Ferrari, a Cambridge Nanotechnology professor, who also heads the Cambridge Graphene Center, alongside Marco Romagnoli, head of advanced photonics at CNIT in Pisa and the startup’s chief scientific officer.

The parent company, 2D Photonics, recently acquired £25m in funding from a diverse group of investors, including Italy’s sovereign wealth fund, NATO, the Sony Innovation Fund, Bosch Ventures, and the UK’s Frontier IP Group. The firm will be based in the former Pirelli photonics research facility in Pisa and aims to launch a pilot manufacturing site in the Milan region designed for large-scale production of 200mm wafers, confident in receiving an additional €317m (£276m) in funding by year-end.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Aside from data centers, the company’s chips have potential uses in high-performance computing, 5G and 6G mobile systems, aviation technologies, autonomous vehicles, advanced digital radar, non-satellite space communications, and beyond.

Paragraph, a spin-out from Cambridge University located in the nearby village of Somersham, has thrived in the past decade with backing from the UK Treasury. The firm creates graphene-based electronic devices, including sensors designed for electric vehicles and biosensors for early disease detection and various applications in medicine and agriculture. Recently, they secured $55 million (£41 million) from a group of investors, including a sovereign wealth fund from the United Arab Emirates, which acquired a 12.8% share in Paragraph.

Graphene Innovations Manchester, a fledgling company started by Vivek Konchery in 2021, finalized a deal with Saudi Arabia in December for the first commercial production of graphene-enhanced carbon fiber. This material will be utilized in constructing roofs, facades, and light poles. Production has begun in Tabuk with local partners, with an expected output of 3,000 tons by 2026.

2D photonics cleanroom at the Pisa development facility. Photo: 2D Photonics

Conversely, other companies are facing harsher realities. One of the pioneering firms in this domain, Applied Graphene Materials, was launched in 2010 by Professor Carl Coleman, a spin-out from Durham University. It introduced various products, such as anti-corrosion primers and bike detail protection sprays, which became available in Halfords stores. However, the struggling company declared bankruptcy in 2023, resulting in its main operations being acquired by Canada’s Universal Matter.

Ron Mertens, the owner of Graphene-Info, remarked, “As is often true in the broader materials industry, the path to market can be lengthy. Many graphene producers and developers have yet to generate substantial revenue or profit.”

Versarian, located in Gloucestershire, expanded from a garage startup with support from the government agency Innovate UK. They developed graphene powder and other products for usage in sensors, low-carbon concrete, paints, electronic inks, textiles, and more, including running gear and prototype stealth technologies for the US military.

The AIM-listed firm sought to establish operations in Spain and South Korea, but encountered financial troubles, leading several subsidiaries to enter administration or voluntary liquidation in July. Versarian is now looking to sell off assets, such as its patent portfolio, and currently has enough funds to last only until the end of October.

Depending on the nature of the upcoming transactions, this may trigger a liquidation process for the company or a financial shelter. Their investment agreement with a Chinese partner collapsed after the British government intervened to block any technological collaboration, marking a somber potential finale for what was once a promising graphene venture.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Battlefield 6 Review – A Grand Symphony of Thunderous, Immersive Warfare | Game

Posted on October 13, 2025 by Igor Mitreski

BJust moments into the first round of the expansive multiplayer mode Conquest, you can’t help but feel the thrill of battle return. Fighter jets zoom overhead, tanks thunder by, and buildings crumble under the impact of rocket-propelled grenades. While Call of Duty has traditionally emphasized close-quarters combat in online matches, Battlefield 6 immerses you in a colossal military engagement that’s both bewildering and ear-piercing. Even in the quieter moments, you’re jolted back to reality by the distant sounds of rifle fire, urgent shouts for orders, and calls for medics.

EA’s legendary FPS series has faced significant challenges in recent years, and its futuristic installment Battlefield 2042 is widely regarded as a letdown. In response, the development team—comprising various studios including the original creator DICE—has returned to the stellar Battlefield 4 for inspiration. This time, the focus is on contemporary military warfare, delivering an authentic experience across expansive maps with numerous players involved. Similar to previous titles, Battlefield 6 offers four distinct classes: Assault, Support, Engineer, and Recon. Each class comes equipped with unique weapons and gadgets, which you can upgrade and customize as you gain experience and level up your soldiers. It’s a hybrid system that blends elements from earlier Battlefield games with features from modern Call of Duty titles, notably the Gunsmith system, which has revolutionized weapon customization in online shooters.

Brooklyn at war…Battlefield 6. Photo: Electronic Arts

The standout online modes are the large-scale ones like Conquest and Breakthrough, which concentrate on capturing objectives and seizing territory from rivals. There are also smaller modes such as King of the Hill and Domination, but for seasoned Battlefield players, these options feel like a different approach altogether. Since the groundbreaking Battlefield 1942 in 2002, the series has promoted strategic gameplay, encouraging teamwork among allies to infiltrate enemy bases, synchronizing assaults with helicopter cover, and gradually breaking through defenses. In a good game session, you may find yourself stealthily navigating the map or inching toward a heavily fortified structure. The rapid-fire nature of Call of Duty, characterized by quick skirmishes and instant respawns, seems worlds apart.

Yet, engaging in combat here feels invigorating. Whether you’re navigating the bustling streets of Brooklyn or the shores of Cairo, debris cascades, bullets ricochet, and tanks detonate in fiery explosions. The graphics and audio design are remarkably well-executed, channeling the gritty, camera-shaking documentary style of Generation Kill or Warfare rather than the polished action-movie mayhem typical of CoD. If you’re fortunate enough to join a solid team (I strongly recommend playing with one or two friends), you’ll forge genuine camaraderie.

https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/LqWVp3p-FPk?wmode=opaque&feature=oembed" title="Battlefield 6: Official Launch Hype Trailer" height="480" width="854" allowfullscreen="

However, the game does stumble with its lackluster campaign mode. The storyline is a standard techno-thriller set in a near-future world where a private military firm seeks global domination, and only a rugged team of American special forces stands in their way. This narrative feels clichéd and uninspired. By portraying the antagonist as a fictional military corporation, the developer sidesteps political controversy and avoids addressing the game’s potential market dynamics or its investors at Electronic Arts. Additionally, staying engaged with the cast of tough guys, who consistently deliver lines like “There’s no bureaucracy here” or quip, “I don’t know what’s more impressive, the scenery or the firepower” while staking out an enemy base in sunny Gibraltar can be a challenge. When Murphy, the protagonist, states, “There’s no one I want to join in this fight,” I seriously wished that defection had been an option.

Don’t let that discourage you. Overall, Battlefield 6 marks a triumphant return to form, delivering a thrilling, almost operatic shooter experience that masterfully blends explosive combat with tactical finesse. It remains to be seen how it will fare amidst the contemporary landscape of hero shooters and battle royale games, but it is undoubtedly worth your time.

