SLIM lunar lander from Japan successfully enters lunar orbit

Smart Lander for Investigating Moon (SLIM) aims to demonstrate pinpoint landing technology and obstacle detection technology to “land where you want to land.” Credit: JAXA

Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency(JAXA) announced that its Smart Lander for Lunar Exploration (SLIM) has successfully entered lunar orbit at 16:51 on December 25, 2023 (Japan Standard Time, JST).

SLIM’s lunar orbit will be inserted into an elliptical lunar orbit connecting the moon’s north and south poles every 6.4 hours, and the altitude at the point closest to the moon (near orbit) will be approximately 600 km (approximately 370 miles). . , 4,000 km (about 2,500 miles) at its furthest point from the moon (Apolune). The orbit change proceeded as planned, and the spacecraft is currently in a normal state.

Lunar orbit insertion (LOI) on December 25, 2023 at 16:51 (Japan time).
Light blue line: current orbit of the moon.
Future Plans:
Green line: Circular orbit at an altitude of approximately 600km.
Yellow line: Altitude approximately 600km x 150km on an elliptical orbit.
Red line: Altitude approximately 600km x 15km on an elliptical orbit. Credit: JAXA

From now on, the Apollone point will descend until mid-January 2024, and the orbit will be adjusted to a circular orbit at an altitude of about 600 km. After that, the perigee will drop and preparations for landing will begin. On January 19th, the near-orbit point will be lowered to an altitude of 15 km (approximately 9 miles), and the descent toward the moon will begin at around midnight (Japan time) on January 20th, with a scheduled landing on the lunar surface. There is. Around 0:20 a.m. on January 20th (Japan time)

Source: scitechdaily.com

What Venture Capitalists Seek in Emerging Cybersecurity Startups

In cybersecurity, AI is often stands for “already implemented”. Security vendors have leveraged AI-based technology to leverage existing knowledge databases to address talent shortages. As an investor focused on supporting expansion-stage B2B startups in the cybersecurity, AI, and DevOps space, he has recently invested in cybersecurity company Huntress and AI startup Weights & Biases. and cybersecurity companies, I feel fortunate to have a unique perspective on both. It is scheduled to take off after 2024.

From my perspective, organizations today face an uphill battle when it comes to securing their data and networks. Cyber ​​threats are becoming more frequent and severe as the potential attack surface grows and hackers organize increasingly sophisticated schemes. Thanks to the power of artificial intelligence (AI), malicious attackers are becoming more efficient, conducting more personalized attacks, and increasing their scale, resulting in billions of dollars in lost business. .

Meanwhile, organizations of all sizes are innovating new defenses at an astonishing rate, often leveraging advanced AI capabilities as well. Businesses are hungry for solutions that can further enhance their efforts. According to Gartner, global corporate security spending will reach an estimated $188 billion this year and is expected to rise to $215 billion by 2024. Security software spending is the IT area least likely to be cut during an economic downturn. morgan stanley.

The next wave of successful startups will help businesses leverage GenAI to prevent attacks while increasing organizational productivity.

Over the next year, we aim to partner with players to help cybersecurity teams increase productivity and address talent shortages while addressing growing threats.

What VCs are looking for in the next wave of cybersecurity startups

The emergence of large-scale language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT has created new opportunities for AI-driven innovation within the industry. Here are some of the features investors are looking for in the next successful cybersecurity startup.

Proactive approach to customer education

During the cloud computing revolution, many companies are rushing to implement cloud solutions, putting security on the back burner. This has allowed cybersecurity to catch up to some extent. So far, the opposite is true for generative AI (GenAI). Businesses are keen to reap the benefits of technology, but are very aware of the risks of compromising sensitive information and betraying customer trust. Concerns are growing after major data breaches occur at companies such as samsung. In response, many companies have been reluctant to launch GenAI initiatives, limiting usage to a small cohort or, in some cases, issuing blankets. prohibit.

Source: techcrunch.com

Common household products and cosmetics found to impact cell epigenetics

New research has found that formaldehyde poses serious risks to epigenetics, interfering with gene activity and potentially causing cancer and other diseases. The study emphasizes the need for stricter policies to limit exposure to formaldehyde, given its prevalence in various household products, cosmetics, polluted air, architecture, and other industries.

The research, conducted by Dr. Manel Esteller and Dr. Lucas Pontel from the Josep Carreras Leukemia Research Institute and Dr. Christopher J. Chan from the University of California, Berkeley, focused on the effects of high formaldehyde concentrations in the body. The study revealed formaldehyde’s harmful impact on normal epigenetic patterns and its association with cancer, liver degeneration, and increased asthma risk.