Source: www.theguardian.com

British MPs Demand Investigation into TikTok’s Plan to Eliminate 439 Content Moderators

Posted on October 13, 2025 by Igor Mitreski

Labor unions and online safety advocates are urging Members of Parliament to examine TikTok’s decision to eliminate hundreds of content moderation jobs based in the UK.

The social media platform intends to reduce its workforce by 439 positions within its trust and safety team in London, raising alarms about the potential risks to online safety associated with these layoffs.

Conferences from trade unions, communication unions, and prominent figures in online safety have authored an open letter to Chi Onwurah MP, who chairs Labour’s science, innovation, and technology committee, seeking an inquiry into these plans.

The letter references estimates from the UK’s data protection authority indicating that as many as 1.4 million TikTok users could be under the age of 13, cautioning that these reductions might leave children vulnerable to harmful content. TikTok boasts over 30 million users in the UK.

“These safety-focused staff members are vital in safeguarding our users and communities against deepfakes, harm, and abuse,” the letter asserts.

Additionally, TikTok has suggested it might substitute moderators with AI-driven systems or workers from nations like Kenya and the Philippines.

How TikTok harms boys and girls differently – video

Two Years After the School Phone Ban in Australia: What Changes Have We Seen? | Children

Posted on October 13, 2025 by Igor Mitreski

When the Australian Christian College, a secondary school situated in Melbourne’s Casey suburb, enforced a mobile phone ban, it was driven by numerous factors. There was an escalation in peer conflicts online, students had difficulty maintaining focus, and teachers noticed students engaging in “code-switching on notifications.”

Caleb Peterson, the school’s principal, stated, “When a phone is within arm’s reach, a student’s attention is only half in the room. We aimed to reclaim their full attention.”

Traditionally, cell phone bans in educational institutions necessitate that devices be stored in bags or lockers during class hours, with confiscation upon discovery to be retained in the school office until the day’s end. This month signifies the two-year mark since the introduction of phone bans across many Australian states. Victoria notably pioneered this move by prohibiting mobile phone usage in public primary and secondary schools back in 2020. By the close of the fourth term in 2023, Western Australia, Tasmania, New South Wales, and South Australia implemented similar measures, with Queensland limiting mobile phone use starting early 2024.

The announcement regarding the ban received endorsement from both parents and politicians, many of whom contended that: restricting access to phones enhances focus and minimizes distractions, though some experts expressed doubts concerning its efficacy. Two years later, what has truly transpired within Australia’s phone-free schools?

At a high school in New South Wales, students’ mobile phones are being stored in a container after being “checked in.” Photo: Stephen Safoir/AAP

“The effects have been evident,” Peterson remarked. “Post-ban, we’ve enhanced class beginnings, diminished disruptions, and improved class dynamics. Conflicts related to devices have reduced, and recess and lunch have transformed. We now see games, conversations, and positive interactions among students and staff. That’s the atmosphere young people seek.”

A year following the implementation of the ban, a survey involving nearly 1,000 public school principals, conducted by the NSW Department of Education’s Center for Education Statistics and Evaluation, revealed that 95 percent still advocated for the ban. Furthermore, 81% believed the ban enhanced student learning, 86% indicated improved student interactions, and 87% perceived fewer classroom distractions.

Research from South Australia—released earlier this March—indicated that 70% of educators noticed increased focus and engagement during learning periods, while 64% noted “a reduction in the rate of serious incidents” attributable to device usage.

Lucaya, a graduate from a western Sydney high school in 2024, views the ban as an “overreaction.” Having experienced both unrestricted cell phone use and the ban during her final year, she reports that students still find covert ways to use their devices.

“Teenagers regard cell phones as vital,” she asserts. “It provides them with a sense of safety and security. Denying them something that holds such significance will only exacerbate stress and anxiety, complicating matters for teachers and administrators.” [and] assisting staff in coping.”

Several students believe that the removal of cell phones from the classroom has curtailed their options to cheat. Photo: Mike Bowers/The Guardian

Nevertheless, anecdotal evidence from dialogues with students and staff across various public and private institutions suggests a general consensus that the ban has yielded positive outcomes. An anonymous high school teacher noted that simply having mobile phones present in classrooms can prove distracting, even if not actively used. “They simply offer opportunities,” she commented. “You can distinctly notice the difference in their absence.”

Many students believe the ban has created a more equitable learning environment. Amy, a Year 11 student at a public high school in Sydney’s west, remarked that eliminating mobile phones in classrooms has curtailed misbehavior while also fostering social connections for those who spend excess time online.

“Students [feel more at ease] “It fosters a safe environment where we don’t have to stress about people sharing pictures of us,” she stated.

Mariam, a Year 11 student at a public high school in Sydney’s south, felt that the phone ban was “unjust” and claimed that teachers occasionally used it to exert authority, but admitted it positively influenced learning outcomes. Aisha, a Year 11 student from a private Islamic school in Sydney’s west, noted that the phone ban has helped her “maintain attention longer and perform better academically.”

Dr. Tony Mordini, principal of Melbourne High School, a public selective institution, has observed this heightened attention firsthand. His school adopted a no-phone policy in January 2020, following guidelines from the Victorian Department of Education.

“From a professional perspective, this ban has clearly had a beneficial impact,” he stated. “Students exhibit increased focus during lessons and are less sidetracked by online distractions. Furthermore, the absence of phones has significantly curtailed opportunities for cyberbullying and harassment in classrooms.”

However, Mordini acknowledges that the ban also curtails certain student opportunities.

“It’s crucial to recognize what we’ve surrendered,” he remarks. “Mobile phones can serve as powerful educational tools, capable of storing extensive content, assisting with research, capturing photographs, creating videos, and hosting valuable applications. Lacking a mobile phone necessitates reliance on the traditional resources and devices provided by the school.”

Skip past newsletter promotions

Professor Neil Selwyn from Monash University’s School of Education, Culture, and Society, stated, “We’ve been informed that banning phones will curb cyberbullying, enhance concentration in class, and reduce the need for teachers to discipline for phone misuse.” Some politicians promised to boost student learning and mental health, but a significant impetus behind these bans was their popularity.

He suggested that schools might serve as a stand-in for wider concerns about children and their device usage, but questions whether schools serve as the optimal solution.

“Young people spend a significant amount of time outside school, thus parents and families must engage in discussions on regulating their children’s device usage at home,” he emphasizes. “Regrettably, this isn’t a priority for most policymakers, so enacting phone bans in schools feels like an easy way to address the broader issue of excessive digital device use.”

Mr. Selwyn indicated that Australia’s phone ban was not implemented “with the intent of thoroughly investigating its effectiveness” and termed specific research into this field as “not conclusive or particularly rigorous.”

He further asserted that recent government data from New South Wales and South Australia is “not particularly illuminating.”

“The critical concern remains how these bans will affect us over time,” he noted. “Claims suggesting these bans suddenly result in dramatic improvements may sound politically appealing, but the tangible impact of these bans necessitates more comprehensive and ongoing investigation.

“We must go beyond merely asking principals if they believe student learning has enhanced. We need to enter classrooms and engage students and teachers about their varied experiences with the ban, and the potential benefits they foresee moving forward.”

He referenced a recent UK study of 30 schools and over 1,200 students which concluded that “students in schools devoid of smartphones showed no notable differences in mental health, sleep, academic performance in English or mathematics, or even disruptive behavior in class.”

“Phone bans are not a silver bullet, but they serve as an important tool,” Peterson comments. Photo: Dan Peled/AAP

“While some studies imply a connection between phone bans and improved academic performance, they are not deemed to provide reliable evidence of direct causation,” he states. “It would be imprudent to assume a phone ban would singularly and significantly rectify these issues.”

Peterson takes care not to “exaggerate” the ban’s implications but asserts that it aims to “foster conditions conducive to successful learning and friendships.” Despite exempting medical management, disability support, or assistive translation applications, he contends that academic flow is enhanced, conflict is reduced, and social unity is improved. His school’s “health metrics” indicate “lessened psychological distress.”

“Phone bans are not a panacea,” he notes. “However, they are a valuable resource, particularly when paired with digital citizenship, mental health advocacy, and positive playground initiatives.”

Peterson conveyed that numerous students suggested the ban offers them a “reprieve.”

“Phone bans have now simply become the norm, with real and modest benefits that are genuinely worthwhile.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Say Goodbye to Spotify: A DIY Movement for Artists and Fans to Ditch Music Apps

Posted on October 12, 2025 by Igor Mitreski

TThis past month, independent musicians in San Francisco convened for a series of discussions titled “Death to Spotify,” where attendees delved into “the implications of decentralizing music discovery, production, and listening from a capitalist framework.”

Hosted at Bathers Library, the event featured speakers from indie radio station KEXP, record labels Cherub Dream Records and Dandy Boy Records, along with DJ collectives No Bias and Amor Digital. What began as a modest gathering quickly sold out, gaining international interest. Organizers were approached by individuals as far away as Barcelona and Bengaluru eager to replicate the event.

“Death to Spotify” event held on September 23rd at Buzzards Library in San Francisco, California. Photo: Dennis Heredia

These discussions occur as the global backlash against Spotify gains traction. In January, music journalist Liz Perry released *Mood Machine*, a critical examination arguing that streaming services have decimated the industry, turning listeners into “passive, unstimulated consumers.” Perry asserts that Spotify’s business model pays artists meagerly, particularly if they consent to be “playlisted” in discovery mode, which delivers a bland, ambient soundtrack that blends into the background.

While artists have long voiced concerns over inadequate compensation, this past summer, criticism turned personal, specifically targeting Spotify’s billionaire co-founder Daniel Ek’s backing of Hellsing, a German company developing military technology AI. Prominent acts like Massive Attack, King Gizzard & the Lizard Wizard, Deerhoof, and Hotline TNT have pulled their songs from the platform in protest, though Spotify stresses that “Spotify and Hellsing are entirely separate entities.”

“Mood Machine: The Rise of Spotify and the Cost of the Perfect Playlist” by Liz Perry. Photo: Hodder

In Oakland, Stefani Dukic read *Mood Machine*, learned about the boycott, and felt inspired.

While not a musician, Dukic, who investigates city police complaints, describes her fascination with sound alongside her friend Manasa Karthikeyan, who works in an art gallery. They decided to foster a similar dialogue. “Spotify plays a vital role in our music interaction,” Dukic explains. “We thought it would be enriching to investigate our relationship with streaming, the significance of deleting a file, and the process involved.” Thus, Death to Spotify was conceived.

In essence, the aim was to “end algorithmic listening, cease royalty exploitation, and discontinue AI-generated music.”

Karthikeyan believes the onus of quitting Spotify falls on both listeners and musicians. “One must acknowledge that not everything is instantly available,” she states. “It prompts deeper consideration of what you support.”

Yet, will musicians and fans truly commit to a long-term boycott of the app?

Numerous prominent artists have previously pulled their catalogs from Spotify amid much fanfare, only to quietly return. Taylor Swift, one of the platform’s biggest stars, returned in 2017 after a three-year boycott over unfair payment practices. Thom Yorke, the frontman of Radiohead, removed some solo projects in 2013 for similar reasons, labeling Spotify as “the last desperate fart of a dying corpse,” yet he later reinstated them.

In 2022, Neil Young and Joni Mitchell left the platform due to an exclusive deal with anti-vaccine podcast host Joe Rogan. Having both contracted polio in their childhood during the 1950s, they have also reinstated their catalogs on Spotify.

Eric Drott, a music professor at the University of Texas at Austin, suggests this latest wave of boycotts feels distinct. “These artists are not mainstream. Many have realized for years that streaming isn’t lucrative, but they still sought recognition. With the sheer volume of available music, people are questioning its overall value.”

Will Anderson of Hotline TNT asserted there is “0%” chance his band will return. “There’s no rationale for genuine music enthusiasts to be there,” he claims. “Spotify’s primary objective is to encourage you to stop pondering what’s being played.” When the band sold their new album, “Raspberry Moon,” directly via Bandcamp and a 24-hour Twitch stream, it sold hundreds of copies and generated substantial revenue.

Manasa Karthikeyan (left) and Stephanie Dukic. Photo: Eva Tuff

Pop-rock artist Caroline Rose and others are also experimenting with alternative distribution methods. Her album *Year of the Slug*, influenced by Cindy Lee’s “Diamond Jubilee,” was exclusively released on vinyl and Bandcamp, initially available only on YouTube and the file-sharing platform Mega. “It’s disheartening to pour your heart and soul into something only to give it away online for free,” Rose articulates.

Rose is a member of the Union of Musicians and Allied Workers (UMAW), an advocacy organization established to protect music professionals since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Joey DeFrancesco, a member of the punk band Downtown Boys and a UMAW co-founder, stated the group “clearly advocates for artists as agents, holding corporations accountable and facilitating necessary dialogue,” including efforts to remove music from Spotify. He also noted the “limitations” inherent in individual boycotts.

“Our goal in the labor movement and within UMAW is to act collectively,” he emphasized. Notable examples include UMAW’s successful campaign—in partnership with the Palestine for Palestine coalition—to persuade the South by Southwest music festival to cut ties with U.S. military and arms manufacturers as sponsors for its 2025 event, as well as the introduction of the Living Wage for Musicians Act (a bill aimed at regulating payments to artists on Spotify) championed by Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib.