Formaldehyde is commonly found in products used in architecture, furniture manufacturing, textiles, and hair products, as well as in polluted gases and the metabolism of certain food substances. It can also be produced in the body and has the potential to alter the epigenetic landscape of cells.

The study concluded that formaldehyde inhibits the production of S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAM), a universal donor of the methyl chemical group that regulates genetic activity. This decrease in SAM content leads to a loss of methylation of histones, proteins that package DNA and control gene function, contributing to formaldehyde’s carcinogenic properties.

As such, the researchers stressed the need for environmental and health policies aimed at reducing exposure to formaldehyde in various industries and environmental sources. Despite restrictions by international health authorities, there are still areas of work where formaldehyde is used at high levels, necessitating further regulations to minimize exposure to this hazardous substance.

Reference: Vanha N. Pham, Kevin J. Bruemmer, Joel DW Toh, Eva J. Ge, Logan Tenney, Carl C. Ward, Felix A Dingler, Christopher L. Millington, Carlos A. Garcia Prieto, Mia C. Pross Holmes, Nicholas T. Ingoglia, Lucas B. Pontel, Manel Esther, Keetan J. Patel, and Daniel K.・Nomura, Christopher J. Chan, November 3, 2023, science. DOI: 10.1126/science.abp9201

Source: scitechdaily.com

Hackers in 2023 stole $2 billion worth of cryptocurrencies, reveals data

Over the course of another year, hackers stole billions of dollars in cryptocurrencies. However, the cryptocurrency security firm says it is on the decline for the first time since 2020.

According to Web3 security firm De.FI, hackers have stolen about $2 billion worth of cryptocurrencies in dozens of cyberattacks and thefts this year. Rekt leaderboard. The site ranks the worst crypto hacks of all time, from the 2022 Ronin network breach, in which hackers stole more than $600 million in crypto, to this year’s big-money hack of Mixin Network. It is attached. The hacker made about $200 million.

“This amount, while spread across a variety of incidents, highlights the persistent vulnerabilities and challenges within the DeFi ecosystem,” De.Fi said in the report, which the company reported on TechCrunch shared. “2023 was a year that demonstrated both the ongoing vulnerabilities and the progress made in addressing them, even though the first half of the year saw a relative lack of interest in the sector due to the bear market. .”

In early December, blockchain intelligence company TRM Labs also announced Announcing estimated value of stolen virtual currency By hackers this year. According to the company, the total amount as of mid-December was approximately $1.7 billion.

Other worst cryptocurrency thefts this year include the hack into Euler Finance, where hackers stole nearly $200 million. Also included were major hacks of Multichain ($126 million), BonqDAO ($120 million), Poloniex ($114 million), Atomic Wallet ($100 million), and more.

Last year, a blockchain monitoring company Chainalysis reported that cybercriminals stole an all-time record of approximately $3.8 billion In code. $1.7 billion of that was stolen by North Korean government hackers known as the Lazarus Group, one of the most prolific crypto theft groups, as part of efforts to fund the regime’s sanctioned nuclear weapons program. .

“It is no exaggeration to say that crypto hacking represents a significant portion of this country’s economy,” Chainalysis said in a report last year.

The previous year, in 2021, hackers stole $3.3 billion. According to Chainalysis,

It is impossible to predict what will happen in 2024. However, given the insufficient security implemented by many cryptocurrencies and Web3 projects and the enormous monetary value they hold, Discussed at TechCrunch Disrupt earlier this yearit is expected that hackers will continue to target growing industries.

Source: techcrunch.com

The ongoing battle between open source and proprietary software

Every time chaos breaks out Millions of people rely on this unique technology, and many people’s default reaction seems to be:Hey, let’s see what the open source world has to offer

Case in point: the steady demise of X (Twitter) since Elon Musk took over last year has led many to look for more “open” alternatives, whether it’s Mastodon or Bluesky.

This scenario will become familiar throughout 2023, as established technologies that millions of people rely on reach a chaotic curve, and how indebted people become to proprietary platforms over which they have little control. now recognized.

The OpenAI debacle in November, in which the ChatGPT hitmaker temporarily lost its co-founders, including CEO Sam Altman, sparked five days of turmoil before Altman returned to the OpenAI hot seat. It has arrived. However, only after the emergence of companies that built products on OpenAI’s GPT-X Large-Scale Language Model (LLM). I started having doubts. That’s the wisdom of going all-in on OpenAI, as it puts you in a better position to take advantage of “open” alternatives such as Meta’s Llama-branded LLM family.

Even Google seems to acknowledge that “open” may trump “proprietary” AI. leaked An internal memo written by researchers expressed concerns that open source AI was gaining the upper hand. “We don’t have a moat, and neither does OpenAI,” the memo said.

Elsewhere, Adobe’s $20 billion acquisition of rival Figma was a boon for PenPot, an open source challenger to Figma, although the deal fell through due to regulatory headwinds. PenPot saw a surge in registrations amidst a mad panic that Adobe was about to wreak havoc on businesses. About Figma’s proverbial parade.

And when the cross-platform game engine Unity announced; Controversial new fee structure, developers were furious, calling the change breaking and unfair. In the aftermath, Unity quickly pivoted, but only after its developer community expanded widely. Checkout has started open source rivals godotnow commercial companies are also promoting core development.

But while all this has served to highlight the eternal struggle between open source and proprietary software realms, At the inner The open source community is back in the spotlight. Usually, the root cause of the uproar is a proprietary company.

(not) open source elements

Back in August, HashiCorp switched We’ve moved the popular “infrastructure as code” software Terraform from a “copyleft” open source license to a business source license (BSL or, in some cases, BUSL) available at source. This places greater restrictions on how third parties can commercialize the software, especially if they can. It competes with HashiCorp itself. Why the change? According to HashiCorp, some third-party vendors have benefited from Terraform’s community-driven development without giving anything in return.

This led to vendor-driven factions forking the original Terraform project and proceeding solely with OpenTF, ultimately leading to Rebranded as OpenTofu, served by the Linux Foundation As a governing body. Although HashiCorp was fully within its rights to change the license and protect its business interests, it caused anxiety among many users. According to OpenTofu manifesto:

Overnight, tens of thousands of businesses, from mom-and-pop stores to Fortune 500 companies, woke up to a new reality: The foundation of their infrastructure suddenly became a potential legal risk. His BUSL and additional usage permissions created by the HashiCorp team are ambiguous. All companies, vendors, and developers currently using Terraform must consider whether what they are doing is considered to be in competition with his HashiCorp’s products.

Of course, HashiCorp isn’t the first company to make such a change.App performance management (APM) platform guard Switched from open source BSD 3-Clause License It moved to BSL in 2019 for similar reasons cited by HashiCorp. But this year, Sentry created an entirely new license called the Functional Source License (FSL) aimed at “giving freedom without harmful free riders,” the company said at the time. This is similar to his BSL, but with some adjustments. For example, an FSL licensed product automatically reverts to the open source Apache license after 2 years, but with BSL it takes 4 years.

This once again highlights the persistent struggle of companies to embrace the spirit of open source without compromising commercial interests.

“There’s been a long history of companies with deeper pockets and more resources leveraging traditional open source companies,” says Sentry’s head of open source. chad whitaker he said in November. “Open source companies, regardless of licensing or pedantic definitions, are increasingly dependent on support from venture-backed, commercial, or, more importantly, companies that rely on their code. ”

And similar Grafana before thatElement has moved its decentralized communications protocol Matrix from the fully permissive Apache 2.0 license to the less permissive AGPL open source license. This forces all derivative projects to maintain the exact same license, which is a huge deterrent to commercial companies looking to develop their own products.

At a time when other companies’ business models were designed around developing their own Matrix-based software, Element realized that the cost of maintaining the Matrix, to which it is largely responsible, was He said he was forced to take on costs that he did not have to incur. To maintain the matrix. “While we have succeeded in making Matrix a huge success, Element is losing its ability to compete in the very ecosystem it has created,” the company wrote at the time.

This license change effectively meant that companies using Matrix would either have to contribute code to the project or pay a commercial license to Element in order to continue using it in their own products.

So, on the one hand, businesses, consumers, and developers alike are seeing that going all-in on proprietary platforms can lead to vendor lock-in and dire consequences if things break down. I’m doing it. But on the other hand, companies built on solid open source foundations can easily move up the ladder by changing contract terms in the name of commercial protectionism.

Of course, all this is nothing new. But the past 12 months have highlighted both the power and danger of open source software.

Source: techcrunch.com

Hubble’s Close-Up of UGC 8091

The Hubble team has released a close-up image of UGC 8091, a dwarf irregular galaxy that resembles a glittering festive snow globe.