The organizers of Death to Spotify assert that their intent isn’t to dismantle the app but rather to prompt users to critically reflect on their music consumption habits. “We want to encourage a more thoughtful engagement with how we listen to music,” Karthikeyan explains. “Sticking to algorithmically generated comfort zones only serves to diminish the richness of our culture.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Looking to Upgrade Your Laptop?

Posted on October 12, 2025 by Igor Mitreski

Is it really time for a new laptop?

If you’re contemplating an upgrade, a new laptop you’re in good company. Many individuals consider replacing their device when it starts to feel sluggish or antiquated. However, before you invest in the latest technology, it’s crucial to ask: Do you truly need a new laptop?

For the majority of users, the answer is: no. The reality is that the requirements for laptop performance haven’t evolved significantly even as technology progresses. Whether you’re browsing, participating in video conferences, or working on spreadsheets, your current laptop likely meets all your needs.

**Reasons not to upgrade**

If your laptop is still adequate for your daily tasks, an upgrade might be unnecessary. Here’s why:

Most applications don’t need cutting-edge specifications.
Upgrading from an Intel Core i3 to an Ultra Core 5 won’t necessarily speed up report generation. Productivity is often influenced more by effective workflows than by raw CPU speed.
New ports are adaptable.
Even without USB-C or Wi-Fi 7, adapters and dongles make it simple to connect to modern devices.
It’s both financially and environmentally responsible.
A new laptop could set you back between $1,000 and $10,000, and its production utilizes rare minerals and significant energy. Repairing or upgrading your existing device is better for your finances and the environment.

**When is buying a new laptop justified?**

There are valid reasons for purchasing a new laptop in 2025.

Severe physical damage or hardware failure (e.g., a malfunctioning motherboard or a battery that can’t be replaced)
Display or keyboard issues that hinder daily usage
Incompatibility with essential new software vital for work or study

If your current device meets any of these criteria, it might be time for a replacement. Otherwise, with a few tweaks, you can restore your laptop to like-new condition.

Enhancing laptop performance without a new purchase

1. Optimize startup programs

Excessive startup applications can degrade performance.

On Windows, open Task Manager → Startup and disable any unnecessary apps.
On macOS, navigate to System Settings → Users and Groups → Login Items and remove what you don’t need.

2. Uninstall unused browser extensions

Extensions can consume resources and slow down your browsing experience.
For Chrome, enter: chrome://extensions in the address bar and remove any outdated extensions.

3. Free up storage

Utilize a free disk analysis tool such as:

WinDirStat (Windows)
Disk Inventory X (Mac)

Delete large files, outdated downloads, and applications you no longer use. This can free up valuable space and help you avoid costly storage upgrades.

4. Consider hardware upgrades

Small upgrades can significantly enhance your system’s performance.

Add RAM (8GB is the minimum, but 16GB is recommended)
Switch from HDD to SSD for improved speed
Replace your battery if it drains quickly

5. Reinstall the operating system

A clean OS installation can eliminate years of accumulated digital clutter.
Be sure to back up your files first, then download and reinstall the operating system from the official site. You may be surprised by the enhanced performance.

Don’t overlook physical cleaning

One of the best parts of getting a new laptop is how fresh and tidy it is.
To refresh your current device:

Shut down and disconnect.
Use a microfiber cloth to wipe down the screen and surfaces.
Turn the keyboard upside down and gently vacuum to remove any dust or debris.

A clean laptop not only looks appealing but also enhances airflow and minimizes overheating.

Final thoughts: Make wise upgrade decisions

Before you rush to purchase a new laptop, consider enhancing the performance of your current device.
Through simple maintenance, a handful of upgrades, and good cleaning practices, you can extend the lifespan of your laptop by several years— saving money and benefiting the planet.

If you do decide to buy a new one, research thoroughly and focus on what truly matters: performance, reliability, and user experience— not just impressive specifications.

Source: hitechub.com

Is It Time for a New Laptop? When to Upgrade and When to Wait | Technology

Posted on October 12, 2025 by Igor Mitreski

SI’m considering getting a new laptop. It’s a common sentiment; most people feel this way at some point, typically after the initial excitement of a new device wears off. As technology progresses, newer models beckon, making it easy to forget the device you currently own.

I’m not here to judge your choice, but as someone with a background in technology, I can offer insights that might help you resist the temptation to upgrade.

Let’s begin with the essentials. The primary reason most people don’t acquire a new laptop is simply that they don’t need one. We live in a world where technology evolves rapidly, but the tasks we perform on our laptops have changed at a much slower rate. For most of us, 99% of our time is spent on a few key applications: web browsers, video conferencing tools, word processors, and presentation or spreadsheet software.

If you’re seeking a new laptop because your current one has a subpar screen or a frustrating keyboard, you may indeed have a valid reason. However, if it’s all about that faster processor or more storage, SSD, take a breather. Do you truly believe that transitioning to a Core Ultra 5 processor from an older i3 will drastically improve your report writing speed? Before blaming your tech, consider where your productivity stands.

Additionally, having an outdated connector isn’t a strong argument either. While your laptop may not possess the latest USB ports or Wi-Fi capabilities, the beauty of modern standards lies in their impressive backward and forward compatibility. There’s no need for a new laptop just to connect with your state-of-the-art Wi-Fi 7 router—my Wi-Fi 5 card still performs fine (even though Windows updates might take longer). With the right cable or adapter, you can use any USB device dating back to 1996.

Save Money and the Environment

Laptop computers utilize materials that negatively impact the environment. Photo: Bloomberg/Getty Images

Also, consider that staying with your current laptop could save you money. Spending upwards of $10,000 on a high-spec device is significant, and the notion of a long-term investment might make it feel justified. However, that amount might be better allocated elsewhere.

If you’re facing issues with your laptop and contemplating a replacement, repairs could offer a more economical solution. Unfortunately, this isn’t always feasible due to the trend toward factory-sealed devices and soldered components. Still, sometimes, a damaged laptop can be restored for a fraction of the replacement cost.

Another point against retiring your old laptop is that producing a new one requires environmentally damaging materials, and disposing of an old laptop can be more harmful to the environment.

Finally, after unboxing your sleek new laptop, you’ll likely spend days or weeks reinstalling various software and drivers, tweaking settings until it functions just like your old laptop did.

How to Maximize Your Existing Laptop

Upgrading your hardware can give your laptop a new lease on life. Photo: baona/Getty Images/iStockphoto

If you decide to keep your laptop, there are steps to improve its performance. If you’re annoyed by constant pop-ups or sluggishness, consider reviewing your startup items and disabling those you don’t need. Windows can function smoothly without third-party apps launching at startup. Likewise for Mac users, check your login items and eliminate the unnecessary.

The same applies to browser extensions, which can accumulate, leading to a cluttered browsing experience. Each extension uses resources and can impact performance. If you use Chrome, enter chrome://extensions in the address bar to remove unmaintained extensions. For Microsoft Edge, use edge://extensions; for Safari, go to [設定] and select [拡張機能].

While you’re at it, conduct a thorough clean-up of your storage as well. Numerous effective free tools can analyze your hard drive and show you what’s consuming space. My favorites include WinDirStat for Windows and Disk Inventory X for Mac. You might be surprised by how much space is occupied by old downloads and unnecessary applications. Deleting them might not speed up your computer, but if storage is a concern, it could help stave off the urge to upgrade.

Alternatively, breathing new life into your laptop could be a matter of hardware upgrades. While this isn’t always feasible, it’s worthwhile to see if you can increase your memory, enhance storage, or replace the battery. Notably, boosting your RAM can dramatically enhance your overall experience, as modern operating systems and applications are designed with a baseline of at least 8GB in mind and often prefer 16GB or more to operate smoothly.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Reinstall from Scratch

… Or consider giving it a thorough cleaning. Photo: d3sign/Getty Images

There’s also the comprehensive option of a complete system wipe and reinstallation. Thanks to modern technology, you don’t need to juggle floppy disks anymore; you can easily download and reinstall operating system files from the Internet. This process can refresh your laptop, but remember, it will revert your computer to the original, uncustomized state like a brand-new laptop. Before doing this, ensure you back up all your personal files, as reinstallers might suggest preserving documents and settings, but any loss will be your responsibility.

While we’re discussing this, don’t overlook the benefits of physical cleanliness. Part of the excitement of a new laptop often comes from a pristine screen and clean, responsive keys. I recommend shutting down your laptop, grabbing a non-abrasive cloth (a microfiber one is ideal), and giving it a thorough wipe down. Following that, turn it upside down and use a handheld vacuum to clean the keyboard, making sure to scrub the keys and remove any dust or small debris.

You Might Need a New One After All: Signs to Upgrade Your Laptop

In some cases, purchasing a new laptop may be unavoidable. Photo: Westend61/Getty Images

Despite these points, there are situations where investing in a new laptop is justified. As noted earlier, repairs and upgrades might not be viable options. If your screen is cracked, the only recourse may be to consult with a computer repair shop.

Another frustrating scenario arises when the hardware functions properly but is just too old to accommodate the latest operating systems and security updates. For the first time in about a decade, this issue is emerging with Apple systems, impacting millions of PCs as Microsoft will end support for Windows 10 on October 14th. Systems meeting Windows 11’s requirements can upgrade for free, leaving older models unsupported.

If your computer falls into this unfortunate category and you’re not in a position to switch to a different operating system, then acquiring a new laptop becomes crucial. Although continuing to use unsupported software is possible, we ethically cannot recommend it, as it exposes you to security vulnerabilities.

This doesn’t mean you have to dispose of your existing laptop. Almost any device can support the free Linux operating system, allowing you to use it for basic tasks like web browsing, document editing with LibreOffice, or video calls.

Alternatively, Google’s ChromeOS Flex platform presents a free version of the Chromebook OS that can be installed on various laptops. Whether you keep it for yourself or gift it, you’re contributing to its lifespan and helping mitigate the environmental impact associated with its disposal.

Lastly, it’s important to consider the social aspect of this situation. Portable computers are meant to be seen. Using an older laptop at your local café might communicate a message, but it doesn’t necessarily carry a negative connotation; it indicates loyalty and practicality, showcasing your resistance against consumerism.

For more tips, check out our guide on extending your phone’s lifespan.

Darien Graham-Smith has been a professional IT journalist for over 20 years, covering brands from Amazon to Zyxel. He has contributed to various magazines, newspapers, and websites, and as a lifelong technology enthusiast, he created the first “HELLO WORLD” program on his Sinclair ZX-80 and takes pride in having a home stocked with all the latest consumer gadgets, whether they are useful or not.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Using Profanity in Google Searches Might Make AI Stop Responding – Is It Worth It?

Posted on October 11, 2025 by Igor Mitreski

Using explicit language in your Google searches can help reduce the frequency of unwanted AI-generated summaries. Some applications also provide options to disable artificial intelligence features.

You might consider not utilizing ChatGPT, steering clear of AI-integrated software, or avoiding interactions with chatbots altogether. You can disregard Donald Trump’s deepfake posts, and find alternatives to Tilly the AI actor.

As AI becomes more widespread, so do concerns regarding its associated risks and the resistance to its omnipresence.

Dr. Kobi Raines, a specialist in AI management and governance, emphasizes that healthcare professionals often feel compelled to utilize AI.

She mentioned that she preferred not to use AI transcription software for her child’s appointment, but was informed that the specialist required it due to time constraints and suggested she seek services elsewhere if she disagreed.

“There is individual resistance, but there are also institutional barriers. The industry is advocating for the use of these tools in ways that may not be sensible,” she states.

Where is the AI?

AI is deeply embedded in digital frameworks.

It’s integrated into tools like ChatGPT, Google’s AI repository, and Grok, the controversial chatbot developed by Elon Musk. It informs smartphones, social media platforms, and navigation systems.

Additionally, it’s now part of customer service, finance, and online dating, impacting how resumes, job applications, rental requests, and lawsuits are evaluated.

AI is expected to further integrate into the healthcare sector, easing administrative workloads for physicians and aiding in disease diagnoses.

A University of Melbourne Global Studies report released in April noted that half of Australians engage with AI regularly or semi-regularly, yet only 36% express trust in it.

Professor Paul Salmon, deputy director of the Center for Human Factors and Socio-Technical Systems at the University of the Sunshine Coast, highlights that avoiding AI is becoming increasingly challenging.

“In professional environments, there’s often pressure to adopt it,” he shares.

“You either feel excluded or are informed you will be.”

Should we avoid using AI?

Concerns include privacy violations, biases, misinformation, fraudulent use, loss of human agency, and lack of transparency—just a few risks highlighted in MIT’s AI risk database.

It warns about AIs potentially pursuing objectives conflicting with human goals and values, which could lead to hazardous capabilities.

Greg Sadler, CEO of Good Ancestors charity and co-coordinator of Australians for AI Safety, frequently references the database and advises caution, stating, “Never use AI if you don’t trust its output or are apprehensive about it retaining information.”

Additionally, AI has a sizable energy footprint. Google’s emissions rose by over 51%, partly because of the energy demands of its data centers that facilitate AI operations.

The International Energy Agency predicts that electricity consumption by data centers could double from 2022 levels by 2026. Research indicates that by 2030, data centers may consume 4.5% of the world’s total energy production.

How can I avoid using AI?

AI Overview features a “Profanity Trigger.” If you inquire on Google, “What is AI?” its Gemini AI interface may provide a bland or sometimes inaccurate response, acting as an “answer engine” rather than a “search engine.”