This Hubble image shows UGC 8091, a dwarf irregular galaxy about 7 million light-years away in the constellation Virgo. The color images were created from separate exposures taken with Hubble’s Advanced Survey Camera (ACS) and Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3). Image credits: NASA / ESA / Hubble / Yumi Choi, NSF’s NOIRLab / Caroline Gilbert, STScI / Julien Dalcanton, Center for Computational Astrophysics and University of Washington Flatiron Institute.

UGC 8091 It is located in the constellation Virgo, about 7 million light years away from Earth.

Also known as GR 8, DDO 155, LEDA 44491, or TC 257, this galaxy discovered It was discovered by astronomers at Lick Observatory in the 1940s and 1950s.

“Unlike other galaxies whose stars appear more regular, UGC 8091 is classified as an irregular galaxy,” said the Hubble astronomer.

“It’s not hard to see why. The stars that make up this cluster look more like a tangle of bright string lights than a galaxy.”

“While some irregular galaxies are thought to have become entangled due to intense internal activity, others are known to have formed through interactions with neighboring galaxies.”

“The result is a class of galaxies with a wide range of sizes and shapes, including these galaxies with diffuse and scattered stars.”

UGC 8091, also classified as a dwarf irregular galaxy, contains about 1 billion stars.

“That’s a huge amount of light, but not for a galaxy. Our Milky Way galaxy is thought to contain more than 100 billion stars, and other galaxies have trillions. “There could be as many stars as possible,” the astronomers said.

“Dwarf galaxies often orbit around larger galaxies, and their lower masses make them vulnerable to interference and consumption from larger neighbors, and in the process they destroy twisted dwarfs like UGC 8091. A galaxy is generated.”

“This type of galaxy is thought to have characteristics similar to the very old and distant galaxies seen in deep-field images.”

“Investigating the composition of dwarf galaxies and their stars, particularly their low metal content, could help uncover evolutionary links between these ancient galaxies and more modern galaxies like ours. We hope it will be helpful.”

To do this, researchers have carefully examined UGC 8091’s colorful stars.

“By using filters that restrict the light entering Hubble’s instruments to very specific wavelength ranges, we can pick out different features of galaxies,” the researchers said.

“These filtered images can be recombined to create a full-color image. An astonishing 12 filters are combined to produce this image, capturing light from the mid-UV to the red end of the visible spectrum. Contributing.”

“The blooming red spots represent light emitted by excited hydrogen molecules in hot, energetic stars formed in recent starbursts.”

“The other sparks in this image are a mixture of older stars.”

Source: www.sci.news

Code.org, a nonprofit organization, files a lawsuit against WhiteHat Jr, Byju’s organization, over disputed membership fee payments

US education nonprofit Code.org has filed a lawsuit in California District Court, alleging that WhiteHat Jr, a subsidiary of Byju, violated its licensing agreement by continuing to use Code.org’s platform without paying fees.

WhiteHat Jr, which was sold to Byju’s in 2020 for $300 million, partnered with Code.org last year, agreeing to pay $4 million over four years to license Code.org’s coding education platform. However, in a lawsuit filed earlier this month, Code.org alleges that WhiteHat Jr. failed to adhere to its payment schedule while continuing to utilize its coding courseware.

According to the Code.org complaint, WhiteHat Jr paid the 2022 license fee, but notified the nonprofit earlier this year that it would not be able to make the remaining payments scheduled in the four-year contract. Code.org claims that WhiteHat Jr requested that his original contract be amended to backload unpaid license fee obligations. But Code.org’s lawyers argue that the original contract makes clear that termination does not relieve WhiteHat Jr. of its obligation to pay all future license fees. There is.

“To date, White Hat has not paid either its Q1 2023 invoice or its Q2 2023 invoice. In fact, despite repeated written and verbal requests for payment by Code.org, , WhiteHat has not made any payments in excess of the $1 million it paid pursuant to the 2022 invoice before the agreement was amended,” Code.org’s lawyers claim.

Byju’s did not respond to a request for comment.

The lawsuit is the latest trouble for Byju stemming from its acquisition of WhiteHat Jr, and adds to existing problems the company has faced since the acquisition. The Indian edtech giant, which was valued at $22 billion in a funding round in early 2022, was considering whether to wind down WhiteHat Jr earlier this year, TechCrunch reported.

This also makes Byju’s predicament even worse. Byju’s is facing a difficult situation due to prolonged delays in financial reporting and governance issues. Byju’s leading backer, Prosus, recently reduced the startup’s valuation to less than his $3 billion.

Source: techcrunch.com