However, posing the question, “What exactly is AI?” will yield more targeted search results along with relevant links.

There are a variety of browser extensions capable of blocking AI-related sites, images, and content.

To bypass certain chatbots, you can attempt to engage a human by repeating words like “urgent” and “emergency” or using the term “blancmange,” a popular dessert across Europe.

James Jin Kang, Senior Lecturer in Computer Science at RMIT University, Vietnam, remarked: living without it entails taking a break from much of modern life.

“Why not implement a kill switch?” he questions. The issue, he claims, is that AI is so deeply entrenched in our lives that “it’s no longer something you can easily switch off.”

“As AI continues to seep into every facet of our existence, it’s imperative to ask ourselves: Do we still have the freedom to refuse?”

“The real concern is not whether we can coexist with AI, but whether we possess the right to live without it before it becomes too late to break away.”

What does the future hold for AI?

Globally, including in Australia, governments are grappling with AI, its implications, potential, and governance challenges.

The federal government faces mounting pressure to clarify its regulatory approach as major tech firms seek access to journalism, literature, and other resources necessary for training their AI models.

The discussion includes insights from five experts on the future trajectory of AI.

Notably, three out of five experts believe AI does not present an existential threat.

Among those who express concerns, Aaron J. Snoswell of the Queensland University of Technology opines that the transformative nature of AI is not due to its potential intelligence but rather to “human decisions about how to construct and utilize these tools.”

Sarah Vivian Bentley of CSIRO concurs that the effectiveness of AI is dictated by its operators, while Simon Coghlan of the University of Melbourne argues that despite the worries and hype, evidence remains scant that superintelligent AI capable of global devastation will emerge anytime soon.

Conversely, Nyusha Shafiabadi of Australian Catholic University warns that although current systems possess limited capabilities, they are gradually acquiring features that could facilitate widespread exploitation and present existential risks.

Moreover, Saydari Mirjalili, an AI professor at Torrens University in Australia, expresses greater concern that humans might wield AI destructively—through militarization—rather than AI autonomously taking over.

Raines mentions she employs AI tools judiciously, utilizing them only where they add value.

“I understand the environmental impacts and have a passion for writing. With a PhD, I value the process of writing,” she shares.

“The key is to focus on what is evidence-based and meaningful. Avoid becoming ensnared in the hype or the apocalyptic narratives.

“We believe it’s complex and intelligent enough to accommodate both perspectives, implying these tools can yield both beneficial and detrimental outcomes.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Tony Blair and Nick Clegg Host Dinner to Connect Tech Leaders with UK Ministers

Posted on October 11, 2025 by Igor Mitreski

Earlier this year, Tony Blair and Nick Clegg organized a private dinner where a group of technology entrepreneurs had the opportunity to meet influential ministers, as revealed by official documents.

As a long-time supporter of the tech industry, the former prime minister hosted this dinner at a high-end hotel in London, representing the Tony Blair Institute (TBI) political consultancy.

Together with former deputy prime minister Mr. Clegg, who was a senior executive at Meta at the time, they invited leaders from six tech firms, including Poppy Gustafsson, the government’s investment minister tasked with encouraging businesses to invest in the UK.

Mr. Blair is a passionate advocate for the transformative potential of technology in public services and has actively sought partnerships with industry leaders. His consultancy has produced several policy papers that advocate for placing artificial intelligence at the core of government initiatives.

However, some critics express concerns that Prime Minister Blair, known for his close ties to Keir Starmer’s administration, has been able to influence the agenda without adequate public oversight. There are also questions surrounding the reliance of Blair’s consultancy on significant contributions from Silicon Valley’s billionaire Larry Ellison, an acquaintance of Donald Trump and Elon Musk.

Mr. Ellison, who briefly claimed the title of the world’s richest person this year, has donated or committed over $300 million to Mr. Blair’s consultancy.

Documents obtained by the Guardian through freedom of information laws reveal that 12 attendees discussed the government’s evolving stand on artificial intelligence at a gathering deemed a “salon dinner.”

Do you have any information about this story? Email henry.dyer@theguardian.com or message (using your non-work phone) Signal or WhatsApp to +44 7721 857348. For the most secure communications, visit theguardian.com/tips.

The dinner took place at the luxurious Corinthia Hotel in late January and featured Ron Jaffe, managing director of Insight Partners, a US venture capital firm investing in tech companies.

Also present was Alex Kendall, CEO of Wave, focused on self-driving cars, along with Nigel Thune, head of Graphcore, a computer chip manufacturer, and Mark Warner, CEO of Faculty AI, who last year collaborated with TBI to produce a document on leveraging AI to enhance public services.

A representative for Mr. Clegg noted, “During his tenure at Meta, Nick Clegg frequently interacted with government ministers and other tech CEOs, which is standard for his role in policy and global affairs.”

According to a TBI spokesperson, “The event featured discussions with ministers about various issues among tech leaders. No companies were charged to attend.”

Companies that participated asserted they do not contribute to or employ TBI.

This dinner illustrates how Prime Minister Blair’s consultancy is advancing pro-technology policies. The rapidly growing TBI is active in 45 countries and employs over 900 staff members. Its most recent financial statement reported revenues of $145 million in 2022 from advisory services and donations, although many donors and clients remain undisclosed.

The consultancy faces criticism for potentially allowing donor interests to influence its policy positions, a claim it disputes. It has also been criticized for continuing financial ties with Saudi Arabia following the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi in 2018. Blair is anticipated to play a significant role in the reconstruction of Gaza following the war.

Weeks prior to the dinner, the government confidentially provided an outline of an AI action plan to TBI shortly before it was set to be publicly released. On January 9, Ferial Clark, then Minister of Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT), made this request at the prompting of TBI’s Director of Science Policy, Jacob Mokander.

The following day, an aide to Mr. Clark reached out to Mr. Mokander stating, “It was a pleasure speaking with you. As a follow-up, here’s the top-secret action plan summary. Thank you for expanding the plan through your networks and supportive quotes on Monday.” Mr. Mokander replied, “Thanks for sharing the action plan (confidentiality).” Blair endorsed the action plan on January 13, which aims to bolster the UK’s role in AI development and deployment.

When asked why this document was shared with TBI so early, a DSIT spokesperson stated, “We cannot apologize for our regular engagement with stakeholders. It’s standard to share embargoed information with them ahead of publication.”

A spokesperson for TBI remarked, “It’s typical for governments to consult experts and engage various stakeholders when crafting policy. As indicated in the footnotes, the AI Opportunity Action Plan accurately references our published work.”

quick guide

How to contact the research team

show

The best public interest journalism relies on first-hand reporting from those in the know.

If you have something to share regarding this matter, please contact our research team confidentially by:

Secure messaging in the Guardian app

The Guardian app has a tool to submit story tips. Messages are end-to-end encrypted and hidden within the daily activities performed by all Guardian mobile apps. This prevents observers from knowing that you are communicating with us, much less what you are saying.

If you don’t already have the Guardian app, please download it (iOS/Android) to go to the app menu. Select ‘Secure Messaging’, follow the instructions to compose your message, and select ‘UK Research Team’ as the recipient.

SecureDrop, instant messenger, email, phone, mail

If you can safely use the Tor network without being monitored or observed, you can send messages and documents to Guardians through the SecureDrop platform.

Finally, the guide at theguardian.com/tips lists several ways to contact us safely and discusses the pros and cons of each.

Illustration: Guardian Design/Rich Cousins

Source: www.theguardian.com

Please Clarify: Why Are Runners and Riders Concerned About the Strava and Garmin Feud?

Posted on October 10, 2025 by Igor Mitreski

Josh, there’s been quite the buzz online among runners and cyclists regarding Strava’s lawsuit against Garmin. As a runner, I must admit that I hit the pavement to escape reality, not to get involved in more online debates. What is going on?

Miles, Strava is the essential app for runners and cyclists to log their workouts. Its social features enable users to compete against each other’s times in a friendly rivalry and discover popular exercise spots.

If you’re eager to showcase your workouts to everyone, this is the Instagram for fitness.

While workouts can be tracked via smartphones or Strava’s integrated GPS, many prefer wearing fitness watches for their perceived accuracy. This is where Garmin comes into play. Strava lets Garmin fitness tracking watches interface with its app through Garmin Connect.

The collaboration between both companies has worked well for several years, but now Strava is suing Garmin in US court, claiming that Garmin has infringed on two of Strava’s patents: segments and heatmaps.

Segments and heatmaps… I’m feeling lost.

Segments allow users to monitor their times on specific sections of a route and compare against others, while heatmaps help users identify popular locations for running worldwide.

Strava alleges that Garmin has copied these features, thus violating a 10-year-old agreement they had where Garmin promised not to reverse engineer certain functionalities of the Strava app.

But why do runners seem so obsessed with their sport (see what I did there)? Why does my Reddit feed overflow with enthusiastic runners?

Perhaps you’ve heard someone annoying say, “If it wasn’t on Strava, it didn’t happen.” Runners fixate on their metrics and strive for the quickest segment times. It almost resembles a cult. Some people are even sharing coffee mugs, t-shirts, and their unique creations, with wedding photos on Strava.

The surge of Strava coincides with the running boom, and like other cultural shifts, it’s manifesting both in real life and online. Strava simplifies data sharing, making it a hotspot for fitness influencers.

Despite some unrest since early November regarding Garmin compelling users to watermark Strava workouts with Garmin device details, much of the backlash centers on Strava’s lawsuit that may impede users from sharing their runs.

Some users worry that this conflict might hinder their workout plans, with reports like tracking no longer available. Others express that while they enjoy the Strava app, it feels too closely associated with their Garmin devices for comfort. Tracking training.

One user pointed out that much of the data forming Strava’s heat maps is sourced from Garmin users, meaning a lack of this data could spell trouble for Strava.

So what does Strava seek from Garmin? Or are they just looking to end the partnership?

Matt Salazar, Strava’s Chief Product Officer, addressed the situation on Reddit recently. He indicated the lawsuit was filed after Garmin mandated Strava to comply with new watermarking protocols, which threatened the continuation of Garmin data usage by November 1st. This lawsuit attempts to address that issue.

In its court filings, Strava is demanding Garmin halt the sale of devices that allegedly infringe on their patents.

Salazar’s Reddit post bore the title “Setting the record straight on Garmin.” However, comments under his post revealed users stating they would stop using Strava if it were discontinued, accusing Strava of hypocrisy regarding its claims to safeguard user data.

Currently, Garmin has yet to comment on the allegations or requests for statements. The company plans to hold a conference call for investors later this month, ahead of the Strava deadline on November 1st, so we can expect more information then.

What steps should runners take? Which side should they support in this clash?

If you head out for a run and it doesn’t appear on Strava or Garmin, remember, it truly took place. Log off, lace up, and reconnect with nature.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Sam Altman: The Man Who Took Copyright Rights—Can He Transform the Future by Revisiting the Past?

Posted on October 10, 2025 by Igor Mitreski

TTake a look at Sam Altman. Seriously, check Google Images, and you’ll notice an abundance of photos featuring the endearing Lost Puppy from Silicon Valley, showcasing the OpenAI chief sporting a clever grin. Yet, I suggest hiding the lower half of his face in these images. Suddenly, Sam’s expression takes on the haunting gaze of the boyfriend of a missing woman, pleading for her return: “Please come home, Sheila. We’re worried about you, and we just want you back.”

Don’t be alarmed if the humor feels misplaced, crude, or somewhat manipulative. I rely on OpenAI’s guiding principle: reciprocity. Content creators must formalize and painstakingly select subjects for use in generated content. outside to be utilized in any manner users see fit. I haven’t received any word from Sam, leading me to believe I know precisely where he is because I placed Sheila there. After all, he seems to fit the archetype that often accompanies the term “visibly.”

For Sam, the past fortnight has revolved around the debut of the AI video generator Sora 2 (a remarkable enhancement from the Sora of just ten months prior) and his entanglement in issues surrounding copyrighted content. Additionally, there were announcements about further interconnected transactions involving OpenAI and chip manufacturers like: Nvidia and AMD. This has led to the OpenAI frenzy, with total transaction volume surpassing $1 trillion just this year. While you can enjoy videos showcasing meticulously designed characters manipulated into digital puppets by uncreative, bigoted individuals, it also means that with OpenAI, you could lose your home in a disastrous financial collapse if the bubble bursts.

I don’t wish to offend the creators of Sora. I’ve strolled through art galleries and realized that if I were to deface an artwork with a ridiculous doodle, it would surprisingly add value; hence, if I didn’t want it, I wouldn’t have exposed it to the public. Moreover, none of the tech giants seem to lead a civilized life, so they probably cannot fathom any creative value worth preserving from being tarnished for profit. If you’ve followed Sam’s frequent reading lists, you’ll see it’s akin to the “Business Philosophy” section of a mediocre airport bookstore. This week, they mainly wanted to convey that Sora 2 is about being cool and fun. “Seeing your feed filled with memes about yourself isn’t as bizarre as you might think,” Sam assured us. So all is well! Though, I think it’s beneficial to note that while you’re inundated with simulated revenge content in a modern-day version of Byzantium, you’re also one of the most influential individuals globally profiting immensely from it. confuse “guardrail.”

I’ve heard people propose that OpenAI’s motto should be “It’s better to ask for forgiveness than permission,” but that misplaces the priority. Its real motto appears to be, “We do what we wish, and you simply deal with it.” Consider Altman’s recent political trajectory. “For those familiar with German history in the 1930s” Sam forewarned back in 2016, reflecting on Trump’s actions. It seems he has reconciled this concern in time to join. Donald Trump’s second inauguration. Perhaps, to extend his well-crafted analogy, it’s due to him being among the entrepreneurs welcomed into the Prime Minister’s office to claim their portion of the gains. “Thank you for being such a pro-business, pro-innovation president,” Sam effused to Trump at a recent White House dinner for tech executives. “It’s a refreshing change.” Unsurprisingly, the Trump administration has chosen to evade AI regulation entirely.

On the flip side, recall what Sam and his skeptical comrades stated earlier this year when it was suggested that the Chinese AI chatbot DeepSeek might have leveraged some of OpenAI’s work. His organization issued a concerned statement, asserting, “We are aware of and investigating indications that DeepSeek may have improperly extracted our models. We will provide further details as we learn more.” “We are taking proactive and assertive measures to safeguard our technology.” Interestingly, OpenAI appears to be the only entity on earth with the ability to combat AI theft.

This week, Hollywood talent agencies took the initiative to coax some form of temporary silence from Altman. I posted flannel—if not in riches, then certainly in striving to establish a “new kind of engagement” with those he has openly referred to as “rights holders.” Many of us remember just a short while ago, when rights holders held all the power. Those who possess rights. In other words, the hint lies within the terminology. However, Sam embodies the post-light era. The question arises: if he is bestowing creative rights, can we genuinely believe he’s not also conferring other types of rights?

OpenAI desires what all nurturing platforms ultimately aim for: users to remain within their realm indefinitely. It is clearly poised to become the new default homepage of the internet, much like Meta once was. Are childhood privacy catastrophes, election manipulation controversies, and child exploitation crises not far off?

Skip past newsletter promotions

Because, incredibly, we have already traversed this life cycle. But I suppose we must revisit it, right? Or more accurately, since Sam’s company is advancing at an unprecedented pace, we have already done it again. Initially, we admire the enigmatic engineer Pied Piper as a brilliant and unconventional altruist, only to later uncover that he is not as he appears and that his technology poses greater risks than we comprehended, leading to our failure to regulate it, rendering us the victims. In many ways, this mirrors a poor AI reinterpretation of a film we’ve already witnessed. If Altman’s model can learn, why can’t we?

Marina Hyde is a columnist for the Guardian
A year at Westminster: John Crace, Marina Hyde, and Pippa Crellard
On Tuesday, December 2nd, Crace, Hyde, and Crellard will reflect on this remarkable year alongside special guests. It will be streamed live from the Barbican in London and available worldwide. Reserve your ticket here or on guardian live
Do you have thoughts on the subjects discussed in this article? Click here if you would like to send an email response of up to 300 words for publication in our email section.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Google Granted Special Status by Watchdog to Enforce Changes in UK Search Practices

Posted on October 10, 2025 by Igor Mitreski

Google is encountering mandatory changes in its search operations within the UK, following the competition regulator’s decision to grant the company special status and impose stricter regulations.

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has confirmed that Google holds a “strategic market position” (SMS) in both search and search advertising. This classification indicates that the company wields sufficient market power to necessitate a unique regulatory framework.

The regulator now has the authority to mandate alterations in how Google conducts business in these sectors, as per new digital legislation. This announcement on Friday marks the first time a tech company has been recognized with an SMS designation.

The CMA has already indicated several potential changes, such as providing internet users with the option to select a different search service through a “choice screen.” This could include AI-driven competitors like Perplexity and ChatGPT among the available options.

The CMA is also looking to ensure equitable ranking of search results and to provide publishers with greater control over the usage of their content, including responses generated by AI. Features such as AI Overview and AI Mode powered by Google’s AI are also included under the SMS classification.

The CMA clarified that its ruling does not imply any wrongdoing and that no immediate actions will be enforced. However, this year it intends to initiate discussions regarding potential alterations to Google’s operations.

Will Hayter, executive director of digital markets at the CMA, asserted that enhancing competition in realms like search and search advertising—which involves advertisers paying to appear in users’ search results—could foster new business opportunities and stimulate investment throughout the UK economy.

He stated: “Over 90% of searches in the UK are executed on Google’s platform, underscoring Google’s continued strategic role in search and search advertising.” He added, “In response to the feedback we received post our proposed decision, we have today designated Google’s search service with a strategic market position.”

Oliver Bethel, Google’s senior director of competition, expressed concerns that this decision might jeopardize UK users’ access to emerging products and services.

He commented: “Several of the intervention ideas proposed in this process could hinder innovation and growth in the UK, potentially delaying product introductions at a time when AI-based advancements are rapidly progressing.”

Skip past newsletter promotions

Tom Smith, a competition lawyer at Geradin Partners and former CMA legal director, noted that there is a substantial case against Google.

He remarked: “There exists a clear basis for eliminating some of the market distortions caused by Google’s monopolistic stance. This has already been addressed in the US and EU. Today’s ruling empowers the CMA to take similar action.”

In a separate inquiry, the CMA is evaluating whether Google’s and Apple’s mobile platforms should be classified as SMS-enabled under the newly established digital regulatory framework outlined in the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024.

Source: www.theguardian.com

5 Ways to Reduce Your Carbon Footprint

Legal Issues

“Whack-a-Mole” Approach

Setting up ROG Xbox Ally X

ROG Xbox Ally performance

Game on the go or on the couch

ROG Xbox Ally X game library

What to Play

What to Read

What to Click

Question Block

US tariffs on China threaten electronics supply chain once more

Panic triggered by AI bubble

Wider TechScape

Specifications

A19 Pro Chip

Sustainability

Camera

Price

Verdict

Contact us about this story

What’s Changing with Windows 10?

What Are the Risks?

How Can I Mitigate the Threat?

What If My Computer Lacks the Necessary Hardware to Upgrade to Windows 11?

Are There Alternatives to Windows 11?

Buying a New Computer

Specifications

Excellent Sound and Noise Cancellation

Sustainability

Price

Verdict

Contact us about this story

Is it really time for a new laptop?

Reasons not to upgrade

When is buying a new laptop justified?

Enhancing laptop performance without a new purchase

1. Optimize startup programs

2. Uninstall unused browser extensions

3. Free up storage

4. Consider hardware upgrades

5. Reinstall the operating system

Don’t overlook physical cleaning

Final thoughts: Make wise upgrade decisions

Consider this:

related

Save Money and the Environment

How to Maximize Your Existing Laptop

Reinstall from Scratch

You Might Need a New One After All: Signs to Upgrade Your Laptop

Where is the AI?

Should we avoid using AI?

How can I avoid using AI?

What does the future hold for AI?

How to contact the research team

**Reasons not to upgrade**

**When is buying a new laptop justified?**